Английская Википедия:Chinese treasure ship

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Redirect Шаблон:Use mdy dates

Шаблон:Infobox ship imageШаблон:Infobox ship careerШаблон:Infobox ship characteristicsШаблон:Infobox ship imageШаблон:Infobox ship careerШаблон:Infobox ship characteristics

A Chinese treasure ship (Шаблон:Zh, literally "gem ship"Шаблон:Sfn) is a type of large wooden ship in the fleet of admiral Zheng He, who led seven voyages during the early 15th-century Ming dynasty. The size of the largest Chinese treasure ships has been a subject of controversy, with some Chinese records mentioning the size of 44 zhang or 44.4 zhang, which has been interpreted by some as over Шаблон:Cvt in length, while others have stated that Zheng He's largest ship was Шаблон:Cvt or less in length.[1]

Accounts

Chinese

Файл:Ming-Expeditions.svg
The Ming treasure voyages alongside Yishiha's expeditions to the northeast and Chen Cheng's embassy to the Timurids.

According to the Шаблон:Interlanguage link multi (1658), the first voyage consisted of 63 treasure ships crewed by 27,870 men.Шаблон:Sfn

The History of Ming (1739) credits the first voyage with 62 treasure ships crewed by 27,800 men.Шаблон:Sfn A Zheng He era inscription in the Jinghai Temple in Nanjing gave the size of Zheng He ships in 1405 as 2,000 liao (500 tons), but did not give the number of ships.Шаблон:Sfn

Alongside the treasures were also another 255 ships according to the Шаблон:Interlanguage link multi (1520), giving the combined fleet of the first voyage a total of 317 ships. However, the addition of 255 ships is a case of double accounting according to Edward L. Dreyer, who notes that the Taizong Shilu does not distinguish the order of 250 ships from the treasure ships. As such the first fleet would have been around 250 ships including the treasure ships.Шаблон:Sfn

The second voyage consisted of 249 ships.Шаблон:Sfn The Jinghai Temple inscription gave the ship dimensions in 1409 as 1500 liao (375 tons).Шаблон:Sfn

According to the Xingcha Shenglan (1436), the third voyage consisted of 48 treasure ships, not including other ships.Шаблон:Sfn

The Xingcha Shenglan states that the fourth voyage consisted of 63 treasure ships crewed by 27,670 men.Шаблон:Sfn

There are no sources for number of ships or men for the fifth and sixth voyages.Шаблон:Sfn

According to the Liujiagang and Changle Inscriptions, the seventh voyage had "more than a hundred large ships".Шаблон:Sfn

Yemen

The most contemporary non-Chinese record of the expeditions is an untitled and anonymous annalistic account of the then-ruling Rasūlid dynasty of Yemen, compiled in the years 1439–1440. It reports the arrival of Chinese ships in 1419, 1423, and 1432, which approximately correspond to Zheng He's fifth, sixth, and seventh voyages. The 1419 arrival is described thus:

Шаблон:Quotation

The later Yemeni historian, Ibn al-Daybaʿ (1461–1537), writes:

Шаблон:Quotation

Mamluks

Mamluk historian Ibn Taghribirdi (1411–1470) writes:

Шаблон:Quotation

Niccolò de' Conti

Niccolò de' Conti (Шаблон:Circa–1469), a contemporary of Zheng He, was also an eyewitness of Chinese ships in Southeast Asia, claiming to have seen five-masted junks of about 2000 tons* burthen:Шаблон:Sfn Шаблон:Quotation

  • Other translations of the passage give the size as a 2000 butts,[2] which would be around a 1000 tons, a butt being half a ton.Шаблон:NoteTag Christopher Wake noted that the transcription of the unit is actually vegetes, that is Venetian butt, and estimated a burthen of 1300 tons.Шаблон:Sfn The ship of Conti may have been a Burmese or Indonesian jong.Шаблон:Sfn

Song and Yuan junks

Файл:Sir Henry Yule illustration of Yuan dynasty war junk.jpg
Sir Henry Yule's 1871 illustration of Yuan dynasty war junk used in the Mongol invasion of Java (1293 CE).
Файл:Zheng He's Treasure Ship 3.jpg
A model of a treasure ship from Admiral Zheng He's fleet.

Although active prior to the treasure voyages, both Marco Polo (1254–1325) and Ibn Battuta (1304–1369) attest to large multi-masted ships carrying 500 to 1000 passengers in Chinese waters.Шаблон:Sfn The large ships (up to 5,000 liao or 1520–1860 tons burden) would carry 500–600 men, and the second class (1,000–2,000 liao) would carry 200–300 men.Шаблон:Sfn Unlike Ming treasure ships, Song and Yuan great junks were propelled by oars, and had with them smaller junks, probably for help in maneuvering.Шаблон:Sfn The largest junks (5,000 liao) may have had a hull length twice that of a Quanzhou ship (1,000 liao),Шаблон:Sfn Liuhe, Taicang is Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn However, the usual Chinese trading junks pre-1500 was around Шаблон:Convert long, with the length of Шаблон:Convert only becoming the norm after 1500 CE. Large size could be a disadvantage for shallow harbors of southern seas, and the presence of numerous reefs exacerbates this.Шаблон:Sfn

Marco Polo

Шаблон:Quotation

Ibn Battuta

Файл:WorldShips1460.jpg
Ships of the Fra Mauro map (1460).

Шаблон:Quotation

Description

Файл:Nanjing Treasure Boat - P1070978.JPG
A stationary full-size model of a treasure ship (63.25 m long) at the Treasure Ship Shipyard site in Nanjing. It was built c. 2005 from concrete and wooden planking
Файл:Nanjing Treasure Ship model - interior - P1070992.JPG
Inside the display ship in Nanjing

Taizong Shilu

The most contemporary accounts of the treasure ships come from the Taizong Shilu, which contains 24 notices from 1403 to 1419 for the construction of ships at several locations.Шаблон:Sfn

On 4 September 1403, 200 "seagoing transport ships" were ordered from the Capital Guards in Nanjing.Шаблон:Sfn

On 1 March 1404, 50 "seagoing ships" were ordered from the Capital Guards.Шаблон:Sfn

In 1407, 249 vessels were ordered "to be prepared for embassies to the several countries of the Western Ocean".Шаблон:Sfn

On 14 February 1408, 48 treasure ships were ordered from the Ministry of Works in Nanjing. This is the only contemporary account containing references to both treasure ships and a specific place of construction. Coincidentally, the only physical evidence of treasure ships comes from Nanjing.Шаблон:Sfn

On 2 October 1419, 41 treasure ships were ordered without disclosing the specific builders involved.Шаблон:Sfn

Longjiang Chuanchang Zhi

Шаблон:Interlanguage link multi's Longjiang Chuanchang Zhi (1553), also known as the Record of the Dragon River Shipyard, notes that the plans for the treasure ships had vanished from the ship yard in which they were built.Шаблон:Sfn

Sanbao Taijian Xia Xiyang Ji Tongsu Yanyi

According to Шаблон:Interlanguage link multi's 1597 novel Sanbao Taijian Xia Xiyang Ji Tongsu Yanyi (Eunuch Sanbao Western Records Popular Romance), the treasure fleet consisted of five distinct classes of ships:Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn[3]

Edward L. Dreyer claims that Luo Maodeng's novel is unsuitable as historical evidence.Шаблон:Sfn The novel contains a number of fantasy elements; for example the ships were "constructed with divine help by the immortal Lu Ban".Шаблон:Sfn Scholars have worked, however, to distinguish the fictional elements from those that the author had access to but have subsequently been lost, including both written and oral sources.[4]

Файл:Treasure Boat Shipyard museum - anchor - P1080045.JPG
An old anchor discovered at the Treasure Boat Shipyard in 2004.

Dimensions

Contemporary descriptions

The contemporary inscription of Zheng He's ships in the Jinghai temple (靜海寺—Jìng hǎi sì) inscription in Nanjing gives sizes of 2,000 liao (500 tons) and 1,500 liao (275 tons),Шаблон:Sfn which are far too low than would be implied by a ship of 444 chi (450 ft) given by the History of Ming. In addition, in the contemporary account of Zheng He's 7th voyage by Gong Zhen, he said it took 200 to 300 men to handle Zheng He's ships. Ming minister Song Li indicated a ratio of 1 man per 2.5 tons of cargo, which would imply Zheng He's ships were 500 to 750 tons.Шаблон:Sfn

The inscription on the tomb of Hong Bao, an official in Zheng He's fleet, mentions the construction of a 5,000 liao displacement ship.[5]

44 zhang ship

History of Ming

According to the History of Ming (Ming shi—明史), completed in 1739, the treasure ships were 44 zhang, 4 chi, i.e. 444 chi in length, and had a beam of 18 zhang. The dimensions of ships are no coincidence. The number "4" has numerological significance as a symbol of the 4 cardinal directions, 4 seasons, and 4 virtues. The number 4 was an auspicious association for treasure ships.Шаблон:Sfn These dimensions first appeared in a novel published in 1597, more than a century and a half after Zheng He's voyages. The 3 contemporary accounts of Zheng He's voyages do not have the ship dimensions.Шаблон:Sfn

The zhang was fixed at 141 inches in the 19th century, making the chi 14.1 inches. However the common Ming value for chi was 12.2 inches and the value fluctuated depending on region. The Ministry of Works used a chi of 12.1 inches while the Jiangsu builders used a chi of 13.3 inches. Some of the ships in the treasure fleet, but not the treasure ships, were built in Fujian, where the chi was 10.4 to 11 inches. Assuming a range of 10.5 to 12 inches for each chi, the dimensions of the treasure ships as recorded by the History of Ming would have been between 385 by 157.5 feet and 440 by 180 feet (117.5 by 48 metres, and 134 by 55 metres).Шаблон:Sfn Louise Levathes estimates that it had a maximum size of 110–124 m (390–408 feet) long and 49–51 m (160–166 feet) wide instead, taking 1 chi as 10.53–11.037 inches.Шаблон:Sfn

According to British scientist, historian and sinologist Joseph Needham, the dimensions of the largest of these ships were Шаблон:Convert by Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn American historian Edward L. Dreyer is in broad agreement with Needham's views.Шаблон:Sfn

Modern estimates

Modern scholars have argued on engineering grounds that it is highly unlikely that Zheng He's ship was Шаблон:Convert in length. Guan Jincheng (1947) proposed a much more modest size of 20 zhang long by 2.4 zhang wide (204 ft by 25.5 ft or 62.2 m by 7.8 m).[6] Xin Yuan'ou, a shipbuilding engineer and professor of the history of science at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, argues on engineering grounds that it is highly unlikely that Zheng He's treasure ships were 450 ft long, and suggests that they were probably closer to 200–250 ft (61–76 m) in length.Шаблон:Sfn[7] Hsu Yun-Ts'iao does not agree with Xin Yuan'ou: Estimating the size of a 2,000 liao ship with the Treatise of the Longjiang shipyard (龙江船厂志—lóng jiāng chuánchǎng zhì) at Nanjing, the size is as follows: LOA Шаблон:Convert, bottom's hull length Шаблон:Convert, overhanging "tail" length Шаблон:Convert, front depth Шаблон:Convert, front width Шаблон:Convert, mid-hull depth Шаблон:Convert, mid-hull width Шаблон:Convert, tail depth Шаблон:Convert, tail width Шаблон:Convert, and the length to width ratio is 7:1.Шаблон:Sfn Dionisius A. Agius (2008) estimated a size of 200–250 ft (60.96 m–76.2 m) and maximum weight of 700 tons.Шаблон:Sfn Tang Zhiba, Xin Yuan'ou, and Zheng Ming have calculated the dimensions of the 2,000 liao ship, obtaining a length of Шаблон:Convert, width of Шаблон:Convert, and draught of Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn Zheng Ming believes that the "Heavenly Princess Classics" depict 2,000 liao ships.Шаблон:Sfn

Файл:Longjiang junk ship.JPG
A four masted junk from the Treatise of the Longjiang shipyard, 1553

André Wegener Sleeswyk extrapolated the size of liao (料 — material) by deducing the data from mid-16th century Chinese river junks. He suggested that the 2,000 liao ships were bao chuan (treasure ship), while the 1,500 liao ships were ma chuan (horse ship). In his calculations, the treasure ships would have had a length of 52.5 m, a width of 9.89 m, and a height of 4.71 m. The horse ships would have a length of 46.63 m, a width of 8.8 m, and a height of 4.19 m.Шаблон:Sfn Richard Barker estimated that the treasure ships would have a length of Шаблон:Convert, a width of Шаблон:Convert, and a draught of Шаблон:Convert. He estimated it using an assumed displacement of 3100 tons.[8]

One explanation for the colossal size of the 44 zhang treasure ships, if in fact built, was that they were only for a display of imperial power by the emperor and imperial bureaucrats on the Yangtze River when on court business, including when reviewing Zheng He's actual expedition fleet. The Yangtze River, with its calmer waters, may have been navigable for such large but unseaworthy ships. Zheng He would not have had the privilege in rank to command the largest of these ships. Some of the largest ships of Zheng He's fleet were the 6 masted 2000-liao ships. This would give burthen of 500 tons and a displacement tonnage of about 800 tons.[7]Шаблон:Sfn Because they were built and based in Nanjing, and repeatedly sailed along the Yangtze river (including in winter, when the water is low), their draught cannot exceed 7–7.5 m. It is also known that Zheng He's fleet visited Palembang in Sumatra, where they needed to cross the Musi river. It is unknown whether Zheng He's ships sailed as far as Palembang, or whether they waited on the shore in the Bangka Strait while the smaller ships sailed at Musi; but at least the draught of the ship that reaches Palembang should not be more than 6 m.Шаблон:Sfn

Файл:Zheng He's visits to the West on the book "Heavenly Princess Classics" 1420.jpg
A restored copy of the illustration of Zheng He's visits to the West on the flyleaf of the book "Heavenly Princess Classics" in 1420. This invaluable picture is the earliest pictorial record of Zheng He treasure-ships. The ships are depicted with 6 masts, but only 3 sails used.

Xin Yuan'ou, a naval engineer and historian, has argued that Zheng He's ships could not have been as large as recorded in the History of Ming.Шаблон:Sfn based on the following reasons:

  1. Ships of the dimensions given in the Ming shi would have been 15,000–20,000 tons according to his calculations, exceeding a natural limit to the size of a wooden ocean-going ship of about 7,000 tons displacement.Шаблон:Sfn
  2. With the benefit of modern technology it would be difficult to manufacture a wooden ship of 10,000 tons, let alone one that was 1.5–2 times that size. It was only when ships began to be built of iron in the 1860s that they could exceed 10,000 tons.Шаблон:Sfn
  3. Watertight compartments characteristic of traditional Chinese ships tended to make the vessels transversely strong but longitudinally weak.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
  4. A ship of these dimensions would need masts that were 100 metres tall. Several timbers would have to be joined vertically. As a single tree trunk would not be large enough in diameter to support such mast, multiple timbers would need to be combined at the base as well. No evidence that China had the type of joining materials necessary to accomplish these tasks.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
  5. A ship with 9 masts would be unable to resist the combined strength and force of such huge sails, she would not be able to cope with strong wind and would break.Шаблон:Sfn
  6. It took four centuries (from the Renaissance to the modern era) for Western ships to increase in size from 1500 to 5000 tons displacement. For Chinese ships to have reached three or four times this size in just two years (from Emperor Yongle's accession in 1403 to the launch of the first expedition in 1405) was unlikely.Шаблон:Sfn
  7. The 200 to 300 sailors as mentioned by Gong Zhen could not have managed a 20,000 ton ship. According to Xin, a ship of such size would have had to have a complement of 8,000 men.Шаблон:Sfn

From the comments of modern scholars on Medieval Chinese accounts and reports, it is apparent that a ship had a natural limit to her size, going beyond, would have made her structurally unsafe as well as causing a considerable loss of maneuverability, something the Spanish Armada ships famously experienced.[9] Beyond a certain size (about 300 feet or 91.44 m in length) a wooden ship is structurally unsafe.Шаблон:Sfn It was not until the mid to late 19th century that the length of the largest western wooden ship began to exceed 100 meters, even this was done using modern industrial tools and iron parts.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Measurement conversion

It is also possible that the measure of zhang (丈) used in the conversions was mistaken. Seventeenth-century Ming records state that the European East Indiamen and galleons were 30, 40, 50, and 60 zhang (90, 120, 150, and 180 m) in length.Шаблон:Sfn The length of a Dutch ship recorded in the History of Ming was 30 zhang. If the zhang is taken to be 3.2 m, the Dutch ship would be 96 m long. Also, the Dutch Hongyi cannon was recorded to be more than 2 zhang (6.4 m) long. A comparative study by Hu Xiaowei (2018) concluded that 1 zhang would be equal to 1.5–1.6 m, this means the Dutch ship would be 45–48 m long and the cannon would be 3–3.2 m long.Шаблон:Sfn Taking 1.6 m for 1 zhang, Zheng He's 44 zhang treasure ship would be Шаблон:Convert long and Шаблон:Convert wide, or 22 zhang long and 9 zhang wide if the zhang is taken to be 3.2 m.Шаблон:Sfn It is known that the measuring unit during the Ming era was not unified: A measurement of East and West Pagoda in Quanzhou resulted in a zhang unit of 2.5–2.56 m.Шаблон:Sfn According to Chen Cunren, one zhang in the Ming Dynasty is only half a zhang in modern times.Шаблон:Sfn

5,000 liao ship

In June 2010, a new inscription was found in Hong Bao's tomb, confirming the existence of the Ming dynasty's 5,000 liao ship.Шаблон:Sfn[5] Taking the liao to be Шаблон:Convert burthen, that would be 1,250 tons burthen.Шаблон:Sfn Sleeswyk argued that the term liao refers to the displacement and not cargo weight, one liao would be equivalent to Шаблон:Convert of displacement.Шаблон:Sfn According to Zheng Ming, the 5,000 liao ship would have a dimension of Шаблон:Convert, width of Шаблон:Convert, with Шаблон:Convert draught, and the displacement would reach more than 2,700 tons. The 5,000 liao ship may have been used as the flagship but the number of ships was relatively small.Шаблон:Sfn Wake argued that the 5,000 liao ships were not used until after the 3rd voyage, when the voyages were extended beyond India.Шаблон:Sfn Xi Longfei identified that the word "treasure ship", which would refer to the 44 zhang ship, appeared for the first time in the 6th year of Yongle. This large ship was too late to be used for the third voyage, so it appeared for the first time during the 4th voyage, and was recorded by Ma Huan.Шаблон:Sfn Judging from the three images from the Ming era, the largest ships had 3–4 main masts and 2–3 auxiliary masts.Шаблон:Sfn

Structure

Файл:Section of the Zheng He's treasure ship.jpg
Section of the Zheng He's treasure ship (mock-up in the Maritime Experiential Museum, Sentosa island, Singapore).

The keel consisted of wooden beams bound together with iron hoops. In stormy weather, holes in the prow would partially fill with water when the ship pitched forward, thus lessening the violent turbulence caused by waves. Treasure ships also used floating anchors cast off the sides of the ship in order to increase stability. The stern had two 2.5 m (8 foot) iron anchors weighing over a thousand pounds each, used for mooring offshore. Like many Chinese anchors, these had four flukes set at a sharp angle against the main shaft. Watertight compartments were also used to add strength to the treasure ships. The ships also had a balanced rudder which could be raised and lowered, creating additional stability like an extra keel. The balanced rudder placed as much of the rudder forward of the stern post as behind it, making such large ships easier to steer. Unlike a typical fuchuan warship, the treasure ships had nine staggered masts and twelve square sails, increasing its speed. Treasure ships also had 24 cast-bronze cannons with a maximum range of 240 to 275 m (800–900 feet). However, treasure ships were considered luxury ships rather than warships. As such, they lacked the fuchuan's raised platforms or extended planks used for battle.Шаблон:Sfn

Non-gunpowder weapons on Zheng He's vessels seems to be bows. For gunpowder weapons, they carried bombards (albeit shorter than Portuguese bombards) and various kind of hand cannons, such as can be found on early 15th century Bakau shipwreck.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Comparing with Penglai wrecks, the fleet may have carried cannons with bowl-shaped muzzle (which dates back to late Yuan dynasty), and iron cannons with several rings on their muzzle (in the wrecks they are 76 and 73 cm long, weighing 110 and 74 kg), which according to Tang Zhiba, a typical of early Ming iron cannon. They may also carry incendiary bombs (quicklime bottles).Шаблон:Sfn Girolamo Sernigi (1499) gives an account of the armament of what possibly the Chinese vessels:

It is now about 80 years since there arrived in this city of Chalicut certain vessels of white Christians, who wore their hair long like Germans, and had no beards except around the mouth, such as are worn at Constantinople by cavaliers and courtiers. They landed, wearing a cuirass, helmet, and visor, and carrying a certain weapon [sword] attached to a spear. Their vessels are armed with bombards, shorter than those in use with us. Once every two years they return with 20 or 25 vessels. They are unable to tell what people they are, nor what merchandise they bring to this city, save that it includes very fine linen-cloth and brass-ware. They load spices. Their vessels have four masts like those of Spain. If they were Germans it seems to me that we should have had some notice about them; possibly they may be Russians if they have a port there. On the arrival of the captain we may learn who these people are, for the Italian-speaking pilot, who was given him by the Moorish king, and whom he took away contrary to his inclinations, is with him, and may be able to tell.
Girolamo Sernigi (1499) about the then-unknown Chinese visitors [10]

Physical evidence

Файл:Treasure Boat Shipyard - stele pavilion - P1080088.JPG
A stone tortoise overlooking the former 4th working pool of the Longjiang Shipyard (now a park), where treasure ships were built 600 years ago

From 2003 to 2004, the Treasure Shipyard was excavated in northwestern Nanjing (the former capital of the Ming Dynasty), near the Yangtze River. Despite the site being referred to as the "Longjiang Treasure Shipyard" (龍江寶船廠—lóng jiāng bǎo chuánchǎng) in the official names, the site is distinct from the actual Longjiang Shipyard, which was located on a different site and produced different types of ships. The Treasure Shipyard, where Zheng He's fleet were believed to have been built in the Ming Dynasty, once consisted of thirteen basins (based on a 1944 map), most of which have now been covered by the construction of buildings in the 20th century. The basins are believed to have been connected to the Yangtze via a series of gates. Three long basins survive, each with wooden structures inside them that were interpreted to be frames for the ships to be built on. The largest basin extends for a length of Шаблон:Convert. While they were long enough to accommodate the largest claimed Zheng He treasure ship, they were not wide enough to fit even a ship half the claimed size. The basin was only Шаблон:Convert wide at most, with only a Шаблон:Convert width area of it showing evidence of structures. They were also not deep enough, being only Шаблон:Convert deep. Other remains of ships in the site indicate that the ships were only slightly larger than the frames that supported them. Moreover, the basin structures were grouped into clusters with large gaps between them, if each cluster was interpreted as a ship framework, then the largest ship would not exceed Шаблон:Convert at most, probably less.[11]

In 1957, a large 11-meter-long rudder shaft was discovered during excavations at the Treasure shipyards. The rudder blade, which did not survive, was attached to a 6-meter section of the axis. According to Chinese archaeologists, the area of the rudder was approximately 42.5 m², and the length of the ship to which it belonged was estimated at 149–166 meters.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Refn However, such use of this piece of archeological evidence rests upon supposing proportions between the rudder and the length of the ship, which have also been the object of intense contestation: That length was estimated using steel, engine-driven ship as the reference. By comparing the rudder shaft to the Quanzhou ship, Church estimated that the ship was Шаблон:Convert long.Шаблон:Sfn

Файл:Treasure Boat Shipyard museum - great tiller - P1080070.JPG
A large tiller discovered at the Treasure Boat Shipyard in 2004.

Speed

The treasure ships were different in size, but not in speed. Under favorable conditions, such as sailing with the winter monsoon from Fujian to Southeast Asia, Zheng He's fleet developed an average speed of about Шаблон:Convert; on many other segments of his route, a significantly lower average speed was recorded, of the order of Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn

As historians note, these speeds were relatively low by the standards of later European sailing fleets, even in comparison with ship of the line, which were built with an emphasis on armament rather than speed. For example, in 1809, Admiral Nelson's squadron, consisting of 10 ships of the line, crossed the Atlantic Ocean at an average speed of Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn

Replica

A Шаблон:Convert copy of a treasure ship was announced in 2006 to be completed in time for the 2008 Olympic Games.[12] However, the copy was still under construction in Nanjing in 2010.[13] A new date of completion was set for 2013;[14] when this dateline failed to be met in 2014, the project was built for 4 years.[15]

See also

Notes

Шаблон:NoteFoot

References

Citations

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

Шаблон:Refbegin

Шаблон:Refend

Further reading

Шаблон:Commons category

  • Traditions and Encounters - A Global Perspective on the Past by Bentley and Ziegler.

Шаблон:- Шаблон:World's largest wooden ships Шаблон:Sailing Vessels and Rigs Шаблон:Ancient and Dynastic Chinese Military History

Шаблон:Authority control

  1. Шаблон:Cite news
  2. Шаблон:Citation
  3. Шаблон:Cite book
  4. Barbara Witt, "Introduction: Sanbao Taijian Xiyang Ji Tongsu Yanyi:: An Annotated Bibliography," Crossroads 12 (2015): 151-155.
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  6. "Zheng He xia Xiyang de chuan” ["The Ships with which Zheng He Went to the Western Ocean"] 鄭和下西洋的船, Dongfang zazhi 東方雜誌 43 (15 January 1947) 1, pp. 47-51, reprinted in Zheng He yanjiu ziliao huibian 鄭和研究資料匯編 (1985), pp. 268-272.
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  8. Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. Howarth, David (1981). The Voyage of the Armada: The Spanish Story. New York, NY: The Viking Press. Page 209–10; he asserts that the Spanish ships were “over-masted for Atlantic weather and had rigging which was too light”.
  10. Sernigi, Girolamo (1499). Translation in Шаблон:Cite book See also Шаблон:Harvp.
  11. Шаблон:Cite book
  12. Шаблон:Cite news
  13. Шаблон:Cite news
  14. Шаблон:Citation
  15. Шаблон:Cite news