Просмотр кода страницы Английская Википедия:Economy of Door County, Wisconsin

{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}}
[[File:Acres made scarce advertisement Door County Advocate 1970.tif|thumb|Adge from a 1970 real estate ad in the ''Door County Advocate''. In 2019 figures, real estate and leasing was the largest sector of the county's economy.]]

The '''economy of Door County''' is similar to that of [[Bayfield County, Wisconsin|Bayfield]], [[Iron County, Wisconsin|Iron]], [[Oneida County, Wisconsin|Oneida]], [[Sawyer County, Wisconsin|Sawyer]], and [[Vilas County, Wisconsin|Vilas]] counties. These six northern Wisconsin counties have been categorized as having "forestry-related tourism"-based economies.<ref>[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.46.6962&rep=rep1&type=pdf Clustering Wisconsin Counties for Analytical Comparisons] by Martin Shields and Steven C. Deller, CCED Staff Paper # 96.7, October 1996, pp. 11 and 16 (pp. 13 and 19 of the pdf)</ref>

== By sector ==
=== Gross domestic product ===

An analysis comparing 1999 data for select Wisconsin counties found that [[Door County, Wisconsin|Door County]] was especially strong in the retail of building and materials, groceries, apparel and accessories, miscellaneous retail, and restaurants. For services, it ranked strong in amusement, movie, and recreation and lodging. Door County ran a fiscal surplus in all categories to all other counties, with the exception of furniture & home furnishing, in which Door County had a [[Leakage (retail)|leakage]] of sales to other counties.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20200117233651/https://tind-customer-agecon.s3.amazonaws.com/e53d44a6-0aab-43f7-94f8-42915c7d9d1c?response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27stpap428.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAXL7W7Q3XHXDVDQYS&Expires=1579307811&Signature=pKiLzQjlbdIURp9C0VHE4xL4zGc%3D Trade Area Analysis of Select Wisconsin Counties] by Steven C. Deller, August 2001, Staff Paper No. 428, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Staff Paper Series. Archived January 17, 2020</ref> In January 2021, there were 1,263 private establishments for all industries put together, up from 919 establishments in January 1990, but down from a peak of 1,314 establishments in September 2005.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvB5 Number of Private Establishments for All Industries in Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref>

In 2020, the total [[gross domestic product]] (GDP) of the county in 2020 dollars was $1.39 billion, a 1.9% decrease from $1.42 billion in 2019. Out of 3,091 counties and county-level equivalents for which figures were available in 2020, Door County had the 1,297th largest economy. In 2019, the county's economy ranked 1,306th out of 3,090 counties.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/> The per-capita GDP in 2020 was $46,370.<ref name="2020CensusInteractive">{{cite web |title = 2020 Population and Housing State Data |url = https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/2020-population-and-housing-state-data.html |publisher = United States Census Bureau |access-date = August 28, 2021 |url-status = |archive-url = |archive-date = }}</ref><ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

The largest out of fifteen different industry sector categories by total GDP generated was finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing at $299 million, which accounted for 21.4% of the overall GDP. This sector was divided into two subsectors. Real estate and rental and leasing accounted for 18.7% of the county's GDP at $260 million, while finance and insurance accounted for 2.8% of the county's GDP at $38 million. The real estate and rental and leasing subsector declined 4.8 percent from 2019 to 2020, while manufacturing increased 0.2% to $274 million. Together, this resulted in manufacturing outpacing and overtaking real estate and rental and leasing in 2020 to become the county's leading individual subsector that year at 19.7% of the county's overall GDP.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

Door County was one of 53 Wisconsin counties where manufacturing was a larger industry than real estate and rental and leasing. In 18 of Wisconsin's 72 counties, real estate and rental and leasing was larger than manufacturing. In [[Waushara County, Wisconsin|Waushara County]], figures for manufacturing were redacted in 2020 and it is not possible to determine which subsector was larger.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

In 2001, the earliest year for which figures were compiled by the [[Bureau of Economic Analysis]], GDP from real estate and rental and leasing in the county was $186 million in [[chained dollars|chained 2012 dollars]]. By 2020, the subsector grew to $210 million in chained 2012 dollars, for an increase of 12.9% over 19 years and an average of 0.68% growth each year.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020>[https://apps.bea.gov/regional/zip/CAGDP9.zip CAGDP9: Real GDP in Chained Dollars by County and MSA], 2001–2020, Regional Economic Accounts, 2020, ''Bureau of Economic Analysis''</ref> Using [[Real versus nominal value (economics)|non-inflation-adjusted]] dollars, the sector gained 69.0% over the 19 years from 2001 to 2020, for an average annual gain of 3.6%.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020>[https://apps.bea.gov/regional/zip/CAGDP2.zip CAGDP2: GDP in Current Dollars by County and MSA], Regional Economic Accounts, 2020, ''Bureau of Economic Analysis''</ref>

{| class="wikitable sortable floatleft" style="text-align:left; border:0px solid #C4C3D0;"
|-style="background-color:#C4C3D0; text-align:center"
|colspan=4|2020 Door County GDP by category in non-inflation adjusted 2020 dollars<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>
|-
|colspan=4 align=left|{{box|background=|align=left|border size=0px|radius=|text align=center|{{ Graph:Chart
| type = pie
| width = 272
| height = 280
| y1   = 274417000,260403000,156507000,123687000,120249000,113332000,81043000,50250000,44333000,38613000,38174000,26694000,23692000,21249000,11819000,5120000,4234000,350000
| yAxisFormat = 
| xAxisAngle = -40
| x = Manufacturing, Real estate and rental and leasing, Government and government enterprises, Retail trade, Arts; entertainment; recreation; accommodation; and food services, Health care and social assistance, Construction, Professional; scientific; and technical services and management of companies and enterprises, Other services (except government and government enterprises), Finance and insurance, Agriculture; forestry; fishing and hunting, Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services, Information, Wholesale trade, Transportation and warehousing, Utilities, Educational services, Mining; quarrying; and oil and gas extraction
| colors=#B284BE,#563C5C,#EE82EE,#645394,#C9A0DC,#32174D,#AA98A9,#8806CE,#9678B6,#6F00FF,#880085,#DE6FA1,#9370DB,#9F00C5,#8A496B,#330099,#D8BFD8,#FF00FF
}}
|caption=
|link=
}}
{{stack begin | float=left | clear=false}}
{{box|background=|align=left|border size=0px|radius=|text align=center|{{Legend inline|#B284BE|Manufacturing, $274 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#563C5C|Real estate and rental and leasing, $260 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#EE82EE|Government and government enterprises, $157 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#645394|Retail trade, $124 million}}{{spaces|12|en}}<br>{{Legend inline|#C9A0DC|Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation,<br>and food services, $120 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#32174D|Health care and social assistance, $113 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#AA98A9|Construction, $81.0 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#8806CE|Professional, scientific, and technical services<br>and management of companies and enterprises, $50.3 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#9678B6|Other services (except government and government enterprises), $44.3 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#6F00FF|Finance and insurance, $38.6 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#880085|Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting, $38.2 million}}{{spaces|7|en}}<br>{{Legend inline|#DE6FA1|Administrative and support and waste management<br>and remediation services, $26.7 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#9370DB|Information, $23.7 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#9F00C5|Wholesale trade, $21.2 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#8A496B|Transportation and warehousing, $11.8 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#330099|Utilities, $5.12 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#D8BFD8|Educational services, $4.23 million}}<br>{{Legend inline|#FF00FF|Mining and quarrying, $0.350 million}}
}}
{{stack end}}
|- style="background:#eee;"
|}
{{clear}}

=== Taxable sales ===
From 2020 [[Wisconsin Department of Revenue]] figures, the five largest annual sources of taxable sales were motor vehicle and parts dealers, food services and drinking places, accommodation, nonstore retailers, and building material and garden equipment and supplies dealers. Together they together accounted for 47.3% of all taxable sales in the county.<ref name=DORmonthlysales/>

From 2019 to 2020 Department of Revenue figures, the total value of all taxable rental and leasing services in the county increased 18.8% in non-inflation adjusted, current-year dollars, while the total value of all taxable real estate sold in the county decreased 20.0% during the same time period. Only three areas had a greater percent decrease than real estate that year. Taxable telecommunications sales decreased 24.7%, but this was a result of a legal change which eliminated certain taxes. Taxable computer and electronic product manufacturing sales decreased by 23.8% and taxable machinery manufacturing sales decreased by 22.8%. The largest increases in taxable sales was seen in transportation equipment manufacturing, which gained 203.7%, professional, scientific, and technical services, which gained 90.0%, and nonstore retailers, which gained 80.6%.<ref name=DORmonthlysales>[https://public.tableau.com/shared/989WSSH3B?:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link Monthly Taxable Sales Reported on Sales/Use Tax Returns by County], ''Wisconsin Department of Revenue'', [https://web.archive.org/web/20210912231319if_/https://public.tableau.com/vizql/w/CountyTaxableSalesComparison/v/Story/tempfile/sessions/6438FDDFCBFD45E9950D0A93C0F96DDD-0:0/?key=581441861&keepfile=yes&attachment=yes flat table for Door County] (archived September 12, 2021)</ref>

===Real estate===
==== Housing cost and supply ====
[[File:Architect's Cottage exterior.jpg|thumb|A cottage along Lake Michigan]]

Between 2000 and 2017, [[Real estate appraisal|prices]] for houses in Door County rose only 1.3% annually, less than the U.S. average of 2.5%.<ref>[https://www.wpr.org/sites/default/files/door_county_housing_study_1-25-2019_final.pdf Door County Housing Analysis] from the Door County Economic Development Corporation, January 25, 2019</ref> The price of houses in the county increased 178% from January 1986 to January 2020.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ATNHPIUS55029A All-Transactions House Price Index for Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> compared to a 235% increase for the state as a whole.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvQM All-Transactions House Price Index for Wisconsin], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> Median home price in the county for 2021 was $315,000, with the highest sale volume since at least the 1970s.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/median-home-price-booms/ Median Home Price Booms] by Bob Dolan, ''Peninsula Pulse'', January 26, 2022</ref>

According to the 2000 census, 6,201 housing units (30.7%) in the county were built before 1950, 6,580 units (33.6%) were built between 1950 and 1979, and 6,806 units (35.7%) were built between 1980 and 2000, for a total of 19,587 housing units.<ref>[https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/DataExplorer/#/ Data Explorer], ''National Center for Environmental Health, National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network'', Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and [https://web.archive.org/web/20220120165258/https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/phc-3-51.pdf Wisconsin: 2000 Population and Housing Unit Counts], Table 2. Population and Housing Units: 1960 to 2000, page 2 (page 44 of the pdf), ''US Census Bureau'', Issued August 2003 (Archived January 20, 2022)</ref> 
From 2000 through January 1, 2020, 5,561 new private housing structures have been authorized by building permits. Building permits for new housing structures peaked in 1999 with 527 permits issued and have since declined, with 139 permits issued in 2020.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvN8 New Private Housing Structures Authorized by Building Permits for Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref>  In 2006, nonresidents paid about 60% of the property taxes in the northern half of the county.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20190922013738/https://www.wisconsinacademy.org/files/FOFbook_web.pdf The Future of Farming and Rural Life in Wisconsin: Findings, Recommendations, Steps to a Healthy Future] by the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, p. 100</ref> According to the 2020 census, there were 23,738 housing units in the county. Of these, 13,989 (58.9%) were occupied and 9,749 (41.1%) were vacant.<ref>[https://data.census.gov/cedsci/vizwidget?g=0500000US55029&infoSection=Housing%20Units&type=chart&chartType=chart Housing Occupancy in Door County, Wisconsin], ''US Census Bureau'', accessed September 26, 2021</ref> According to 2019 ACS five-year estimates, 46.9% of the housing units in the county were vacant, compared to 12.4% for the state as a whole.<ref>[https://data.census.gov/cedsci/vizwidget?g=0500000US55029&infoSection=Vacancy&type=chart&chartType=chart Vacancy Rate in Door County, Wisconsin] and [https://data.census.gov/cedsci/vizwidget?g=0400000US55&infoSection=Vacancy&type=chart&chartType=chart Vacancy Rate in Wisconsin], ''US Census Bureau'', accessed September 26, 2021</ref> In 1960 there were 4,715 cottages or second homes in the county.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094247897&view=1up&seq=252 The Green Bay Watershed: Past/Present/Future] by Gerard Bertrand, Jean Lang, and John Ross, Technical Report #229, ''University of Wisconsin Sea Grant College Program'' January 1976, Chapter 10: Recreation, Section 1: Recreation Areas of Green Bay, page 232</ref>

As residential and commercial land tends to require more in government services than the property taxes they generate, these zones are subsidized by taxes on industrial, agricultural, and open lands. Although these zones may not necessarily have a high valuation, they generally require few government services and as a result in a net profit for the county.<ref name=costcommunity/> The demand for real estate in the county increased property prices, which in turn raised property assessments. Development pressure made some feel compelled to subdivide and sell their land, and the rising cost of taxes caused some to develop their land against their wishes.<ref>"A Paradigm Case in
Land Use Ethics: Door County, Wisconsin" by Robert Florence, Door County Planner, in [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED093646.pdf Ethics for Environment: Three Religious Strategies]. Proceedings of a National Conference (University of Wisconsin&mdash;Green Bay, June 11–13, 1973), edited by Dave Steffenson, Walter J. Herrscher, and Robert S. Cook, page 75, page 81 of the pdf</ref> One seller was quoted in 1986 with this reflection: "I really don't have much choice but to sell it – I just can't keep up with it any more. If I don't sell it, I'm afraid my land valuation is going to go so high that I'll be taxed off of it anyhow."<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951t002328748&view=1up&seq=169&skin=2021 "We don't own this land"] by Marty Gureski, in Conversations on Door County by Dave Crehore, ''Wisconsin Natural Resources'', May–June 1986, Volume 10, Number 3, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, page 33</ref> From 2006 to 2021, the increase in equalized value in real-dollar amounts was 85.7% for manufacturing, 45.8% for undeveloped land, 25% for productive forest, 10.59% for agricultural, and 19.2% for agricultural forest.<ref name=equalized>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/EqualizedValues/Dashboard1 Equalized Values], ''WI DOR - Division of Research and Policy'', public.tableau.com, accessed September 19, 2021</ref>

===== Shoreline development =====
[[File:Kingdom So Delicious advertisement Door County Advocate 1970.tif|thumb|A 1970 advertisement from the ''Door County Advocate'' referencing a [[Door Peninsula#Potawatomi and Menominee|comment made by the French explorer Pierre-Esprit Radisson in 1665]].]]

As of 2011, 7,889 residential buildings were located in within a {{convert|1/4|mi|m|abbr=off|sp=us|spell=in}} of the shore,<ref name=2016hazard/> some which form strip developments enclosing scenic areas.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&dq=%22Development+beyond+the+villages+should%22&pg=PA158 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 159</ref> Out of {{convert|268|mi|km}} miles of county shoreline along Lake Michigan and Green Bay surveyed in 2012, {{convert|164.4|mi|km}} was developed for low-density residential use, {{convert|27.4|mi|km}} for medium-density residential use, {{convert|16.9|mi|km}} for commercial use, and {{convert|2.5|mi|km}} for high-density residential use. {{convert|11.3|mi|km}} was undeveloped forest and {{convert|45.7|mi|km}} was located in parks. Out of the entire area surveyed, {{convert|42.9|mi|km}} of the shore was replaced with artificial surfaces and {{convert|31.8|mi|km}} was surrounded by manicured lawns.<ref name=STARR>{{cite book |chapter-url  =http://greatlakescoast.org/pubs/DiscoveryReports/Michigan/Final/Appendix_F_Kewaunee_Door_Brown_County_WI.pdf |chapter = Appendix F, Kewaunee, Door, and Brown County, Section I.IV.i.7, Shoreline Information |title = Discovery Report |author = STARR Partners |pages = shoreline: pages 18–19, (pages 26–27 of the pdf), flood insurance: page 30 (page 38 of the pdf) |date = February 2013 |publisher = Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V }}</ref> By 2012, {{convert|211.2|mi|km}}, or 78.7% of the {{convert|268|mi|km}} of total shoreline surveyed was developed,<ref name=STARR/> an increase from 1964 when only {{convert|66.7|mi|km}} had been developed.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&pg=PA63 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 63</ref>

Although the [[United States Army Corps of Engineers|Army Corps of Engineers]] considered most of Green Bay shore<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094247897&view=1up&seq=135 The Green Bay Watershed: Past/Present/Future] by Gerard Bertrand, Jean Lang, and John Ross, Technical Report #229, ''University of Wisconsin Sea Grant College Program'' January 1976, Chapter 5: Erosion and Flooding, Section 1: Fluctuating Water Levels, Part B, Damage from High Water, Figure 33. Shoreline Areas Subject to Flooding and Erosion, page 115</ref> and the entire Lake Michigan shore from Baileys Harbor northwards to be non-erodable in 1971,<ref name=coeshorelinestudy>[https://books.google.com/books?id=alvuAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA39 National Shoreline Study: Great Lakes Region Inventory Report] by the United States Army Corps of Engineers North Central Division, August 1971, Chapter 4: The State of Section 2: The State of Wisconsin, Lake Michigan Northwest Planning Subarea 2.1, Figure 11. Shorelands of the Great Lakes, Marinette, Oconto, Brown, Kewaunee, Door Counties, page 39</ref> shoreline developments may still be vulnerable to erosion<ref name=2016hazard>[http://map.co.door.wi.us/Agendas-minutes/CountyBoard/Misc/2016/2016-06%20Res%202016-45%20DC%20Hazard%20Mitigation%20Plan%20-%20FINAL%20PLAN%20ATTACHMENT.pdf Door County Hazard Mitigation Plan] by the Door County Planning Department, June 28, 2016, Chapter 2: Risk Assessment, p. 22 (erosion) and p. 43 (spills)</ref> and destruction from [[ice shove]]s.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/an-icy-home-invasion/ Ice Shove Plows into Home in Southern Door County] by Jim Lundstrom, April 6, 2018, ''Door County Pulse'' and [https://tamug-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/1969.3/29121/Coastal%20Hazards%20Planning%20Guide_201404040910571863.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y Guide to Hazard Mitigation Planning for Wisconsin Coastal Communities] by the Bay–Lake Regional Planning Commission, June 2007, Section on Coastal Shove Ice and Jams, pp. 36–37 (pp. 43–44 of the pdf)</ref> [[Seiche]]s on Green Bay cycle about every 11 hours but are highly variable and are capable of reversing the flow of water from rivers.<ref name=2013seagrant>[https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/State-of-the-Bay-Report-2013.pdf State of the Bay Report 2013] by Theresa Qualls, H.J. (Bud) Harris, and Victoria Harris; The State of the Bay: The Condition of the Bay of Green Bay/Lake Michigan 2013, page 63</ref>

The lay of the land reduces the area of floodplains on the west side of the county north of the canal. The city of Sturgeon Bay, the eastern side of the town of Sevastopol, and the towns of Gardner, Nasewaupee, Sturgeon Bay, Forestville, Jacksonport, and Baileys Harbor consist of floodplain to a greater degree than the rest of the county.<ref>[https://dhsgis.wi.gov/dhs/raft/ Wisconsin Risk Assessment Flood Tool] by the Climate and Health Program, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, "Analysis Layers" and "Percent of Land Area within Floodplain" selections</ref> From 1996 to 2010 an additional {{convert|171|acre}} of land within [[Federal Emergency Management Agency|FEMA]] designated floodplains was developed.<ref>[https://coast.noaa.gov/snapshots/#/process?action=flood&state=55&county=029&bounds=-88.13606452923293,44.275207321488814,-86.40542089295911,45.82854748146619 Flood Exposure Snapshot: Door County, Wisconsin], Coastal County Snapshots, National Ocean Service</ref> From the spring of 1951 through April 1952, high water damage to existing protective structures in Sturgeon Bay was estimated at $151,000 and damage to other improvements on shore properties and in the water was estimated at $94,000. The value of land lost to erosion was estimated at $21,300 and damage to crops or improvements due to flooding was estimated at $27,000. Altogether this totaled $293,300 in damages within Sturgeon Bay; high water damages in the rest of the county were estimated at $100,000, with $393,300 in total estimated damages throughout the county. The total value of improvements vulnerable to future high water incidents was estimated at $1,465,700.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000731&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=additional%20100,000%20throughout%20the%20county%20survey%20results%20reveal&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=-599616000000&query2_max=-505008000000 Water Damage Estimated at $293,300 here] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211021224742/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000731&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=additional%20100,000%20throughout%20the%20county%20survey%20results%20reveal&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=-599616000000&query2_max=-505008000000 |date=2021-10-21 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 91 Issue 13, April 1, 1952, page 1</ref> Major flooding occurred in 1973; high lake levels and storm damage cost an estimated $24 million.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000297&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=heavy%20water%20damage%20in%20shoreline%20areas&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=157680000000 Heavy Water Damage in Shoreline Areas] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020213502/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000297&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=heavy%20water%20damage%20in%20shoreline%20areas&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=157680000000 |date=2021-10-20 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 112, Number 7, April 10, 1973 and Door County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-2026, in [https://www.co.door.wi.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10122021-1046 Public Safety Committee Agenda for October 12, 2021], page 37 of the report, page 58 of the pdf and the agenda packet</ref> Between 1978 and July 2012 there were 238 flood insurance policies issued within the county. During these years there were 34 [[National Flood Insurance Program]] claims totaling of $180,031.<ref name=STARR/> A flash flood in Ephraim in 2017 caused $75,000 in damage and four flooding incidents on the lakeshore from 2019 to 2020 caused $80,000 in damage.<ref>Door County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022-2026, in [https://www.co.door.wi.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10122021-1046 Public Safety Committee Agenda for October 12, 2021], pages 8–9 of the report, pages 29–30 of the pdf and the agenda packet</ref>

According to the county Land Use Services director, shoreline parcels are frequently listed for sale at almost twice of their tax assessed value.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/baileys-harbor-residents-say-yes-to-buying-waterfront-property/  Baileys Harbor Residents Say Yes to Buying Waterfront Property], by Craig Sterrett, ''Peninsula Pulse'', April 21, 2021</ref> Shoreline parcels tend to be the most highly valued real estate and are typically owned by non-Wisconsin residents unless they are public property.<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Hart25/publication/267704477_WHO_OWNS_THE_COAST_APPLICATIONS_OF_AN_INTEGRATED_DIGITAL_PARCEL_MAP_FOR_THE_LAKE_MICHIGAN_COAST_OF_WISCONSIN/links/566eecd008ae4bef406100c0/WHO-OWNS-THE-COAST-APPLICATIONS-OF-AN-INTEGRATED-DIGITAL-PARCEL-MAP-FOR-THE-LAKE-MICHIGAN-COAST-OF-WISCONSIN.pdf  Who owns the coast? Applications of an integrated digital parcel map for the Lake Michigan coast of Wisconsin], by David Hart and Alberto Vargas, Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Coastal GeoTools Conference Charleston, SC, January 8–11, 2001, pp. 12–13</ref>

In 1964, the Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program stated an opinion in the county's development plan against strip development of the shoreline, and instead advocated cluster development:<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&q=%22By%20dividing%20up%20all%20121%20miles%20of%20presently%20undeveloped%22 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, pages 102–103</ref>

<blockquote>By dividing up all 121 miles of presently undeveloped shoreline in the county into 150-foot lots, about 4,200 cottage sites could be provided. The public in this case would be limited to the already overcrowded shoreline of existing parks: and with increasing visitor pressure, these areas would in time become outdoor slums.

The adverse effects on general tourism in the county would be severe; transient visitors who came to sightsee, or enjoy the parks and scenery, and who might stay a night or two in the county (and spend considerable money in total), would have increasingly less reason to visit Door County.</blockquote>

and also:<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&q=%22One%20development%20possibility%22 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 242</ref>

<blockquote>One development possibility is to sliver the remaining shoreline into private lots. This would severely limit public use of the shores and would make the interior area virtually land locked&mdash;seriously impairing its development potential. If in addition, the quality of the shoreline were destroyed (trees cut, hills leveled, ground bulldozed, beaches filled) to make development easier, the desirability of much of the area would be lost... a second possibility...is to reserve certain outstanding resource areas as public lands and to encourage clustering of private development along shorelines near existing communities and municipal services and in accordance with good development standards.</blockquote>

In August 1971, the Army Corps of Engineers completed a shoreline use survey:<ref name=coeshorelinestudy/>
[[File:1971 shoreland uses in Marinette, Oconto, Brown, Kewaunee, and Door counties.png|thumb|left|upright=3.0| {{box|background=|align=center|border size=0px|radius=|text align=center|'''Shoreline uses, published August 1971'''<br>{{Legend inline|#f5602f|Commercial, industrial, residential, and public buildings}}<br>{{Legend inline|#367d3e|Recreational and urban open space}}<br>{{Legend inline|#f6d42b|Agricultural and undeveloped}}<br>{{Legend inline|#3f2c62|Forest}}}}]]
{{clear}}
In 1973, County Planner Robert Florence gave a response to a question about to cluster developments:<ref>"A Paradigm Case in Land Use Ethics: Door County, Wisconsin" by Robert Florence, Door County Planner, in [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED093646.pdf Ethics for Environment: Three Religious Strategies]. Proceedings of a National Conference (University of Wisconsin&mdash;Green Bay, June 11–13, 1973), edited by Dave Steffenson, Walter J. Herrscher, and Robert S. Cook, page 82, page 88 of the pdf</ref>

<blockquote>I continually advocate that approach. No one listens to me... The county has a general development plan, but it's pretty old. It's outdated. It was good for its time, I suppose. I find criticism with it in that it was primarily an inventory and not really a plan. But it's old and it hasn't been updated. It becomes difficult since it is so old to point to it with any authority and say: "Look. This is a general development plan which the county board adopted back in 19 such-and-such. This outlines the direction that we're going to go. We don't have the kind of document that we can point to with authority and say, "No, Mr. So and So. Your development doesn't fit the scheme."</blockquote>

By 1976, almost all desirable shoreline properties in the county had been subdivided, particularly those with sandy beaches, but at the time not all of the new lots had been sold off or built up.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094246774&view=1up&seq=25&skin=2021 Large Recreational Home Developments in Wisconsin's Coastal Zone] by Charles Prentice, ''Wisconsin Coastal Management'' November 1976, page 17</ref> Charles Prentice for the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program noted:<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094246774&view=1up&seq=11&skin=2021 Large Recreational Home Developments in Wisconsin's Coastal Zone] by Charles Prentice, ''Wisconsin Coastal Management'' November 1976, page 3</ref>

<blockquote>Door County and other unique recreational areas could become overdeveloped and unrecreational. To avoid this, at some point in the process, there is a need for public decisions and the degree to which particular areas should be developed and the degree to which they should remain rural and leisurely in character. Unless these decisions are made, the coastal and other recreational areas will be developed without consideration of important factors which do not receive weight in a free market decision-making process. If this is the case, it is highly likely that many of the results will be looked upon as quite unfortunate.</blockquote>

====Effects of high property values====
In 2017 the county had the second highest property values per capita in the state.<ref name=2018green>[https://www.forward-analytics.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2018_County_Fact_Book.pdf The Green Book: A book of county facts], Forward Analytics, Wisconsin Counties Association, 2019, property values: p. 47 (p. 53 of the pdf); tax burden: p. 29 (p. 35 of the pdf); property tax rate: p. 31 (p. 37 of the pdf); sales tax: p. 33 (p. 39 of the pdf); state financial assistance: p. 27 (p. 33 of the pdf); county spending: p. 21 (p. 27 of the pdf); personal income: p. 39 (p. 45 of the pdf); poverty level: p. 45 (p. 51 of the pdf); educated: p. 15, (p. 19 of the pdf)</ref> Property values are high because of the effects of tourism. In 1970, a study using 1968 data found that tourism boosts property tax revenues in two ways. One way is through direct tax payments made by seasonal residents and the other way is through the cumulative impacts of tourism which raise the assessed property values for other properties. For every dollar received in the county in tax from seasonal residents an additional $5.30 was received due to the impact of tourism on property assessments for other properties. Combined, this meant that local governments received 17% more property tax revenue than they would have without tourism.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094248184&view=1up&seq=91&skin=2021 Recreation and the Local Economy, An Input-Output Model of a Recreation-Oriented Economy] by William A. Strang. Bureau of Business Research and Service, Sea Grant Technical Report #4, UW-Wisconsin Madison Graduate School of Business Administration, October 1970 pages 38–39</ref>

The high property values combined with low enrollment serve to punish local school districts in the state funding formula.<ref name= Referendum/> Since 1959, the [[Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction]] has wanted more school consolidation in Door County in order to achieve their statewide goal of having every district supported by a large tax base and offering a sufficiently comprehensive high school program. However, only the Southern Door School District complied with the DPI's expectations by consolidating into a single site in 1962.<ref>Chapter on "[https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1806583 The Fight for Funding]" in ''The Fight for Local Control: Schools, Suburbs, and American Democracy'' by Campbell F. Scribner, Cornell University Press, 2016, pages 109–112 (pages 17–20 of the pdf)</ref> On June 17, 1976, the county board passed an ordinance forbidding school districts in the county from complying with state law regarding negative school aid, which required wealthier school districts to fund less wealthy districts.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000631&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20money&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 Ordinance would hold negative aid money in escrow] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022040528/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000631&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20money&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 |date=2021-10-22 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Number 27, June 22, 1976, page 1</ref> Three of the county's five school districts were affected by the law.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000630&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20delay%20veto%20sustained&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 Negative aid delay veto sustained] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022040529/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000630&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20delay%20veto%20sustained&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 |date=2021-10-22 }} by Keta Steebs, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Number 26, June 17, 1976, page 1</ref> The state argued that districts with tiny [[:wikt:millage#Noun|mill]] rates needed to pay their fair share to the state and that negative aid would provide equal education to children. The opposing side cited local control of schools, the need for taxing entities to take responsibility for raising taxes, and the rights of school districts to provide more than a minimum education as reasons against negative state aid.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000614&pg_seq=12&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20briefs%20filed%20with%20high%20court&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 Negative aid briefs filed with high court] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022040526/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000614&pg_seq=12&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aid%20briefs%20filed%20with%20high%20court&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 |date=2021-10-22 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Issue 10, April 22, 1976, page 12</ref> Following a November 30, 1976 decision by the [[Wisconsin Supreme Court]] that negative school aid was unconstitutional,<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000677&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aids%20ruledunconstitutional&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 Negative School Aids Ruled Unconstitutional] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022040525/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000677&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=negative%20aids%20ruledunconstitutional&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=94694400000&query2_max=220838400000 |date=2021-10-22 }} by Keta Steebs, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Issue 73, November 30, 1976, page 1</ref> the Washington Island School District declared a holiday to celebrate.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000686&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=unconstitutionality%20of%20negative%20school%20aids%20rates%20as%20year's%20top%20story&query1_field=CONTENTOn Unconstitutionality of negative school aids rates as year's top story] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022040530/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc%2Fwsbd0000%2F20170120%2F00000686&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=unconstitutionality%20of%20negative%20school%20aids%20rates%20as%20year%27s%20top%20story&query1_field=CONTENTOn |date=2021-10-22 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Issue 82, December 30, 1976, page 1</ref> As a result of the state funding formula, the county's school districts often have [[Initiatives and referendums in the United States|referendums]] for additional property tax funding.<ref name= Referendum>[https://doorcountypulse.com/school-referendum-round-up/ School Referendum Round-Up], by Door County Pulse, March 28, 2013</ref>

For forested lands, high property values drive up [[Property tax in the United States#Levy of tax|property tax levies]], which in turn encourages landowners to enroll their land in the Managed Forest [[Private landowner assistance program|Program]] to reduce their taxes.<ref>[https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/jrnl/2006/ne_2006_bowe_001.pdf Small-Diameter Timber Utilization in Wisconsin: A Case Study of Four Counties] by Scott A. Bowe and Matthew S. Bumgardner, ''NJAF 23''(4) 2006, p. 253</ref>

====Effects of protected areas on nearby development====
A 2012 report found that Door County's preserved open spaces reduced the likelihood that nearby land would be subdivided, but if it was subdivided, areas near the open space were divided into more parcels than those further away. It did not appear to affect agriculture-related development.<ref>[https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124599/files/Zipp%20AAAE%202012%20ecology%20paper.pdf The effects of open-space conservation on ecosystems: An application of a joint ecological-economic model] by Katherine Y. Zipp, presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's 2012 AAEA Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, August 12–14, 2012 [https://web.archive.org/web/20200114071548/https://tind-customer-agecon.s3.amazonaws.com/a6b1b4aa-5feb-494d-ab1a-b8550a3d0255?response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Zipp%2520AAAE%25202012%2520ecology%2520paper.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAXL7W7Q3XHXDVDQYS&Expires=1578989667&Signature=Nshkb3WItugRwcV3yL9UDkOSZVA%3D Archived], January 14, 2020</ref>

=== Tourism ===
====Comparison of two sub-sectors====
[[File:Bills at Nelsen's Hall on Washington Island, Door County, Wisconsin.jpg|thumb|Bills pinned up at Nelsen's Hall on [[Washington Island (Wisconsin)|Washington Island]]]]
In 2020, the arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services sector contributed $120 million to the county's GDP in non-inflation adjusted 2020 dollars.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

Using inflation-adjusted chained 2012 dollars, the sector shrank 13.8% over the 19 years from 2001 to 2020, with an average contraction of 0.72% per year.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020/> In non-inflation adjusted current-year dollars, the sector grew 51.1% over the 19 years from 2001 to 2020, with an average growth of 2.7% per year.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

The Bureau of Economic Analysis subdivides the arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services sector into two smaller sub-sectors. The arts, entertainment, and recreation subsector accounted for 15.1% of the total combined sector at $18 million in 2020 dollars. The other sub-sector was accommodation and food services, which in 2020 accounted for 84.9% of the total combined sector at $102 million in 2020 dollars.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/> The definition used for food services only includes "meals, snacks, and beverages for immediate consumption" rather than food sold at groceries, farm stands, and farmers' markets.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020/>

In inflation-adjusted chained 2012 dollars, arts, entertainment, and recreation grew 51% over the six years from 2001 to 2007 when it peaked at the highest value recorded by the BEA. From 2007 to 2020 the sector contracted 34% over 13 years, with 2020 having the lowest value recorded by the BEA. Altogether from 2001 to 2020 the sector grew 0.29% over the 19-year period, for an average of 0.015% growth per year in inflation-adjusted chained 2012 dollars.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020/> In non-inflation adjusted current-year dollars, the sub-sector grew 64% over the 19-year period, for an average of 3.4% growth per year.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

In inflation-adjusted chained 2012 dollars, accommodation and food services grew 6.6% over the three years from 2001 to when it peaked in 2004 at the highest value recorded by the BEA. From the three years from 2004 through 2007 it contracted 13%. Over the four years from 2007 to 2011 it grew 6.8% before contracting 5.3% over the two years from 2011 to 2013. From 2013 to 2019 it grew 13.3% over the six years. Over one year from 2019 to 2020 it contracted 21% Altogether from 2001 to 2020 the sector shrank 16% over the 19-year period, for an average contraction of 0.85% per year in inflation adjusted chained 2012 dollars.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020/> In non-inflation adjusted current-year dollars, the sub-sector grew 49% over the 19-year period, for an average of 2.6% growth per year.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

====Sales and spending====
[[File:Entrance to Door Shakespeare outdoor theater - Bjorklunden Baileys Harbor Wisconsin.jpg|thumb|Playbill near the entrance of an outdoor theater in Baileys Harbor listing ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]'' and {{nowrap|''[[The Tempest]]''}} as the shows for the 2015 acting season]]

Taxable sales for the amusement, gambling, and recreation industry grew 1.78% in non-inflation adjusted, current year dollars from 2019 to 2020, with both years seeing the most sales in July.<ref name=DORmonthlysales/>

In 2020, 3.1% of all traveler expenditures in the state occurred in Door County.<ref>[http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202020-%20with%20DDC%20portion(1).pdf 2020 Annual Meeting Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210829215915/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202020-%20with%20DDC%20portion%281%29.pdf |date=2021-08-29 }}, ''Door County Tourism Zone'', July 15, 2021, "Primary Results" table, page 23</ref>

In 2015, Door County arts and cultural organizations spent $9.7 million, of which 70.9% was spent locally, in addition to $15.0 million spent by attendees. An estimated 1,582 volunteers for arts and cultural organizations averaged 35.7 hours each. In 2015, 194,424 people attended arts and cultural events in the county, 78.0% of them non-residents. In 2016, the average arts event attendee from the county spent $28.96, while the average nonresident spent $90.53. In 2016, 50.6% of non-residents said the arts event was the primary reason they made the trip to the county. 66.0% of county resident attendees in 2016 were 65 or older, while 48.6% of non-resident attendees were 65 or older.<ref>[https://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/aep5/PDF_Files/NationalFindings_StatisticalReport.pdf Arts and Economic Prosperity 5, National Statistical Report] by Americans for the Arts, pp. B–25, B–73, B–189, B–205, B–333, B–365, B–381, B–413, B–445 (pp. 57, 105, 221, 237, 365, 397, 413, 445, and 477 of the pdf)</ref>

Survey responses from arts and cultural organizations in the county from March 13, 2020, to February 15, 2021, estimated that the organizations would lose $10,035,156 due to the impacts of coronavirus, with a median loss of $146,250 per organization. There were forty organizations recorded as existing in the county.<ref>[https://www.americansforthearts.org/by-topic/disaster-preparedness/the-economic-impact-of-coronavirus-on-the-arts-and-culture-sector The Economic Impact of Coronavirus on the Arts and Culture Sector] by Americans for the Arts</ref>

==== Tourist-oriented businesses ====
In 2016, 36.1% of all employees in the county worked at establishments with less than twenty employees, the eighth-most in the state. 82.6% of establishments had less than twenty employees, the fourth-highest percentage in the state.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/BusinessSizebyCounty/Story1 Business Size by County], ''WI DOR - Division of Research and Policy'', ''public.tableau.com'', accessed September 19, 2021</ref> In 2003, researchers found that compared to other Wisconsin counties, Door County had a middling amount of inland water acreage, forestland, county-owned acreage, and [[Rail trail#United States|rail trail]] mileage and a high number of golf courses, amusement businesses,{{efn|such as go-kart tracks, water parks, and mini-golf}} and [[Campsite#Campgrounds|campgrounds]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20190302172244/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9f65/5760fa12dca9766f5b9e98331d7a3bdc209b.pdf Standardizing county-level recreation supply components: A precursor to the Wisconsin SCORP, 2005] Working Paper 03-2 November 2003 by Peter Herreid, Dave Marcouiller, and Jeff Prey</ref> Despite the high number of campgrounds the Wisconsin DNR in 2006 reported that "demand for camping far exceeds current supply."<ref>Wisconsin Land Legacy Report, [https://web.archive.org/web/20100228151140/http://www.dnr.wi.gov/master_planning/land_legacy/documents/nlakemich.pdf Northern Lake Michigan Coastal ecological landscape], subsection "Recreation Uses and Opportunities", page 119 (page 2 of the pdf), 2006, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources</ref>

In 1970, a study analyzed 1968 data and found that tourist-oriented businesses in the county tend to earn relatively little due to the [[Multiplier (economics)|multiplier effect]] from other sectors in the county; certain other sectors were more dependent on one another while tourist-oriented businesses were more dependent on tourists.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094248184&view=1up&seq=95&skin=2021 Recreation and the Local Economy, An Input-Output Model of a Recreation-Oriented Economy] by William A. Strang. Bureau of Business Research and Service, Sea Grant Technical Report #4, UW-Wisconsin Madison Graduate School of Business Administration, October 1970 page 40</ref>

====Comparison of tourism and manufacturing employment====
[[File:Sturgeon Bay Tower 4 - panoramio.jpg|thumb|Sturgeon Bay Industrial Park]]
Manufacturing employment in the county is more stable and less seasonal than tourist employment.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112064645267&view=1up&seq=24&skin=2021 Economic base survey of Sturgeon Bay, Wis.] by the Bureau of Community Development, University of Wisconsin Extension Division, November 1956, page 6</ref> 22.0% of the county's 13,728 employed workers{{efn|Excluding [[unreported employment|unreported workers]]}} in 2018 served in the leisure and hospitality sector, more than any other sector. However, because leisure and hospitality jobs tend not to pay very well, they only earned 12.9% of all wages earned in the county. In contrast, manufacturing employees received 24.5% of the wages paid in 2018, even though they only made up 17.0% of the workforce. This is despite the average annual wage for leisure and hospitality workers being 109.3% of the state average wage for leisure and hospitality in 2018. In contrast, workers employed in manufacturing received 86.7% of the state average wage for manufacturing. Wages in Door County trailed state averages for every sector except leisure and hospitality.<ref>[https://jobcenterofwisconsin.com/wisconomy/wits_info/downloads/CP/door_profile.pdf 2019 Workforce profile: Door County] by Ryan Long, Bay Area Regional Economist for the State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, 2019, p. 7, section "Industry Employment and Wages, 2018 Employment and Wage Distribution by Industry, Door County"</ref>

From 2018 to 2019, leisure and hospitability grew 0.1% and manufacturing grew 0.2%. There were 2,683 leisure and hospitability jobs in 2020, with a gain of 2 jobs from the previous year. There were 2,298 manufacturing jobs in 2020, with a gain of 4 jobs from the previous year. From 2019 to 2020, leisure and hospitability contracted 12.7% and manufacturing contracted 4.7%. There were 2,341 leisure and hospitability jobs in 2020, with a loss of 342 jobs from the previous year. There were 2,189 manufacturing jobs in 2020, with a loss of 109 jobs from the previous year.<ref name="public.tableau.com">[https://public.tableau.com/views/EconomicScorecard-Quarterly/EconomicScorecard?:embed=y&:showVizHome=no&:host_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublic.tableau.com%2F&:tabs=no&:toolbar=yes&:animate_transition=yes&:display_static_image=no&:display_spinner=no&:display_overlay=yes&:display_count=yes&:loadOrderID=0 Economic Scorecard Quarterly, 2020 Q4], ''Headlight Data'', from an analysis of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW Covered Employment Series</ref>

=== Utilities ===
[[File:Rosiere Wind Farm - panoramio.jpg|thumb|upright=1|Rosiere Wind Farm]]

From 2001 to 2020 in inflation-adjusted dollars, the GDP of the utilities sector grew 1,193%, averaging an annual 63% increase over the 19 years, making utilities the fastest growing sector for which statistics were available. The second fastest growing sector was the information industry which grew 184% overall and averaged 9.7% growth per year.<ref name=GDPchaineddollars20012020/> In real, non-inflation adjusted dollars, the utilities industry expanded from $292,000 in 2001 to $5.12 million in 2020, an increase of 1,653% over the 19 years with an average annual increase of 87%.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/>

A wind turbine project crossing the county line on the [[Niagara Escarpment]] was completed in 1999. At the time the 30.5-acre (12.3-ha) [[Rosiere, Wisconsin#Wind farm|Rosiere Wind Farm]] was the largest in the eastern [[United States of America|United States]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120217135231/https://www.mge.com/environment/green/wind/rosiere.htm Rosière Wind Farm], ''Madison Gas and Electric'' Accessed July 8, 2009 (Archived February 17, 2012) and  {{cite news|url=http://www.wisconsinagconnection.com/story-state.php?Id=809&yr=2009|title=MGE Celebrates 10th Anniversary of State's First Wind Farm|date=July 7, 2009|publisher=Wisconsin Ag Connection|access-date=July 8, 2009}}</ref> Since the retirement of the [[Kewaunee Power Station]] in Carlton and the [[J. P. Pulliam Generating Station]] in Green Bay, power to Door County is primarily from the gas-powered plant in De Pere (Brown County) owned by SkyGen and the [[Point Beach Nuclear Plant]] in Kewaunee County.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20200113060016/https://baylakerpc.org/application/files/2815/2840/3401/Town_of_Union_Comp_Plan_May_2007.pdf Town of Union 20-Year Comprehensive Plan], May 2007, Chapter 9, page 1, page 181 of the pdf (Archived January 13, 2020)</ref> An exception to this is Chambers Island, which has no electrical grid system.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/chambers-island/ Chambers Island: An Escape to Simpler Pleasures] by Susan Glenn, Door County Living, July 1st, 2005</ref>

=== Non-metallic mining and agriculture===
{{Further|Door County, Wisconsin#Soils}}
[[File:John Backey demonstrates chisel.jpg|thumb|Mr. John Backey (right), Manual Training teacher at Sturgeon Bay High School, demonstrates the use of the chisel during the 1915–1916 school year.]]
[[File:Milking parlor at Schopf s Hilltop Dairy Sevastopol Wisconsin.jpg|thumb|A [[Dairy farming#Milking parlors|milking parlor]] in Sevastopol]]

In 2020, the smallest contributor measured to the county's GDP was the mining and quarrying industry at $0.35 million in current-year dollars.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/> From 2019 to 2020, mining added 19 new jobs for a total of 215 jobs in 2020.<ref name="public.tableau.com"/>

The prevalence of shallow soils and exposed bedrock hinders agriculture but is beneficial for mining. As of 2016, there are 16 active [[gravel pit]]s and quarries in the county. They produce sand, gravel, and [[Crushed stone|crushed rock]] for roadwork and construction use.<ref>[https://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/doing-bus/eng-consultants/cnslt-rsrces/tools/estimating/pit-locations.xlsx Pit locations spreadsheet], Wisconsin Department of Transportation, January 21, 2016</ref> Six of them are county-owned and produce 75,000 cubic yards annually.<ref name=2019highway>[https://www.co.door.wi.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_05112020-611 2019 Annual Report Door County Highway and Airport Department], pages 35 and 37</ref>

Minerals found in Door County include [[fluorite]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/fluorite/ Fluorite] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> [[gypsum]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/gypsum/ Gypsum] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> [[calcite]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/calcite/ Calcite] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> [[Dolomite (mineral)|dolomite]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/dolomite/ Dolomite] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> [[quartz]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/quartz/ Quartz] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> [[marcasite]],<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/marcasite/ Marcasite] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> and [[pyrite]].<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/pyrite/ Pyrite] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> Crystals may be found in [[vug]]s.<ref>''Tales of the wild: a year with nature'' by Roy Lukes, ([http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/43145798 entry on worldcat.org]) Egg Harbor, Wisconsin: Nature-Wise, 2000, p. 47</ref>

On three occasions in the early 1900s [[Petroleum|oil]] was found within a layer of shale in the middle and southern part of the county.<ref>At an exploratory hole drilled by the Tornado Oil & Gas Co. near Brussels, oil showings were reported at 760, 820, and 947–950 feet in depth. A water well dug for the City of Sturgeon Bay found oil at 650 to 800 feet in depth, but mostly at about 800 feet. The report states: "it was of dark color and very offensive smell. So much was obtained that he said that they feared they would get oil rather than water." This problem was solved when they drilled deeper, past the layer of shale into sandstone. The inflow of water from the deepest aquifer washed away the oil. Similar findings were reported at the well dug for Sawyer on the northern side of the Sturgeon Bay. [http://wgnhs.uwex.edu/pubs/000581/ Structure and oil possibilities in Door County, Wisconsin] by F. T. Thwaites and R. C. Lentz, Oil Indications, pp. 14–15 (pp. 16–17 of the pdf)</ref> Additionally, solid [[bitumen]] has been observed in dolomite exposed along the Lake Michigan shore.<ref>[https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/minerals/hydrocarbons/ Hydrocarbons] in ''Minerals of Wisconsin'' by William S. Cordua, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 1998</ref> Drilling near [[Maplewood, Wisconsin|Maplewood]] in 1950,<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000542&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20drilling%20set&query1_field=CONTENT Oil Drilling Set Near Maplewood] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023182534/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000542&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20drilling%20set&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Issue 27, June 26, 1950, page 1; [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000544&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20begun%20on&query1_field=CONTENT Drilling Begun on Maplewood Oil Site] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023182533/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000544&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20begun%20on&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Issue 29, July 6, 1950, page 1; and [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000552&pg_seq=11&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=laduron%20now%20seeking%20oil%20at%20tisch%20mills&query1_field=CONTENT Laduron now seeking oil at Tisch Mills] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023182533/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000552&pg_seq=11&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=laduron%20now%20seeking%20oil%20at%20tisch%20mills&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Issue 37, August 3, 1950, page 3</ref> in [[Union, Door County, Wisconsin|Union]] from 1950 to 1951,<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000586&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=michigan%20men&query1_field=CONTENT Union Oil Drillers to Start Work Wednesday] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026212036/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000586&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=michigan%20men&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-26 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Number 71, December 5, 1950, page 1 ([http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000589&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=0/7%20drilling%20commences%20in%20brussels&query1_field=CONTENT photo] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026213043/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000589&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=0/7%20drilling%20commences%20in%20brussels&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-26 }}) and [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000603&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20drilling%20in%20brussels&query1_field=CONTENT Will Abandon Oil Drilling in Brussels] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026212037/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000603&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20drilling%20in%20brussels&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-26 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Number 88, February 6, 1951, page 1</ref> in the [[Sturgeon Bay (town), Wisconsin|town of Sturgeon Bay]] in 1951,<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000611&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=evergreen%20oil%20leases%20again%20being%20solicited&query1_field=CONTENT Evergreen Oil Leases Again Being Solicited] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026220644/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000611&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=evergreen%20oil%20leases%20again%20being%20solicited&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-26 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 89, Number 96, March 6, 1951, page 1; [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000635&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20for%20oil%20started%20in%20evergreen&query1_field=CONTENT Drilling for Oil Started in Evergreen] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026220640/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000635&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20for%20oil%20started%20in%20evergreen&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-26 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 90, Number 19, May 24, 1951, page 1; and [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000694&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=big%20gives%20up&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=-571536000000&query2_max=-539913600000 Oil Drilling Discontinued] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211026220641/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20141103/00000694&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=big%20gives%20up&query1_field=CONTENT&query2_modifier=AND&query2_field=DATE_PUBLISHED_MILLIS&query2_min=-571536000000&query2_max=-539913600000 |date=2021-10-26 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 90, Number 78, December 18, 1951, page 1</ref> and west of [[Baileys Harbor, Wisconsin|Baileys Harbor]] in 1972 yielded no oil.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000240&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20firmwill%20drillies%E2%80%99r&query1_field=CONTENT Oil firm will drill test well at Baileys Harbor] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023181017/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000240&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=oil%20firmwill%20drillies%E2%80%99r&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 111, Number 54, September 21, 1972, page 1; ([http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000241&pg_seq=6&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=wen-saved&query1_field=CONTENT correction to the story] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023181018/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000241&pg_seq=6&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=wen-saved&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}) and [http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000258&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20for%20oil%20continues&query1_field=CONTENT Drilling for oil continues west of Baileys Harbor] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023181020/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000258&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=drilling%20for%20oil%20continues&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }} by Henry Shea, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 111, Number 72, November 22, 1972, page 1</ref> In the 1970s, oil leases were sold in the towns of [[Forestville (town), Wisconsin|Forestville]], Union, [[Brussels, Wisconsin|Brussels]], [[Gardner, Wisconsin|Gardner]], and Baileys Harbor, but no oil was produced.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000612&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=release-from%20leases&query1_field=CONTENT Release from leases sought by landowners] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023181017/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000612&pg_seq=1&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=release-from%20leases&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-10-23 }}, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Number 8, April 15, 1976</ref>

In 2020, the GDP of the agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting industry was $38.2 million in current-year dollars.<ref name=GDPrealdollars20012020/> In 2018, 430 income tax returns filed by county residents included farm income or expenses, down by 23.6% from 2011 when 563 returns included farm income or expenses.<ref>[https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/11incywi.xls Wisconsin: Individual Income Tax Returns: Selected Income and Tax Items by State, County, and Size of Adjusted Gross Income, Tax Year 2011], SOI Tax Stats County Data 2011, ''Internal Revenue Service'' and [https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/18incywi.xlsx Wisconsin: Individual Income Tax Returns: Selected Income and Tax Items by State, County, and Size of Adjusted Gross Income, Tax Year 2018], SOI Tax Stats County Data 2018, ''Internal Revenue Service''</ref>

Agricultural land use in Door County reached its peak in 1920, when 264,126 acres were farmed,<ref name=ruralresources>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094237591&view=1up&seq=19 Wisconsin Rural Resources: Door County] by the Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Wisconsin State Department of Agriculture, 1956, Part III: Physical Resources of Door County, section on Crop Reporting Service Bulletin, page 17</ref> representing 85.6% of the county's total land area.<ref name=ruralresources/><ref name="GR1">{{cite web |url = http://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/maps-data/data/gazetteer/counties_list_55.txt |publisher = United States Census Bureau |access-date = August 4, 2015 |date = August 22, 2012 |title = 2010 Census Gazetteer Files |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150904092735/http://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/maps-data/data/gazetteer/counties_list_55.txt |archive-date = September 4, 2015 }}</ref> In 1944, there were {{convert|158,063|acre}} of cropland and {{convert|76,775|acre}} of pastures in the county. In 2017, there were {{convert|90,126|acre}} of cropland and {{convert|6,602|acre}} of pasture, with cropland declining 43.0% and pastures declining 91.4%. The total decline in both cropped and pastured farmland was 58.8% over the seventy-three years.<ref name=agcensus>For 1944 figures, see [https://web.archive.org/web/20210914211525/http://lib-usda-05.serverfarm.cornell.edu/usda/AgCensusImages/1950/01/07/1786/12159355v1p7ch2.pdf Census of Agriculture: Wisconsin, Chapter B: Statistics for Counties], Operators: Censuses of 1950 and 1945, ''Census of Agriculture Historical Archive, United States Department of Agriculture,'' page 41 (page four of the pdf) (Archived September 14, 2021) and for 2017 figures, see [https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/3A754EE4-FB45-38B5-9DBB-7F5C2502B2FE NASS Quick Stats, Door County, cropland and pastureland, 2017], ''National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture'', accessed September 14, 2021</ref> From 2020 to 2017, the total decline for farmland was 63.4% over ninety-seven years, with an average decline of 0.65% per year.<ref name=ruralresources/><ref name=agcensus/>

In 1970, a study compiled what each industry received in sales in 1968, how it spent the money, and where the money went after it was spent. Out of all sectors, the combined agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing sector funneled money to entities within the county more than any other sector. Each dollar in sales made by agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing resulted in $3.02 more in total sales within the county.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094248184&view=1up&seq=85&skin=2021 Recreation and the Local Economy, An Input-Output Model of a Recreation-Oriented Economy] by William A. Strang. Bureau of Business Research and Service, Sea Grant Technical Report #4, UW-Wisconsin Madison Graduate School of Business Administration, October 1970 page 38</ref> For every dollar spent by agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing, 32 cents was received by other agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing entities and the rest went to other sectors.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094248184&view=1up&seq=99&skin=2021 Recreation and the Local Economy, An Input-Output Model of a Recreation-Oriented Economy] by William A. Strang. Bureau of Business Research and Service, Sea Grant Technical Report #4, UW-Wisconsin Madison Graduate School of Business Administration, October 1970 page 42</ref>

Both sale prices and rental values of [[agricultural land]] are lower than most Wisconsin counties.<ref>See the [https://web.archive.org/web/20200113062236/http://map.co.door.wi.us/planning/Comp-Plan/2035-Update/6-2.pdf map of soils by suitability for agriculture] for context. In 2016, the average rental value was $81.00 per acre, less than the Wisconsin average of $131.00 per acre and $144.00 per acre for Kewaunee County. The average sale price of agricultural land in 2016 was $3,861 per acre, less than the Wisconsin average of $5,306 per acre and $6,568 per acre for Kewaunee County. Statistics from the [https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/2017AgStats_web.pdf 2017 Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics] pp. 5 and 10 and (9 and 14 of the pdf), by the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, September 2017</ref> The most important field crops by acres harvested in 2017 were hay and [[Silage#Haylage|haylage]] at {{convert|25,197|acre}}, [[soybean]]s at {{convert|16,790|acre}}, corn ([[Field corn|grain]]) at {{convert|15,371|acre}}, corn ([[Corn stover#Fodder (ensilaged or nonensilaged)|silage]]) at {{convert|9,314|acre}}, [[wheat]] at {{convert|8,790|acre}}, [[oat]]s at {{convert|2,610|acre}}, and [[barley]] at {{convert|513|acre}}.<ref>[https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/Wisconsin/cp55029.pdf County Profile: Door County Wisconsin], 2017 Census of Agriculture, USDA ''National Agricultural Statistics Service'', page 2 and [https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/AE33961F-4605-3D18-A255-CCC67180C699 Quick Stats data] from the USDA ''National Agricultural Statistics Service''.</ref> Despite lower [[Agricultural productivity|productivity]] for other forms of agriculture, in the early 1900s the combination of thin soils and fractured bedrock was described by area promoters as beneficial to fruit horticulture, as the land would quickly drain during wet conditions and provide ideal soil conditions for orchard trees.<ref name=Cain>{{cite thesis |last1 = Cain |first1 = Cortney |date = May 2006 |title = The Development of Apple Horticulture in Wisconsin, 1850s-1950s: Case Studies of Bayfield, Crawford, and Door Counties |type = M.A. thesis |chapter = Chapter 4, Door County Apple Horticulture |publisher = UW-Madison |chapter-url = https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005752947 |access-date = September 15, 2019 }}</ref> For apples, the influence of the calcium-rich dolomite on the soil was expected to promote good color.<ref>[https://archive.org/details/encyclopediapra02wortgoog/page/n116 <!-- pg=90 --> The Encyclopedia of Practical Horticulture: A Reference System of Commercial Horticulture, Volume 1] by Granville Lowther and William Worthington, Seattle: Lowman and Hanford, 1914, p. 90</ref>

In 2018, there were an estimated 23,500 head of cattle in the county.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20201030200938/https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/County_Estimates/WI-CtyEst-Cattle-17-18.pdf All cattle and calves in Wisconsin as of January 1, 2017–2018], by the USDA [[National Agricultural Statistics Service]] (Archived October 30, 2020)</ref> In 2017, Door and Kewaunee counties were reported to have equal deer-to-human ratios, although Kewaunee County had a considerably greater cow-to-human ratio.<ref>[https://www.wiscontext.org/where-cows-and-deer-outnumber-people-wisconsin Where Cows and Deer Outnumber People In Wisconsin A Badger State Approach to Rural Identity], Malia Jones, UW Applied Population Lab, November 17, 2017, Accessed December 12, 2019</ref>

The Evergreen Nursery in Sturgeon Bay was founded in 1864. It first consisted of pulling wild evergreens and exporting them via [[Goodrich Transportation Company|Goodrich steamboats]].<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=88b0dabc-478c-4621-a4a1-0ae7125b6234/wsbd0000/20131118/00001626&pg_seq=7&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=evergreennursery%20observes&query1_field=CONTENT Evergreen nursery observes seventy-fifth anniversary] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210904213835/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=88b0dabc-478c-4621-a4a1-0ae7125b6234/wsbd0000/20131118/00001626&pg_seq=7&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=evergreennursery%20observes&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-09-04 }}, ''Door County News'', Volume 25, Issue 39, March 30, 1939, page 7</ref> As of 2021, it was the largest wholesale nursery in the state.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/ron-amos-named-a-distinguished-agriculturist/ Ron Amos Named a Distinguished Agriculturist], ''Door County Pulse'', June 4, 2021</ref>

==County finances==
===Revenues===
County spending in Door County is supported by property taxes, sales taxes, and state aid. In 2017, the county had the highest per capita property tax burden in the state,<ref name=2018green/> although when compared by amount levied per $1,000 of property the tax was comparatively low with the county having the fifteenth lowest per capita property tax rate per $1,000 out of all 72 Wisconsin counties.<ref name=2018green/> The county collected $154.12 in per capita sales taxes in 2020, the highest in the state, with an average annual increase of 3.62% in non-inflation adjusted, current-year dollars from 2003 when it collected $95.38 per capita and ranked second-highest in the state.<ref>[https://www.revenue.wi.gov/Pages/RA/Sales-Tax-Per-Capita.aspx Sales Tax Per Capita], ''Wisconsin Department of Revenue'', [https://web.archive.org/web/20210913024228/https://public.tableau.com/vizql/w/PerCapitaCountySalesTax/v/Story1/tempfile/sessions/94F440125E97499780E9637A3B5545F2-0:0/?key=1697411685&keepfile=yes&attachment=yes flat table for Sales Tax Per Capita] (archived September 13, 2021)</ref> It also received the ninth highest level of per capita state financial assistance to the county government in 2015 figures.<ref name=2018green/>

===Expenses===
{{Image frame|width=320|content='''Expenses of the Door County Tourism Zone Commission, 2008–2020'''<ref>[http://doorcountytourismzone.com/reporting/annual-reporting Annual Audit Reports] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210830211709/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/reporting/annual-reporting |date=2021-08-30 }} ''Door County Tourism Zone'' website, accessed August 29, 2021</ref>
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=220
 | height=150
 | xAxisTitle=year
 | xAxisAngle=-40
 | yAxisTitle=expenses in dollars
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | y1Title=
 | type=line
 | x=2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020
 | y1=3540713,3540713,3061891,3230130,3262205,3509884,3629997,3791164,4140998,4456811,4665124,4906036,4781816
 | yAxisFormat =

}}|caption= In 2014, Door County spent $11,287 per resident on advertising and other forms of tourism promotion, the second-most per capita of any Wisconsin county.<ref>''Rural Wisconsin Today 2016'', UW-Extension, December 17, 2017 p. 27</ref> {{nowrap|30% of the expenses reflected in this graph are}} refunds to individual municipalities collecting the tax. The municipalities are not required to spend this money on tourism promotion.<ref>[https://wispolicyforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/CheckingIn_FullReport.pdf Checking in, a look at Wisconsin Room Tax Trends] by Jason Stein, Matt Tompach, and Rob Henken, Wisconsin Policy Forum, May 2019. Individual spending by each municipality is described on the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue [https://ww2.revenue.wi.gov/VaultPublic/publish/rt/report.html Room Tax Reports]</ref>
|link=
|align=right}}
In 2015, Door County had the third-highest level of per capita county spending in Wisconsin.<ref name=2018green/> It was Wisconsin's only county with high per capita government spending in 2005 that did not also have a large low-income population. High per capita county government spending in Wisconsin is typically due to poverty.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20170204181102/http://lacrossecounty.org/departments/admin%20coord/docs/WITaxpayer. A Snapshot of County Finances: 2005], The Wisconsin Taxpayer, October 2007 (Archived February 4, 2017)</ref> Door County's spending can be explained by both the need to provide services to people present only during the tourism season<ref>[https://www.doorcountybusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/SeasonalPopulation.pdf Estimating the Seasonal Population of Door County] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210721040910/https://www.doorcountybusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/SeasonalPopulation.pdf |date=2021-07-21 }} by Greg Lamb, Door County University Extension</ref> and by development patterns.

A 2004 study showed that residential and commercial land tends to require more in government services than property taxes generate. These in turn are subsidized by taxes on industrial, agricultural, and open lands, which generally require few government services.<ref name=costcommunity>[https://www.doorcountylandtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/COCS_FullReport.pdf The Cost of Community Services in the Towns of Gibraltar and Nasewaupee Door County, Wisconsin] by Mary Edwards, November 2004</ref> The residential share of the county's overall assessed value increased from 66.65% in 1984 to 85.22% in 2021, while the commercial share decreased from 11.57% to 10.18% over the same time period. In 2021, the residential share of the county's overall valuation was the 6th largest out of all Wisconsin counties, and the commercial share was the 41st largest. In contrast, manufacturing, agriculture, agricultural forest, productive forest, and undeveloped land ranked 65th, 63rd, 50th, 48th, 50th largest respectively out of all 72 Wisconsin counties.<ref name=equalized/>

The dispersal of residential developments is also a factor. A 2002 study found that Wisconsin town residents are typically subsidized by city and village residents.<ref name="uwosh.edu">[http://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/mcgee/Impl-Subsidy-Sprawl.pdf County Spending and the Implicit Subsidy to "Urban Sprawl"] by M. Kevin McGee, Revised March 2002</ref> In addition to the dispersal of structures, the population density per housing unit is also low for the state. The effect of seasonal residents on persons-per-housing unit figures was once masked by larger family sizes among year-round inhabitants. Beginning in the 1980 census the number of persons per housing unit fell below typical figures for Wisconsin as the number of children in the county dropped.<ref name=Hart>{{cite magazine |last = Hart |first = John Fraser |jstor = 214100 |title = Resort Areas in Wisconsin |magazine = Geographical Review |volume = 74 |issue = 2 |year = 1984 |pages = 206, 207, and 198–200 }} and {{cite magazine |url = https://archive.org/stream/americanbeejourn411901hami/#page/597/mode/1up |title = A Bee-keeper's Vacation Spent in Wisconsin |first = C. F. |last = Dadant |date = September 19, 1901 |magazine = American Bee Journal |volume = 41 |issue = 38 |location = Chicago |page = 957 }}</ref>

==Carrying capacity==
[[File:Timber harvest and construction of a group camping facility at Potawatomi State Park Door County Wisconsin.jpg|thumb|Camground construction in [[Potawatomi State Park]], 2008; the overnight capacity of the park increased by 120 persons due to this project.<ref>[[:File:Site of Future Group Camping Facility Potawatomi State Park Door County Wisconsin.jpg|Site of Future Group Camping Facility]], Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2008</ref>]]
Attempts at estimating the carrying capacity of the county have been made in a variety of different ways. In 1964, the Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program estimated the public beach capacity of the county at between 3,500 and 7,000 persons, and projected the need to acquire "roughly one and one-half miles of new beach by 1980 and an additional six and three-fourth miles by 2000" to prevent overcrowding.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&pg=PA104 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 104</ref> The same plan also projected a need to acquire more state park lands to accommodate a tripling or quadrupling<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&pg=PA103 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 103</ref> of peak tourist traffic by the year 2000: "11,000-12,000 acres of new state park lands will be needed by 1980, and another 9,000-10,000 acres by the year 2000."<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=soYr0dwaLFkC&pg=PA101 Door County Board of Supervisors Comprehensive Planning Program], assisted by the Wisconsin Department of Resource Development, 1964, page 101</ref> [[Newport State Park]] was founded in accordance with this plan.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112078786966&view=1up&seq=37&skin=2021 Environmental impact statement for the proposed development and management of Newport State Park, Door County, Wisconsin], by the Wisconsin Bureau of Parks and Recreation, by C. D. Besadny, Director, Bureau of Environmental Impact, September 1974, page 15</ref>

One alternative proposed to constructing what later became Newport State Park was for the state to construct additional campsites at Peninsula State Park instead. In response, a representative for the 
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources responded that "Only so much development is possible before you destroy the natural beauty for which the area was preserved in the first place. You can't put a campsite in every clearing and a picnic table behind every tree."<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20151119/00000253&pg_seq=10&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=wrifer%20disagrees&query1_field=CONTENT Writer Disagrees With Published Statements Attributed to Opponent of Europe Lake Park] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102035644/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20151119/00000253&pg_seq=10&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=wrifer%20disagrees&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-11-02 }}, Volume 101, Number 22, by Doug Larson, June 5, 1962</ref> In 1976 the county board blocked the DNR from expanding the park or purchasing the Pine Ledges along the North Bay.<ref>[http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000677&pg_seq=22&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=resolution%20no%2031-76&query1_field=CONTENT Resolution No. 31-76] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102035647/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:8080/jsp/RcWebImageViewer.jsp?doc_id=1e8fc801-90a4-4104-8e86-19a1ea0947dc/wsbd0000/20170120/00000677&pg_seq=22&search_doc=&query1_modifier=AND&query1=resolution%20no%2031-76&query1_field=CONTENT |date=2021-11-02 }} by the Door County Board of Supervisors, ''Door County Advocate'', Volume 115, Issue 73, November 30, 1976, page 6</ref> In addition, the DNR's attempt to acquire [[Detroit Island]] in its entirety for a state park in 1978 was thwarted by the Detroit Island Landowners' Association and local governments.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=SGw5AQAAMAAJ Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Acquisition, Development and Management of Grand Traverse Islands State Park, Door County Wisconsin]'' by the Bureau of Environmental Impact, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, June 1978, pages 106 and 110</ref>

In 1984, Jim Cook, an Egg Harbor business owner, stated that the [[Sustainable population#Carrying capacity|carrying capacity]] was limited by the degree of [[Pollution in Door County, Wisconsin|pollution in the county]]. He thought that if development was uncontrolled, the population would be limited by poor environmental quality to no more than a 50% increase of what it currently was, but if development was controlled the population could increase threefold.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951t002328748&view=1up&seq=167&skin=2021 "I’m saying you have a limit"] by Joe Cook, in Conversations on Door County by Dave Crehore, ''Wisconsin Natural Resources'', May–June 1986, Volume 10, Number 3, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, page 31</ref> During the [[1980 United States census|1980 census]] the county had a population of 25,029.<ref>[https://doa.wi.gov/DIR/Time_Series_Co_2021.xlsx Time Series Population Estimates (1970 - 2021)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211015212442/https://doa.wi.gov/DIR/Time_Series_Co_2021.xlsx |date=2021-10-15 }}, Demographic Services Center, Wisconsin Department of Administration, 2021</ref> In a 2008 survey of county residents, the most frequent local concern was the need to control rampant overdevelopment, including condos.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20190409212053/http://www.co.door.wi.gov/docview.asp?docid=287&locid=137 2008 Door County Citizen's Survey]</ref> In 2021, Ryan Heise, former [[Egg Harbor, Wisconsin|Egg Harbor village]] administrator, stated that it was selfish to think Door County was currently at its tourist carrying capacity.<ref>[https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/door-co/2021/06/15/door-county-environmental-council-hosts-panel-tourism-impacts/7504737002/ Tourism stimulates Door County's economy but affects environment, residents — panelists weigh in on solutions] by Daphne Lemke, ''Green Bay Press-Gazette'', June 15, 2021; for the panel discussion where the comment was made, see [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktxp32_uKF8 DCEC Overtourism Program], ''Door County Environmental Council'', June 9, 2021 (YouTube)</ref>

== Seasonality ==
=== The tourist influx ===
Although Door County has a year-round population of 30,066,<ref name="2020CensusInteractive"/> it experiences an influx of tourists each summer between [[Memorial Day]] and [[Labor Day]], with over 2.1 million visitors per year.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20200113062550/http://map.co.door.wi.us/planning/Comp-Plan/Completed/Town%20of%20Sevasopol%20Comprehensive%20Plan.pdf Town of Sevastopol Comprehensive Plan 2028], November 2008, Chapter 4, p. 11, (page 64 of the pdf)</ref> Most businesses are targeted to tourism and operate seasonally. According to Wisconsin Department of Revenue figures, taxable accommodations industry sales peaked in July in both 2019 and 2020,<ref name=DORmonthlysales/> and [[Transient occupancy tax|room tax]] collections from 2017 to 2018 also peaked in July, although [[Sales taxes in the United States#Wisconsin|sales tax]] revenue was higher in August. The fewest room taxes from 2017 to 2018 were collected for January, and the fewest sales taxes were collected for April.<ref name=bureau2019>[http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/12-2019%20-%20DDC%20December%202019%20Monthly%20Report.pdf Monthly Report, December 2019] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923183640/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/12-2019%20-%20DDC%20December%202019%20Monthly%20Report.pdf |date=2020-09-23 }}, Door County Visitor Bureau, pp. 1 and 5</ref> From 2015 to 2020, [[9-1-1]] calls made by non-residents peaked in July.<ref>[https://www.co.door.wi.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_07202021-971 Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Agenda], Joint Administrative Committee, Public Safety Committee, and Finance Committee, pages 13—15</ref>

{{image frame
|align=none
|width=625
|content=
'''Room occupancy for motels, resorts, and inns in Door County, July 2018 – December 2020'''<ref>[https://doorcountytourismzone.com/reporting/admin-monthly-report Administrator's Monthly Reports] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302015741/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/reporting/admin-monthly-report |date=2021-03-02 }} by Kim Roberts, ''Door County Tourism Zone'' website, Accessed April 11, 2020</ref>
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=570
 | height=150
 | xAxisTitle=month
 | xAxisAngle=-40
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | type=line
 | x= Jul. 2018,Aug. 2018,Sep. 2018,Oct. 2018,Nov. 2018,Dec. 2018,Jan. 2019,Feb. 2019,Mar. 2019,Apr. 2019,May 2019,Jun. 2019,Jul. 2019,Aug. 2019,Sep. 2019,Oct. 2019,Nov. 2019,Dec. 2019,Jan. 2020,Feb. 2020,Mar. 2020,Apr. 2020,May 2020,Jun. 2020,Jul. 2020,Aug. 2020,Sep. 2020,Oct. 2020,Nov. 2020,Dec. 2020
 | y1= 0.7965,0.7385,0.6251,0.5842,0.2148,0.1596,0.1579,0.225,0.1925,0.1731,0.3199,0.5764,0.7758,0.776,0.622,0.5843,0.1869,0.1561,0.1748,0.2111,0.1219,0.0362,0.1402,0.4099,0.7412,0.7291,0.5910,0.4952,0.1789,0.1313
 | yAxisFormat= %
}}}}
{{multiple image
 | footer =
 | align = left

 | image1 = AmericInn® Sturgeon Bay - panoramio.jpg
 | width1 = 205
 | caption1 =A motel, Sturgeon Bay, October 2009
 | alt1=

 | image2 = Lull Abi Inn Egg Harbor - panoramio.jpg
 | width2 = 205
 | caption2 =An inn, Egg Harbor, October 2009
 | alt2=

 | image3 = Edgewater Lodge, ideally situated at the Water's Edge, Ephraim, Wisconsin (86301).jpg
 | width3 = 205
 | caption3 =A resort, Ephraim, printed between circa 1930 and circa 1945; in 1976 those staying at hotels and resorts were thought to spend more in the county overall, and to spend it in manners which caused more overall economic activity.<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89094246774&view=1up&seq=61&skin=2021 Large Recreational Home Developments in Wisconsin's Coastal Zone] by Charles Prentice, ''Wisconsin Coastal Management'' November 1976, page 52</ref>
 | alt3=

}}
{{clear}}

=== Employment ===
Door County unemployment rates during the summer and fall are considerably lower than in winter.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WIDOOR9URN Monthly Unemployment Rate for Door County, WI, 1991-2019], graph by FRED Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed December 12, 2019.</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210624203746/https://baylakerpc.org/application/files/1015/2840/3401/Town_of_Nasewaupee_Comprehensive_Plan.pdf Year 2025 Comprehensive Plan Town of Nasewaupee Door County, Wisconsin], September 2003, p. 117 of the pdf, Figure 6-1 (Archived June 24, 2021)</ref> Annual earnings in Door County are typically less than similar jobs in other areas of Wisconsin. This has been attributed to the seasonal nature of much of the employment. In 2009 it was found that people were 4.85 times more likely to be employed by hotels and motels in Door County as opposed to the rest of the nation.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20180201083553/https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/Sectors/documents/DellerEconomicImpacts0324.pdf The Economic Impacts of Agriculture in Wisconsin Counties] by Steven C. Deller and David Williams.</ref>

{{Image frame|width=515|content='''Homes, cabins, and cottages permitted for short term rentals, 2008 – May 2021'''<ref>[http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE-FINAL-Annual-Meeting-Presentation-2018.pdf 2018 Annual Meeting Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210721040914/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE-FINAL-Annual-Meeting-Presentation-2018.pdf |date=2021-07-21 }} by the ''Door County Tourism Zone'', table: 2008–2019: A Historical Look at Permit Totals By Year June 20, 2019, p. 24; also Permit Statistics: By Permit Type & Percent of the Total on page 14 in the [http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202019%206-18-2020%20UPDATED%202020%20VERSION.pdf 2019 Annual Meeting Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210721040941/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202019%206-18-2020%20UPDATED%202020%20VERSION.pdf |date=2021-07-21 }}, ''Door County Tourism Zone'', June 18, 2020; and Permit Statistics: By Permit Type & Percent to Total on page 14 in the [http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202020-%20with%20DDC%20portion(1).pdf 2020 Annual Meeting Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210829215915/http://doorcountytourismzone.com/uploads/ckfiles/files/ZONE%20Annual%20Meeting%20Presentation%202020-%20with%20DDC%20portion%281%29.pdf |date=2021-08-29 }}, ''Door County Tourism Zone'', July 15, 2021</ref>
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=452
 | height=180
 | xAxisTitle=year
 | xAxisAngle=-40
 | yAxisTitle=number of properties
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | y1Title=
 | type=line
 | x=2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,May 2019, May 2020,May 2021
 | y1=459,549,578,576,601,632,650,676,716,765,856,889,943,988
}}|caption=
|link=
|align=right}}

=== Labor and housing shortages ===
Total employment in the county grew 1% from 2016 to 2017. From 2017 to 2018, employment shrank 0.12%, another 0.03% from 2018 to 2019, and another 7.12% from 2019 to 2020 for three consecutive years of contraction. The decrease in employment from 2019 to 2020 was the largest experienced in the county since at least 1976. The labor force also shrank during the three consecutive years from 2018 to 2020.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/WIcounties/Story1 WI counties] by ''WI DOR - Division of Research and Policy'', public.tableau.com, accessed September 19, 2021</ref>

The [[Sunshine tax|effects of the low earnings are compounded by average housing prices]]; other areas in Wisconsin with low wages tend to have low housing prices.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20190410034729/http://map.co.door.wi.us/planning/Comp-Plan/Completed/Village%20of%20Sister%20Bay%20Comprehensive%20Plan.pdf Village of Sister Bay 2020 Comprehensive Plan] Chapter 1, p. 16 (p. 31 of the pdf), 2003</ref> The [[Affordable housing|unaffordability of housing]] has been linked to the [[Shortage#Labour shortage|labor shortage]] problem, as new employees may be unable to afford housing and [[Employee retention|decide to leave]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20190410034230/http://map.co.door.wi.us/planning/Comp-Plan/Completed/Town%20of%20Liberty%20Grove%20Comprehensive%20Plan.pdf Town of Liberty Grove Comprehensive Plan 2003] Chapter 1, p. 12 (p. 32 of the pdf)</ref>

Based on 5-year ACS estimates, from January 2010 to January 2019 the percent of households in the county spending more than 30% of their income on housing fell from 37.4% to 24.3%.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvRM Burdened Households (5-year estimate) in Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> A 2019 study found the county to have the eighth highest cost of living out of all Wisconsin counties.<ref>This was for a two-parent family with one school-age child and one preschooler, the annual self-sufficiency standard was $63,001. [https://web.archive.org/web/20191219055433/http://www.selfsufficiencystandard.org/sites/default/files/selfsuff/docs/WI2019_SSS.pdf The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Wisconsin 2019] by Diana M. Pearce and the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, May 2019, Center for Women's Welfare, University of Washington School of Social Work, p. 11 (p. 13 of the pdf) (Archived December 19, 2019)</ref>

From 2018 to 2019 [[Internal Revenue Service]] figures, 337 tax returns migrated to the county from outside Wisconsin, 439 migrated to the county from other counties in Wisconsin. 303 tax returns migrated from the county to somewhere out-of-state but still within the United States. 382 migrated to another county in Wisconsin. No tax returns migrated in either direction between Door County and any foreign country. The average [[adjusted gross income]] was $62,934 for all migrating tax returns leaving the county and $78,589 for all migrating tax returns moving to the county.<ref name="irs.gov">[https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/1819wi.xls Wisconsin: Individual Income Tax Returns: County-to-County Migration Inflow and Outflow for Selected Income Items, Calendar Years 2018-2019], SOI Tax Stats - Migration Data 2018–2019, ''Internal Revenue Service''</ref> The average gross adjusted income of tax returns migrating out of the county reported income that was 86.5% of the income for returns in the county which did not migrate, and the average gross adjusted income of tax returns migrating into the county reported income that was 108.0% of the income for returns in the county which did not migrate.<ref name="irs.gov"/>

Door County has fewer recently relocated residents than the state as a whole. According to ACS 5-year estimates for 2019, only 6.0% of household owners or renters in the county reported moving into their current residence since 2017 or later. 13.2% of household owners or renters moved in from 2015 to 2016, 20.1% moved in from 2010 to 2014, 24.7% moved in from 2000 to 2009, 18.5% moved in from 1990 to 1999, and 17.6% moved in 1989 or earlier.<ref>[https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0500000US55029&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S2502&hidePreview=true Door County: Demographic Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units], ''US Census Bureau'', Accessed September 26, 2021</ref> For the state as a whole, 26.6% of household owners or renters reported moving into their current residence since 2017 or later. 11.9% moved in from 2015 to 2016, 15.1% moved in from 2010 to 2014, 20.6% moved in from 2000 to 2009, 12.5% moved in from 1990 to 1999, and 13.2% moved in 1989 or earlier.<ref>[https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0400000US55&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S2502&hidePreview=true Wisconsin: Demographic Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units], ''US Census Bureau'', Accessed September 26, 2021</ref>

The seasonal housing problem has been made more severe as properties once available to residents or seasonal laborers have been turned into [[Airbnb]]-style short-term rentals for tourists.<ref>[https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/door-co/news/2019/01/24/door-county-airbnb-type-vacation-rentals-impacts-housing-market/2427066002/ Proliferation of Airbnb-type rentals hits Door Co. housing market, traditional lodging] by Liz Welter, ''Green Bay Press-Gazette'', January 24, 2019</ref> A 2019 documentary interviewed residents to examine and publicize this.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/a-place-of-our-own-the-challenge-of-home-in-door-county/ A Place of Our Own: The Challenge of ‘Home’ in Door County], ''Peninsula Pulse'' – April 19, 2019</ref>

{{clear}}

==Commuting patterns==
[[File:Sturgeon Bay Transit Inc Bus 1943.png|thumb|Morning commute in Sturgeon Bay, 1943]]
For reported labor, people in the county tend to work in the county, and jobs in the county tend to be performed by county residents.<ref>[https://www.wistatedocuments.org/digital/api/collection/p267601coll4/id/23881/download Anatomy of Door County: A Traffic Safety Summary] by the Division of State Patrol Bureau of Transportation
Safety and Technical Services, ''Wisconsin Department of Transportation'', January 2020, Commuting Flows, page 5</ref> According to 2011–2015 [[American Community Survey|ACS]] data, out of 17 counties in northeastern Wisconsin, Door County had the second lowest percentage of residents commuting {{nowrap|out-of-county}} to work. Only Brown County residents were less likely to commute out of their county to work. 89.08% of reported jobs in the county are performed by workers residing within it, the highest percentage of jobs filled by {{nowrap|in-county}} workers in the {{nowrap|17-county}} area. The low ranking has been attributed to the peninsula, which limits the directions people can practically commute.<ref>[https://jobcenterofwisconsin.com/wisconomy/wits_info/downloads/CP/door_profile.pdf 2019 Workforce profile: Door County] by Ryan Long, Bay Area Regional Economist for the State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, 2019, p. 5, section "Door County Worker Commute" and [https://doorcountypulse.com/perspective-the-numbers-tell-the-story-of-our-labor-shortage-2/ Perspective: The Numbers Tell the Story of Our Labor Shortage] by Steve Grutzmacher, ''Peninsula Pulse'', April 30, 2021</ref> Within the county from 2017 ACS statistics, the communities of Sister Bay, Ephraim, Gibraltar, and the city of Sturgeon Bay have more people commuting into the community than away from it and rank within the top 25% of Wisconsin municipalities for the percent of jobs filled by outside commuters. Meanwhile, Sevastopol, Nasewaupee, Gardner, Union, and the town of Forestville all rank within the top 25% of Wisconsin municipalities for the percent of job holders residing in the community, but commuting somewhere else.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/commuterpatterns Commuter patterns], ''WI DOR - Division of Research and Policy'', public.tableau.com, accessed September 19, 2021</ref>

==Reliance on immigrant and foreign student labor==
Because foreign workers brought in under the [[Summer Work Travel Program]] are sometimes housed in a different community from where they are employed, some have ended up bicycling 10–15 miles a day since they lack cars and the county has limited public transportation.<ref name=Reardon>[https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2511&context=all_dissertations Administrative Relationships, Agency Theory, and the Summer Work Travel Program: 2012–2013] by Mark Reardon, Ph.D. thesis, Clemson University, p. 134 (143 of the pdf)</ref> Additionally, illegal or [[Undocumented immigrant population of the United States#Characteristics|undocumented immigrants]] who work in the tourism industry often lack drivers' licenses.<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/building-bridges-between-cultures/ Building Bridges Between Cultures] by Gary Jones, ''Peninsula Pulse'', February 4, 2011</ref> In 2012, Door County District Attorney Ray Pelrine said the "illegal immigrant workforce is now built into the structure of a lot of businesses here."<ref>[https://doorcountypulse.com/the-immigration-debate-and-why-it-matters-to-door-county-more-than-you-think/ The Immigration Debate – and Why it Matters to Door County More than You Think by Myles Dannhausen Jr.], ''Peninsula Pulse'', July 5, 2012</ref>

As high school enrollment in the county has dwindled, employers have turned to [[J-1 visa]]s to fill seasonal positions instead.<ref>In 2020 there were no J-1 visas issued for workers in the county. [https://doorcountypulse.com/door-countys-seasonal-housing-crisis/ Door County’s Seasonal Housing Crisis], by Jim Schuessler, ''Peninsula Pulse'', August 22, 2019, [https://doorcountypulse.com/j-1-visa-program-growing-in-door-county/ J-1 Visa Program Growing in Door County] by Jackson Parr, ''Peninsula Pulse'' May 4, 2018, [https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/door-co/2019/08/15/door-county-seasonal-j-1-visa-workers-housing-focus-new-plan/2009275001/ Door County's seasonal, J-1 Visa workers need housing. This Illinois couple hopes to help] by Sammy Gibbons, ''Green Bay Press-Gazette'', August 15, 2019, [https://doorcountypulse.com/worker-shortage-endures-for-manufacturing-sector-n-e-w-industries-shares-story-about-changes-that-make-it-difficult-to-remain-fully-staffed/ Overseas Restrictions Limit J-1 Visa Arrivals: Door County Businesses Prepare For Workforce Shortage] by Jackson Parr, ''Peninsula Pulse'', May 14, 2021, and [https://www.nbc26.com/news/local-news/j1-visa-shortage-is-slowing-down-business-in-door-county J1 visa shortage is slowing down business in Door County] by Nina Sparano, ''nbc26.com'', June 21, 2021</ref> As of March 28, 2022, there were no J-1 visas issued for Washington Island, four for Ellison Bay, 32 for Sister Bay, three for Ephraim, seven each for Fish Creek and Baileys Harbor, fifty for Egg Harbor, and fifteen for Sturgeon Bay as well as pending visas issued for each of these communities. As of March 28, there was one J-1 visa being used for work in the county.<ref>[https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1C-Q-wmVDJ0YSwtJGSfJyOG_Lrp8&ll=44.88453324367231%2C-87.21526282988091&z=8 Summer Work Travel Exchange Visitors Map] (Google Maps), BridgeUSA, ''j1visa.state.gov'', figures from the [https://egov.ice.gov/sevis/ SEVIS] report on March 28, 2022</ref>

{{stack|
{{Image frame|width=430|content='''Total 9–12 enrollment at all five Door County high schools, {{nowrap|2000–2001 & 2004–2019}}'''<ref name=enrollment>2000-2019 enrollment figures come from the Wisconsin DPI [https://dpi.wi.gov/school-nutrition/program-statistics/archive#epr Program Statistics Archives, Wisconsin School Free/Reduced Eligibility Data] and the Wisconsin DPI [https://dpi.wi.gov/school-nutrition/program-statistics School Nutrition Program Statistics] reports for school level enrollment and participation data, except for Washington Island, which was missing for 2019. Instead, 2018 [https://wisedash.dpi.wi.gov/Dashboard/Page/Home/Topic%20Area/Enrollment/Enrollment%20(Single%20Year)?filtersetid=d3297b44-3080-46bc-aaef-12d4905a0f81 WISEdash elementary] and [https://wisedash.dpi.wi.gov/Dashboard/Page/Home/Topic%20Area/Enrollment/Enrollment%20(Single%20Year)?filtersetid=0e64588c-5e7f-40b9-aad5-7e81da9fe662 high school] statistics for Washington Island are used. Due to incomplete reporting or reporting of statistics identical to the previous year by one or more county schools in 2002, 2003, these years are omitted from the graph</ref>
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=315
 | height=140
 | xAxisTitle=year
  | xAxisAngle=-40
 | yAxisTitle=enrollment
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | y1Title=
 | type=rect
 | x=2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019
 | y1=1508,1493,0,0,1438,1451,1441,1377,1386,1348,1276,1229,1155,1151,1116,1128,1128,1118,1143,1133,
}}|caption=|link=Hed|align=center}}| float=left | clear=true or false}}

{{stack|{{Image frame|width=|content={{spaces|7|en}}'''J-1 visas issued for work in Door County, 2014–2021'''{{spaces|7|en}}
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=250
 | height=173
 | xAxisTitle=year
 | yAxisTitle=visas issued
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | y1Title=
 | type=rect
 | x=2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020,2021
 | y1=204,250,340,403,494,510,0,280
}}|caption=|link=|align=center}}|float=left | clear=true or false}}

{{clear}}

==Equitable and inequitable costs and benefits==
===Income and socio-economic status===
In 2016, the county had the third highest per capita personal income in the state<ref name=2018green/> and in 2015 it had the seventh lowest poverty level in the state.<ref name=2018green/> In 2015, 39.0% of the population had an associate degree or more, making Door County the 12th most educated out of all 72 Wisconsin counties.<ref name=2018green/>

In 2017, 9.9% of the population received money from the [[Earned Income Tax Credit]],<ref>[https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/7572-population-benefitting-from-earned-income-tax-credit?loc=51&loct=5#detailed/5/7055/false/871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133,38,35/any/17940,14715 Population benefitting from earned income tax credit in Door], ''Kids Count Data Center'', [[Annie E. Casey Foundation]]</ref> compared to 12.1% for residents of the state as a whole.<ref>[https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/7572-population-benefitting-from-earned-income-tax-credit?loc=51&loct=5#detailed/2/any/false/871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133,38,35/any/17940,14715 Population benefitting from earned income tax credit in Wisconsin], ''Kids Count Data Center'', [[Annie E. Casey Foundation]]</ref>

In 1986, Dave Crehore noted that "Door County people are 'survivors,' who have put up with the worst aspects of rural and small-town life, along with generations of near-poverty."<ref>[https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951t002328748&view=1up&seq=139&skin=2021 Door County – a sketch for a portrait] by Dave Crehore, ''Wisconsin Natural Resources'', May–June 1986, Volume 10, Number 3, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, page 5</ref> From 1969 to 2003, the county's per capita personal income kept pace with that of the state as a whole, but from 2003 to 2019, the state's per capita personal income in non-inflation adjusted dollars has only increased 65.4%, while Door County's per capita personal income jumped 101.4% to $64,249 in 2019, compared to $53,207 for the state as a whole.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvwV Per Capita Personal Income in Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and [https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvTi Per Capita Personal Income in Wisconsin], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> During most years from 1992 through 2019, taxpayers who moved into the county earned more than those who already lived there, and taxpayers who moved out of the county earned less than those remaining in the county.<ref name=soi/>

{{Image frame|width=585|content='''Average annual adjusted gross income per tax return {{nowrap|by migration into or out of Door County, 1992–2019}}'''<ref name=soi>[https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-migration-data SOI Tax Stats - Migration Data], ''Internal Revenue Service'', May 25, 2021</ref>{{box|background=|align=center|border size=0px|radius=|text align=center|{{Legend inline|orange|income reported on tax returns migrating into the county}}<br>{{Legend inline|black|income reported on tax returns remaining in the county}}<br>{{Legend inline|purple|income reported on tax returns migrating out of the county}}}}
{{Graph:Chart
 | width=502
 | height=180
 | xAxisTitle=years
 | xAxisAngle=-40
 | yAxisTitle=income in dollars
 | yAxisMin = 0
 | colors=orange,purple,black
 | y1Title= Into
 | y2Title=Out
 | y3Title=Stay
 | type=line |x=1992–1993,1993–1994,1994–1995,1995–1996,1996–1997,1997–1998,1998–1999,1999–2000,2000–2001,2001–2002,2002–2003,2003–2004,2004–2005,2005–2006,2006–2007,2007–2008,2008–2009,2009–2010,2010–2011,2011–2012,2012–2013,2013–2014,2014–2015,2015–2016,2016–2017,2017–2018,2018–2019
|y1=30794,30392,37988,45124,40960,48990,46116,50752,55580,49747,51142,51244,56914,72433,75257,58689,45175,51163,54094,67796,62369,74295,62603,71450,97991,80185,78588
|y2=22242,22550,24603,27018,32456,28913,29253,33192,37090,33251,37852,38026,36893,42211,40427,46845,73102,40229,33025,48000,55348,43744,52435,48363,48800,60690,62934
|y3=30472,32103,32149,34739,37387,42372,43791,47353,49687,46891,45690,46181,48893,51557,55337,57913,52571,48588,51874,54781,63439,60415,63792,66007,66400,69466,72766
}}|caption=Notes: {{efn|Most years only depict tax returns migrating inside the United States. However, the figures for 1992–1993, 2000–2001, 2002–2003, 2003–2004, 2007–2008, and 2009–2010 also include a small number of returns involving migration between the county and military zip codes or foreign countries.}} {{efn|The average adjusted gross income of returns migrating out of the county in 2008–2009 was heavily weighted by just 71 returns which migrated to one or more states in the South. This group of returns had an average adjusted gross income of $351,747 each. The other 556 returns migrated to other destinations in the US outside the south over the course of 2008-2009. These other returns had average adjusted gross incomes ranging from $24,286 for 14 returns migrating to Winnebago County to $66,778 for 18 returns migrating to Dane County.}}
|link=
|align=left}}

{{clear}}

=== Geographic disparities ===
==== Resident income ====
According to 2014–2018 ACS data, four communities had median incomes lower than the county median income of $58,287. Of these, Sister Bay had the lowest median household income at $40,944, ranking the 135th lowest in the state out of 1,951 cities, villages, and towns which had available data. Following Sister Bay was the village of Forestville at $49,500 and ranking 444th lowest in a tie with [[Waupaca County, Wisconsin|New London]] in Waupaca County, the city of Sturgeon Bay at $52,917 and ranking 610th lowest, and Washington Island at $55,341 and ranking 737th lowest.

Gibraltar had the highest median income in the county at $80,602, the 232nd highest in the state, followed by Ephraim at $77,500 and ranking 305th highest, Egg Harbor at $75,833 and ranking 343rd highest, and Jacksonport at $70,625 at 483rd highest.<ref name=20142018profiles>[https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p01213b.xlsx p01213b] spreadsheet by Eric Grosso, Office on Aging, Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources, Wisconsin Department of Health Services</ref>

==== Local government debt ====
In 2019, the villages of Egg Harbor, Ephraim, and Sister Bay had the three highest levels of per capita municipal debt in the county, owing $45,539, $19,061, and $13,568 respectively. In contrast, the Village of Forestville and the towns of Sturgeon Bay, Sevastopol, Nasewaupee, Forestville, and Egg Harbor had no debt at all. Aside from these six communities without debt, the three indebted local governments with the lowest per capita levels of debt in the county were the County of Door and the towns of Brussels and Clay Banks, which respectively owed $479, $422, and $45 per capita. The villages of Egg Harbor, Ephraim, and Sister Bay respectively had the highest, second-highest and fourth-highest per capita debt of all 1,921 Wisconsin local governments in 2019. The Town of Gibraltar ranked as the sixth-highest in the state with $8,917 of per capita debt.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/LocalGovernmentDashboard_0/LocalGovernment Local Government Dashboard], ''Wisconsin Department of Revenue'', public.tableau.com, accessed September 19, 2021</ref>

In September 2021, the village of Sister Bay approved a plan to take on an additional $6.3 million in debt in 2023 and 2024 to fund the construction of a new village administration building, a new post office, and to improve the ice skating rink.<ref>[https://www.sisterbaywi.gov/wp-content/uploads/file-manager-advanced/PublicDocuments/Agendas%20and%20Minutes/Village%20Board/Meeting%20Packets%20In%20Digital%20Format/2021/092121%20Virtual%20Village%20Board%20Digital%20Meeting%20Packet.pdf?_t=1631902760 Village Board Meeting Packet], September 21, 2021, Capital Improvement Plan 2022-2026, pages 15, 24–25, and 63–64 of the plan (pages 41, 50–51, and pages 89–90 of the pdf) and [https://doorcountypulse.com/sister-bays-first-capital-improvement-plan-reveals-big-picture/ Sister Bay’s First Capital Improvement Plan Reveals Big Picture], by Sara Rae Lancaster, Peninsula Pulse, October 8, 2021</ref>

===Mortgage lending===
The estimated percentage of people in the county with a bad [[Credit score in the United States|credit score]] decreased from a peak of 18.1% in January 2010 to 9.0% in April 2021.<ref>[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvY9 Equifax Subprime Credit Population for Door County, WI], January 1991-present</ref>

In 2017 [[Home Mortgage Disclosure Act]] figures, out of 1,593 mortgage loan applications in Door County, 1,111 were approved and sent through the [[Loan origination|origination]] process. 71 additional loan applications were also approved, but for some other reason the loans were ultimately not taken out. 227 applications were denied, 146 were withdrawn, and 38 resulted in other actions. Of the 1,111 loans originated in 2017, 615 were for purchasing a home, 82 financed home improvements, and 414 were for refinancing. Out of the 1,111 loans originated in 2017, 1,073 were for single family dwellings and 38 were for manufactured homes. The median amount loaned was $149,000, and the median applicant or applicant household earned $70,000 annually. 37 loans required between 1.5% to 3.5% additional interest for a [[Subprime lending|subprime]] loan. This amounted to 3.3% of the total 1,111 loans and is less than the 6.7% of subprime loans originated in the United States as whole in 2017. For the 227 denied loan applications, 65 were due to the applicant already owing too much debt. Another 62 were denied because the applicant lacked adequate [[Collateral (finance)|collateral]]. 14 applications were denied because they didn't have enough money for the [[down payment]] and [[closing costs]]. Another 14 were denied because the loan application was incomplete. 4 did not have a good enough employment history to qualify for the loan, four did not verify their information, and 8 loan applications were denied for other reasons.<ref>[http://www.ruraldataportal.org/index.aspx The Rural Data Portal], search results for Housing Finance Data, 2017 Door County, Wisconsin</ref>

===Income inequality and housing===
[[File:10 mile radius panel Door County Advocate.jpg|thumb|A comic drawn for the ''Door County Advocate'' in 1977 depicting elderly county residents with limited income]]
In 2019 income percentiles for Wisconsin taxable income (excluding dependents), county residents were less likely to be in the top 5% and 80%–95% income percentiles than residents of the state as a whole, and were more likely to be in the 0%–20% and 20%–40% income percentiles than residents of the state as a whole.<ref>[https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/research.policy/viz/EqualizedValues/Dashboard1 County Income Distribution], ''WI DOR - Division of Research and Policy'', public.tableau.com, accessed September 19, 2021</ref>

Estimates for the [[Gini coefficient]] document an overall increase in the degree of income inequality in the county from 1990 to 2015–2019. Larger coefficient values indicate more income inequality. Gini coefficient estimates for the county were 0.3995 in 1990, 0.4226 in 2000,<ref>[https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/historical-income-counties/county5.xls 1990 and 2000 Historical Income for Counties], ''US Census Bureau''</ref> 0.411 for the 2006–2010 ACS five-year estimate<ref>[https://www.swmpc.org/downloads/621.xls Gini Coefficient, All Counties in the United States, 2006-2010], ''Southwest Michigan Planning Commission''</ref> and 0.4390 for the 2015–2019 ACS five-year estimate. Due to the margins of error for the estimates, some of the intermediate fluctuations between 1990 and 2015-2019 may be due to chance rather than reflect actual trends.<ref>[https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=income%20inequality%20door%20county&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.B19083 Gini Index of Income Inequality, Survey/Program: American Community Survey, Universe: Households, TableID: B19083 Product: 2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables, County Door], ''US Census Bureau''</ref>

Comparisons of income inequality between Door and other counties nationally show mixed results. Using the ACS five-year estimates from 2012 to 2016, the household income ratio between the 80th to 20th percentiles was only 3.76, the 352nd lowest such ratio out of 3,140 U.S. counties. On the other hand, 23.1% of all household income in the county was earned by the top 5th percentile, the 452nd greatest percentage out of 3,135 U.S. counties reporting data.<ref name=2018index>[https://www.lee.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/530b270e-b6eb-4ff4-8754-97108e81a064/social-capital-project-social-capital-index-data.xlsx Social Capital Project: Social Capital Index Data] accompanying the U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Social Capital Project. “The Geography of Social Capital in America.” Report prepared by the Vice Chairman's staff, 115th Cong., 2nd Sess. (April 2018)</ref>

A 2019 report by the Wisconsin Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources based on data from 2013 to 2017 found that while only 12.7% of Door County residents aged 65 and older rented (compared to 23.5% statewide), 59.8% of those who did rent spent 30% or more of their income on rental costs (compared to 55.4% statewide).<ref name=p01213>[https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p01213.xlsx Profiles of Persons Ages 65 and Older], Wisconsin Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources, Eric Grosso</ref> In 2018 Internal Revenue statistics, income tax returns showed Door County's elderly to have a higher degree of income inequality when compared to elderly in the state as a whole and also when compared to county income tax returns for all ages. 3.51% of returns by elderly Door County residents indicated an income of less than $1, compared to 2.30% of returns filed by elderly in the state as a whole, and also compared to 2.17% of returns filed by Door County residents of all ages. In contrast, 25.4% of returns filed by Door County's elderly indicated an income of $100,000 or greater, compared to 20.6% of returns filed by elderly in the state as a whole, and also compared to 18.6% of returns filed by Door County residents of all ages.<ref>[https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/18incywi.xlsx Wisconsin: Individual Income Tax Returns: Selected Income and Tax Items by State, County, and Size of Adjusted Gross Income, Tax Year 2018], SOI Tax Stats County Data 2018, ''Internal Revenue Service''</ref>

Most of the homeless in Door County are [[:wikt:couch surf|couch surfers]], although in the summer many will camp or live out of their vehicles.<ref>[https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/door-co/news/2017/12/15/donations-united-way-salvation-army-red-ksought-place-homeless-door-county-families-temporary-housin/944346001/ Donations to United Way, Salvation Army Red Kettles help homeless Door County families] Liz Welter, Green Bay Press Gazette December 15, 2017</ref> Out of 45 children or adults recently reaching the [[age of majority]] discharged from the foster care system in the county between 2005 and 2013, two became homeless and none were homeless during their last placement setting.<ref>[https://lafollette.wisc.edu/images/publications/workshops/2014-homeless.pdf Examining Homeless Outcomes Among Foster Care Youth in Wisconsin] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220319180429/https://lafollette.wisc.edu/images/publications/workshops/2014-homeless.pdf |date=2022-03-19 }} by Beauregard Blazavier, Sarah Foster, Brett Halverson, Ellen Hildebrand, John Magnino, and Caroline McCormack, Appendix 1: Foster Children in Wisconsin's Counties (2005-2013), Prepared for the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, capstone paper, UW–Madison La Follette School of Public Affairs, Spring 2014, page 36 (page 47 of the pdf)</ref>

The largest single-family house in the state is in Liberty Grove.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4h9V3OGDNU Video tour of Sur la Baie], Door County mansion, November 1, 2012, ''Door County Advocate''</ref> It was built in 1996 and is about 35,000 square feet. Although in 2005 it sold for about $20 million, in 2016 it sold for only $2.7 million,<ref>[http://archive.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/ellison-bay-mansion-largest-in-wisconsin-is-sold-b99711108z1-376570171.html Ellison Bay mansion, largest in Wisconsin, is sold], Samantha Hernandez, ''Journal Sentinel Online'', April 21, 2016</ref> and in 2019 was assessed at $2.6 million.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20200519015343/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us/RERV10O/rer007?form=taxdtl&parcnbra=18&parcnbrb=660530A&parctype=R&parcyear=2019&encusr=3A963F4E1B1763442F611935A3AF0AFB&session=071299341679097 2019 Parcel Tax Bill Detail], Door County Treasurer's Office (Archived May 19, 2020) and [https://web.archive.org/web/20210830211709/http://pubinfo.co.door.wi.us:10088/temp/0712993416790973015343400.pdf State of Wisconsin Property Tax Bill for 2019, Town of Liberty Grove] (Archived August 30, 2021)</ref> Additionally, an [[earth shelter|earth house]] in Sevastopol has been considered the "strangest home in Wisconsin."<ref>[https://patch.com/wisconsin/wauwatosa/mushroom-house-wisconsins-strangest-property-sale 'Mushroom House' Is Wisconsin's Strangest Property For Sale] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210830211712/https://patch.com/wisconsin/wauwatosa/mushroom-house-wisconsins-strangest-property-sale |date=2021-08-30 }} by Scott Anderson, ''patch.com'', January 20, 2019, and [https://doorcountypulse.com/inside-dunes-dwelling-door-countys-hobbit-home/ Inside the Dunes Dwelling: Door County’s Hobbit Home] by Olivia Quinlan, ''Door County Living'', July 1, 2017</ref>

== Patents ==
From 2000 to 2015, 61 patents have been issued to inventors with Door County being the residence of the first inventor listed.<ref>[https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/countyall/usa_county_gd.htm U.S. State Patenting Breakout by Regional Component], by the Patent Technology Monitoring Team, US Patent and Trademark Office and [https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=GvT3 U.S. Granted Utility Patents Originating in Door County, WI], ''Federal Reserve Economic Data'', Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</ref> From 1976–August 2021, 154 patents were issued to inventors and plant breeders residing in Sturgeon Bay.<ref>[https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Sturgeon+Bay&FIELD1=INCI&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT Results of Search in US Patent Collection db for: IC:"Sturgeon Bay"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210902202004/https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Sturgeon+Bay&FIELD1=INCI&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT |date=2021-09-02 }}, ''USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database'', US Patent Office</ref>

== See also ==
* [[List of Wisconsin locations by per capita income]]
* [[Wisconsin#Economy|Wisconsin § Economy]]
* [[Economy of Illinois]]
* [[Economy of Chicago]]
* [[Great Lakes#Economy|Great Lakes § Economy]]
* [[Resort town#Resort town economy|Resort town § Resort town economy]]

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}

== Further reading ==
*{{cite magazine |title = Wisconsin's Door Peninsula 'A Kingdom So Delicious' |first = William S. |last = Ellis |magazine = National Geographic |date = March 1969 |pages = 346–371 }}
*{{cite news |last=Marcus |first=J.S. |date=August 12, 2021 |title=Door County Lives Up to Its Nickname as the Midwest's Cape Cod |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/door-county-wisconsin-real-estate-news-11628787522 |work=Wall Street Journal |location=New York |access-date=August 30, 2021}}
*{{cite news |last=Lemke |first=Daphne |date=June 15, 2021 |title=Tourism stimulates Door County's economy but affects environment, residents — panelists weigh in on solutions |url=https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/door-co/2021/06/15/door-county-environmental-council-hosts-panel-tourism-impacts/7504737002/ |work=Green Bay Press Gazette |location=Green Bay, Wisconsin |access-date=August 30, 2021}}
*{{Citation
 | last1 = Kerwin | first1 = Rebecca
 | contribution = Chapter 5: Economic Development
 | title = Door County Comprehensive and Farmland Preservation Plan 2035: Volume II, Resource Report
 | place = Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
 | pages = 59–92
 | date = December 16, 2014
 | url = https://www.co.door.wi.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1680/Chapter-5-Economic-Development}}
*{{Citation
 | last1 = Door County UW-Extension | last2 = Deller | first2 = Steven C. 
 | contribution = 
 | title = Door County Agriculture: Value & Economic Impact
 | place = Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
 | pages = 1–2
 | date = 2014 
 | url = https://anre.uwex.edu/files/2015/01/Door_2014.pdf}}
*{{cite news |last=Clark |first=Brian E. |date=June 30, 2015 |title=Tourism key to Door County economy |url=https://www.wisbusiness.com/2015/tourism-key-to-door-county-economy/ |work=WisBusiness |location=Madison, Wisconsin |access-date=August 30, 2021}}
*{{cite news |last=Edwards |first=Colin |date=January 28, 2021 |title=Useful Stats: Annual change in county GDP per capita, 2018 to 2019 |url=https://ssti.org/blog/useful-stats-annual-change-county-gdp-capita-2018-2019 |work=State Science & Technology Institute |location=Westerville, Ohio |access-date=December 8, 2021}}

== References ==
{{reflist}}

{{Economy of the United States by jurisdiction|state=expanded}}

[[Category:Door County, Wisconsin]]
[[Category:Economy of Wisconsin]]
{{Навигационная таблица/Портал/Английская Википедия}}
[[Категория:Английская Википедия]]
[[Категория:Википедия]]
[[Категория:Статья из Википедии]]
[[Категория:Статья из Английской Википедии]]