Просмотр кода страницы Английская Википедия:2010 United States census

{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}}
{{short description|23rd United States national census}}
{{Use American English|date = February 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2018}}
{{Infobox census
| name = Twenty-third census<br>of the United States
| logo = Seal of the United States Census Bureau.svg
| logo_caption = Seal of the U.S. Census Bureau
| image = US-Census-2010Logo.svg
| image_caption = 2010 U.S. census logo
| country = United States
| population = 308,745,538
| percent_change = {{increase}} 9.7%
| region_type = state
| date           = April 1, 2010
| most_populous = {{nowrap|[[California]] (37,253,956)}}
| least_populous = {{nowrap|[[Wyoming]] (563,826)}}
| previous_census = 2000 United States census
| previous_year = 2000
| next_census   = 2020 United States census
| next_year     = 2020
}}
The '''2010 United States census''' was the 23rd [[United States census]]. National [[Census]] Day, the reference day used for the census, was April 1, 2010.<ref name="timeline">{{cite web|title=Interactive Timeline|url=http://2010.census.gov/2010census/about/timeline-text.php|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101220032051/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/about/timeline-text.php|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 20, 2010|work=About the 2010 Census|publisher=U.S. Census Bureau|access-date=June 17, 2010|year=2011}}</ref> The census was taken via mail-in citizen self-reporting, with enumerators serving to spot-check randomly selected neighborhoods and communities. As part of a drive to increase the count's accuracy, 635,000 temporary enumerators were hired<!--, [N] more than [[2000 United States Census|the previous census in 2000]]-->.<ref name="hawaii"/><ref name="635Khired"/> The population of the United States was counted as 308,745,538,<ref>{{cite press release|title=U.S. Census Bureau Announces 2010 Census Population Counts – Apportionment Counts Delivered to President|url=http://2010.census.gov/news/releases/operations/cb10-cn93.html|publisher=[[United States Census Bureau]]|date=December 21, 2010|access-date=January 9, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101224044247/http://2010.census.gov/news/releases/operations/cb10-cn93.html|archive-date=December 24, 2010|url-status=dead|df=mdy}}</ref> a 9.7% increase from the [[2000 United States Census]]. This was the 1st census in which all states recorded a population of over 500,000 people as well as the 1st in which all 100 largest cities recorded populations of over 200,000.

==Introduction==

As required by the [[United States Constitution]], the U.S. Census has been conducted every 10 years since 1790. The [[2000 U.S. Census]] was the previous census completed. Participation in the U.S. Census is required by law of people living in the United States in [[Title 13 of the United States Code]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Selby |first1=W. Gardner |date=January 9, 2014 |title=Americans must answer U.S. Census Bureau survey by law, though agency hasn't prosecuted since 1970 |url=http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2014/jan/09/us-census-bureau/americans-must-answer-us-census-bureau-survey-law-/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170107100752/http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2014/jan/09/us-census-bureau/americans-must-answer-us-census-bureau-survey-law-/ |archive-date=January 7, 2017 |access-date=January 6, 2017 |website=PolitiFact}}</ref>

On January 25, 2010, [[United States Census Bureau|Census Bureau]] Director [[Robert Groves (academic)|Robert Groves]] personally inaugurated the 2010 census enumeration by counting [[World War II]] veteran Clifton Jackson, a resident of [[Noorvik, Alaska]].<ref name="noorvik-kickoff">{{cite news|url=http://www.denverpost.com/2010/01/25/remote-alaska-village-is-first-eyed-in-census/|title=Remote Alaska village is first eyed in census|first=Rachel|last=D'oro|agency=Associated Press|location=Noorvik, Alaska|access-date=January 6, 2017|date=January 25, 2010|work=[[The Denver Post]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170107170607/http://www.denverpost.com/2010/01/25/remote-alaska-village-is-first-eyed-in-census/|archive-date=January 7, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> More than 120 million census forms were delivered by the [[U.S. Post Office]] beginning March 15, 2010.<ref>{{cite web|title=2010 Census forms arrive, kicking off once-a-decade head count|url=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/2010_cenus_forms_arrive_kickin.html|website=NJ.com|access-date=January 6, 2017|date=March 15, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170524221440/http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/2010_cenus_forms_arrive_kickin.html|archive-date=May 24, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The number of forms mailed out or hand-delivered by the Census Bureau was approximately 134 million on April 1, 2010.<ref name=economist_april>{{cite news|title=Stand up and be counted|url=http://www.economist.com/node/15819188|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|access-date=January 6, 2017|date=March 31, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525010916/http://www.economist.com/node/15819188|archive-date=May 25, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Although the questionnaire used April 1, 2010 as the reference date as to where a person was living, an insert dated March 15, 2010 included the following printed in bold type: "Please complete and mail back the enclosed census form today."

The 2010 census national mail participation rate was 74%.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/ |title=Take 10 Map 2010 Census Participation Census Bureau |access-date=August 10, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100820144620/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/take10map/ |archive-date=August 20, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> From April through July 2010, census takers visited households that didn't return a form, an operation called "non-response follow-up" (NRFU).

In December 2010, the [[United States Census Bureau|U.S. Census Bureau]] delivered population information to the [[president of the United States|U.S. president]] for [[apportionment (politics)|apportionment]], and later in March 2011, complete [[redistricting]] data was delivered to states.<ref name="timeline"/>

[[Personally identifiable information]] will be available in 2082.<ref>{{Cite web|title = The "72-Year Rule" – History – U.S. Census Bureau|url = https://www.census.gov/history/www/genealogy/decennial_census_records/the_72_year_rule_1.html|website = www.census.gov|access-date = October 26, 2015|first = US Census Bureau, Census History Staff|last = PIO|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190416202132/https://www.census.gov/history/www/genealogy/decennial_census_records/the_72_year_rule_1.html|archive-date = April 16, 2019|url-status = live}}</ref>

==Major changes==
The Census Bureau did not use a long form for the 2010 census.<ref name="c2010-aboutform">{{cite web|url=http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/2010_TQA_Agent_FAQs_english.pdf |title=Frequently Asked Questions |work=2010 Census |publisher=U.S. Census Bureau |date=May 10, 2010 |access-date=June 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714082232/http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/2010_TQA_Agent_FAQs_english.pdf |archive-date=July 14, 2011 }}</ref> In several previous censuses, one in six households received this long form, which asked for detailed social and economic information. The 2010 census used only a short form asking ten basic questions:<ref name="c2010-aboutform"/>
# How many people were living or staying in this house, apartment, or mobile home on April 1, 2010?
# Were there any additional people staying here on April 1, 2010, that you did not include in Question 1? Mark all that apply: (checkboxes for: children; relatives; non-relatives; people staying temporarily; none)
# Is this house, apartment, or mobile home – [Checkboxes for owned with a mortgage, owned free and clear, rented, occupied without rent.]
# What is your telephone number?
# What is Person 1's name? (last, first)
# What is Person 1's sex? (male, female)
# What is Person 1's age and Person 1's date of birth?
# Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? (checkboxes for: "No", and several for "Yes" which specify groups of countries)
# What is Person 1's race? (checkboxes for 14 including "other". One possibility was "Black, African Am., or Negro")
# Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else? (checkboxes for "No", and several locations for "Yes")
The form included space to repeat some or all of these questions for up to twelve residents total.

In contrast to the 2000 census, an Internet response option was not offered, nor was the form available for download.<ref name="c2010-aboutform"/><ref name="itif-unplugged"/>

Detailed socioeconomic information collected during past censuses will continue to be collected through the [[American Community Survey]].<ref name="itif-unplugged">{{cite web|url=http://www.itif.org/files/eCensusUnplugged.pdf|title=e-Census Unplugged: Why Americans Should Be Able to Complete the Census Online|first=Daniel|last=Castro|publisher=Information Technology & Innovation Foundation|location=Washington, D.C.|access-date=March 29, 2010|date=February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100704115832/http://www.itif.org/files/eCensusUnplugged.pdf|archive-date=July 4, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> The survey provides data about communities in the United States on a 1-year or 3-year cycle, depending on the size of the community, rather than once every 10 years. A small percentage of the population on a rotating basis will receive the survey each year, and no household will receive it more than once every five years.<ref>{{cite web|title=Chapter 4: Sample Design and Selection|url=https://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/survey_methodology/Chapter_4_RevisedDec2010.pdf|work=ACS Design and Methodology|publisher=U.S. Census Bureau|access-date=June 17, 2011|date=December 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111020045514/http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/survey_methodology/Chapter_4_RevisedDec2010.pdf|archive-date=October 20, 2011|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref>

In June 2009, the U.S. Census Bureau announced that it would count [[Same-sex marriage|same-sex married couples]]. However, the final form did not contain a separate "same-sex married couple" option. When noting the relationship between household members, same-sex couples who are married could mark their spouses as being "Husband or wife", the same response given by opposite-sex married couples. An "unmarried partner" option was available for couples (whether same-sex or opposite-sex) who were not married.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/factSheet_General_LGBT.pdf|title=LGBT Fact Sheet|website=2010.census.gov|access-date=October 12, 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100528144411/http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/factSheet_General_LGBT.pdf|archive-date=May 28, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref>

The Census 2010 Language Program was significantly expanded. Language assistance in 49 languages in the 2000 Census was increased to 59 languages in Census 2000. In addition to English, Census questionnaire was available in five non-English languages: Spanish, Chinese (simplified), Korean, Vietnamese, and Russian.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Reist |first=Burton |title=2010 Census Language Program Assessment Report |url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2012/dec/2010_cpex_204.html |access-date=September 20, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Pan |first1=Yuling |last2=Sha |first2=Mandy |title=2010 Census Language Program: Pretesting of Census 2010 Questionnaire in Five Languages |url=https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2009/adrm/rsm2009-01.html |access-date=September 20, 2023}}</ref>

==Cost==
The 2010 census cost $13 billion, approximately $42 per capita; by comparison, the 2010 census per-capita cost for China was about US$1 and for India was US$0.40.<ref name="econ201106">{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18772674?story_id=18772674&CFID=165420949&CFTOKEN=32425086 |title=Censuses: Costing the count |date=June 2, 2011 |newspaper=The Economist |access-date=June 17, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610033208/http://www.economist.com/node/18772674?story_id=18772674 |archive-date=June 10, 2011 |url-status=live |df=mdy }}</ref> Operational costs were $5.4 billion, significantly under the $7 billion budget.<ref name="cnn20100810"/> In December 2010 the [[Government Accountability Office]] (GAO) noted that the cost of conducting the census has approximately doubled each decade since 1970.<ref name="econ201106"/> In a detailed 2004 report to [[United States Congress|Congress]], the GAO called on the Census Bureau to address cost and design issues, and at that time, had estimated the 2010 census cost to be $11 billion.<ref name="gao">{{cite web|url=http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-04-37 |title=2010 Census: Cost and Design Issues Need to Be Addressed Soon (GAO-04-37) |issue=GAO-04-37 |date=January 15, 2004 |format=PDF |publisher=U.S. General Accounting Office |location=Washington, D.C. |oclc=54778614 |access-date=December 27, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107165327/http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-04-37 |archive-date=January 7, 2010 |url-status=live |df=mdy }}</ref>

In August 2010, Commerce Secretary [[Gary Locke]] announced that the census [[operating expense|operational costs]] came in significantly under budget; of an almost $7 billion operational budget:<ref name="cnn20100810">{{cite news|title=Census Bureau comes in under budget for 2010 operational costs|url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/10/census.under.budget/|publisher=CNN|date=August 10, 2010|access-date=August 10, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121109161610/http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/10/census.under.budget/|archive-date=November 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref>
* $650 million was saved in the budget for the door-to-door questioning (NRFU) phase because 72% of households returned mailed questionnaires;
* $150 million was saved because of lower-than-planned costs in areas including Alaska and tribal lands; and
* the $800 million emergency fund was not needed.
Locke credited the management practices of Census Bureau director [[Robert Groves]], citing in particular the decision to buy additional advertising in locations where responses lagged, which improved the overall response rate. The agency also has begun to rely more on questioning neighbors or other reliable third parties when a person could not be immediately reached at home, which reduced the cost of follow-up visits. Census data for about 22% of U.S. households that did not reply by mail were based on such outside interviews, Groves said.<ref name="cnn20100810"/>

==Technology==
In 2005, [[Lockheed Martin]] won a six-year, $500 million contract to capture and standardize data for the census. The contract included systems, facilities, and staffing.<ref>{{Cite news|title = Lockheed Gets Census Job|url = harps://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/02/AR2005100201032.html|newspaper = The Washington Post|date = October 3, 2005|access-date = September 28, 2015|issn = 0190-8286|first = Mary|last = Mosquera|archive-date = September 29, 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150929040021/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/02/AR2005100201032.html|url-status = live}}</ref> The final value of that contract was in excess of one billion dollars.<ref>{{Cite report|title = 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series No 195|url = https://www.census.gov/2010census/pdf/2010_Census_DRIS_Paper_Questionnaire_Data_Capture_Assessment.pdf|date = May 22, 2012|access-date = February 10, 2016|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160124030623/http://www.census.gov/2010census/pdf/2010_Census_DRIS_Paper_Questionnaire_Data_Capture_Assessment.pdf|archive-date = January 24, 2016|url-status = live}}</ref> Information technology was about a quarter of the projected $11.3 billion cost of the decennial census.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://fcw.com/articles/2005/06/13/preparing-for-a-decennial-task.aspx|title=Preparing for a decennial task|first=Aliya|last=Sternstein|date=June 13, 2005|work=[[Federal Computer Week]]|publisher=1105 Media|location=Falls Church, Virginia|access-date=December 27, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111003125951/http://fcw.com/articles/2005/06/13/preparing-for-a-decennial-task.aspx|archive-date=October 3, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> The use of high-speed document scanning technology, such as ImageTrac scanners developed by [[IBML]], helped Lockheed Martin complete the project on schedule and under budget.<ref>[http://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/ibml-scanning-platform-helps-lockheed-martin-0001 "IBML Scanning Platform Helps Lockheed Martin Team Complete 2010 Census Project On Schedule, Under Budget"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150108150947/http://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/ibml-scanning-platform-helps-lockheed-martin-0001 |date=January 8, 2015 }}. Health IT Outcomes. Retrieved January 20, 2015.</ref>

This was the first census to use [[Hand Held Computer|hand-held computing devices]] with [[Global Positioning System|GPS]] capability, although they were only used for the address canvassing operation. Enumerators (information gatherers) that had operational problems with the device understandably made negative reports. During the 2009 Senate confirmation hearings for [[Robert Groves]], President Obama's Census Director appointee, there was much mention of contracting problems but very little criticism of the units themselves.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web | url=http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2008/03/28/Have-feds-cheapened-contract-bonuses.aspx | title=Have feds cheapened contract bonuses? | publisher=FCW | date=March 28, 2008 | access-date=August 9, 2013 | author=Chan, Wade-Hahn | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120826010307/http://fcw.com/Articles/2008/03/28/Have-feds-cheapened-contract-bonuses.aspx | archive-date=August 26, 2012 | url-status=live }}</ref> The Census Bureau chose to conduct the primary operation, Non-Response Follow Up (NRFU), without using the handheld computing devices.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.harris.com/view_pressrelease.asp?act=lookup&pr_id=1818|title=Press Releases|website=Harris.com|access-date=October 12, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160420233313/http://harris.com/view_pressrelease.asp?act=lookup&pr_id=1818|archive-date=April 20, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://ask.census.gov/cgi-bin/askcensus.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=8517&p_sid=eTlggqZj&p_created=1250512381&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0mcF9wcm9kcz0mcF9jYXRzPSZwX3B2PSZwX2N2PSZwX3BhZ2U9MQ!!&p_search_text=Hand%20held%20computers|title=U.S. Census Bureau – Use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS)|website=Ask.census.gov|access-date=October 12, 2017}}{{Dead link|date=September 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

==Marketing and undercounts==
Due to allegations surrounding previous censuses that poor people and non-whites are routinely undercounted, for the 2010 census, the Census Bureau tried to avoid that bias by enlisting tens of thousands of intermediaries, such as churches, charities and firms, to explain to people the importance of being counted.<ref name=economist_april/>

The [[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]] (ACORN) was given a contract to help publicize the importance of the census count and to encourage individuals to fill out their forms. In September 2009, after [[ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy|controversial undercover videos]] showing four ACORN staffers giving tax advice to a man and a woman posing as a prostitute, the bureau canceled ACORN's contract.<ref name=wsjournal>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125271412822705239|title=Census Bureau Cuts Its Ties With Acorn|last=Sherman|first=Jake|author-link=Jake Sherman (journalist)|date=September 12, 2009|work=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=June 17, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090915173548/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125271412822705239.html|archive-date=September 15, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> Various American celebrities, including [[Demi Lovato]] and [[Eva Longoria]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.looktothestars.org/news/4051-demi-lovato-and-eva-longoria-urge-census-participation|title=Demi Lovato And Eva Longoria Urge Census Participation|date=March 19, 2010|website=Looktothestars.org|access-date=October 12, 2017|archive-date=May 24, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170524221820/https://www.looktothestars.org/news/4051-demi-lovato-and-eva-longoria-urge-census-participation|url-status=live}}</ref> were used in [[public service announcement]]s targeting younger people to fill out census forms. [[Wilmer Valderrama]] and [[Rosario Dawson]] have helped spread census awareness among young Hispanics, a historically low participating ethnicity in the U.S. census.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.icelebz.com/gossips/rosario_dawson_wilmer_valderrama_encourage_latinos_to_complete_2010_census_in_new_psa_s/|title=Rosario Dawson, Wilmer Valderrama Encourage Latinos To Complete 2010 Census In New PSA's|website=icelebz.com|access-date=April 28, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100221065454/http://www.icelebz.com/gossips/rosario_dawson_wilmer_valderrama_encourage_latinos_to_complete_2010_census_in_new_psa_s/|archive-date=February 21, 2010|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Rapper [[Ludacris]] also participated in efforts to spread awareness of the 2010 census.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.killerhiphop.com/ludacris-2010-census-campaign-new-york/|title=Ludacris 2010 Census Campaign In New York|website=Killerhiphop.com|access-date=October 12, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170620152551/http://www.killerhiphop.com/ludacris-2010-census-campaign-new-york/|archive-date=June 20, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>

The Census Bureau hired about 635,000 people to find those U.S. residents who had not returned their forms by mail; as of May 28, 2010, 113 census workers had been victims of crime while conducting the census.<ref name="635Khired">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalledger.com/ledgerdc/article_272632041.shtml |title=US Census Takers Attacked on the Job |work=National Ledger |date=May 28, 2010 |access-date=May 30, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100531064523/http://www.nationalledger.com/ledgerdc/article_272632041.shtml |archive-date=May 31, 2010 |url-status=live |df=mdy }}</ref>{{Update after|2014|8|16}} As of June 29, there were 436 incidents involving assaults or threats against enumerators, more than double the 181 incidents in [[2000 United States Census|2000]]; one enumerator, attempting to hand-deliver the census forms to a [[Hawaii County, Hawaii|Hawaii County]] police officer, was arrested for trespassing – the officer's fellow policemen made the arrest.<ref name="hawaii">{{cite news|title=Census worker taken to court for trespassing|url=https://nypost.com/2010/07/05/census-worker-taken-to-court-for-trespassing/|agency=Associated Press|date=July 5, 2010|access-date=January 6, 2017|quote=The resident continued to refuse to take the Census, and [census worker Russell] Haas said he waited outside a chain-link fence while the resident called his co-workers at the [[Hawai‘i County Police Department]]. When police arrived, instead of asking the resident to accept the forms as required by federal law, the officers crumpled the papers into Haas' chest and handcuffed him, Haas said....Haas said he told officers that it was his duty to leave the Census forms with the resident, and that he would leave as soon as he did it. The officers were enforcing state law and had not been trained on the federal Census law, Hawaii County Police Maj. Sam Thomas said.|work=New York Post|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170107101424/http://nypost.com/2010/07/05/census-worker-taken-to-court-for-trespassing/|archive-date=January 7, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>

Some political conservatives and libertarians questioned the validity of the questions and even encouraged people to refuse to answer questions for privacy and constitutional reasons.<ref name="Wapo williams"/> [[Michele Bachmann]], a former conservative [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] [[United States House of Representatives|Representative]] from [[Minnesota]], stated that she would not fill out her census form other than to indicate the number of people living in her household because "the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5095844-503544.html|title=Rep. Bachmann Refuses To Fill Out 2010 Census|last=Swami|first=Perana|date=June 18, 2009|work=Political Hotsheet|publisher=CBS News|access-date=April 15, 2010|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120909025325/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5095844-503544.html|archive-date=September 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Former Republican representative and [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian]] presidential candidate [[Bob Barr]] stated that the census has become too intrusive, going beyond the mere enumeration (i.e., count) intended by the framers of the U.S. Constitution.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/09/08/census-goes-too-far-with-children/|title=Census goes too far with children|newspaper=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution|access-date=September 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090911162305/http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/09/08/census-goes-too-far-with-children/|archive-date=September 11, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to political commentator [[Juan Williams]], "Census participation rates have been declining since 1970, and if conservatives don't participate, doubts about its accuracy and credibility may become fatal."<ref name="Wapo williams"/>

As a result, the Census Bureau undertook an unprecedented advertising campaign targeted at encouraging white political conservatives to fill out their forms, in the hope of avoiding an undercount of this group. The 2010 U.S. census was the primary sponsor at NASCAR races in Atlanta, Bristol, and Martinsville, and sponsored the No. 16 [[Ford Fusion (Americas)|Ford Fusion]] driven by [[Greg Biffle]] for part of the season, because of a marketing survey that indicated most NASCAR fans lean politically conservative.<ref name="Wapo williams">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/28/AR2010022803364.html|title=Marketing the 2010 census with a conservative-friendly face|first=Juan|last=Williams|date=March 1, 2010|newspaper=Washington Post|access-date=March 25, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100424175241/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/28/AR2010022803364.html|archive-date=April 24, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> It also ran an advertisement during the [[Super Bowl XLIV|2010 Super Bowl]], and hired singer [[Marie Osmond]], who is thought to have many conservative fans, to publicize the census.<ref name="Wapo williams"/>

==Reapportionment==
[[File:HouseDelegations2013-23.svg|upright=1.8|thumb|right|The 435 seats of the [[United States House of Representatives|House]] grouped by state, as apportioned after the 2010 census]]

The results of the 2010 census determined the number of seats that each state received in the [[United States House of Representatives]] starting with the [[United States elections, 2012#United States House of Representatives|2012 elections]]. Consequently, this affected the number of votes each state had in the [[Electoral College (United States)|Electoral College]] for the [[2012 United States presidential election|2012 presidential election]].

Because of population changes, eighteen states had changes in their number of seats. Eight states gained at least one seat, and ten states lost at least one seat. The final result involved 12 seats being switched.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://2010.census.gov/news/pdf/apport2010_table1.pdf |title=Apportionment Population and Number of Representatives, By State: 2010 Census |work=US Census |date=December 21, 2010 |access-date=December 21, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110124054026/http://2010.census.gov/news/pdf/apport2010_table1.pdf |archive-date=January 24, 2011 }}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|- style="vertical-align:bottom;"
! Gained four seats|| | Gained two seats|| |Gained one seat|| |Lost one seat|| |Lost two seats
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|[[United States congressional delegations from Texas|Texas]]
|[[United States congressional delegations from Florida|Florida]]
|[[United States congressional delegations from Arizona|Arizona]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Georgia|Georgia]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Nevada|Nevada]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from South Carolina|South Carolina]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Utah|Utah]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Washington|Washington]]
|[[United States congressional delegations from Illinois|Illinois]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Iowa|Iowa]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Louisiana|Louisiana]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Massachusetts|Massachusetts]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Michigan|Michigan]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Missouri|Missouri]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from New Jersey|New Jersey]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]
|[[United States congressional delegations from New York|New York]]<br />[[United States congressional delegations from Ohio|Ohio]]
|}

==Controversies==
Some objected to the counting of persons who are in the United States illegally.<ref>{{cite news|title=Our Unconstitutional Census|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204908604574332950796281832|work=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=August 9, 2009|first1=John S.|last1=Baker|first2=Elliott|last2=Stonecipher|date=August 9, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150905190247/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204908604574332950796281832|archive-date=September 5, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Census 2010: Latino Pastors Urge Census Boycott|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/04/census_2010_latino_pastors_urg.html|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=April 22, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111130155608/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/04/census_2010_latino_pastors_urg.html|archive-date=November 30, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Senators [[David Vitter]] (R-LA) and [[Bob Bennett (politician)|Bob Bennett]] (R-UT) tried unsuccessfully to add questions on immigration status to the census form.<ref name=economist_april/>

Organizations such as the [[Prison Policy Initiative]] argued that the census counts of incarcerated men and women as residents of prisons, rather than of their pre-incarceration addresses, skewed political clout and resulted in misleading demographic and population data.<ref>{{cite journal|format=PDF|url=http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=plr|title=Prisoners of the Census: Electoral and Financial Consequences of Counting Prisoners Where They Go, Not Where They Come From|first1=Eric|last1=Lotke|first2=Peter|last2=Wagner|journal=Pace Law Review|volume=24|issue=2|date=Spring 2004|pages=587–607|publisher=[[Pace Law School]]|location=White Plains, NY|issn=0272-2410|access-date=June 10, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714205154/http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=plr|archive-date=July 14, 2014|url-status=live}}  Originally presented at ''Prison Reform Revisited'': a symposium held at Pace University School of Law and the New York State Judicial Institute, Oct. 16–18, 2003. Research supported by grants from the Soros Justice Fellowship Program of the [[Open Society Institute]]. Retrieved January 2, 2010.</ref>

The term "[[Negro]]" was used in the questionnaire as one of the options for [[African Americans]] (Question 9. What is Person (number)'s race? ... [[Black people|Black]], African Am., or Negro) as a choice to describe one's race. Census Bureau spokesman Jack Martin explained that "many older African-Americans identified themselves that way, and many still do. Those who identify themselves as Negroes need to be included."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://2010.census.gov/2010census/how/interactive-form.php |title=U.S. Census Bureau interactive form, Question 9 |access-date=January 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100108084300/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/how/interactive-form.php |archive-date=January 8, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/01/06/2010-01-06_census_negro_issue_use_of_word_on_forms_raises_hackles_memories_of_jim_crow.html |title=Use of word Negro on 2010 census forms raises memories of Jim Crow |author1=McFadden, Katie |author2=McShane, Larry |newspaper=[[Daily News (New York)|NYDailyNews.com]] |date=January 6, 2010 |access-date=January 8, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100109012939/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/01/06/2010-01-06_census_negro_issue_use_of_word_on_forms_raises_hackles_memories_of_jim_crow.html |archive-date=January 9, 2010 |url-status=live |df=mdy }}</ref> The word was also used in the 2000 census, with over 56,000 people identifying themselves as "Negro".<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1955923,00.html |title=Should the Census Be Asking People if They Are Negro? |magazine=Time |date=January 23, 2010 |access-date=February 7, 2010 |first=Barbara |last=Kiviat |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100126090118/http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0%2C8599%2C1955923%2C00.html |archive-date=January 26, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref>

The 2010 census contained ten questions about age, gender, ethnicity, home ownership, and household relationships. Six of the ten questions were to be answered for each individual in the household. Federal law has provisions for fining those who refuse to complete the census form.<ref>[https://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/frequently-asked-questions-national-census Frequently Asked Questions on the National Census] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130813191041/http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/frequently-asked-questions-national-census |date=August 13, 2013 }} from the [[ACLU]] website</ref>

[[Mayor of Detroit|Detroit Mayor]] [[Dave Bing]] held a press conference on March 22, 2011, to announce that the city would challenge its census results.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://michigan.drupal.publicbroadcasting.net/post/bing-plans-challenge-detroit-census-numbers|title=Bing plans to challenge Detroit census numbers|author=Cwiek, Sarah|publisher=MichiganRadio.com|date=March 22, 2011|access-date=June 15, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110821222755/http://michigan.drupal.publicbroadcasting.net/post/bing-plans-challenge-detroit-census-numbers|archive-date=August 21, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> The challenge, being led by the city's planning department, cited an inconsistency as an example showing a downtown census tract which lost only 60 housing units, but 1,400 people, implying that a downtown jail or dormitory was missed in canvassing.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://michigan.drupal.publicbroadcasting.net/post/detroit-census-challenge|title=Detroit census challenge|author=Davidson, Kate|publisher=MichiganRadio.com|date=May 2, 2011|access-date=June 15, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110821224315/http://michigan.drupal.publicbroadcasting.net/post/detroit-census-challenge|archive-date=August 21, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref>

[[Mayor of New York City|NYC Mayor]] [[Michael Bloomberg]] held a conference on March 27, 2011, to announce that the city would also challenge his city's census results, specifically the apparent undercounting in the boroughs of [[Queens]] and [[Brooklyn]].<ref>NYC To File Formal Challenge to 2010 Census under Count Question Resolution Process {{cite web|url=http://www.mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=F93690A8-C29C-7CA2-F22FCD1FB0842DD4 |title = NYC To File Formal Challenge to the 2010 Census Count  |access-date=March 31, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110330064242/http://www.mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=F93690A8-C29C-7CA2-F22FCD1FB0842DD4 |archive-date=March 30, 2011 }}</ref> Bloomberg said that the numbers for Queens and Brooklyn, the two most populous boroughs, are implausible.<ref>[http://www.mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=E98B9E79-C29C-7CA2-FE04261B98D69D26 On the 2010 Census Results] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110528071135/http://www.mikebloomberg.com/index.cfm?objectid=E98B9E79-C29C-7CA2-FE04261B98D69D26 |date=May 28, 2011 }}</ref> According to the census, they grew by only 0.1% and 1.6%, respectively, while the other boroughs grew by between 3% and 5%. He also stated that the census showed improbably high numbers of vacant housing in vital neighborhoods such as [[Jackson Heights, Queens]].

The [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]] announced in August 2011 that it would also challenge its census results. The Mayor's Office claimed that the detailed information provided for 549 census blocks is "nonsensical", listing examples of census data that show housing units located in the middle of a street that does not actually exist. However, officials do not believe the city's total population will drastically change as a result of the challenge.<ref>{{cite news|last=DeBonis|first=Mike|title=District challenges its 2010 Census count|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/district-challenges-its-2010-census-count/2011/08/10/gIQAdmfP7I_story.html|access-date=August 14, 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=August 10, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811124716/http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/district-challenges-its-2010-census-count/2011/08/10/gIQAdmfP7I_story.html|archive-date=August 11, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref>

==State rankings==
{{see also|List of U.S. states and territories by population}}
The state with the highest percentage rate of growth was [[Nevada]], while the state with the largest population increase was [[Texas]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-21/texas-hispanics-set-to-challenge-status-quo-in-reapportionment.html|title=Texas Adds Four Congressional Seats as State's Hispanic Population Grows|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|access-date=October 12, 2017|date=December 21, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202172654/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-21/texas-hispanics-set-to-challenge-status-quo-in-reapportionment.html|archive-date=February 2, 2014|url-status=live}}{{subscription required|date=October 2017}}</ref> [[Michigan]], the 8th largest by population, was the only state to lose population (although [[Puerto Rico]], a [[Territories of the United States|U.S. territory]], lost population as well), and the [[District of Columbia]] saw its first gain since the 1950s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/default.htm|title=USA Today 2010 Census|website=USA Today|access-date=October 12, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110309070907/http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/default.htm|archive-date=March 9, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> The resident populations listed below do not include people living overseas. For Congressional apportionment, the sum of a state's resident population and its population of military personnel and federal contractors living overseas (but not other citizens overseas, such as missionaries or expatriate workers) is used.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-08.pdf|title=Congressional Apportionment|website=Census.gov|access-date=October 12, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180115155344/https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-08.pdf|archive-date=January 15, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

<!-- Please do not add Puerto Rico, it is better if the territories have their own list. -->[[File:Population Change by Percentage - 2010 US Census.png|center|thumb|483x483px|A map showing the population change of each US State by percentage.]]
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right;"
|+ Population and population change in the United States by state
|-
! Rank
! State
! Population as of<br />2010 census
! Population as of<br />2000 census<ref>{{cite web|url=http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php |title=Resident Population Data: Population Change |date=December 23, 2010 |publisher=[[United States Census Bureau]] |access-date=December 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101225031104/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php |archive-date=December 25, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref>
! data-sort-type="number" |Change
! data-sort-type="number" |Percent<br />change
|-
| 1
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|California}}
| 37,253,956
| 33,871,648
| 3,382,308 {{increase}}
| 10.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 2
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Texas}}
| 25,145,561
| 20,851,820
| 4,293,741 {{increase}}
| 20.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 3
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|New York}}
| 19,378,102
| 18,976,457
| 401,645 {{increase}}
| 2.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 4
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Florida}}
| 18,801,310
| 15,982,378
| 2,818,932 {{increase}}
| 17.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 5
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Illinois}}
| 12,830,632
| 12,419,293
| 411,339 {{increase}}
| 3.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 6
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Pennsylvania}}
| 12,702,379
| 12,281,054
| 421,325 {{increase}}
| 3.4% {{increase}}
|-
| 7
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Ohio}}
| 11,536,504
| 11,353,140
| 183,364 {{increase}}
| 1.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 8
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Michigan}}
| 9,883,640
| 9,938,444
| −54,804 {{decrease}}
| −0.6% {{decrease}}
|-
| 9
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Georgia (U.S. state)|name=Georgia}}
| 9,687,653
| 8,186,453
| 1,501,200 {{increase}}
| 18.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 10
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|North Carolina}}
| 9,535,483
| 8,049,313
| 1,486,170 {{increase}}
| 18.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 11
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|New Jersey}}
| 8,791,894
| 8,414,350
| 377,544 {{increase}}
| 4.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 12
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Virginia}}
| 8,001,024
| 7,078,515
| 922,509 {{increase}}
| 13.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 13
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Washington}}
| 6,724,540
| 5,894,121
| 830,419 {{increase}}
| 14.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 14
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Massachusetts}}
| 6,547,629
| 6,349,097
| 198,532 {{increase}}
| 3.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 15
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Indiana}}
| 6,483,802
| 6,080,485
| 403,317 {{increase}}
| 6.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 16
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Arizona}}
| 6,392,017
| 5,130,632
| 1,261,385 {{increase}}
| 24.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 17
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Tennessee}}
| 6,346,105
| 5,689,283
| 656,822 {{increase}}
| 11.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 18
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Missouri}}
| 5,988,927
| 5,595,211
| 393,716 {{increase}}
| 7.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 19
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Maryland}}
| 5,773,552
| 5,296,486
| 477,066 {{increase}}
| 9.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 20
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Wisconsin}}
| 5,686,986
| 5,363,675
| 323,311 {{increase}}
| 6.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 21
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Minnesota}}
| 5,303,925
| 4,919,479
| 384,446 {{increase}}
| 7.8% {{increase}}
|-
| 22
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Colorado}}
| 5,029,196
| 4,301,261
| 727,935 {{increase}}
| 16.9% {{increase}}
|-
| 23
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Alabama}}
| 4,779,736
| 4,447,100
| 332,636 {{increase}}
| 7.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 24
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|South Carolina}}
| 4,625,364
| 4,012,012
| 613,352 {{increase}}
| 15.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 25
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Louisiana|2006}}
| 4,533,372
| 4,468,976
| 64,396 {{increase}}
| 1.4% {{increase}}
|-
| 26
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Kentucky}}
| 4,339,367
| 4,041,769
| 297,598 {{increase}}
| 7.4% {{increase}}
|-
| 27
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Oregon}}
| 3,831,074
| 3,421,399
| 409,675 {{increase}}
| 12.0% {{increase}}
|-
| 28
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Oklahoma}}
| 3,751,351
| 3,450,654
| 300,697 {{increase}}
| 8.7% {{increase}}
|-
| 29
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Connecticut}}
| 3,574,097
| 3,405,565
| 168,532 {{increase}}
| 4.9% {{increase}}
|-
| 30
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Iowa}}
| 3,046,355
| 2,926,324
| 120,031 {{increase}}
| 4.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 31
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Mississippi|2001}}
| 2,967,297
| 2,844,658
| 122,639 {{increase}}
| 4.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 32
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Arkansas}}
| 2,915,918
| 2,673,400
| 242,518 {{increase}}
| 9.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 33
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Kansas}}
| 2,853,118
| 2,688,418
| 164,700 {{increase}}
| 6.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 34
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Utah|1913}}
| 2,763,885
| 2,233,169
| 530,716 {{increase}}
| 23.8% {{increase}}
|-
| 35
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Nevada}}
| 2,700,551
| 1,998,257
| 702,294 {{increase}}
| 35.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 36
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|New Mexico}}
| 2,059,179
| 1,819,046
| 240,133 {{increase}}
| 13.2% {{increase}}
|-
| 37
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|West Virginia}}
| 1,852,994
| 1,808,344
| 44,650 {{increase}}
| 2.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 38
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Nebraska}}
| 1,826,341
| 1,711,263
| 115,078 {{increase}}
| 6.7% {{increase}}
|-
| 39
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Idaho}}
| 1,567,582
| 1,293,953
| 273,629 {{increase}}
| 21.1% {{increase}}
|-
| 40
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Hawaii}}
| 1,360,301
| 1,211,537
| 148,764 {{increase}}
| 12.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 41
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Maine}}
| 1,328,361
| 1,274,923
| 53,438 {{increase}}
| 4.2% {{increase}}
|-
| 42
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|New Hampshire}}
| 1,316,470
| 1,235,786
| 80,684 {{increase}}
| 6.5% {{increase}}
|-
| 43
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Rhode Island}}
| 1,052,567
| 1,048,319
| 4,248 {{increase}}
| 0.4% {{increase}}
|-
| 44
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Montana}}
| 989,415
| 902,195
| 87,220 {{increase}}
| 9.7% {{increase}}
|-
| 45
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Delaware}}
| 897,934
| 783,600
| 114,334 {{increase}}
| 14.6% {{increase}}
|-
| 46
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|South Dakota}}
| 814,180
| 754,844
| 59,336 {{increase}}
| 7.9% {{increase}}
|-
| 47
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Alaska}}
| 710,231
| 626,932
| 83,299 {{increase}}
| 13.3% {{increase}}
|-
| 48
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|North Dakota}}
| 672,591
| 642,200
| 30,391 {{increase}}
| 4.7% {{increase}}
|-
| 49
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Vermont}}
| 625,741
| 608,827
| 16,914 {{increase}}
| 2.8% {{increase}}
|-
| {{sort|50|—}}
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|District of Columbia}}
| 601,723
| 572,059
| 29,664 {{increase}}
| 5.2% {{increase}}
|-
| {{sort|51|50}}
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|Wyoming}}
| 563,626
| 493,782
| 69,844 {{increase}}
| 14.1% {{increase}}
|- class="sortbottom"
| &nbsp;
| style="text-align: left;" |{{flagg|unc|United States}}
| 308,745,538
| 281,421,906
| 27,323,632 {{increase}}
| 9.7% {{increase}}
|}

==Metropolitan rankings==
{{see also|List of metropolitan statistical areas}}
These are core metropolitan rankings versus combined statistical areas. For full list with current data, go to [[List of metropolitan statistical areas|metropolitan statistics]].
{|class="wikitable sortable"
|+<big>The top 25 metropolitan statistical areas of the United States of America</big><br /><br />
!Rank
!Metropolitan&nbsp;statistical&nbsp;area
!2010 census
!Encompassing combined statistical&nbsp;area
|-
|align=center| {{nts|1}}
|<!-- 35620 -->[[New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|19,567,410
|<!-- 408 -->[[New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|2}}
|<!-- 31080 -->[[Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|12,828,837
|<!-- 348 -->[[Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|3}}
|<!-- 16980 -->[[Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|9,461,105
|<!-- 176 -->[[Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|4}}
|<!-- 19100 -->[[Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|6,426,214
|<!-- 206 -->[[Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|5}}
|<!-- 37980 -->[[Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|5,965,343
|<!-- 428 -->[[Philadelphia-Reading-Camden, PA-NJ-DE-MD Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|6}}
|<!-- 26420 -->[[Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|5,920,416
|<!-- 288 -->[[Houston-The Woodlands, TX Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|7}}
|<!-- 47900 -->[[Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|5,636,232
|<!-- 548 -->[[Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|8}}
|<!-- 33100 -->[[Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|5,564,635
|<!-- 370 -->[[Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Port St. Lucie, FL Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|9}}
|<!-- 12060 -->[[Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|5,286,728
|<!-- 122 -->[[Atlanta–Athens-Clarke County–Sandy Springs, GA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|10}}
|<!-- 14460 -->[[Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|4,552,402
|<!-- 148 -->[[Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|11}}
|<!-- 41860 -->[[San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|4,335,391
|<!-- 488 -->[[San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|12}}
|<!-- 19820 -->[[Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|4,296,250
|<!-- 220 -->[[Detroit-Warren-Ann Arbor, MI Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|13}}
|<!-- 40140 -->[[Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|4,224,851
|<!-- 348 -->[[Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|14}}
|<!-- 38060 -->[[Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|4,192,887
|
|-
|align=center| {{nts|15}}
|<!-- 42660 -->[[Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|3,439,809
|<!-- 500 -->[[Seattle-Tacoma, WA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|16}}
|<!-- 33460 -->[[Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|3,348,859
|<!-- 378 -->[[Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|17}}
|<!-- 41740 -->[[San Diego-Carlsbad, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|3,095,313
|
|-
|align=center| {{nts|18}}
|<!-- 41180 -->[[St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,787,701
|<!-- 476 -->[[St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|19}}
|<!-- 45300 -->[[Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,783,243
|
|-
|align=center| {{nts|20}}
|<!-- 12580 -->[[Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,710,489
|<!-- 548 -->[[Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|21}}
|<!-- 19740 -->[[Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,543,482
|<!-- 216 -->[[Denver-Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|22}}
|<!-- 38300 -->[[Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,356,285
|<!-- 430 -->[[Pittsburgh-New Castle-Weirton, PA-OH-WV Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|23}}
|<!-- 38900 -->[[Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,226,009
|<!-- 440 -->[[Portland-Vancouver-Salem, OR-WA Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|24}}
|<!-- 16740 -->[[Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,217,012
|<!-- 172 -->[[Charlotte-Concord, NC-SC Combined Statistical Area]]
|-
|align=center| {{nts|25}}
|<!-- 41700 -->[[San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area]]
|2,142,508
|
|}

==City rankings==
{{see also|List of United States cities by population}}
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Rank
! City
! State
! Population
! Land area<br> <small>(square miles)</small>
! Population density<br> <small>(per square mile)</small>
! [[US Census Regions|Region]]
|-
| 1
| [[New York City|New York]]
| [[New York (state)|New York]]
| {{Nts|8175133}}
| {{Nts|302.6}}
| {{Nts|27016.3}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 2
| [[Los Angeles]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|3792621}}
| {{Nts|468.7}}
| {{Nts|8091.8}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 3
| [[Chicago]]
| [[Illinois]]
| {{Nts|2695598}}
| {{Nts|227.6}}
| {{Nts|11843.6}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 4
| [[Houston]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|2099451}}
| {{Nts|599.6}}
| {{Nts|3502.8}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 5
| [[Philadelphia]]
| [[Pennsylvania]]
| {{Nts|1526006}}
| {{Nts|134.1}}
| {{Nts|11379.6}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 6
| [[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|1445632}}
| {{Nts|516.7}}
| {{Nts|2797.8}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 7
| [[San Antonio]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|1327407}}
| {{Nts|460.9}}
| {{Nts|2880.0}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 8
| [[San Diego]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|1307402}}
| {{Nts|325.2}}
| {{Nts|4020.3}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 9
| [[Dallas]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|1197816}}
| {{Nts|340.5}}
| {{Nts|3517.8}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 10
| [[San Jose, California|San Jose]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|945942}}
| {{Nts|176.5}}
| {{Nts|5359.4}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 11
| [[Jacksonville, Florida|Jacksonville]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|821784}}
| {{Nts|747.0}}
| {{Nts|1100.1}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 12
| [[Indianapolis]]
| [[Indiana]]
| {{Nts|820445}}
| {{Nts|361.4}}
| {{Nts|2270.2}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 13
| [[San Francisco]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|805235}}
| {{Nts|46.9}}
| {{Nts|17169.2}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 14
| [[Austin, Texas|Austin]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|790390}}
| {{Nts|297.9}}
| {{Nts|2653.2}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 15
| [[Columbus, Ohio|Columbus]]
| [[Ohio]]
| {{Nts|787033}}
| {{Nts|217.2}}
| {{Nts|3623.5}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 16
| [[Fort Worth, Texas|Fort Worth]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|741206}}
| {{Nts|339.8}}
| {{Nts|2181.3}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 17
| [[Charlotte, North Carolina|Charlotte]]
| [[North Carolina]]
| {{Nts|731424}}
| {{Nts|297.7}}
| {{Nts|2456.9}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 18
| [[Detroit]]
| [[Michigan]]
| {{Nts|713777}}
| {{Nts|138.8}}
| {{Nts|5142.5}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 19
| [[El Paso, Texas|El Paso]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|649121}}
| {{Nts|255.2}}
| {{Nts|2543.6}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 20
| [[Memphis, Tennessee|Memphis]]
| [[Tennessee]]
| {{Nts|646889}}
| {{Nts|315.1}}
| {{Nts|2053.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 21
| [[Baltimore]]
| [[Maryland]]
| {{Nts|620961}}
| {{Nts|80.9}}
| {{Nts|7675.7}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 22
| [[Boston]]
| [[Massachusetts]]
| {{Nts|617594}}
| {{Nts|48.3}}
| {{Nts|12786.6}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 23
| [[Seattle]]
| [[Washington (state)|Washington]]
| {{Nts|608660}}
| {{Nts|83.9}}
| {{Nts|7254.6}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 24
| [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]]
| [[Washington, D.C.|District of Columbia]]
| {{Nts|601723}}
| {{Nts|61.0}}
| {{Nts|9864.3}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 25
| [[Nashville, Tennessee|Nashville]]
| [[Tennessee]]
| {{Nts|601222}}
| {{Nts|475.1}}
| {{Nts|1265.5}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 26
| [[Denver]]
| [[Colorado]]
| {{Nts|600158}}
| {{Nts|153.0}}
| {{Nts|3922.6}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 27
| [[Louisville, Kentucky|Louisville]]
| [[Kentucky]]
| {{Nts|597,337}}
| {{Nts|385.09}}
| {{Nts|1551.2}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 28
| [[Milwaukee]]
| [[Wisconsin]]
| {{Nts|594833}}
| {{Nts|96.1}}
| {{Nts|6189.7}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 29
| [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]]
| [[Oregon]]
| {{Nts|583776}}
| {{Nts|134.3}}
| {{Nts|4346.8}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 30
| [[Las Vegas, Nevada|Las Vegas]]
| [[Nevada]]
| {{Nts|583756}}
| {{Nts|135.8}}
| {{Nts|4298.6}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 31
| [[Oklahoma City]]
| [[Oklahoma]]
| {{Nts|579999}}
| {{Nts|606.4}}
| {{Nts|956.5}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 32
| [[Albuquerque, New Mexico|Albuquerque]]
| [[New Mexico]]
| {{Nts|545852}}
| {{Nts|187.7}}
| {{Nts|2908.1}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 33
| [[Tucson, Arizona|Tucson]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|520116}}
| {{Nts|226.7}}
| {{Nts|2294.3}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 34
| [[Fresno, California|Fresno]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|494665}}
| {{Nts|112.0}}
| {{Nts|4416.7}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 35
| [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|466488}}
| {{Nts|97.9}}
| {{Nts|4764.9}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 36
| [[Long Beach, California|Long Beach]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|462257}}
| {{Nts|50.3}}
| {{Nts|9190.0}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 37
| [[Kansas City, Missouri|Kansas City]]
| [[Missouri]]
| {{Nts|459787}}
| {{Nts|315.0}}
| {{Nts|1459.6}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 38
| [[Mesa, Arizona|Mesa]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|439041}}
| {{Nts|136.5}}
| {{Nts|3216.4}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 39
| [[Virginia Beach, Virginia|Virginia Beach]]
| [[Virginia]]
| {{Nts|437994}}
| {{Nts|249.0}}
| {{Nts|1759.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 40
| [[Atlanta]]
| [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]
| {{Nts|420003}}
| {{Nts|133.2}}
| {{Nts|3153.2}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 41
| [[Colorado Springs, Colorado|Colorado Springs]]
| [[Colorado]]
| {{Nts|416427}}
| {{Nts|194.5}}
| {{Nts|2141.0}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 42
| [[Omaha, Nebraska|Omaha]]
| [[Nebraska]]
| {{Nts|408958}}
| {{Nts|127.1}}
| {{Nts|3217.6}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 43
| [[Raleigh, North Carolina|Raleigh]]
| [[North Carolina]]
| {{Nts|403892}}
| {{Nts|142.9}}
| {{Nts|2826.4}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 44
| [[Miami]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|399457}}
| {{Nts|35.9}}
| {{Nts|11126.9}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 45
| [[Cleveland]]
| [[Ohio]]
| {{Nts|396815}}
| {{Nts|77.7}}
| {{Nts|5107.0}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-     
| 46
| [[San Juan, Puerto Rico|San Juan]]
| [[Puerto Rico]]
| {{Nts|395326}}
| {{Nts|47.9}}
| {{Nts|8253.1}}
| [[Territories of the United States|United States disputed territories]]
|-
| 47
| [[Tulsa, Oklahoma|Tulsa]]
| [[Oklahoma]]
| {{Nts|391906}}
| {{Nts|196.8}}
| {{Nts|1991.4}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 48
| [[Oakland, California|Oakland]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|390724}}
| {{Nts|55.8}}
| {{Nts|7002.2}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 49
| [[Minneapolis]]
| [[Minnesota]]
| {{Nts|382578}}
| {{Nts|54.0}}
| {{Nts|7084.8}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 50
| [[Wichita, Kansas|Wichita]]
| [[Kansas]]
| {{Nts|382368}}
| {{Nts|159.3}}
| {{Nts|2400.3}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 51
| [[Arlington, Texas|Arlington]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|365438}}
| {{Nts|95.9}}
| {{Nts|3810.6}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 52
| [[Bakersfield, California|Bakersfield]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|347483}}
| {{Nts|142.2}}
| {{Nts|2443.6}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 53
| [[New Orleans]]
| [[Louisiana]]
| {{Nts|343829}}
| {{Nts|169.4}}
| {{Nts|2029.7}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 54
| [[Honolulu]]
| [[Hawaii]]
| {{Nts|337256}}
| {{Nts|60.5}}
| {{Nts|5574.5}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 55
| [[Anaheim, California|Anaheim]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|336265}}
| {{Nts|49.8}}
| {{Nts|6752.3}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 56
| [[Tampa, Florida|Tampa]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|335709}}
| {{Nts|113.4}}
| {{Nts|2960.4}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 57
| [[Aurora, Colorado|Aurora]]
| [[Colorado]]
| {{Nts|325078}}
| {{Nts|154.7}}
| {{Nts|2101.3}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 58
| [[Santa Ana, California|Santa Ana]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|324528}}
| {{Nts|27.3}}
| {{Nts|11887.5}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 59
| [[St. Louis, Missouri|Saint Louis]]
| [[Missouri]]
| {{Nts|319294}}
| {{Nts|61.9}}
| {{Nts|5158.2}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 60
| [[Pittsburgh]]
| [[Pennsylvania]]
| {{Nts|305704}}
| {{Nts|55.4}}
| {{Nts|5518.1}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 61
| [[Corpus Christi, Texas|Corpus Christi]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|305215}}
| {{Nts|160.6}}
| {{Nts|1900.5}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 62
| [[Riverside, California|Riverside]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|303871}}
| {{Nts|81.1}}
| {{Nts|3746.9}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 63
| [[Cincinnati]]
| [[Ohio]]
| {{Nts|296943}}
| {{Nts|77.9}}
| {{Nts|3811.8}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 64
| [[Lexington, Kentucky|Lexington]]
| [[Kentucky]]
| {{Nts|295803}}
| {{Nts|283.6}}
| {{Nts|1043.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 65
| [[Anchorage, Alaska|Anchorage]]
| [[Alaska]]
| {{Nts|291826}}
| {{Nts|1704.7}}
| {{Nts|171.2}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 66
| [[Stockton, California|Stockton]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|291707}}
| {{Nts|61.7}}
| {{Nts|4727.8}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 67
| [[Toledo, Ohio|Toledo]]
| [[Ohio]]
| {{Nts|287208}}
| {{Nts|80.7}}
| {{Nts|3559.0}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 68
| [[St. Paul, Minnesota|Saint Paul]]
| [[Minnesota]]
| {{Nts|285068}}
| {{Nts|52.0}}
| {{Nts|5482.1}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 69
| [[Newark, New Jersey|Newark]]
| [[New Jersey]]
| {{Nts|277140}}
| {{Nts|24.2}}
| {{Nts|11452.1}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 70
| [[Greensboro, North Carolina|Greensboro]]
| [[North Carolina]]
| {{Nts|269666}}
| {{Nts|126.5}}
| {{Nts|2131.7}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 71
| [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]]
| [[New York (state)|New York]]
| {{Nts|261310}}
| {{Nts|40.4}}
| {{Nts|6468.1}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 72
| [[Plano, Texas|Plano]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|259841}}
| {{Nts|71.6}}
| {{Nts|3629.1}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 73
| [[Lincoln, Nebraska|Lincoln]]
| [[Nebraska]]
| {{Nts|258379}}
| {{Nts|89.1}}
| {{Nts|2899.9}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 74
| [[Henderson, Nevada|Henderson]]
| [[Nevada]]
| {{Nts|257729}}
| {{Nts|107.7}}
| {{Nts|2393.0}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 75
| [[Fort Wayne, Indiana|Fort Wayne]]
| [[Indiana]]
| {{Nts|253691}}
| {{Nts|110.6}}
| {{Nts|2293.8}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 76
| [[Jersey City, New Jersey|Jersey City]]
| [[New Jersey]]
| {{Nts|247597}}
| {{Nts|14.8}}
| {{Nts|16729.5}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 77
| [[St. Petersburg, Florida|Saint Petersburg]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|244769}}
| {{Nts|61.7}}
| {{Nts|3967.1}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 78
| [[Chula Vista, California|Chula Vista]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|243916}}
| {{Nts|49.6}}
| {{Nts|4917.7}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 79
| [[Norfolk, Virginia|Norfolk]]
| [[Virginia]]
| {{Nts|242803}}
| {{Nts|54.1}}
| {{Nts|4488.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 80
| [[Orlando, Florida|Orlando]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|238300}}
| {{Nts|102.4}}
| {{Nts|2327.1}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 81
| [[Chandler, Arizona|Chandler]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|236123}}
| {{Nts|64.4}}
| {{Nts|3666.5}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 82
| [[Laredo, Texas|Laredo]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|236091}}
| {{Nts|88.9}}
| {{Nts|2655.7}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 83
| [[Madison, Wisconsin|Madison]]
| [[Wisconsin]]
| {{Nts|233209}}
| {{Nts|76.8}}
| {{Nts|3036.6}}
| [[Midwestern United States|Midwest]]
|-
| 84
| [[Winston-Salem, North Carolina|Winston-Salem]]
| [[North Carolina]]
| {{Nts|229617}}
| {{Nts|132.4}}
| {{Nts|1734.3}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 85
| [[Lubbock, Texas|Lubbock]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|229573}}
| {{Nts|122.4}}
| {{Nts|1875.6}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 86
| [[Baton Rouge, Louisiana|Baton Rouge]]
| [[Louisiana]]
| {{Nts|229493}}
| {{Nts|76.9}}
| {{Nts|2984.3}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 87
| [[Durham, North Carolina|Durham]]
| [[North Carolina]]
| {{Nts|228330}}
| {{Nts|107.4}}
| {{Nts|2126.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 88
| [[Garland, Texas|Garland]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|226876}}
| {{Nts|57.1}}
| {{Nts|3973.3}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 89
| [[Glendale, Arizona|Glendale]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|226721}}
| {{Nts|60.0}}
| {{Nts|3778.7}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 90
| [[Reno, Nevada|Reno]]
| [[Nevada]]
| {{Nts|225221}}
| {{Nts|103.0}}
| {{Nts|2186.6}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 91
| [[Hialeah, Florida|Hialeah]]
| [[Florida]]
| {{Nts|224669}}
| {{Nts|21.5}}
| {{Nts|10449.7}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 92
| [[Chesapeake, Virginia|Chesapeake]]
| [[Virginia]]
| {{Nts|222209}}
| {{Nts|340.8}}
| {{Nts|652.0}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 93
| [[Scottsdale, Arizona|Scottsdale]]
| [[Arizona]]
| {{Nts|217385}}
| {{Nts|183.9}}
| {{Nts|1182.1}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 94
| [[North Las Vegas, Nevada|North Las Vegas]]
| [[Nevada]]
| {{Nts|216961}}
| {{Nts|101.3}}
| {{Nts|2141.8}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 95
| [[Irving, Texas|Irving]]
| [[Texas]]
| {{Nts|216290}}
| {{Nts|67.0}}
| {{Nts|3228.2}}
| [[Southwestern United States|Southwest]]
|-
| 96
| [[Fremont, California|Fremont]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|214089}}
| {{Nts|77.5}}
| {{Nts|2762.4}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 97
| [[Irvine, California|Irvine]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|212375}}
| {{Nts|66.1}}
| {{Nts|3212.9}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|-
| 98
| [[Birmingham, Alabama|Birmingham]]
| [[Alabama]]
| {{Nts|212237}}
| {{Nts|146.1}}
| {{Nts|1452.7}}
| [[Southeastern United States|Southeast]]
|-
| 99
| [[Rochester, New York|Rochester]]
| [[New York (state)|New York]]
| {{Nts|210565}}
| {{Nts|35.8}}
| {{Nts|5881.7}}
| [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]
|-
| 100
| [[San Bernardino, California|San Bernardino]]
| [[California]]
| {{Nts|209924}}
| {{Nts|59.2}}
| {{Nts|3546.0}}
| [[Western United States|West]]
|}

==See also==
* [[2010 in the United States]]
* [[United States census]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
{{Commons category|2010 United States Census}}
* [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade.2010.html 2010 Census]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20170724062356/https://www.census.gov/schools/pdf/2010form_info.pdf 2010 United States Census Form]
* [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-census-main.html  2020 Census]
* [https://www.census.gov/ U.S. Census Bureau]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20101226041024/http://www.life.com/image/first/in-gallery/53671/the-2010-census-winners-and-losers#index/0 The 2010 Census: Winners and Losers] – slideshow by ''[[Life magazine]]''
* [http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/AFF_deep_linking_guide_v1.1.pdf How to deep link into US Census Bureau FactFinder2] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515200535/http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/AFF_deep_linking_guide_v1.1.pdf |date=May 15, 2011 }}, see [http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20190408010255/http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/aff2.html FactFinder2 info]
* [http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/22/census_alters_nations_political_landscape_and Census: As Red States Grow, So Do Hispanic Populations Within] – video report by ''[[Democracy Now!]]''

{{USCensus}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:2010 in American politics|census 2010]]
[[Category:Lockheed Martin]]
[[Category:United States census]]
[[Category:2010 censuses|United States]]
{{Навигационная таблица/Портал/Английская Википедия}}
[[Категория:Английская Википедия]]
[[Категория:Википедия]]
[[Категория:Статья из Википедии]]
[[Категория:Статья из Английской Википедии]]