Английская Википедия:Dehn v Attorney-General

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 02:46, 26 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|New Zealand court case}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} {{orphan|date=October 2014}} {{Infobox court case | name = Dehn v Attorney-General | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 14 April 1989 | full name = Janice Dehn, Harrison & Dehn v Attorney-General | citations = CA180/88 [1989]...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Orphan Шаблон:Infobox court case Dehn v Attorney-General CA180/88 [1989] NZCA 57; [1989] 1 NZLR 320 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding trespass and the implied licence to enter a property.[1]

Background

One night Dehn phoned her sister in Auckland suggesting that their mother and her grandchildren were now dead. Not surprisingly, the sister rang the Police to do a welfare check at their Christchurch residence.

The police soon discovered that the mother was very much still alive. So much so, that she even joined Dehn in taunting the attending police officers with comments such as "Nazi's" and "Gestapo".

They later sued the police for trespass and assault. The court awarded the nominal damages of $1 for the trespass, and nothing for assault, as due to ACC law, damages for assault can only be awarded if the conduct merits exemplary damages.

The Dehn's appealed.

Held

The court confirmed that this case did not merit exemplary damages.

References

Шаблон:Reflist


Шаблон:NewZealand-case-law-stub