Английская Википедия:History of Rome (Livy)

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Italic title Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About

Файл:Altar Mars Venus Massimo.jpg
Stories from Livy I.4, on an altar panel from Ostia. Father Tiber looks on at the lower right while the national lupa (wolf) nourishes Romulus and Remus, founders of Rome. The herders are about to find them. One of their goats can be seen. Small animals denote the wildness of the place. The national aquila (eagle) is portrayed.

The History of Rome, perhaps originally titled Шаблон:Lang, and frequently referred to as Шаблон:Lang (Шаблон:Lang-en),[1] is a monumental history of ancient Rome, written in Latin between 27 and 9 BC by the Roman historian Titus Livius, better known in English as "Livy".Шаблон:Efn The work covers the period from the legends concerning the arrival of Aeneas and the refugees from the fall of Troy, to the city's founding in 753 BC, the expulsion of the Kings in 509 BC, and down to Livy's own time, during the reign of the emperor Augustus.Шаблон:EfnШаблон:Efn The last event covered by Livy is the death of Drusus in 9 BC.[1] 35 of 142 books, about a quarter of the work, are still extant.[2] The surviving books deal with the events down to 293 BC (books 1–10), and from 219 to 166 BC (books 21–45).

Contents

Corpus

The History of Rome originally comprised 142 "books", 35 of which—Books 1–10 with the Preface and Books 21–45—still exist in reasonably complete form.[1] Damage to a manuscript of the 5th century resulted in large gaps (lacunae) in Books 41 and 43–45 (small lacunae exist elsewhere); that is, the material is not covered in any source of Livy's text.Шаблон:Sfn

A fragmentary palimpsest of the 91st book was discovered in the Vatican Library in 1772, containing about a thousand words (roughly three paragraphs), and several papyrus fragments of previously unknown material, much smaller, have been found in Egypt since 1900, most recently about 40 words from Book 11, unearthed in 1986.Шаблон:Sfn

Some passages are nevertheless known thanks to quotes from ancient authors, the most famous being on the death of Cicero, quoted by Seneca the Elder.

Abridgements

Файл:Papyrus PSI 1291 - Epitome of Livy XLVII–XLVIII - Egyptian Museum, Cairo.jpg
Fragment of P. Oxy. 668, with Epitome of Livy XLVII–XLVIII

Livy was abridged, in antiquity, to an epitome, which survives for Book 1, but was itself abridged in the fourth century into the so-called Periochae, which is simply a list of contents. The Periochae survive for the entire work, except for books 136 and 137.[3]

In Oxyrhynchus, a similar summary of books 37–40, 47–55, and only small fragments of 88 was found on a roll of papyrus that is now in the British Museum classified as P.Oxy.IV 0668.[4] There is another fragment, named P.Oxy.XI 1379, which represents a passage from the first book (I, 6) and that shows a high level of correctness.[5] However, the Oxyrhynchus Epitome is damaged and incomplete.

Chronology

The entire work covers the following periods:[1][6]

Books 1–5 – The legendary founding of Rome (including the landing of Aeneas in Italy and the founding of the city by Romulus), the period of the kings, and the early republic down to its conquest by the Gauls in 390 BC.Шаблон:Efn

Books 6–10 – Wars with the Aequi, Volsci, Etruscans, and Samnites, down to 292 BC.

Books 11–20 – The period from 292 to 218, including the First Punic War (lost).

Books 21–30 – The Second Punic War, from 218 to 202.

Books 31–45 – The Macedonian and other eastern wars from 201 to 167.

Books 46 to 142 are all lost:

Books 46–70 – The period from 167 to the outbreak of the Social War in 91.

Books 71–90 – The civil wars between Marius and Sulla, to the death of Sulla in 78.

Books 91–108 – From 78 BC through the end of the Gallic War, in 50.

Books 109–116 – From the Civil War to the death of Caesar (49–44).

Books 117–133 – The wars of the triumvirs down to the death of Antonius (44–30).

Books 134–142 – The rule of Augustus down to the death of Drusus (9).

Table of contents

Book number Status Years covered Main events covered
1 Шаблон:Yes Down to 510 BC Foundation myths: Aeneas, Ascanius, Romulus and Remus, Rape of the Sabine women; history of the Roman Kingdom, expulsion of Tarquinus Superbus.
2 Шаблон:Yes 509–468 BC Foundation of the Republic by Brutus, wars against Tarquinius Superbus and Porsena, Secession of the Plebs, Volscian Wars.
3 Шаблон:Yes 467–446 BC The Decemvirate.
4 Шаблон:Yes 445–404 BC Conflict of the Orders, murder of Spurius Maelius by Ahala, war against the Fidenates.
5 Шаблон:Yes 403–387 BC War against Veii, Sack of Rome by Brennus.
6 Шаблон:Yes 387–366 BC Story of Marcus Manlius Capitolinus, Leges Liciniae Sextiae.
7 Шаблон:Yes 366–342 BC Stories of Titus Manlius Torquatus and Marcus Valerius Corvus, First Samnite War.
8 Шаблон:Yes 341–322 BC First Samnite War, Latin War.
9 Шаблон:Yes 321–304 BC Second Samnite War, defeat of the Caudine Forks, alternate history with Alexander the Great defeated by Rome.
10 Шаблон:Yes 303–293 BC Third Samnite War, sacrifice of Publius Decius Mus.
11 Шаблон:MaybeШаблон:Efn 292–287 BC Third Samnite War, plague in Rome, Secession of the Plebs.
12 Шаблон:Lost 284–280 BC War against the Senones, Pyrrhic War, campaigns against the Samnites and Italians, betrayal of Decius Vibullius at Rhegium.
13 Шаблон:Lost 280–278 BC Pyrrhic War, treaty with Carthage, campaigns against Italic peoples.
14 Шаблон:Lost 278–272 BC Pyrrhic War, treaty with Ptolemy II, Carthage breaks the treaty with Rome, campaigns against Italic peoples.
15 Шаблон:Lost 272–267 BC Rome recovers Tarentum and Rhegium. The Picentes, Umbrians and Sallentini submit.
16 Шаблон:NoШаблон:Efn 264–263 BC First Punic War, first gladiatorial games.
17 Шаблон:Lost 260–256 BC First Punic War
18 Шаблон:NoШаблон:Efn 255 BC First Punic War
19 Шаблон:NoШаблон:Efn 251–241 BC First Punic War
20 Шаблон:Lost 237–220 BC Wars against the Faliscans, Sardinians, Corsicans, Illyrians, Gauls, Insubres, and Istrians.
21 Шаблон:Yes 219–218 BC Second Punic War: Battle of the Trebia.
22 Шаблон:Yes 217–216 BC Second Punic War, defeats of the Lake Trasimene and Cannae.
23 Шаблон:Yes 216–215 BC Second Punic War.
24 Шаблон:Yes 215–213 BC Second Punic War, First Macedonian War.
25 Шаблон:Yes 213–212 BC Second Punic War, fall of Syracuse.
26 Шаблон:Yes 211–210 BC Second Punic War, First Macedonian War. Source for The Continence of Scipio.
27 Шаблон:Yes 210–207 BC Second Punic War, First Macedonian War.
28 Шаблон:Yes 207–205 BC Second Punic War, First Macedonian War.
29 Шаблон:Yes 205–204 BC Second Punic War, revolt of Indibilis and Mandonius.
30 Шаблон:Yes 203–201 BC Second Punic War, Battle of Zama.
31 Шаблон:Yes 201–199 BC Second Macedonian War.
32 Шаблон:Yes 198–197 BC Second Macedonian War.
33 Шаблон:Yes 197–195 BC Second Macedonian War, Battle of Cynoscephalae.
34 Шаблон:Yes 195–194 BC Lex Oppia repealed, victory of Cato in Hispania, War against Nabis, triumphs of Cato and Flamininus.
35 Шаблон:Yes 193–192 BC Campaign against the Ligurians, discussion between Scipio Africanus and Hannibal, affairs of Greece, talks with Antiochus III, who then invades Greece.
36 Шаблон:Yes 191 BC Roman-Seleucid War, Battle of Thermopylae.
37 Шаблон:Yes 190–188 BC Roman-Seleucid War.
38 Шаблон:Yes 188 BC Operations in Greece, campaign against the Galatians, Treaty of Apamea, trial and exile of Scipio Africanus.
39 Шаблон:Yes 187–181 BC The Bacchanalia, causes of the Third Macedonian War, deaths of Scipio Africanus and Hannibal.
40 Шаблон:Yes 184–179 BC Perseus kills his brother Demetrius, and inherits the kingdom of Macedon. Campaign against the Ligurians.
41 Шаблон:Yes 179–174 BC Campaigns against the Ligurians, Histrians, Sardinians and Celtiberians; Perseus' activities in Greece.
42 Шаблон:Yes 173–171 BC Third Macedonian War.
43 Шаблон:Yes 171–169 BC Third Macedonian War.
44 Шаблон:Yes 169–168 BC Third Macedonian War, Battle of Pydna.
45 Шаблон:Yes 168–166 BC Third Macedonian War, capture of Perseus, Sixth Syrian War, triumph of Aemilius Paullus.
46 Шаблон:Lost 165–160 BC Eumenes II's visit to Rome, campaigns in North Italy, embassies to Ptolemy VI and Ptolemy VIII, and Ariarathes V, death of Paullus Aemilius, the Pomptine Marshes are drained.
47 Шаблон:Lost 160–154 BC Division of Egypt between Ptolemy VI and Ptolemy VIII, support of Ariarathes V against Demetrius I, campaigns against the Dalmatians and Ligurians.
48 Шаблон:Lost 154–150 BC Origin of the Third Punic War, death of Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, Second Celtiberian War, Lusitanian War.
49 Шаблон:Lost 149 BC Third Punic War, Lusitanian War, Fourth Macedonian War.
50 Шаблон:Lost 149–147 BC Prusias II of Bithynia is killed by his son Nicomedes II, death of Massinissa, Third Punic War, Scipio Aemilianus elected consul, Fourth Macedonian War.
51 Шаблон:Lost 147–146 BC Third Punic War, destruction of Carthage, Achaean War.
52 Шаблон:Lost 146–145 BC Achaean War, Lusitanian War, war between Alexander Balas and Demetrius II.
53 Шаблон:Lost 143 BC Lusitanian War.
54 Шаблон:Lost 141–139 BC Numantine War, Lusitanian War, death of Viriathus.
55 Шаблон:Lost 138–137 BC Numantine War, murder of Antiochus VI by Diodotus Tryphon.
56 Шаблон:Lost 136–134 BC Numantine War, First Servile War.
57 Шаблон:Lost 133 BC Numantine War, campaign of Scipio Aemilianus.
58 Шаблон:Lost 133 BC Reforms of Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, his death; First Servile War.
59 Шаблон:Lost 133–129 BC Numantine War, victory of Scipio Aemilianus; First Servile War, revolt of Eumenes III of Pergamon, war between Antiochus VII and Phraates II, crisis in Egypt, riots in Rome in the aftermath of Tiberius Gracchus' reforms.
60 Шаблон:Lost 126–123 BC Reforms of Gaius Sempronius Gracchus, Quintus Caecilius Metellus' campaign in the Balearic Islands.
61 Шаблон:Lost 122–120 BC War against the Gauls, victory of Fabius Maximus Allobrogicus against Bituitus, death of Gaius Gracchus.
62 Шаблон:Lost 118–117 BC Affairs of Numidia, with a civil war started by Jugurtha.
63 Шаблон:Lost 114–112 BC Campaigns against the Scordiscians in Thrace, beginning of the Cimbrian War.
64 Шаблон:Lost 112–110 BC Jugurthine War.
65 Шаблон:Lost 109–107 BC Jugurthine War, Cimbrian War.
66 Шаблон:Lost 106 BC Jugurthine War.
67 Шаблон:Lost 105–104 BC Cimbrian War, Marius' triumph and successive consulships.
68 Шаблон:Lost 103–100 BC Cimbrian War.
69 Шаблон:Lost 100 BC Reforms of Saturninus and Glaucia, their deaths.
70 Шаблон:Lost 97–91 BC Campaign against the Celtiberians, Ptolemy Apion bequeaths his kingdom, Sulla reinstates Ariobarzanes in his kingdom, reforms of Marcus Livius Drusus.
71 Шаблон:Lost 91 BC Drusus is murdered, Social War.
72 Шаблон:Lost 91 BC Social War.
73 Шаблон:Lost 90 BC Social War.
74 Шаблон:Lost 89–88 BC Social War.
75 Шаблон:Lost 88 BC Social War.
76 Шаблон:Lost 89–88 BC Social War, Mithridates conquers Cappadocia and Bithynia.
77 Шаблон:Lost 88 BC Sulla's march on Rome, First Mithridatic War.
78 Шаблон:Lost 88 BC First Mithridatic War.
79 Шаблон:Lost 87 BC Bellum Octavianum.
80 Шаблон:Lost 87–86 BC Citizenship given to Italian allies, Bellum Octavianum, death of Marius.
81 Шаблон:Lost 87–86 BC First Mithridatic War, Sulla takes Athens.
82 Шаблон:Lost 86 BC First Mithridatic War, battles of Chaeronea and Orchomenus, Valerius Flaccus is murdered by Flavius Fimbria.
83 Шаблон:Lost 86–84 BC First Mithridatic War, Sulla's civil war.
84 Шаблон:Lost 84 BC Sulla's civil war, death of Cinna.
85 Шаблон:Lost 83 BC Sulla's civil war.
86 Шаблон:Lost 83–82 BC Sulla's civil war, Second Mithridatic War.
87 Шаблон:Lost 82 BC Sulla's civil war.
88 Шаблон:Lost 82 BC Sulla's civil war, Battle of the Colline Gate, death of Marius the Younger.
89 Шаблон:Lost 82–81 BC Sulla's civil war, death of Carbo, Sulla's proscription and reforms, Pompey's first triumph.
90 Шаблон:Lost 78 BC Death of Sulla, uprising of Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, Sertorian War.
91 Шаблон:MaybeШаблон:Sfn 77 BC Sertorian War.
92 Шаблон:Lost 76 BC Sertorian War, campaign of Gaius Scribonius Curio against the Dardanians.
93 Шаблон:Lost 76–75 BC Publius Servilius conquers Isauria, Third Mithridatic War, Sertorian War.
94 Шаблон:Lost 74 BC Third Mithridatic War, Sertorian War.
95 Шаблон:Lost 74–73 BC War of Gaius Scribonius Curio against the Dardanians, Third Servile War, Third Mithridatic War.
96 Шаблон:Lost 73–72 BC Third Servile War, Sertorian War.
97 Шаблон:Lost 71–70 BC Third Servile War, campaign of Marcus Antonius Creticus in Crete, Third Mithridatic War, Crassus and Pompey become consuls.
98 Шаблон:Lost 70–69 BC Third Mithridatic War, campaign of Quintus Caecillius Metellus in Crete.
99 Шаблон:Lost 68–67 BC Third Mithridatic War, Pompey's expedition against the Cilician pirates, campaign of Quintus Caecillius Metellus in Crete.
100 Шаблон:Lost 66 BC Third Mithridatic War, wars in Armenia.
101 Шаблон:Lost 66–65 BC Third Mithridatic War, Catilinarian conspiracy.
102 Шаблон:Lost 64–63 BC Third Mithridatic War, death of Mithridates, Pompey takes Jerusalem, Catilinarian conspiracy.
103 Шаблон:Lost 62–58 BC Catilinarian conspiracy, Publius Clodius Pulcher goes over to the plebeians, First Triumvirate, Gallic Wars.
104 Шаблон:Lost 58–56 BC Gallic Wars, Cicero returns from exile.
105 Шаблон:Lost 56–54 BC Cato's attempt to obstruct the Triumvirate, Gallic Wars, first Crossing of the Rhine.
106 Шаблон:Lost 54–53 BC Gallic Wars, Battle of Carrhae, death of Crassus.
107 Шаблон:Lost 53–52 BC Gallic Wars, murder of Clodius by Milo, Pompey elected sole consul, revolt of Vercingetorix.
108 Шаблон:Lost 52–50 BC Gallic Wars, Battle of Alesia, victory of Gaius Cassius Longinus against the Parthians.
109 Шаблон:Lost 50–49 BC Caesar's Civil War, Crossing of the Rubicon.
110 Шаблон:Lost 49–48 BC Caesar's Civil War.
111 Шаблон:No[7] 48 BC Caesar's Civil War (Battle of Pharsalus).
112 Шаблон:NoШаблон:Efn 48 BC Caesar's Civil War.
113 Шаблон:Lost 47 BC Caesar's Civil War.
114 Шаблон:Lost 46 BC Caesar's Civil War.
115 Шаблон:Lost 46 BC Caesar's Civil War.
116 Шаблон:Lost 45–44 BC Caesar's Civil War, assassination of Caesar.
117 Шаблон:Lost 44 BC Octavian arrives in Italy, Antony disrupts the allotment of provinces, preparations for war on multiple sides.
118 Шаблон:Lost 44 BC Brutus takes the army of Publius Vatinius in Greece, Octavian builds an army, Antony besieges Modena.
119 Шаблон:Lost 44–43 BC Publius Cornelius Dolabella is declared enemy of the state, Battle of Mutina, Octavian becomes consul at 19.
120 Шаблон:NoШаблон:Efn 43 BC Second Triumvirate, proscriptions, death of Cicero.
121 Шаблон:Lost 43 BC Cassius besieges Dolabella in Laodicea, who commits suicide; Brutus executes Gaius Antonius.
122 Шаблон:Lost 43 BC Brutus' campaign in Thrace.
123 Шаблон:Lost 42 BC Sicilian revolt by Sextus Pompey, Liberators' Civil War.
124 Шаблон:Lost 42 BC Battle of Philippi.
125 Шаблон:Lost 41 BC Perusine War.
126 Шаблон:Lost 41–40 BC Perusine War.
127 Шаблон:Lost 40–39 BC Pompeian–Parthian invasion, Pact of Misenum.
128 Шаблон:Lost 38–37 BC Sicilian revolt, Antony's Parthian War, Siege of Jerusalem.
129 Шаблон:Lost 36 BC Sicilian Revolt, Battle of Naulochus, Octavian defeats Lepidus.
130 Шаблон:Lost 36 BC Antony's Parthian War.
131 Шаблон:Lost 35–34 BC Sextus Pompey is captured and executed by Antony, Octavian's campaigns in Illyria, Antony's conquest of Armenia, Donations of Alexandria.
132 Шаблон:Lost 34–31 BC Antony's Civil War: Battle of Actium.
133 Шаблон:Lost 30–28 BC Antony's Civil War: suicides of Antony and Cleopatra; conspiracy of Marcus Aemilius Lepidus Minor.
134 Шаблон:Lost 27 BC Octavian becomes Augustus, census in the three Gauls, campaign of Marcus Licinius Crassus against the Basterni and Moesians.
135 Шаблон:Lost 25 BC Campaigns of Marcus Crassus against the Thracians, and of Augustus in Hispania.
136 Шаблон:Lost Missing in the Periochae.
137 Шаблон:Lost Missing in the Periochae.
138 Шаблон:Lost 15–12 BC Tiberius and Drusus conquers Raetia, death of Agrippa, Drusus makes a census in Gaul.
139 Шаблон:Lost 12 BC Drusus' campaign in Germania, Imperial cult at Lugdunum.
140 Шаблон:Lost 11 BC Conquest of Thracia, Drusus' campaign in Germania, death of Octavia.
141 Шаблон:Lost 10 BC Drusus' campaign in Germania.
142 Шаблон:Lost 9 BC Death of Drusus.

Style

Livy wrote in a mixture of annual chronology and narrative. This emerged from his decision to organise his narrative on a year-by-year scheme with regular announcements of elections of "consuls, prodigies, temple dedications, triumphs, and the like". This kind of year-by-year list of events is termed "annalistic history". Livy employed annalistic features to associate his history with the dominant traditional of Roman history, which was to write these annalistic chronicles; in so doing, he "imbued his history with an aura of continuity and stability" along with "pontifical authority".Шаблон:Sfn

The first and third decades (see below) of Livy's work are written so well that Livy has become a sine qua non of curricula in Golden Age Latin. Some have argued that subsequently the quality of his writing began to decline, and that he becomes repetitious and wordy. Of the 91st book Barthold Georg Niebuhr says "repetitions are here so frequent in the small compass of four pages and the prolixity so great, that we should hardly believe it to belong to Livy...." Niebuhr accounts for the decline by supposing "the writer has grown old and become loquacious...",[8] going so far as to conjecture that the later books were lost because copyists refused to copy such low-quality work.[9]

However, Livy also employed repetitive and formulaic wording in description of repetitive military affairs, described by Ogilvie as "mechanical and careless". Modern readers, however, view Livy's repetitive prose more positively at least in performance of prayers, blessings, and public religious rituals.Шаблон:Sfn

A digression in Book 9, Sections 17–19, suggests that the Romans would have beaten Alexander the Great if he had lived longer and had turned west to attack the Romans, making this digression one of the oldest known written alternate history scenarios.[10]

Publication

Файл:Ab Urbe condita.tif
Ab Urbe condita, 1714

The first five books were published between 27 and 25 BC. The first date mentioned is the year Augustus received that eponymous title: twice in the first five books Livy uses it.[11] For the second date, Livy lists the closings of the temple of Janus but omits that of 25 (it had not happened yet).[12]

Livy continued to work on the History for much of the rest of his life, publishing new material by popular demand. This explains why the work falls naturally into 12 packets, mainly groups of 10 books, or decades, sometimes of 5 books (pentads or Шаблон:Proper name) and the rest without any packet order. The scheme of dividing it entirely into decades is a later innovation of copyists.[13]

The second pentad did not come out until 9 or after, some 16 years after the first pentad. In Book IX Livy states that the Cimminian Forest was more impassable than the German had been recently, referring to the Hercynian Forest (Black Forest) first opened by Drusus and Ahenobarbus.[14] One can only presume that in the interval Livy's first pentad had been such a success that he had to yield to the demand for more.

Manuscripts

There is no uniform system of classifying and naming manuscripts. Often the relationship of one manuscript (MS) to another remains unknown or changes as perceptions of the handwriting change. Livy's release of chapters by packet diachronically encouraged copyists to copy by decade. Each decade has its own conventions, which do not necessarily respect the conventions of any other decade. A family of MSS descend through copying from the same MSS (typically lost). MSS vary widely; to produce an emendation or a printed edition was and is a major task. Usually variant readings are given in footnotes.

First decade

All of the manuscripts (except one) of the first ten books (first decade) of Ab urbe condita, which were copied through the Middle Ages and were used in the first printed editions, are derived from a single recension commissioned by Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, consul, AD 391.[15] A recension is made by comparing extant manuscripts and producing a new version, an emendation, based on the text that seems best to the editor. The latter then "subscribed" to the new MS by noting on it that he had emended it.

Symmachus, probably using the authority of his office, commissioned Tascius Victorianus to emend the first decade. Books I–IX bear the subscription Victorianus emendabam dominis Symmachis, "I Victorianus emended (this) by the authority of Symmachus." Books VI–VIII include another subscription preceding it, that of Symmachus' son-in-law, Nicomachus Flavianus, and Books III–V were also emended by Flavianus' son, Appius Nicomachus Dexter, who says he used his relative Clementianus' copy.[16] This recension and family of descendant MSS is called the Nicomachean, after two of the subscribers. From it several MSS descend (incomplete list):[17][18]

Nicomachean Family of MSS
Identifying
Letter
Location & Number Name Date
V Veronensis rescriptus 10th century
H Harleianus 10th century
E Einsiedlensis 10th century
F Paris 5724 Floriacensis 10th century
P Paris 5725 Parisiensis 9th/10th century
M Mediceus-Laurentianus 10th/11th century
U Upsaliensis 10th/11th century
R Vaticanus 3329 Romanus 11th century
O Bodleianus 20631 Oxoniensis 11th century
D Florentinus-Marcianus Dominicanus 12th century
A Agennensis
Petrarch's copy
12th–14th century
Файл:Livius - Ab urbe condita, nel anno MCCCCLXXXXIII adi XI del mese di febraio - 2399185 S.jpg
Ab urbe condita, 1493

Epigraphists go on to identify several hands and lines of descent. A second family of the first decade consists of the Verona Palimpsest, reconstructed and published by Theodore Mommsen, 1868; hence the Veronensis MSS. It includes 60 leaves of Livy fragments covering Books III-VI. The handwriting style is dated to the 4th century, only a few centuries after Livy.[19]

During the Middle Ages, there were constant rumours that the complete books of the History of Livy lay hidden in the library of a Danish or German Monastery. One individual even affirmed under oath in the court of Martin V that he had seen the whole work, written in Lombardic script, in a monastery in Denmark. All of these rumours were later found to be unsubstantiated.[20]

Veracity

Файл:Livy, Paris, Sainte-Geneviève, Ms. 777.jpg
An illumination in a manuscript of Ab urbe condita, in the French translation of Pierre Bersuire. The manuscript belonged to king Charles V of France. The illumination shows mythical scenes concerning the foundation of Rome and previous mythical history. Paris, Bibliothèque Sainte-Geneviève, Ms. 777, fol. 7r.

The orthodox view is that "Livy was a very poor historian indeed, whether by ancient or modern standards".Шаблон:Sfn This is rooted in a few major reasons. He did "no primary research", relying "exclusively on earlier histories". His understanding of those sources was poor: with Livy relating the same event twice on multiple occasions.Шаблон:Sfn Moreover, "there are clear signs that his Greek was not good enough to understand properly one of his major sources, the Greek historian Polybius",Шаблон:Sfn which he followed closely for events in the east in books 31 to 45.Шаблон:Sfn

Livy also did not intend to produce a history in terms of cataloguing and understanding the past, but rather, in terms of preserving a "memory ... [that] equips the reader with a sense of wrong and right as determined or exemplified by the actions of one's predecessors".Шаблон:Sfn Moreover, the work was also written "under the shadow of the new emperor"Шаблон:Sfn with the goal of supporting "the idea that the Augustan principate was the culmination of Roman history".Шаблон:Sfn

While other sources have attempted to rehabilitate Livy's history in terms of its literary quality (for example, DS Levene's Livy on the Hannibalic War),Шаблон:Sfn this is not a defence of the history's historicity.Шаблон:Sfn Modern criticism of Livy also goes into the "inaccuracy of his battle accounts, the vagueness of his geography, ... the excessive partiality shown to one or [an]other of his 'heroes', and in general the highly rhetorical nature of not only his speeches but also of his dramatic narrations".[21]

However, judgement on Livy's whole work ought to be withheld insofar as only the first third of Ab urbe condita survives; the portions of Livy that survive, heavily relying on an uncritical repetition of earlier sources, may not be the same approach he took for later periods of the republic or his own time, where he would have needed "to do his own research using contemporary testimonies from eyewitnesses[,] the records of the senate and the assemblies[, and records of the] speeches of the great orators".Шаблон:Sfn

Historicity

The details of Livy's History vary from the legendary and mythical stories at the beginningШаблон:Sfn to detailed accounts of real events toward the end. Livy, in his preface on discussing the early history of Rome, noted the difficulties of interpreting or reconciling the sources in his own day:

So many chronological errors, magistrates appearing differently in different authors, suggest ... you cannot tell which consuls came after which or what belonged [to] any one year...Шаблон:Sfn

It is not easy to prefer one thing over the other or one author over another. I think that the tradition has been contaminated... since various families have fraudulently arrogated to themselves the repute of deeds and offices. As a result, both individuals' deeds and the public records of events have certainly been thrown into confusion. Nor is there any writer contemporary with those times who could serve as a reliable standard.Шаблон:Sfn

Livy too recognised that the early years of Rome were profoundly ahistorical, saying "the traditions of what happened prior to the foundation of the city or whilst it was being built, are more fitted to adorn the creations of the poet than the authentic records of the historian".Шаблон:Sfn The first book has been one of the most significant sources of the various accounts of the traditional legend of Romulus and Remus.[22] However, when comparing Livy's account of the kingdom to that of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, his scepticism is better evident, as he omitted "many stories which seemed rather improbable to him".Шаблон:Sfn And in general, the early parts of the books are important accounts of early Rome surviving from antiquity.Шаблон:Sfn

But while Livy did recognise "the higher reliability of older contemporary authors compared to younger ones", he did little to ensure that his history was internally consistent or follow his own insights on unreliability regularly, preferring the story of his chosen choice without changes, "even if he afterward detected capital errors".Шаблон:Sfn

Livy's treatment of his own sources was more in terms of arranging material and synthesising a narrative rather than engaging in original research into official documents; in doing so, he "did little more than [trying] to reconcile discrepancies in his sources by using arguments from probability".Шаблон:Sfn However, Livy did not substantially grapple with the possibility that annalists knew how to invent probable stories.Шаблон:Sfn Furthermore, rarely did Livy provide the names of his sources, especially in the long passages where he followed one major source with infrequent comparisons to other sources to correct errors.Шаблон:Sfn Fortunately, Livy's goal in telling existing narratives with "better style and arrangement" means he seemingly did not introduce into his history "invented episodes of exaggerations".Шаблон:Sfn

Livy's sources

Livy's work "came at the end of a long line of historians ... conventionally known as the 'annalistic tradition'".Шаблон:Sfn Where he relied on these sources (along with other narrative sources available in his day) his principle was similar to that of Herodotus': "tell what he had been told".Шаблон:Sfn

Roman historiography goes back to Quintus Fabius Pictor who wrote Шаблон:Circa, heavily influenced by Greek historiographical canons and methods. Other annalists included Quintus Ennius, Marcius Porcius Cato the censor, Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi, Lucius Cassius Hemina, Gnaeus Gellius, Vennonius, Valerius Antias, Licinius Macer, Quintus Claudius Quadrigarius, and Quintus Aelius Tubero.Шаблон:Sfn The last three annalists (operating in the first century BC) are, however, "widely believed to have been less scrupulous than their second-century predecessors", supplying stories about the archaic period "from their own imaginations".Шаблон:Sfn However, as to certain elements of his narrative, Livy may have relied on "unscrupulous annalists" who "did not hesitate to invent a series of face-saving victories".Шаблон:Sfn

Livy, did not use the libri lintei or the annales maximi kept by the pontifex maximus; nor did he "walk around in Rome, or elsewhere, to discover inscriptions or other new documents".Шаблон:Sfn The difficulties of using the senate's own archives, documented in speeches by Cicero, "hint... at the possibilities of falsifying evidence" and the poor transmission of authoritative historical records.Шаблон:Sfn

Later influences

Machiavelli

Niccolò Machiavelli's work on republics, Discourses on Livy, is presented as a commentary on the History of Rome.

Translations

The first complete rendering of Ab urbe condita into English was Philemon Holland's translation published in 1600. According to Considine, "it was a work of great importance, presented in a grand folio volume of 1,458 pages, and dedicated to [Queen Elizabeth I]".Шаблон:Sfn

A notable translation of Livy titled History of Rome was made by B.O. Foster in 1919 for the Loeb Classical Library. A partial translation by Aubrey de Sélincourt was printed in 1960–1965 for Penguin Classics.[23][24]

Шаблон:Wikisource The version of Livy available on Wikisource is that from the 1905 translation of Reverend Canon Roberts for Everyman's Library.Шаблон:Sfn

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Citations

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

Шаблон:Refbegin

Шаблон:Refend

Further reading

Шаблон:Refbegin

Шаблон:Refend

External links

Шаблон:Wikisourcelang

Primary sources

Secondary sources

Шаблон:Subject bar Шаблон:Authority control

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 Шаблон:Cite DGRBM
  2. Foster (1874), p. xvi.
  3. Шаблон:Cite web
  4. Шаблон:Cite web
  5. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, part XI, London, 1915, pagg. 188-89.
  6. The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature, ed. By M.C. Howatson. Oxford, 1989, p. 326.
  7. Шаблон:Harvnb. Citing Plutarch, Caesar 47.
  8. Niebuhr, ed. Schmitz, 1844 The History of Rome vol. I. p.56
  9. Nieburh, ed. Schmitz, 1844 The History of Rome vol. I. p.57
  10. Шаблон:Cite book
  11. Foster (1874), p. xi, citing Livy I.19 and IV.20.
  12. Foster (1874), p. xi, citing Livy I.19.
  13. Foster (1874), pp xv–xvi.
  14. Niebuhr (1844), p. 39, citing Livy IX.36.
  15. Шаблон:Cite book
  16. Foster (1874), pp. xxxii–xxxvi
  17. Шаблон:Cite book
  18. Kraus (1994), p. 30
  19. Foster (1874), p. xxxii.
  20. Шаблон:Cite journal
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. Шаблон:Cite journal
  23. Шаблон:Cite book
  24. Шаблон:Cite book