Просмотр кода страницы Английская Википедия:Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Simmenthal SpA

{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}}
{{Short description|Legal case concerning conflict between national and EU law}}
{{Infobox court case
| name = Amministrazione delle Finanze v Simmenthal SpA
| court = European Court of Justice
| image = 
| caption = 
| date decided = 
| full name = 
| citations =  (1978) Case 106/77, [1978] ECR 629
| judges = 
| prior actions =  
| subsequent actions = 
| opinions = 
| transcripts =
| keywords = [[Employee]]
}}

'''''Amministrazione delle Finanze v Simmenthal SpA''''' (1978) Case 106/77 is an [[EU law]] case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and European Union law.

==Facts==
[[Bolton_Group#Brands|Simmenthal SpA]] imported beef from [[France]] into [[Italy]]. Italy imposed a public health inspection fee for the meat crossing the border under an Italian Law of 1970. This conflicted with European Community Regulations from 1964 and 1968.

Italian courts heard argument that Italian law must prevail because it was passed after the Regulations, and must be applied by the Italian courts until the law was declared unconstitutional. It referred the question of what to do in a case of conflict to the [[ECJ]]. The Attorney General Reischl gave an Opinion suggesting that timing of the Italian law was irrelevant, and EU law was supreme.<ref>651-2</ref>

==Judgment==
The [[ECJ]] held that the national court had a duty to give full effect to Community provisions, even if a conflicting national law was adopted later.

{{Cquote|17. Furthermore, in accordance with the principle of the precedence of Community law, the relationship between provisions of the treaty and directly applicable measures of the institutions on the one hand and the national law of member states on the other is such that those provisions and measures not only by their entry into force render automatically inapplicable any conflicting provision of current national law but – in so far as they are an integral part of, and take precedence in, the legal order applicable in the territory of each of the member states – also preclude the valid adoption of new national legislative measures to the extent to which they would be incompatible with Community provisions.

18. Indeed any recognition that national legislative measures which encroach upon the field within which the Community exercises its legislative power or which are otherwise incompatible with the provisions of Community law had any legal effect would amount to a corresponding denial of the effectiveness of obligations undertaken unconditionally and irrevocably by member states pursuant to the treaty and would thus imperil the very foundations of the Community.}}

==See also==
{{Clist eusupreme}}
*[[European Union law]]

==Notes==
{{reflist|2}}

==References==
*G Gaja, 'New Developments in a Continuing Story: The Relationship between EEC Law and Italian Law' (1990) 27 CMLR 83

[[Category:Court of Justice of the European Union case law]]
[[Category:1978 in case law]]
[[Category:1978 in Italy]]
[[Category:Italian case law]]
{{Навигационная таблица/Портал/Английская Википедия}}
[[Категория:Английская Википедия]]
[[Категория:Википедия]]
[[Категория:Статья из Википедии]]
[[Категория:Статья из Английской Википедии]]