Английская Википедия:2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 04:04, 22 декабря 2023; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Class I U.S. Senate election in Pennsylvania}} {{Use mdy dates | date=November 2017}} {{Infobox election | election_name = 2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania | country = Pennsylvania | type = presidential | ongoing = no | previous_election = 2000 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania | previous_year = 2000 | next_election = 2012 United States...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox election

Шаблон:ElectionsPA The 2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania was held on November 7, 2006. Incumbent Republican Rick Santorum ran for re-election to a third term, but was defeated by Democratic State Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr., the son of former Pennsylvania governor Bob Casey Sr.[1] Casey was elected to serve between January 3, 2007 and January 3, 2013.

Santorum trailed Casey in every public poll taken during the campaign. Casey's margin of victory (nearly 18% of those who voted) was the largest ever for a Democratic Senate nominee in Pennsylvania, the largest margin of victory for a Senate challenger in the 2006 elections, and the largest general election margin of defeat for an incumbent U.S. Senator since 1980.[2] Casey was the first Pennsylvania Democrat to win a full term in the Senate since Joseph S. Clark Jr. in 1962, and the first Democrat to win a Senate election since 1991. He was the first Democrat to win a full term for this seat since 1940.

As of 2023, this was the last time the following counties have voted Democratic in a Senate election: Greene, Washington, Westmoreland, Somerset, Lawrence, Mercer, Armstrong, Indiana, Cambria, Warren, Forest, Elk, Clearfield, Clinton, Schuylkill, Columbia, and Carbon. As of 2023, this is the last time that an incumbent Senator from Pennsylvania lost re-election.

Republican primary

Candidates

Withdrew

  • John Featherman, Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate in 2000 2000

Featherman withdrew his candidacy after a Republican party petition challenge because he did not have the necessary number of signatures to get on the ballot. As a result, Santorum won the Republican nomination unopposed.[3]

Results

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end


Democratic primary

The Democratic primary was held May 16, 2006.

Candidates

Declined

Results

Casey won a landslide victory in the primary.[7]

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box write-in with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

General election

Candidates

Declined

Michelman decided against running and tacitly endorsed Casey in March 2006[8]

Disqualified

Romanelli was removed from the ballot by a Commonwealth Court judge on September 25, 2006 following a challenge from Democrats for failing to collect enough valid signatures required of third-party candidates. He lost the appeal to the state Supreme Court challenging the required number of signatures, on October 3, 2006[9] Carl Romanelli was ordered to pay more than $80,000 in legal fees stemming from his failed effort to make the ballot.[10]

Campaign

Santorum's support for Arlen Specter

Шаблон:See also Republican strategists took Santorum's primary result in 2006 as a bad omen, in which he ran unopposed for the Republican nomination. Republican gubernatorial nominee Lynn Swann, also unopposed, garnered 22,000 more votes statewide than Santorum in the primary, meaning thousands of Republican voters abstained from endorsing Santorum for another Senate term. This may have been partly due to Santorum's support for Arlen Specter, over Congressman Pat Toomey in the 2004 Republican primary for the U.S. Senate. Even though Santorum is only slightly less conservative than Toomey, he joined virtually all of the state and national Republican establishment in supporting the moderate Specter. This led many socially and fiscally conservative Republicans to consider Santorum's support of Specter to be a betrayal of their cause.[11][12][13] However, Santorum says he supported Specter to avoid risking a Toomey loss in the general election, which would prevent President George W. Bush's judicial nominees from getting through the Senate.[14] Santorum says Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito would not have been confirmed without the help of Specter, who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time.[14]

Santorum's controversial views

Шаблон:See also In the Senate, Santorum was an outspoken conservative from a state with a history of electing moderates. This led many political commentators to speculate that his low approval ratings were due to some of his more controversial statements and opinions.

Among these controversies were his views on the privatization of Social Security[15][16] and the teaching of intelligent design in public schools.[17] In addition, his involvement in the Terri Schiavo case was considered by many in his state to be out of place.[18][19]

All this left Santorum in a precarious position throughout the race. On May 31, 2006, the polling firm Rasmussen Reports declared that Santorum was the "most vulnerable incumbent" among the Senators running for re-election.[20] SurveyUSA polling taken right before the election showed that Santorum was the least popular of all 100 Senators, with a 38% approval rating and a net approval rating of -19%.[21]

Santorum's residency

While Santorum maintained a small residence in Penn Hills, a township near Pittsburgh, his family primarily lived in a large house in Leesburg, a suburb of Washington, D.C. in Northern Virginia. Santorum faced charges of hypocrisy from critics who noted the similarities between his living situation and that of former Representative Doug Walgren, who Santorum defeated in 1990. Back then, Santorum had claimed that Walgren was out of touch with his district; these claims were backed up with commercials showing Walgren's home in the Virginia suburbs.[22]

On NBC's Meet the Press on September 3, 2006, Santorum admitted that he only spent "maybe a month a year, something like that" at his Pennsylvania residence.[23]

Santorum also drew criticism for enrolling five of his six children in an online "cyber school" in Pennsylvania's Allegheny County (home to Pittsburgh and most of its suburbs), despite the fact that the children lived in Virginia. The Penn Hills School District was billed $73,000 in tuition for the cyber classes.[24]

Casey's momentum

Santorum began his contrast campaign against Casey early, charging him with relentlessly seeking higher political office[25] and failing to take definitive stands on issues.[26] While these charges kept the race competitive, in late September and through October, Casey's campaign seemed to regain the momentum it had had throughout most of the campaign, as most polls showed Casey widening his lead after a summer slump. In a Quinnipiac University Polling Institute poll, released on September 26, 2006, Casey was favored by 14 points.[27] An October 18, 2006 poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports showed Casey with a similar double-digit lead. In the Rasmussen poll, only 46% of voters surveyed had a favorable view of Santorum, while 57% of voters viewed Casey favorably.[28]

Negative advertisements

At least one of Santorum's television ads called into question his campaign's use of the facts regarding Casey and people who had donated money to the Casey campaign.[29] The ad, which aired in September, showed several men seated around a table, while talking amongst themselves and smoking cigars, inside a jail cell. While none of the figures, who were played by actors, were named personally, the narrator provided the job descriptions, previous donations to Casey, and ethical and/or legal troubles of each. The Santorum campaign later provided the names of the people portrayed. An editorial in Casey's hometown newspaper, The Times-Tribune, pointed out that all but one of the contributions "[was] made to Casey campaigns when he was running for other offices, at which time none of the contributors were known to be under investigation for anything."[30] In fact, two of the persons cited in the Santorum campaign ad had actually given contributions to Santorum's 2006 Senate campaign. Another of the figures portrayed had died in 2004. Political scientist Larry Sabato called the ad "over the top" and suspected that the fallout would hurt Santorum.[31]

Debates

Predictions

Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[32] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 6, 2006
Sabato's Crystal Ball[33] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 6, 2006
Rothenberg Political Report[34] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 6, 2006
Real Clear Politics[35] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 6, 2006

Polling

Source Date Bob
Casey Jr. (D)
Rick
Santorum (R)
Quinnipiac February 16, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 46% 41%
SurveyUSA March 8–9, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 42%
Keystone March 22, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 44% 43%
Quinnipiac April 23, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 35%
Keystone June 6, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 44% 37%
Quinnipiac July 13, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 39%
Rasmussen July 22, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 41%
Strategic Vision (R) July 31, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 40%
Strategic Vision (R) September 12, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 38%
Keystone September 13, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 37%
Quinnipiac October 3, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 34%
Strategic Vision (R) October 16, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 36%
Keystone November 10, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 35%
Rasmussen November 10, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 54% 34%
Strategic Vision (R) November 16, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 36%
Quinnipiac December 13, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 38%
Strategic Vision (R) December 18, 2005 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 39%
Rasmussen January 15, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 53% 38%
Strategic Vision (R) January 25, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 40%
Keystone February 9, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 39%
Quinnipiac February 13, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 36%
Rasmussen February 16, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 36%
Muhlenberg College March 2, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 37%
Mansfield University March 7, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 45% 31%
Rasmussen March 14, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 48% 38%
Rasmussen March 29, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 41%
Quinnipiac April 6, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 48% 37%
Strategic Vision (R) April 13, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 40%
Rasmussen April 20, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 38%
Muhlenberg/Morning Call April 26, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 46% 38%
Keystone May 4, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 47% 41%
Strategic Vision (R) May 10, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 41%
Quinnipiac May 11, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 36%
Rasmussen May 22, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 56% 33%
American Research Group May 25, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 54% 41%
Strategic Vision (R) June 15, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 40%
Rasmussen June 19, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 37%
Quinnipiac June 21, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 34%
Strategic Vision (R) July 20, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 40%
Rasmussen Шаблон:Webarchive July 26, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 39%
Muhlenberg College August 5, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 45% 39%
Quinnipiac August 15, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 47% 40%
Benenson Strategy Group (D) August 16, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 37%
Strategic Vision (R) August 17, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 47% 41%
Rasmussen August 22, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 48% 40%
Keystone August 24, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 44% 39%
USA Today/Gallup August 27, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 56% 38%
KeystoneШаблон:Dead link September 18, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 45% 38%
Princeton Research Associates September 18, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 31%
Rasmussen September 20, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 39%
Temple/Philadelphia Inquirer September 24, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 39%
Quinnipiac September 26, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 54% 40%
Strategic Vision (R) September 28, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 40%
Mason-Dixon/McClatchy-MSNBC October 2, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 40%
Rasmussen October 5, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 37%
Zogby International/Reuters October 5, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 48% 36%
Muhlenberg/Morning Call October 8, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 46% 41%
Rasmussen October 16, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 55% 43%
Democracy Corps October 17, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 54% 37%
Strategic Vision (R) October 23, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 42%
West Chester University October 27, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 50% 39%
Rasmussen October 28, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 55% 42%
Temple/Philadelphia Inquirer October 29, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 54% 38%
Strategic Vision (R) October 30, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 49% 39%
Quinnipiac November 1, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 42%
KeystoneШаблон:Dead link November 1, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 53% 38%
Reuters/Zogby International November 2, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 48% 40%
Muhlenberg/Morning Call November 3, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 51% 43%
Mason-Dixon/McClatchy-MSNBC November 5, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 39%
Strategic Vision (R) November 6, 2006 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic | 52% 40%

Results

Шаблон:Election box begin Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box write-in with party link Шаблон:Election box total Шаблон:Election box gain with party link no swing Шаблон:Election box end

At 9:45 PM EST on Election Night, Santorum called Casey to concede defeat.[36]

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

By congressional district

Bob Casey Jr won 14 of 19 congressional districts, including the 3rd, 6th, 15th and 18th districts, which elected Republicans to the House.[37]

District Casey Jr. Santorum Representative
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|1st 87.7% 12.3% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Bob Brady
rowspan=2 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|2nd 89.6% 10.4%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Chaka Fattah
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|3rd 54.0% 46.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Phil English
rowspan=2 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|4th 54.9% 45.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Melissa Hart (109th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Jason Altmire (110th Congress)
rowspan=1 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|5th 49.9% 50.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|John E. Peterson
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|6th 58.5% 41.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Jim Gerlach
rowspan=2 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|7th 59.1% 40.9% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Curt Weldon (109th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Joe Sestak (110th Congress)
rowspan=2 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|8th 58.8% 41.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Mike Fitzpatrick (109th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Patrick Murphy (110th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|9th 44.9% 55.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Bill Shuster
rowspan=2 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|10th 49.1% 50.9% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Don Sherwood (109th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Chris Carney (110th Congress)
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|11th 62.3% 37.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Paul Kanjorski
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|12th 62.9% 37.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|John Murtha
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|13th 63.0% 37.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Allyson Schwartz
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|14th 76.4% 23.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Mike Doyle
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|15th 56.9% 43.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Charlie Dent
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|16th 45.8% 54.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Joe Pitts
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|17th 51.3% 48.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Tim Holden
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|18th 55.2% 44.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Tim Murphy
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|19th 45.6% 54.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Todd R. Platts

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:United States elections, 2006

  1. James O'Toole. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Santorum in cross hairs for 2006 election." January 17, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  2. Borys Krawczeniuk. The Times-Tribune. "Casey dominated like no one before." November 9, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  3. Kimberly Hefling, The Associated Press. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Santorum's only GOP challenger bowing out of primary." March 16, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  4. James O'Toole. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Voters Guide 2006: 2 battle Casey for Democratic U.S. Senate nomination." May 8, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  5. Bob Casey for US Senate. "Hafer endorses Casey for U.S. Senate." Шаблон:Webarchive June 7, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  6. Peter Jackson, The Associated Press. The Times-Tribune. Casey to seek Senate nominationl; Hafer and Hoeffel out." March 4, 2007. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  7. Pennsylvania Department of State. Commonwealth of PA - Elections Information. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  8. James O'Toole. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Democratic long shots seek limelight." March 21, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  9. James O'Toole. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Green Party hopeful is out; win for Casey." October 4, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. Шаблон:Cite news
  12. Шаблон:Cite news
  13. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  14. 14,0 14,1 In Iowa, Specter endorsement haunts Rick Santorum
  15. Maeve Reston. Pittsburgh-Post Gazette. "Santorum finds many minds made up on Social Security." February 22, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  16. Americans United. "Americans United announces "Mobilization against Privatization." Шаблон:Webarchive April 19, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  17. The Associated Press. The Washington Post. Santorum breaks with Christian Right law center." December 23, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  18. Tom Barnes. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Santorum defends Schiavo visit." June 18, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  19. Page Rockwell. Salon. "Rick Santorum's Schiavo woes." Шаблон:Webarchive April 25, 2005. Accessed February 8, 2005.
  20. Rasmussen Reports. "Pennsylvania Senate: Casey by 23." Шаблон:Webarchive May 31, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  21. SurveyUSA. "Approval Ratings for all 100 U.S. Senators as of 10/24/06." October 24, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  22. Brian O'Neill. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Santorum: Hoisted on his own back yard." May 25, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  23. Meet the Press with Tim Russert. "MTP Transcript for Sept. 3." September 6, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  24. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  25. RickSantorum.com. "Hey There, Hi There, Ho There." Шаблон:Webarchive August 26, 2006. Accessed February 12, 2007.
  26. Bill Toland. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "Santorum, Casey go toe-to-toe in debate." October 13, 2006. Accessed February 12, 2007.
  27. Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. "Casey leads Santorum among likely voters, Quinnipiac University Pennsylvania poll finds; incumbent's momentum has stalled." Шаблон:Webarchive September 26, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  28. Rasmussen Reports. "Pennsylvania Senate: Santorum trailing by 13." Шаблон:Webarchive October 18, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  29. RickSantorum.com. "Corner Bar." Шаблон:Webarchive September 13, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  30. Шаблон:Cite news
  31. Шаблон:Cite news
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Carrie Budoff and Emilie Lounsberry. The Philadelphia Inquirer. "Sen. Santorum loses in a landslide." November 8, 2006. Accessed February 8, 2007.
  37. Шаблон:Cite web