Просмотр кода страницы Английская Википедия:International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street

{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
  |Litigants=Machinists v. Street
  |ArgueDate=April 21
  |ArgueYear=1960
  |ReargueDateA=January 17
  |ReargueDateB=18
  |ReargueYear=1961
  |DecideDate=June 19
  |DecideYear=1961
  |FullName=[[International Association of Machinists]], et al. v. Street, et al.
  |USVol=367
  |USPage=740
  |ParallelCitations=81 S. Ct. 1784; 6 [[L. Ed. 2d]] 1141; 1961 [[U.S. LEXIS]] 1997 
  |Prior=Appeal from the Supreme Court of Georgia
  |Subsequent=
  |Holding=A union may constitutionally compel contributions from dissenting nonmembers in an agency shop only for the costs of performing the union's statutory duties as exclusive bargaining agent.
  |Plurality=Brennan
  |JoinPlurality=Warren, Clark, Stewart
  |Concurrence=Douglas
  |Concurrence/Dissent=Whittaker
  |Dissent=Black
  |Dissent2=Frankfurter
  |JoinDissent2=Harlan
  |LawsApplied=
}}
'''''International Association of Machinists v. Street''''', 367 U.S. 740 (1961), was a [[United States labor law]] decision by the [[United States Supreme Court]] on labor union freedom to make collective agreements with employers to enroll workers in union membership, or collect fees for the service of [[collective bargaining]].

==Facts==

{{Expand section|date=August 2016}}

==Judgment==
The Supreme Court held that "a union may constitutionally compel contributions from dissenting nonmembers in an agency shop only for the costs of performing the union's statutory duties as exclusive bargaining agent."

==See also==
*[[US labor law]]
* ''[[Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering]]''
* [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 367]]

==Further reading==
*{{Cite journal |last=Cordish |first=D. S. |year=1962 |title=Interpretation of Statutes to Avoid Constitutional Questions re Labor Union Political Contributions |journal=Maryland Law Review |volume=22 |pages=348 |issn=0025-4282 }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Wellington |first=Harry H. |year=1961 |title=''Machinists v. Street'': Statutory Interpretation and the Avoidance of Constitutional Issues |journal=Supreme Court Review |volume=1961 |pages=49–73 |jstor= 3108714|doi= 10.1086/scr.1961.3108714|publisher=The University of Chicago Press |s2cid=142838715 |url=https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1971 }}

==External links==
* {{caselaw source
 | case = ''International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street'', {{ussc|367|740|1961|el=no}}
 | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106288/machinists-v-street/
 | findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/367/740.html
 | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16218813564309818799
 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/367/740/case.html
 | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep367/usrep367740/usrep367740.pdf
 }}

[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court]]
[[Category:United States labor case law]]
[[Category:1961 in United States case law]]
[[Category:International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers]]


{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}
{{Навигационная таблица/Портал/Английская Википедия}}
[[Категория:Английская Википедия]]
[[Категория:Википедия]]
[[Категория:Статья из Википедии]]
[[Категория:Статья из Английской Википедии]]