Английская Википедия:2017 Turkish constitutional referendum

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 01:02, 24 декабря 2023; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|none}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2017}} {{Infobox referendum |country = Turkey |title = Vote on 18 proposed amendments to the constitution |date = 16 April 2017 |yes = 25157463 |no = 23779141 |invalid = 862251 |electorate = 58291898 |map = Turkish constitutional referendum 2017 2.svg |mapdivision = Provinces of Turke...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox referendumШаблон:Turkish constitutional referendum, 2017Шаблон:Constitutional history of Turkey sidebar

A constitutional referendum was held in Turkey on 16 April 2017 on whether to approve 18 proposed amendments to the Turkish constitution that were brought forward by the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). As a result of its approval, the office of Prime Minister was abolished and the existing parliamentary system of government was replaced with an executive presidency and a presidential system.[1] The number of seats in Parliament was raised from 550 to 600, while, among a series of other proposals, the president was given more control over appointments to the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK).[2][3] The referendum was held under a state of emergency that was declared following a failed military coup attempt in July 2016.

Early results indicated a 51–49% lead for the "Yes" vote. In an unprecedented move, the Supreme Electoral Council (YSK) allowed non-stamped ballots to be accepted as valid. Some critics of the reform decried this move to be illegal, claiming that as many as 1.5 million ballots were unstamped, and did not recognize the results.[4] Large-scale protests erupted following the results in order to protest the YSK's decision.[5] In subsequent reports, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) both criticized unfairness during the campaign and declared the YSK's decision to be illegal.[6][7]

An executive presidency was a long-standing proposal of the governing AKP and its founder, the current President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In October 2016, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) announced its co-operation for producing draft proposals with the government, with the combined support of both AKP and MHP MPs being sufficient to put forward the proposals to a referendum following a parliamentary vote in January. Those in favour of a "Yes" vote argued that the changes were necessary for a strong and stable Turkey, arguing that an executive presidency would bring about an end to unstable coalition governments that had dominated Turkish politics since the 1960s up until 2002. The "No" campaign have argued that the proposals would concentrate too much power in the hands of the President, effectively dismantling the separation of powers and taking legislative authority away from Parliament. Three days before the referendum, one of Erdoğan's aides called for a federal system should the "Yes" vote prevail, causing a backlash from the pro-Yes MHP.[8] Both sides of the campaign have been accused of using divisive and extreme rhetoric, with Erdoğan accusing all "No" voters of being terrorists siding with the plotters of the failed 2016 coup.[9]

The campaign was marred by allegations of state suppression against "No" campaigners, while the "Yes" campaign were able to make use of state facilities and funding to organize rallies and campaign events.[10] Leading members of the "No" campaign, which included many high-profile former members of the MHP such as Meral Akşener, Ümit Özdağ, Sinan Oğan, and Yusuf Halaçoğlu were all subject to both violence and campaign restrictions. The "Yes" campaign were faced with campaigning restrictions by several European countries, with the German, Dutch, Danish and Swiss governments all cancelling or requesting the suspension of "Yes" campaign events directed at Turkish voters living abroad. The restrictions caused a sharp deterioration in diplomatic relations and caused a diplomatic crisis between Turkey and the Netherlands. Concerns were also raised about voting irregularities, with "Yes" voters in Germany being caught attempting to vote more than once and also being found to have been in possession of ballot papers before the overseas voting process had started.[11][12] European election monitors said the vote did not meet international standards.[13]

Background

Файл:Turkish constitutional referendum vote and envelope.jpg
A ballot paper and envelope used in the referendum. 'Evet' translates to Yes while 'Hayır' translates to No.

Introducing a presidential system was proposed by then-Minister of Justice Cemil Çiçek and backed by then-Prime Minister Erdoğan in 2005.[14] Since then, the current presidential system has been openly supported by Justice and Development Party leaders several times, along with a "new constitution". Justice and Development Party vice-president Hayati Yazıcı proposed April 2017 as a date for the referendum.[15]

The parliamentary system formally began transforming into a centralised presidential system after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan won the July 2018 elections. Since its inception, there have been competing arguments for and against for this transformation.[16]

Constitutional amendments

Initial proposals

On 10 December 2016, the AKP and MHP brought forward a total of 21 proposed amendments to the constitution and began collecting signatures from MPs in order to begin the parliamentary procedures for initiating a referendum. After Assembly Commission talks, 3 proposals were withdrawn, leaving 18 amendments remaining. The full-text proposal in Turkish and the present Turkish constitution are found at the following links.[17][18] The most important changes have been highlighted by the Union of Turkish Bar Associations.[19]

An English-language summary and interpretation of the 18 amendments is listed in the table below.[20][21]

Description of proposed amendments
Proposal # Article Description of change
1 Article 9 The judiciary is required to act on condition of impartiality.
2 Article 75 The number of seats in the Parliament is raised from 550 to 600.
3 Article 76 The age requirement to stand as a candidate in an election is lowered from 25 to 18, while the condition of having to complete compulsory military service is removed. Individuals with relations to the military are ineligible to run for election.
4 Article 77 Parliamentary terms are extended from four to five years. Parliamentary and presidential elections will be held on the same day every five years.
5 Article 87 The functions of Parliament are
  • Making, changing, removing laws.
  • Accepting international contracts.
  • Discuss, increase or decrease budget (in the Budget Commission) and accept or reject the budget in the General Assembly.
  • Appoint 7 members of HSYK
  • And using other powers written in the constitution
6 Article 89 To overcome a presidential veto, the Parliament needs to adopt the same bill with an absolute majority (301).
7 Article 98 Parliament now detects cabinet and Vice President with Parliamentary Research, Parliamentary Investigation, General Discussion and Written Question. Interpellation is abolished and replaced with Parliamentary Investigation. Vice President needs to answer Written Questions within 15 days.
8 Article 101 In order to stand as a presidential candidate, an individual requires the endorsement of one or more parties that won 5% or more in the preceding parliamentary elections and 100,000 voters. The elected president no longer needs to terminate their party membership if they have one.
9 Article 104 The President becomes both the head of state and head of government, with the power to appoint and sack ministers and Vice President. The president can issue executive decrees. If the Parliament makes a law about a topic where the President has issued an executive order, parliamentary law overrides the decree.
10 Article 105 Parliament can open parliamentary investigation with an absolute majority (301). Parliament discusses proposal in 1 month. Following the completion of Discussion, Parliamentary investigation can begin in Parliament with a secret three-fifths (360) vote in favor. Following the completion of investigations, the parliament can vote to indict the President with a secret two-thirds (400) vote in favor.
11 Article 106 The President can appoint one or more Vice Presidents. If the Presidency falls vacant, then fresh presidential elections must be held within 45 days. If parliamentary elections are due within less than a year, then they too are held on the same day as early presidential elections. If the parliament has over a year left before its term expires, then the newly elected president serves until the end of the parliamentary term, after which both presidential and parliamentary elections are held. This does not count towards the President's two-term limit. Parliamentary investigations into possible crimes committed by Vice Presidents and ministers can begin in Parliament with a three-fifths vote in favor. Following the completion of investigations, the parliament can vote to indict Vice Presidents or ministers with a two-thirds vote in favor. If found guilty, the Vice President or minister in question is only removed from office if their crime is one that bars them from running for election. If a sitting MP is appointed as a minister or Vice President, their parliamentary membership will be terminated.
12 Article 116 The President and three-fifths of the Parliament can decide to hold snap elections. In this case, the enactor also dissolves itself until elections.
13 Article 119 The President's ability to declare a state of emergency is now subject to parliamentary approval before it can take effect. The Parliament can extend, remove or shorten it. A state of emergency can be extended for up to four months at a time, except during war where there is no limitation. Every presidential decree issued during a state of emergency will need approval from Parliament.
14 Article 125 The acts of the President are now subject to judicial review.
15 Article 142 Military courts are abolished unless they are erected to investigate actions of soldiers under conditions of war.
16 Article 146 The President used to appoint one Justice from High Military Court of Appeals, and one from the High Military Administrative Court. As military courts would be abolished, the number of Justices in the Constitutional Court would be reduced from 17 to 15. Consequently, presidential appointees would be reduced from 14 to 12, while the Parliament would continue to appoint three.
17 Article 159 Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors is renamed to "Board of Judges and Prosecutors", members are reduced from 22 to 13, departments are reduced from 3 to 2. 4 members are appointed by President, 7 will be appointed by the Grand Assembly. Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK) candidates will need to get 2/3 (400) votes to pass first round and will need 3/5 (360) votes in second round to be a member of HSYK. (The Justice Minister and Ministry of Justice Undersecretary are ex officio members, which is unchanged).
18 Article 161 The President proposes fiscal budget to the Grand Assembly 75 days prior to the fiscal new year. Budget Commission members can make changes to the budget but Parliamentary members cannot make proposals to change public expenditures. If the budget is not approved, then a temporary budget will be proposed. If the temporary budget is also not approved, the previous year's budget would be used with the previous year's increment ratio.[note 1]
19 Several articles Adaptation of several articles of the constitution with other changes, mainly transferring executive powers of cabinet to the President
20 Temporary Article 21 The next presidential and next general elections will be held on 3 November 2019. If the Grand Assembly decides early elections, both will be held on the same day. Board of Judges and Prosecutors elections will be held within 30 days of approval of this law. Military courts will be abolished once the law comes into force.
21 Applicability of amendments 1-17 The amendments (2, 4, and 7) will come into force after new elections, other amendments (except temporary article) will come into force once a newly elected president is sworn in. Annuls the article which required elected Presidents to forfeit membership in a political party. This constitutional amendment will be voted in a referendum as a whole.
Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

Parliamentary Constitutional Commission

Файл:AKP constitutional proposals at TBMM.jpg
The AKP presenting their constitutional proposals to Parliament Speaker İsmail Kahraman, December 2016
Файл:TBMM Constitutional Commission 2.jpg
The Parliamentary Constitutional Commission scrutinising the proposed changes

After being signed by the AKP's 316 MPs, the 21 proposed changes were submitted to the Speaker of the Grand National Assembly and were then referred to the Parliamentary Constitutional Commission.[22] The Parliamentary Constitutional Commission, headed by AKP MP Mustafa Şentop, began scrutinizing the proposals in December 2016, earlier than the planned date of January 2017. The Constitutional Commission is formed of 25 Members of which 15 are from the AKP, 5 are from the CHP, 3 are from the HDP and 2 are from the MHP, as per the composition of parliament. Since the AKP held a large majority of the commission's seats, it was expected by media commentators that there would be minimal surprise developments at the scrutiny stage.[23] Debates in the commission were heated, with occasional fights being observed between MPs.[24]

The Constitutional Commission has the power to amend or reject the proposed changes before they are put to a vote for all MPs. The Commission made minor changes to numerous proposals, such as raising the number of members of the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors from 12 to 13.[25] The commission rejected three of the 21 proposed changes, reducing the constitutional package from 21 proposals to 18. The 5th proposal, which created 'reserve MPs' to take the parliamentary seats that fall vacant between elections, was controversially rejected with just three signatures, well short of the support of 25 commission members or 184 total MPs necessary.[26] It was reported that AKP MPs opposed the creation of 'reserve MPs' on the grounds that it threatened the security of sitting MPs by incentivizing reserves to incapacitate them in order to take their seat.[27] The 15th proposal, giving the President the right to structure the civil service and state institutions through executive decrees, was rejected.[28] A day later on 29 December, the 14th proposal, which gave the right for the President to appoint senior bureaucratic officials, was also rejected.

The Commission completed the approval process on 30 December, rejecting 3 of the 21 proposals in total.[29]

Parliamentary Constitutional Commission scrutiny process results
Proposal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Result Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Cross Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Cross Шаблон:Cross Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick Шаблон:Tick

Parliamentary voting

Файл:Turkish MPs voting for constitution 2017.jpg
MPs voting on the proposed amendments, January 2017

Following the completion of the Constitutional Commission hearings, the 18 proposals were presented to parliament for ratification. Constitutional amendments need a three fifths majority (330 votes) to be put forward to a referendum and a two-thirds majority (367 votes) to be ratified directly. Justice and Development Party (AKP) officials claimed before the vote that even if the 367-threshold was reached, the government would not ratify the changes without a referendum.[30]

Parliament voted on each of the 18 proposals separately in two rounds. The first round served as an indicator of whether the amendments would gather sufficient support, with amendments being proposed by all parties present in the chamber. In the second round, parties are no longer permitted to propose changes to the proposals. The results of the second round are taken into account, with 330 votes needed to send them to a referendum or 367 for direct implementation. A final vote on all of the approved proposals at large, with the same thresholds, was undertaken at the end of the second round, with the entire process being disbanded if votes in favour fell below 330.[31]

Of the total 550 Members of Parliament, 537 were entitled to a vote. 11 MPs from the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) were under arrest for terrorism charges and were unable to partake in the vote, with the remaining 48 HDP MPs boycotting the vote after their motion calling for the arrested MPs to be brought to parliament to vote was rejected.[32] The Parliamentary Speaker İsmail Kahraman, who is unable to take part in the vote by virtue of being the Speaker, was hospitalized during the vote, meaning that AKP deputy speaker Ahmet Aydın presided over the proceedings and was therefore unable to cast a vote.[33]

Of the 537 MPs eligible to vote, the AKP held 315, the CHP 133, the MHP 39, the HDP 48 and 2 were independent. Of the MHP's 39 MPs, 6 had openly stated that they would vote against the amendments, leaving the total number of MPs expected to vote "Yes" at 348. The CHP's 133 MPs and the two independents, which consisted of Aylin Nazlıaka and Ümit Özdağ, voted "No" while the HDP boycotted the votes.Шаблон:Citation needed

Theoretical distribution of votes according to party lines
Party Leader Party position Total MPs Eligible to vote Voting yes Voting no Graphical representation
AKP Justice and Development Party Binali Yıldırım Шаблон:Tick Yes 317 315 315 0 Файл:TBMM at January 2017.png
CHP Republican People's Party Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu Шаблон:Cross No 133 133 0 133
MHP Nationalist Movement Party Devlet Bahçeli Шаблон:Tick Yes 39 39 33 6
HDP Peoples' Democratic Party Selahattin Demirtaş / Serpil Kemalbay Шаблон:Cross No 59 48 Шаблон:Centre
style="background:Шаблон:Party color; width:4px; text-align:center;"| Independents Шаблон:Cross No Шаблон:Small 2 2 0 2 Шаблон:Small
Total 550 537 348 141 Шаблон:Tick Referendum

Parliamentary voting began on 9 January, with the first round of voting being completed on 15 January. Opposition politicians criticized the rushed way in which the votes were conducted, with four to five votes taking place in a day with no adjournments.[34] The votes were marred by numerous irregularities, with CHP Members of Parliament filming AKP MPs openly casting their vote or intimidating uncertain MPs to vote "Yes".[35] The Minister of Health, Recep Akdağ, was filmed casting an open vote, which is disallowed by the constitution, and openly admitting that he had committed a crime afterwards.[36] AKP MPs responded to attempts to film them with hostility, with fights occasionally breaking out between government and opposition MPs.[37] CHP MP Fatma Kaplan Hürriyet was allegedly strangled by AKP Parliamentary Group Leader Mustafa Elitaş after she filmed Elitaş and Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım casting open votes.[38] Several MPs were hospitalized, while the podium where MPs rose to make speeches was dislocated with one of its €15,000 microphones being reported as missing.[39] The second round of voting was completed on 20 January, with all of the proposed amendments being approved. A final motion to enact the approved amendments was approved by 339 votes, surpassing the 330-vote threshold to hold a referendum but falling short of the 367-vote threshold needed to enact the amendments directly.

Article voting

Proposal Issue First round Second round Results
MP turnout Yes No Other MP turnout Yes No Other
Motion to begin the voting process 480 338 134 3
1 Neutrality of the judiciary 484 347 132 5 486 345 140 1 Шаблон:Tick
2 Increasing the number of MPs to 600 from 550 480 343 133 3 485 342 139 4 Шаблон:Tick
3 Eligibility for parliamentary candidacy 485 341 139 5 486 342 137 6 Шаблон:Tick
4 Elections every five years for both Parliament and Presidency 486 343 139 4 486 342 138 6 Шаблон:Tick
5 Powers and responsibilities of Parliament 354 343 7 4 486 342 140 4 Шаблон:Tick
6 Audit authorities of Parliament 483 343 137 3 485 342 138 5 Шаблон:Tick
7 Election of the President 482 340 136 6 484 340 136 8 Шаблон:Tick
8 Duties of the President 481 340 135 6 483 339 138 6 Шаблон:Tick
9 Penal responsibility of the President 485 343 137 5 483 341 137 5 Шаблон:Tick
10 Vice-presidency and ministries 483 343 135 5 481 340 136 5 Шаблон:Tick
11 Renewal of elections 483 341 134 8 481 342 135 4 Шаблон:Tick
12 State of Emergency 482 344 133 5 484 342 138 4 Шаблон:Tick
13 Abolition of military courts 482 343 133 6 484 343 136 5 Шаблон:Tick
14 High council of judges and prosecutors 483 341 133 9 487 342 139 6 Шаблон:Tick
15 Budget regulation 483 341 134 8 486 342 141 3 Шаблон:Tick
16 Adaptation of other articles 482 341 134 7 486 342 141 3 Шаблон:Tick
17 Temporary article for transition to new system 484 342 135 7 485 341 139 5 Шаблон:Tick
18 President can be party member &
when changes would be effective		 481 344 131 6 488 343 142 3 Шаблон:Tick
Motion to enact the approved changes (330 for referendum, 367 for direct implementation) 488 339 142 7 Шаблон:Tick

SeveralШаблон:Clarify AKP MPs voted openly for the changes, violating the constitutional requirement of a secret vote.[40]

Reception

Файл:Yeniçeri Özdağ Halaçoğlu.jpg
MHP MPs Özcan Yeniçeri, Ümit Özdağ and Yusuf Halaçoğlu announcing their opposition to the proposed constitutional changes

The amendments were received with heavy criticism from opposition parties and non-governmental organisations, with criticism focusing particularly on the erosion of the separation of powers and the abolition of parliamentary accountability. Constitutional legal experts such as Kemal Gözler and İbrahim Kaboğlu claimed that the changes would result in the Parliament becoming effectively powerless, while the executive president would have controls over the executive, legislative, and judiciary.[41] On 4 December, the Atatürkist Thought Association (ADD), Association for the Support of Contemporary Living (ÇYDD) and the Trade Union Confederation held a rally in Ankara despite having their permissions revoked by the Governor of Ankara, calling for a rejection of the executive presidential system on the grounds that it threatened judicial independence and secular democratic values.[42]

The amendments were initially received with mixed responses from the opposition CHP, which have long been critical of the AKP's constitutional plans. Shortly after the proposals were made public and submitted to Parliament on 10 December, Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım reported that the CHP was in agreement with 5 of the proposed changes.[43] However, reception by the CHP was negative, with the party's deputy leader Selin Sayek Böke claiming that the proposals essentially created a "sultanate".[44] Parliamentary group leader Levent Gök, one of the first to comment on the released proposals, claimed that the changes would revert 140 years of Turkish parliamentary democracy, calling on all parties to reject the proposals.[45] Another of the CHP's parliamentary group leaders, Özgür Özel, called the proposals a "regime change", with the parliament being left essentially powerless in scrutinising ministers and holding them to account.[46] Özel claimed that the AKP were unlikely to obtain the 330 votes necessary to put the changes to a referendum, stating that he would be surprised if the number of MPs voting in favour reached 275.[47] CHP MP Selina Doğan claimed that the authoritarian nature of the proposals would effectively end Turkey's EU accession negotiations, citing the lack of any relevance to European values.[48] CHP MP Cemal Oktan Yüksel claimed that the proposals resembled the constitution of Assad's Syria, stating that it wouldn't be a national constitution but "Syria's constitution translated".[49]

Despite having the nationalist MHP's official support, it was reported that Turkish nationalists were also overwhelmingly critical of both the proposals and their party's involvement in their drafting.[50] Bahçeli, who has historically lent support to the AKP in controversial situations, was subject to criticism from all major parties for his decision to support the constitutional amendments, being described as the AKP's "back garden", "life-line" or "spare tyre" by critics.[51][52][53] On 24 October 2016, 5 of the 40 MHP Members of Parliament declared that they would reject the constitutional proposals, against their party line.[54] Ümit Özdağ, who was a leadership candidate against Bahçeli and one of the 5 MPs critical of the changes, had his party membership revoked in November.[55] A poll released by Gezici in December showed that almost two-thirds of MHP supporters were against the proposed changes, though MHP supporters were also the most undecided amongst the other parties.[56] On 27 December, MHP MP Kadir Koçdemir became the fifth MP from his party to publicly state his opposition to the proposals.[57]

Speaking shortly after the proposals were released, the HDP's spokesperson Ayhan Bilgen criticized the proposed changes for being anti-democratic and against the principle of judicial independence. Citing the proposed creation of "executive orders" that can be decreed by the President at will without parliamentary scrutiny, Bilgen criticized the nature of the changes, calling them poorly written and an attempt to cover up constitutional violations that had taken place under the current constitution.[58] However, on 18 December, HDP MP Kadri Yıldırım claimed that there would be no reason to reject the proposals if the changes included a separate "status" for Turkish Kurds and a constitutional entitlement to education for Kurdish citizens in their native Kurdish language.[59] This led to speculation that the HDP could be convinced to support the changes by the AKP government, though the MHP would be unlikely to jointly support any changes that are also endorsed by the HDP.[60] On 21 December, the CHP and HDP issued a parliamentary motion that would declare the proposals "unconstitutional", but the motion was rejected by MPs.[61]

The changes have also received severe criticism from outside Turkey. One commentator went as far as to declare that "if a majority votes yes, this will be the end of parliamentary democracy in Turkey."[62] The NGO Human Rights Watch stated that the changes were a "huge threat to human rights, the rule of law, and the country's democratic future."[63] The Economist concluded that "a vote for Yes would saddle the country with an elected dictator."[64] The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe, in its March 2017 Opinion on the Constitutional amendments, defined them as "a threat to democracy" and stressed the "dangers of degeneration of the proposed system towards and authoritarian and personal regime".[65] Also, before the vote took place, the openDemocracy website reported that some European news outlets published concerns that the 2017 referendum amounted to something like an "enabling act" for Erdoğan.[66]

Campaign positions

Ruling party AKP and opposition MHP are the signatories of the amendments. MHP has provided their conditional support until their conditions are met.[67] Main opposition CHP's initial position was to wait until the amendments were finalized. CHP leader Kılıçdaroğlu once mentioned of bringing the changes into Grand Assembly.[68] Later, CHP decided to favor No vote and started "Türkiye'yi Böldürmeyeceğiz" (Turkish: We'll not partition Turkey) rallies. Parliament's fourth party HDP is against the changes.

Political parties

NGOs and other groups

Campaigns

"Yes" campaign

Файл:AK Party YES 2017.png
The AKP "Yes" campaign logo. Kararımız evet translates to 'Our decision is yes'
Файл:Erdoğan Kahramanmaraş referendum 2017.png
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan campaigning for a "Yes" vote in Kahramanmaraş, 17 February 2017

Шаблон:Main The "Yes" campaign has been predominantly led by Justice and Development Party (AKP) politicians, as well as Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) politicians loyal to leader Devlet Bahçeli. Initially expecting a 7 February start to the campaign, the AKP eventually kicked off their official campaign on 25 February with a presentation by Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım at the Ankara sports stadium. Amid poor showings in opinion polls in February, Erdoğan reportedly asked pro-government pollsters to suspend their opinion polling until the end of March, while proposals for a joint electoral rally by both leading AKP and MHP politicians has also been proposed.[151]

The "Yes" campaign has been criticized for its smear campaign against individuals voting "No", associating them with numerous terrorist organisations. Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım claimed that they would vote "Yes" because the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and the so-called Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Organisation (FETÖ) were voting "No", though both organisations have historically been in favour of an executive presidency.[152] President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also caused controversy when he claimed that those voting "No" were siding with the coup plotters behind the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt.[153]

At present, the "Yes" campaign has been conducted through electoral rallies held by Prime Minister Yıldırım, leading AKP politicians and also President Erdoğan, who has held 'public opening' rallies similar to his tactics in the June 2015 general election.[154] MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli has conducted conferences in favour of a "Yes" vote, with the first occurring in Konya on 12 February 2017.[155]

On 10 March, the Great Union Party (BBP) led by Mustafa Destici announced that they would support a "Yes" vote, bringing the total number of parties supporting "Yes" to six.[156] Both the BBP and MHP have suffered serious opposition to their support for a "Yes" vote, with BBP members calling for Destici's resignation following his announcement.[157] The MHP suffered a wave of resignations, inner-party suspensions and a rival "No" campaign run by high-profile nationalist politicians, with opinion polls indicating that a significant majority of MHP voters intend to vote against the proposals.[158][159][160] Most polls put the percentage of "No" voters in the MHP at between 50% and 80%, with definite "Yes" voters remaining at 20-25%.[161][162] Politicians supporting "No" from both the MHP and BBP have claimed that over 95% of their party supporters are favouring a "No" vote, breaking with their party's executive decision.[163][164]

Key parties campaigning for a "Yes" vote
Party Leader Details
AKP Justice and Development Party Binali Yıldırım View campaign
MHP Nationalist Movement Party (party executive) Devlet Bahçeli View campaign

"No" campaign

Шаблон:Main

Файл:Kılıçdaroğlu referandum Diyarbakır 2017.jpg
CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu addressing a "No" rally in Diyarbakır

The CHP unveiled their campaign logo and slogan on 28 February, using the slogan 'Geleceğim için Hayır' (translating to For my future, no). The party planned their first electoral rally in Amasya, though preliminary rallies were held by party leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu on 21 December 2016 in Adana and by dissident MP Muharrem İnce on 8 March 2017 at Zonguldak. CHP MPs also made a series of overseas visits to rally support from overseas voters, with former leader Deniz Baykal holding an event in France.[165]

High-profile dissident MHP politicians, such as Meral Akşener, Sinan Oğan, Ümit Özdağ, and Yusuf Halaçoğlu all began a "No" campaign based on Turkish nationalism, rivalling the MHP's official "Yes" campaign. The dissident "No" campaign attracted significantly higher popularity than the MHP's official "Yes" events, with opinion polls indicating that an overwhelming majority of MHP voters intend to break the party line and vote "No". In addition to the MHP dissidents, the Turkish Bars Association and its President Metin Feyzioğlu and Leader of "No" Party Leader Tuna Bekleviç[166][167][168][169] embarked on a nationwide tour, intending to meet with locals in numerous towns and villages to rally support for a "No" vote.[170]

"No" campaigners have faced alleged government-backed coercion and suppression. On 1 March, the main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) unveiled a 78-point report regarding irregularities and suppression of "No" campaigners, with Deputy Leader Öztürk Yılmaz claiming that those who were campaigning for a "No" vote faced fear and state coercion.[171][172] CHP parliamentary group leader Engin Altay also criticized the government for using state funds to fund the "Yes" campaign while repressing "No" voters, claiming that their conduct did not allow them to talk of 'democracy'.[173]

Key parties campaigning for a "No" vote
Party Leader Details
CHP Republican People's Party Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu View campaign
MHP Nationalist Movement Party (opposition within the party) Collective leadership View campaign
HDP Peoples' Democratic Party Selahattin Demirtaş View campaign

Controversies and electoral misconduct

Allegations of electoral misconduct, irregularities throughout the campaign and state coercion of "No" supporters were widespread prior to, during and after the referendum. European election monitors said the referendum did not meet international standards.[13]

State suppression of "No" voters

The AKP government and the General Directorate of Security (police) have both been criticized for employing tactics designed to limit the campaigning abilities of "No" supporters, through arrests, control of the media and political suppression. On 23 January 2017, university students campaigning for a "No" vote on a commuter ferry in İstanbul were implicated by security officers for 'insulting the president', with their arrests being stopped by onboard passengers.[174] On 31 January, Republican People's Party council member Sera Kadıgil was arrested and later freed on charges of 'insulting religious values and inciting hatred' for campaigning for a "No" vote on social media.[175] In Bursa, a voter who revealed that he was voting "No" was reported to the police and later arrested.[176] National television channels have been vastly in favour of the "Yes" campaign. One study found that "Yes" supporters received 90% of airtime.[64] A Turkish court banned a pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) song Bejin Na (Say No) which supported the "No" on the grounds that it contravened the constitution and fomented hatred.[177][178]

Municipalities held by pro-"Yes" parties have also sought to limit the campaign events of "No" voters by denying them rights to hold rallies in public spaces of community halls. Meral Akşener, a leading nationalist politician and one of the most prominent campaigners for a "No" vote, was stopped from holding speeches when her campaign venues in Yalova and Edirne were abruptly shut down shortly before her events, with posters advertising her events in Eskişehir being ripped down.[179][180] On 11 February while she was making a speech at a hotel hall in Çanakkale, the venue suffered a power cut and was perceived by the pro-opposition media to be a symbol of the oppressive tactics against the "No" campaign. After initially being obstructed by riot police, attendees at the conference used their phone lights to allow the event to continue.[181][182][183]

Overseas "Yes" campaign bans

Overseas election campaigning, even in diplomatic missions, is illegal under Turkish law.[184][185] Yet, most political parties in Turkey, including CHP and the ruling AKP, have broken the law.Шаблон:How[184][185]

Файл:Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu statement on Germany, 2017.png
Foreign minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu making a statement following the cancellation of campaign events in Germany

In early March, pro-"Yes" campaigners, including high-profile AKP government ministers were barred from holding campaign events in Germany, France, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands.[186]

Germany

In Germany, local municipalities withdrew permits for Justice Minister Bekir Bozdağ's campaign event in Gaggenau and Economy Minister Nihat Zeybekçi's event in Cologne.[187] While authorities cited security concerns, the insufficient capacities of the rented venues and irregularities in the organisational process, the Turkish government strongly condemned the cancellations and claimed that they were directly linked to an anti-Turkish agenda of the German federal government.[188] Turkish foreign minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu claimed that Germany had showed 'double standards' and a disregard for 'human rights and freedom of speech' by cancelling the events. Following a negative reaction by the German federal government to a proposed rally by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Erdoğan accused Germany of 'Nazi-style tactics', causing strong condemnation by German officials and a souring of diplomatic relations.[189] The Turkish government also accused Germany of funding and supporting the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which is designated as a terrorist organisation in both countries.[190] Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu was due to meet his German counterpart on 8 March, with scheduled campaign speeches in Hamburg also being cancelled due to irregularities with the venues. Çavuşoğlu therefore made his speech in the Hamburg consulate, despite Turkish law forbidding election campaigns in diplomatic missions.[191] The cancellations in Germany were met by condemnation from the main opposition and pro-"No" Republican People's Party, with former leader Deniz Baykal cancelling a planned visit to Germany as a result.[192]

Diplomatic crisis with the Netherlands

Файл:Turkey Holland referendum protests 2.jpg
Pro-"Yes" protests outside the Dutch embassy in Turkey following the Dutch–Turkish diplomatic crisis

Шаблон:See Шаблон:See A diplomatic crisis occurred between Turkey and the Netherlands on 11 March, after Çavuşoğlu's official plane had its permission to land revoked mid-air ahead of a scheduled campaign speech. Later that day, Families and Social Policy Minister Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya's convoy was stopped by Dutch police, which blocked her access to the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam. Kaya was later declared persona non grata, with a regional state of emergency being declared and her convoy being asked to leave the country. Kaya was therefore forced to return to Germany, while Çavuşoğlu left for France to attend another campaign event. Violent protests by Turkish expats broke out in Rotterdam following the expulsion of both ministers, with the police making 12 arrests.[193]

The Dutch government had previously asked Turkish ministers to refrain from campaigning in the country, fearing that divisive campaign rhetoric would sow divisions within the Turkish community.[194] Prime Minister Mark Rutte claimed that negotiations with the Turkish government to allow a small scale speech by the minister were still ongoing, when Çavuşoğlu publicly threatened with sanctions should ministers be prevented from campaigning. It was these threats that made the situation unsolvable to the Dutch government.[195]

Many people in Turkey took the side of the Turkish government in the matter, with the pro-"No" main opposition announcing their support for the government and calling on the AKP to freeze diplomatic relations with the Netherlands.[196] All CHP overseas campaign events were later suspended in solidarity, while the pro-"No" MHP dissident camp also expressed their condemnation against the Dutch government for their actions.[197][193][198] In the Dutch parliament all parties, except for the two-seat Denk party, supported the decisions of the Dutch Government. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reiterated his claim that European governments that suspended campaigning were 'Nazi remnants', which the Dutch government denounced as "unacceptable".[199]

Unstamped ballots

On the referendum day, while the voting was underway, the Supreme Electoral Council of Turkey lifted a rule that required each ballot to have an official stamp. Instead, it ruled that ballots with no stamp would be considered valid, unless there was proof that they were fraudulent. Some claim that because ballots had not only stamps but other security measures Шаблон:Which in place, it doesn't make them illegitimate, but no proof whatsoever had been presented for this.[200] The Supreme Electoral Council filed a criminal complaint for the officials that caused the problem by not stamping the ballots.[201] The opposition parties claim that as many as 2.5 million ballots without a stamp were accepted.[202] Opposition parties CHP and HDP have said they will contest the results. CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu said that lifting the rule violated Turkish law.[202] According to Meral Akşener, "No" won by 52 percent.[203] The Peoples' Democratic Party contested the election results announced by pro-government Anadolu Agency and insisted that 2.5 million votes without valid stamps should be cancelled.[204]

Opinion polls

Nationwide

Date(s)
conducted 		Polling organisation/client Sample size Considering undecided vote Considering only Yes/No vote
Yes No Undecided Yes No
16 Apr 2017 Шаблон:Webarchive Шаблон:White 48.8 – Шаблон:White 48.8
11–13 Apr 2017 ORC 3.980 59.4 40.6 – 59.4 40.6
11–13 Apr 2017 Qriously ? 44.1 30.6 25.3 59.0 41.0
8–13 Apr 2017 A&G 6,048 52.9 34.1 13.0 60.8 39.2
8–12 Apr 2017 THEMİS – 46.1 53.9 – 46.1 53.9
7–10 Apr 2017 Шаблон:Webarchive 3,462 46.9 44.1 9.0 51.5 48.5
5–10 Apr 2017 AKAM 8,160 39.3 45.7 15.0 46.2 53.8
5–10 Apr 2017 MAK 5,500 54.6 41.4 4.0 56.5 43.5
5–10 Apr 2017 ANAR 4,189 52.0 48.0 – 52.0 48.0
8–9 Apr 2017 Gezici 1,399 46.6 43.5 9.9 51.3 48.7
9 Apr 2017 Overseas voting for Turkish expats ends
2–8 Apr 2017 Konsensus 2,000 49.0 46.7 4.3 51.2 48.8
1–8 Apr 2017 THEMİS 600 41.7 47.3 11.0 46.9 53.1
4–6 Apr 2017 Qriously 2,593 43.5 31.1 25.4 58.3 41.7
1–4 Apr 2017 NET 2,700 45.9 47.3 6.8 49.2 50.8
1–2 Apr 2017 Gezici – 53.3 46.7 – 53.3 46.7
15 Mar–2 Apr 2017 CHP 4,681 33.2 43.0 22.7 43.6 56.4
28–30 Mar 2017 Qriously 3,418 43.6 27.4 29.0 61.4 38.6
24–27 Mar 2017 ORC 2,740 55.4 44.6 – 55.4 44.6
27 Mar 2017 Konsensus 1,555 43.1 45.2 11.8 48.8 51.2
27 Mar 2017 Voting for Turkish expats abroad begins in 120 different overseas representations in 57 countries, as well as at customs gates.
10–24 Mar 2017 Sonar Шаблон:Refn 5,000 43.34 43.30 13.36 48.8 51.2
18–22 Mar 2017 AKAM 2,032 37.0 46.2 16.8 44.5 55.5
17 Mar 2017 Gezici – 43.5 45.5 11.0 48.9 51.1
17 Mar 2017 CHP – 42.0 46.0 12.0 47.7 52.3
8–15 Mar 2017 Times 2,000 42.3 51.7 6.0 44.3 55.7
10–15 Mar 2017 CHP 5,000 40.2 54.8 5.0 42.3 57.7
6–13 Mar 2017 Politic's 2,753 46.2 36.9 16.9 55.7 44.3
12 Mar 2017 A diplomatic crisis erupts between Turkey and the Netherlands after the latter bars Turkish ministers from campaigning in Rotterdam
3–9 Mar 2017 AKAM 8,120 35.6 48.2 16.2 42.4 57.6
1–7 Mar 2017 ORC 3,140 51.6 38.7 9.7 57.2 42.8
25 Feb – 2 Mar 2017 MAK 5,400 53.0 37.0 10.0 58.9 41.1
1 Mar 2017 President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reportedly asks pro-government pollsters to stop conducting polls until the end of March[205]
16–21 Feb 2017 AKAM 4,060 34.9 45.2 19.9 43.6 56.4
16–19 Feb 2017 NET 3,535 43.8 45.8 10.4 48.9 51.1
10–18 Feb 2017 THEMİS 1,985 36.2 49.3 14.5 42.4 57.6
10 Feb 2017 President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan approves the referendum, with the date confirmed as Sunday, 16 April 2017
9 Feb 2017 Sonar – 43.0 40.0 17.0 51.8 48.2
8 Feb 2017 CHP – 41.0 48.0 11.0 46.1 53.9
4–5 Feb 2017 Gezici 2,860 43.7 45.7 10.6 48.9 51.1
26 Jan – 1 Feb 2017 MAK 5,400 52.0 35.0 13.0 59.8 40.2
30 Jan 2017 GENAR – 55.0 45.0 – 55.0 45.0
24–29 Jan 2017 Konsensus 1,499 44.2 41.1 14.7 51.8 48.2
26 Jan 2017 Gezici – 41.8 58.2 – 41.8 58.2
21 Jan 2017 Parliament votes in favour of submitting all 18 proposed constitutional amendments to a referendum
6–19 Jan 2017 MetroPoll 2,000 42.4 44.0 13.6 49.1 50.9
11–17 Jan 2017 AKAM 2,240 42.4 57.6 – 42.4 57.6
1–11 Jan 2017 ORC 2,340 62.0 38.0 – 62.0 38.0
3–10 Jan 2017 Optimar 2,043 46.3 40.0 13.7 53.6 46.4
1–25 Dec 2016 Sonar 5,000 42.3 44.6 13.1 48.7 51.3
7–16 Dec 2016 KHAS 1,000 36.9 42.2 20.9 46.6 53.4
15 Dec 2016 ORC 2,450 61.0 39.0 – 61.0 39.0
1–8 Dec 2016 The AKP and the MHP agree on draft constitutional proposals and refer them to Parliament for consultation[206][207]
21 Nov – 6 Dec 2016 İVEMШаблон:Dead link 3,650 50.0 39.0 11.0 56.2 43.8
25 Nov – 3 Dec 2016 Gezici – 42.0 58.0 – 42.0 58.0
30 Nov 2016 MetroPoll – 49.0 51.0 - 43.3 56.7
26–27 Nov 2016 A&G 3,010 45.7 41.6 12.7 52.4 47.6
15–17 Nov 2016 Andy-AR 1,516 47.1 41.3 8.5 53.3 46.7
31 Oct 2016 The AKP present their constitutional proposals to the MHP, beginning negotiations between the two parties[208]
10–16 Oct 2016 ORC 21,980 55.9 36.2 7.9 60.7 39.3
11–12 Oct 2016 Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım accepts the MHP's calls for the AKP to bring their proposals to Parliament[209]
15–16 Jul 2016 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt
5–12 Jun 2016 ORC 2,240 58.9 41.1 – 58.9 41.1
1 June 2016 MetroPoll 1,200 41.9 47.5 10.5 46.9 53.1
30 May 2016 Optimar 1,508 49.3 41.6 9.1 54.2 45.8
5–6 May 2016 ORC 1,265 58.4 41.6 – 58.4 41.6
25–29 Apr 2016 MAK 5,500 57.0 33.0 10.0 63.3 36.7
25 Apr 2016 AKAM 1,214 35.0 45.7 19.3 43.4 56.6
19 Apr 2016 Gezici – 55.2 35.5 9.3 60.9 39.1
2–6 Mar 2016 ORC 4,176 57.0 43.0 – 57.0 43.0
12 Feb 2016 İVEM – 60.0 31.0 9.0 65.9 34.1
27 Jan – 3 Feb 2016 ORC 8,329 56.1 43.9 – 56.1 43.9
1 Jan 2016 GENAR 4,900 55.0 40.8 4.2 57.4 42.6
18 May 2015 Gezici 4,860 23.8 76.2 – 23.8 76.2
23 Feb 2015 Gezici 3,840 23.2 76.8 – 23.2 76.8
3 Feb 2015 MetroPoll – 34.3 42.2 23.5 44.8 55.2

Overseas

Date(s)
conducted 		Polling organisation/client Sample size Considering undecided vote Considering only Yes/No vote
Yes No Undecided Yes No
16 Apr 2017 Overseas results 59.5 40.5 – 59.5 40.5
10 Apr 2017 MAK Exit poll 62.0 38.0 – 62.0 38.0
27 Mar–9 Apr 2017 Overseas voting for Turkish expats takes place in 120 representations in 57 countries.

Results

Overall results

Choice Nationwide votes % Overseas votes % Customs votes % Total votes %
Шаблон:Tick "Yes" 24,325,633 51.18 778,833 59.46 52,997 54.17 25,157,463 51.41
Шаблон:Cross No 23,203,316 48.82 530,988 40.54 44,837 45.83 23,779,141 48.59
Шаблон:Align 47,528,949 98.25 1,309,821 98.80 97,834 99.23 48,936,604 98.27
Шаблон:Align 845,627 1.75 15,861 1.20 763 0.77 862,251 1.73
Шаблон:Align Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right Шаблон:Right
Шаблон:Align Шаблон:Centre Шаблон:Centre Шаблон:Centre
Source: Supreme Electoral Council of Turkey (YSK) Шаблон:Webarchive
Файл:2017 Turkish constitutional referendum - Results by province.png
Referendum results by province

Results by province

Province Registered voters People voted Valid votes Invalid votes Yes Yes (%) No No (%) Turnout (%)
Adana 1.511.884 1.302.341 1.281.208 21.133 536.265 41,85 745.021 58,15 86,14
Adıyaman 391.115 336.098 329.957 6.141 230.434 69,83 99.567 30,17 85,93
Afyonkarahisar 501.742 446.104 435.854 10.250 281.377 64,58 154.317 35,42 88,91
Ağrı 293.340 208.469 202.528 5.941 87.145 43,06 115.224 56,94 71,07
Aksaray 261.232 220.403 215.746 4.657 162.795 75,57 52.623 24,43 84,37
Amasya 242.873 219.528 215.727 3.801 121.217 56,29 94.136 43,71 90,39
Ankara 3.860.847 3.467.364 3.415.697 51.667 1.669.047 48,87 1.746.320 51,13 89,81
Antalya 1.639.364 1.429.278 1.403.836 25.442 574.644 40,94 828.862 59,06 87,18
Ardahan 67.650 54.178 52.984 1.194 23.460 44,36 29.420 55,64 80,09
Artvin 128.132 108.868 106.478 2.390 49.982 46,95 56.483 53,05 84,97
Aydın 795.526 699.772 686.887 12.885 245.431 35,74 441.276 64,26 87,96
Balıkesir 919.852 824.390 810.339 14.051 368.817 45,53 441.157 54,47 89,62
Bartın 144.930 124.867 120.904 3.963 67.739 56,03 53.160 43,97 86,16
Batman 329.509 273.462 264.515 8.947 96.424 36,48 167.917 63,52 82,99
Bayburt 57.071 46.772 46.060 712 37.620 81,67 8.446 18,33 81,95
Bilecik 151.865 137.448 134.821 2.627 65.897 48,89 68.895 51,11 90,51
Bingöl 175.142 137.171 132.260 4.911 95.959 72,67 36.087 27,33 78,32
Bitlis 194.243 152.573 148.022 4.551 87.871 59,36 60.163 40,64 78,55
Bolu 221.967 197.371 193.847 3.524 120.733 62,29 73.101 37,71 88,92
Burdur 194.288 173.499 169.001 4.498 87.393 51,73 81.556 48,27 89,3
Bursa 2.109.773 1.885.058 1.856.692 28.366 987.667 53,21 868.610 46,79 89,35
Çanakkale 398.024 359.839 353.965 5.874 139.995 39,55 213.940 60,45 90,41
Çankırı 130.649 110.757 108.740 2.017 79.872 73,46 28.856 26,54 84,77
Çorum 387.151 346.172 340.208 5.964 219.394 64,50 120.814 35,50 89,42
Denizli 736.208 664.554 651.182 13.372 289.876 44,53 361.109 55,47 90,27
Diyarbakır 992.819 801.500 776.822 24.678 251.995 32,42 524.827 67,58 80,73
Düzce 262.542 236.676 232.598 4.078 163.955 70,55 68.427 29,45 90,15
Edirne 308.502 272.510 267.420 5.090 78.877 29,50 188.469 70,50 88,33
Elazığ 406.636 342.529 335.394 7.135 240.773 71,82 94.449 28,18 84,23
Erzincan 154.333 135.686 133.719 1.967 80.908 60,50 52.816 39,50 87,92
Erzurum 484.753 410.871 403.596 7.275 300.545 74,50 102.869 25,50 84,76
Eskişehir 636.858 567.634 558.617 9.017 236.807 42,43 321.273 57,57 89,13
Gaziantep 1.180.938 982.983 967.090 15.893 603.894 62,44 363.198 37,56 83,24
Giresun 327.882 271.898 266.896 5.002 164.575 61,69 102.219 38,31 82,93
Gümüşhane 101.312 74.105 72.651 1.454 54.601 75,16 18.050 24,84 73,15
Hakkâri 162.006 131.017 126.793 4.224 40.940 32,35 85.630 67,65 80,87
Hatay 1.018.200 892.478 879.383 13.095 401.057 45,64 477.724 54,36 87,65
Iğdır 117.904 90.461 88.553 1.908 30.844 34,86 57.629 65,14 76,72
Isparta 310.003 271.693 265.726 5.967 148.868 56,04 116.775 43,96 87,64
İstanbul 10.529.030 9.340.205 9.207.590 132.615 4.479.747 48,65 4.727.761 51,35 88,71
İzmir 3.179.748 2.832.920 2.790.403 42.517 870.860 31,22 1.918.700 68,78 89,09
Kahramanmaraş 719.927 629.154 619.744 9.410 458.093 73,95 161.386 26,05 87,39
Karabük 173.150 150.064 146.615 3.449 89.042 60,73 57.574 39,27 86,67
Karaman 171.482 151.676 147.675 4.001 94.247 63,85 53.370 36,15 88,45
Kars 181.880 141.812 139.109 2.703 70.893 50,99 68.131 49,01 77,97
Kastamonu 278.876 232.890 227.608 5.282 147.567 64,84 80.013 35,16 83,51
Kayseri 932.483 834.477 822.636 11.841 557.172 67,75 265.203 32,25 89,49
Kilis 81.705 70.583 69.373 1.210 44.513 64,13 24.895 35,87 86,39
Kırıkkale 197.697 169.078 166.262 2.816 103.614 62,44 62.335 37,56 85,52
Kırklareli 270.019 242.929 239.126 3.803 68.553 28,67 170.568 71,33 89,97
Kırşehir 163.309 138.471 135.883 2.588 72.362 53,30 63.389 46,70 84,79
Kocaeli 1.301.355 1.166.946 1.147.261 19.685 650.174 56,69 496.716 43,31 89,67
Konya 1.475.597 1.298.525 1.274.212 24.313 928.516 72,88 345.598 27,12 88
Kütahya 421.028 379.510 371.589 7.921 261.242 70,29 110.410 29,71 90,14
Malatya 543.742 471.869 465.177 6.692 323.631 69,57 141.537 30,43 86,78
Manisa 1.031.668 933.101 914.008 19.093 417.267 45,67 496.458 54,33 90,45
Mardin 455.288 374.330 365.386 8.944 149.558 40,96 215.581 59,04 82,22
Mersin 1.247.662 1.096.490 1.077.359 19.131 387.627 35,99 689.508 64,01 87,88
Muğla 691.124 611.470 601.091 10.379 184.520 30,73 415.901 69,27 88,47
Muş 225.416 177.955 172.684 5.271 87.314 50,56 85.370 49,44 78,95
Nevşehir 207.762 182.270 179.211 3.059 117.548 65,59 61.663 34,41 87,73
Niğde 236.211 201.836 201.836 4.268 118.150 59,82 79.344 40,18 85,45
Ordu 549.249 454.428 444.872 9.556 275.344 61,90 169.481 38,10 82,74
Osmaniye 350.988 299.183 293.778 5.405 169.652 57,81 123.811 42,19 85,24
Rize 245.097 208.495 205.186 3.309 155.030 75,56 50.157 24,44 85,07
Sakarya 690.429 616.766 606.975 9.791 412.849 68,08 193.588 31,92 89,33
Samsun 941.614 812.278 798.235 14.043 507.267 63,56 290.837 36,44 86,26
Şanlıurfa 1.029.644 861.730 845.908 15.822 599.092 70,82 246.812 29,18 83,69
Siirt 176.845 147.212 142.486 4.726 68.242 47,93 74.143 52,07 83,24
Sinop 155.463 130.162 126.975 3.187 73.488 57,90 53.437 42,10 83,73
Şırnak 255.760 214.666 207.089 7.577 58.828 28,41 148.213 71,59 83,93
Sivas 433.325 374.007 368.134 5.873 262.506 71,30 105.683 28,70 86,31
Tekirdağ 710.364 632.095 622.595 9.500 242.627 38,98 379.809 61,02 88,98
Tokat 417.661 365.070 359.023 6.047 226.999 63,27 131.772 36,73 87,41
Trabzon 568.504 484.270 475.989 8.281 316.298 66,47 159.573 33,53 85,18
Tunceli 60.801 50.912 50.337 575 9.844 19,58 40.429 80,42 83,74
Uşak 262.877 237.260 232.316 4.944 109.270 47,04 123.017 52,96 90,26
Van 619.947 468.593 453.159 15.434 193.584 42,72 259.575 57,28 75,59
Yalova 172.160 147.039 144.637 2.402 71,59 49,73 72.708 50,27 85,41
Yozgat 295.051 246.192 242.249 3.943 179.543 74,24 62.291 25,76 83,44
Zonguldak 447.774 387.640 377.314 10.326 186.077 49,33 191.099 50,67 86,57
Nationwide results 58.366.647 49.799.163 48.934.116 865.047 25.157.025 51,41 23.777.091 48,59 85,32

Overseas results

Country Yes Yes (%) No No (%)
Albania 153 41.80% 213 58.20%
Algeria 356 43.00% 472 57.00%
Australia 5,960 41.82% 8,290 58.18%
Austria 38,215 73.23% 13,972 26.77%
Azerbaijan 1,024 38.31% 1,649 61.69%
Bahrain 69 13.56% 440 86.44%
Belgium 54,083 74.98% 18,044 25.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 750 61.83% 463 38.17%
Bulgaria 365 28.65% 909 71.35%
Canada 3,247 27.92% 8,384 72.08%
China 213 23.77% 683 76.23%
Czech Republic 73 12.54% 509 87.46%
Denmark 6,604 60.63% 4,288 39.37%
Egypt 259 59.00% 180 41.00%
Finland 558 28.45% 1,403 71.55%
France 91,266 64.85% 49,475 35.15%
Georgia 285 40.66% 416 59.34%
Germany 412,149 63.07% 241,353 36.93%
Greece 176 22.62% 602 77.38%
Hungary 232 25.75% 669 74.25%
Iran 121 45.32% 146 54.68%
Iraq 119 34.59% 225 65.41%
Ireland 173 19.93% 695 80.07%
Israel 284 43.43% 370 56.57%
Italy 2,135 37.94% 3,492 62.06%
Japan 416 36.11% 736 63.89%
Jordan 349 75.87% 111 24.13%
Kazakhstan 636 41.41% 900 58.59%
Kosovo 404 57.14% 303 42.86%
Kuwait 191 23.38% 626 76.62%
Kyrgyzstan 499 57.36% 371 42.64%
Lebanon 1,058 93.88% 69 6.12%
Luxembourg 5,987 62.86% 3,538 37.14%
Macedonia 618 57.97% 448 42.03%
Netherlands 82,672 70.94% 33,871 29.06%
New Zealand 32 17.68% 149 82.32%
Northern Cyprus 19,225 45.18% 23,324 54.82%
Norway 2,193 57.20% 1,641 42.80%
Oman 138 24.04% 436 75.96%
Poland 302 25.61% 877 74.39%
Qatar 241 18.89% 1,035 81.11%
Romania 824 44.64% 1,022 55.36%
Russia 833 26.02% 2,368 73.98%
Saudi Arabia 4,475 55.06% 3,653 44.94%
Singapore 284 44.31% 357 55.69%
South Africa 126 36.84% 216 63.16%
Spain 172 13.32% 1,119 86.68%
Sudan 240 65.93% 124 34.07%
Sweden 4,367 47.09% 4,902 52.91%
Switzerland 19,181 38.08% 31,193 61.92%
Thailand 27 12.92% 182 87.02%
Turkmenistan 510 43.74% 656 56.26%
Ukraine 341 35.74 613 64.26%
United Arab Emirates 395 13.31% 2,572 86.69%
United Kingdom 7,177 20.26% 28,247 79.79%
United States 5,296 16.20% 27,397 83.80%
Uzbekistan 169 53.65% 146 46.35%
Border Gates 52,961 54.17% 44,816 45.83%
Overseas results 831,208 59.09% 575,365 40.91%

Reactions

Sovereign states

Regional organisations

  • Шаблон:EU – The Spokesman for European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker, expressed concerns over allegations of irregularities in the referendum and called on Turkish civil authorities to launch transparent investigations into the claims.[221]

See also

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:Turkish elections Шаблон:Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты
Магазины
Хостинг
Разное

  1. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  2. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  3. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  4. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  5. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  6. ↑ Seçim gözlemi ilk rapor Шаблон:Webarchive
  7. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  8. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  9. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  10. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  11. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  12. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  13. ↑ 13,0 13,1 Inside Turkey's Irregular Referendum Шаблон:Webarchive, The Wall Street Journal
  14. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  15. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  16. ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  18. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  19. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  20. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  21. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  22. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  23. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  24. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  25. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  26. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  27. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  28. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  29. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  30. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  31. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  32. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  33. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  34. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  35. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  36. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  37. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  38. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  39. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  40. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  41. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  42. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  43. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  44. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  45. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  46. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  47. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  48. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  49. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  50. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  51. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  52. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  53. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  54. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  55. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  56. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  57. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  58. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  59. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  60. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  61. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  62. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  63. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  64. ↑ 64,0 64,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  65. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  66. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  67. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  68. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  69. ↑ 69,0 69,1 69,2 69,3 69,4 Шаблон:Cite web
  70. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  71. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  72. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  73. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  74. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  75. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  76. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  77. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  78. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  79. ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
  80. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  81. ↑ 81,0 81,1 81,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  82. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  83. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  84. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  85. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  86. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  87. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  88. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  89. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  90. ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
  91. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  92. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  93. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  94. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  95. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  96. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  97. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  98. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  99. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  100. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  101. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  102. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  103. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  104. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  105. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  106. ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
  107. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  108. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  109. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  110. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  111. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  112. ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
  113. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  114. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  115. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  116. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  117. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  118. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  119. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  120. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  121. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  122. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  123. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  124. ↑ 124,0 124,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  125. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  126. ↑ 126,0 126,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  127. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  128. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  129. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  130. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  131. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  132. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  133. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  134. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  135. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  136. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  137. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  138. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  139. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  140. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  141. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  142. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  143. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  144. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  145. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  146. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  147. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  148. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  149. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  150. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  151. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  152. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  153. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  154. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  155. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  156. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  157. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  158. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  159. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  160. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  161. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  162. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  163. ↑ Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Typo help inlineШаблон:Dead link
  164. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  165. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  166. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  167. ↑ Шаблон:Citation
  168. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  169. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  170. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  171. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  172. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  173. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  174. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  175. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  176. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  177. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  178. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  179. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  180. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  181. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  182. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  183. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  184. ↑ 184,0 184,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  185. ↑ 185,0 185,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  186. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  187. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  188. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  189. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  190. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  191. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  192. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  193. ↑ 193,0 193,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  194. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  195. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  196. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  197. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  198. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  199. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  200. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web Translation of the text: "PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTMay 31, 2022 - It is claimed that some of the minutes to be used by ballot box committees in the elections were made illegally in the posts made on various social media. - The allegations made in the posts are unfounded and the minutes prepared in accordance with the election legislation come into force in the annex of the circulars and resolutions published in the Official Gazette regarding the implementation of the elections in each election calendar period. Since political party representatives in the Supreme Election Board also attend all board meetings regarding circulars and policy decisions, there is no question of making any changes in the minutes used in the elections without the knowledge of the public and political parties. - The minutes that are still in the Election Information System (SEÇSİS) and are being used are the minutes that were prepared in accordance with the laws and used in line with the decisions of the Supreme Election Board in the general elections held in 2018. - It is announced to the public with respect" This clearly does not contain any info regarding alternative security measures apart from the stamps.
  201. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  202. ↑ 202,0 202,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  203. ↑ Meral Akşener oran verdi ve isyan etti: Yazıklar olsun Шаблон:Webarchive cumhuriyet.com.tr
  204. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  205. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  206. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  207. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  208. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  209. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  210. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  211. ↑ 211,0 211,1 211,2 211,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  212. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  213. ↑ 213,0 213,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  214. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  215. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  216. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  217. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  218. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  219. ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
  220. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  221. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news


Ошибка цитирования Для существующих тегов <ref> группы «note» не найдено соответствующего тега <references group="note"/>

Источник — http://wikihandbk.com/ruwiki/index.php?title=Английская_Википедия:2017_Turkish_constitutional_referendum&oldid=12772577