Английская Википедия:96P/Machholz

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Infobox Comet

Comet 96P/Machholz or 96P/Machholz 1[1] is a short-period sungrazing comet discovered on May 12, 1986, by amateur astronomer Donald Machholz on Loma Prieta peak, in central California using Шаблон:Convert binoculars.[1][2] On June 6, 1986, 96P/Machholz passed Шаблон:Convert from the Earth.[3] 96P/Machholz last came to perihelion on January 31, 2023.[4] The comet has an estimated diameter of around Шаблон:Convert.[5]

96P/Machholz is unusual among comets in several respects. Other than small SOHO comets, its highly eccentric 5.29 year orbit has the smallest perihelion distance known among numbered/regular short-period comets,[6] bringing it considerably closer to the Sun than the orbit of Mercury. It is also the only known short-period comet with both high orbital inclination and high eccentricity.[5] In 2007, 96P/Machholz was found to be both carbon-depleted and cyanogen-depleted, a chemical composition nearly unique among comets with known compositions.[7][8] The chemical composition implies a different and possible extrasolar origin.[9][10]

Orbit

The orbit of 96P/Machholz corresponds to the Arietids and the Marsden and Kracht comet groups.[11] Its Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter, TJ, is 1.94 and comets are generally classified as Jupiter family if TJ > 2.[5] Orbital integrations indicate that TJ was greater than 2 about 2500 years ago.[5] 96P/Machholz is currently in a 9:4 orbital resonance with Jupiter.[5] It will not make another close approach to the Earth until 2028, when it will pass at a distance of Шаблон:Convert.[3] It may eventually be ejected from the Solar System.[12]

Шаблон:Anchor

96P/Machholz closest Earth approach around 2139-Jun-13[3]
Date & time of
closest approach
Earth distance
(AU)
Sun distance
(AU)
Velocity
wrt Earth
(km/s)
Velocity
wrt Sun
(km/s)
Uncertainty
region
(3-sigma)
Reference
2139-Jun-13 23:28 ± 13 hours Шаблон:Convert Шаблон:Convert 41.4 37.1 ± 500 thousand km Horizons

Perihelion

Perihelion distance
at different epochs
[13]
Epoch Perihelion
(AU)
1897 0.169
1928 0.152
1939 0.145
1975 0.133
1986 0.127
2023 0.116
2038 0.109
2081 0.095
2102 0.093

96P/Machholz has a perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) of Шаблон:Convert for 2028.[4] At perihelion Comet Machholz passes the Sun at Шаблон:Convert.[14] It comes closer to the Sun than any numbered comet less than 321P/SOHO.[6] Between 1897 and 2102 perihelion gradually drops from Шаблон:Convert to Шаблон:Convert.[13] 2081 will be the first perihelion below 0.1 AU.[13]

Observations

Machholz 1 entered the field of view of the orbiting Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) in 1996, 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017, where it was seen by the corona-observing LASCO instrument in its C2 and C3 coronagraphs.[1][15]

2001/02 perihelion

Файл:Comet 96P-Machholz 1 perihelion 2001-02 skymap.png
2001/2002 perihelion starmap

During the 2001/2002 passage the comet brightened to magnitude −2,[16] and was very impressive as seen by SOHO.[17] Шаблон:-

2007 perihelion

Файл:Comet 96P-Machholz 1 perihelion 2007 skymap.png
Starmap of 2007 perihelion

In 2007, it appeared in SOHO's LASCO C3's field of view from April 2 to 6, peaking in brightness on April 4, 2007,[18] around magnitude +2.[19] In these observations, its coma was substantially smaller than the Sun in volume,Шаблон:Citation needed but the forward scattering of light made the comet appear significantly brighter.[20]

The comet SOHO 2333 is believed to be a fragment of Machholz that came off during the 2007 perihelion. It was discovered by Indian amateur astronomer Prafull Sharma in August 2012 by analyzing data from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, specifically the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph.[21] Data analysis of this sort has become commonplace based on public availability of SOHO images. Sharma became the third Indian to have discovered a comet in this manner.[22] Шаблон:-

2012 perihelion

Файл:Comet 96P-Machholz 1 perihelion 2012 skymap.png
Starmap of 2012 perihelion

Between July 12–17, 2012,[9] 96P/Machholz was visible in the SOHO LASCO/C3 field of view and expected to brighten to about magnitude +2.[23] Two small faint fragments of 96P/Machholz were detected in the SOHO C2 images.[24] The fragments were five hours ahead of 96P/Machholz, and probably fragmented from the comet during the 2007 perihelion passage.[24] Шаблон:-

2017 perihelion

Шаблон:Multiple image The 2017 perihelion was on October 27, 2017. At closest approach, it passed Шаблон:Convert from the Sun. Coronagraphs on SOHO were monitoring the flyby for a fifth time. Its peak brightness was expected to be about 2.0, when it was closest to the Sun.[25] Шаблон:-

2023 perihelion

Файл:96P-20230210-135403.png
96P/Machholz 79 minutes before sunrise on 10 Feb 2023 (lower right of center)

The January 31, 2023 perihelion passage was the sixth passage observed by SOHO.[26] On February 4, 2023, the comet was recovered in the morning sky 2 degrees above the horizon at around magnitude 7.[27]

Using observations through October 2022, which is three months before the 2023 perihelion passage, the comet will next come to perihelion around May 12, 2028.[14]

Unusual composition

Spectrographic analysis of the coma of 96P/Machholz was made during its 2007 apparition, as part of the Lowell Observatory comet composition long-term observing program.[28] When compared with the measured abundances of five molecular species in the comae of the other 150 comets in their database, these measurements showed 96P/Machholz to have far fewer carbon molecules.[5] These other comets had on average 72 times as much cyanogen as 96P/Machholz.

The only comet previously seen with similar depletion both in carbon-chain molecules and cyanogens is Шаблон:Nowrap, but it has a substantially different orbit.[29]

There are currently three hypotheses to explain the chemical composition of 96P/Machholz. One hypothesis for the difference is that 96P/Machholz was an interstellar comet from outside the Solar System and was captured by the Sun.[30] Other possibilities are that it formed in an extremely cold region of the Solar System (such that most carbon gets trapped in other molecules). Given how close it approaches the Sun at perihelion, repeated baking by the Sun may have stripped most of its cyanogen.

Файл:Animation of 96P/Machholz around Sun - 1600-2400.gif
Animation of 96P/Machholz around Sun - 1600-2400
Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2

The following table represents future orbital elements for 96P keeping in mind that results hundreds of years in the future are highly speculative given the uncertain behavior of nongravitational forces over long time intervals and divergent solutions. By the year 2235 the uncertainty in the comets position is more than Шаблон:Convert.[31]

Osculating elements as of January 1[32]
Year 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
Periapsis (au) 0.34 0.27 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03
Apoapsis (au) 5.73 5.77 5.85 5.88 5.90 5.97 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.02
Inclination (degrees) 70.87 69.65 66.35 63.62 60.11 53.20 44.00 32.36 15.08 16.82
Eccentricity 0.89 0.91 0.93 0.94 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:PeriodicComets Navigator Шаблон:Comets

Шаблон:Use mdy dates

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Cometography не указан текст
  2. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Machholz-podcast-2007 не указан текст
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок jpldata не указан текст
  4. 4,0 4,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок MPC не указан текст
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 5,3 5,4 5,5 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Schleicher2008 не указан текст
  6. 6,0 6,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок SBDB-numbered не указан текст
  7. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок IAU8842 не указан текст
  8. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Langland-Shula2007 не указан текст
  9. 9,0 9,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок S&T-2008-12-05 не указан текст
  10. Шаблон:Cite news
  11. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Ohtsuka2003 не указан текст
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. 13,0 13,1 13,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Kinoshita не указан текст
  14. 14,0 14,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Horizons2028 не указан текст
  15. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок meteorbs не указан текст
  16. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Yoshida2002 не указан текст
  17. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок hotshot не указан текст
  18. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок SOHO-data не указан текст
  19. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Yoshida2007 не указан текст
  20. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Marcus2007 не указан текст
  21. Шаблон:Cite news
  22. Шаблон:Cite web
  23. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Kusiak2012 не указан текст
  24. 24,0 24,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок babies не указан текст
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Karl Battams (3 Feb 2023)
  27. Qicheng Zhang (4 Feb 2023) // Michael Jäger (5 Feb 2023)
  28. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Lowell2008 не указан текст
  29. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Fink1992 не указан текст
  30. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок space не указан текст
  31. JPL Horizons RNG_3sigma (uncertainty region) for 96P
  32. Шаблон:Cite web