Английская Википедия:Adrian and Ritheus

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 11:25, 1 января 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{italic title}} '''''Adrian and Ritheus''''' is an Old English prose literary text preserved in British Library manuscript Cotton Julius A ii, fols 137v-140.<ref name="Cross and Hill 1982">{{Cite book|last1=Cross|first1=James E.|title=The Prose Solomon and Saturn and Adrian and Ritheus|last2=Hill|first2=Thomas D.|publisher=University of Toronto Press|yea...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Italic title Adrian and Ritheus is an Old English prose literary text preserved in British Library manuscript Cotton Julius A ii, fols 137v-140.[1]Шаблон:Rp[2] It consists of a dialogue of forty-eight formulaic questions and answers between the titular 'Adrianus' and 'Ritheus'.[1]Шаблон:Rp Adrianus interrogates Ritheus using the formulaic expression Saga me ('tell me'); Ritheus responds using the formulaic Ic þe secge ('I tell you').[1]Шаблон:Rp The nature of the questions posed varies between the factual and the enigmatic, but the style of questioning is "usually short and to the point".[3]Шаблон:Rp

Analogues and origins

Many of the questions asked in Adrian and Ritheus are also featured in the prose version of Solomon and Saturn, a text with "clear relationships"[1]Шаблон:Rp to the former.[4]Шаблон:Rp Twenty of Adrian and Ritheus' forty-eight questions are common with Solomon and Saturn.[4]Шаблон:Rp[5] Bisher identifies the text as part of a "'question and answer' dialogue genre" along with Alfred's translation of Gregory's Dialogues and Augustine's Soliloquies, but characterises Adrian and Ritheus and its analogues as having a '"lighter, more humorous tone".[4]Шаблон:Rp

Another source is the popular Joca Monachorum, whose question formula Dic mihi is the direct Latin equivalent to the Old English Saga me.[3]Шаблон:Rp

Christ's ectopic birth

In the 41st question of the dialogue, Adrianus asks of Ritheus,

Saga me hu wæs crist acenned of maria his meder.[1]Шаблон:Rp [Tell me how Christ was born from his mother Mary.][1]Шаблон:Rp

To this, Ritheus replies,

Ic þe secge, ðurc þæt swiðre breost.[1]Шаблон:Rp [I tell you, through the right breast.][1]Шаблон:Rp

Speculation that the Virgin Mary did not give birth to Christ in the natural fashion was not settled officially until the First Lateran Council of 1123.[6]Шаблон:Rp Nonetheless, Ratramnus and Radbertus, both of Corbie, Francia, would each write a treatise discussing the parturition during the ninth century. The latter satirises the notion that Christ was born from an orifice other than the womb, which suggests that such a belief was held by his some of Radbertus' Frankish contemporaries.[6]Шаблон:Rp Meanwhile, the trope of characters being born from their mother's side is common in Irish legend;[6]Шаблон:Rp Greenfield and Calder consider Irish folklore a significant influence on Adrian and Ritheus' adaptation of the Joca Monachorum.[5]

Proper names in the text

Place names

Glið

In question 6, Adrianus asks Ritheus where the sun shines at night, who answers that it shines on three places: the belly of a whale called Leviathan; then Hell; then an island called Glið, where "the souls of holy men rest [...] until Doomsday".[1]Шаблон:Rp Alongside the heavenly implications of the resting place of "holy men", Pheifer suggests this could be the result of a series of scribal mistranscriptions of gliew or gleow (joy, delight) because of the proximity of graphemes <þ> and <ƿ>.[1]Шаблон:Rp

Malifica and Intimphonis

In question 19 of the dialogue, Adrianus asks Ritheus to tell him "who are the two men in Paradise, and these continually weep and are sorrowful",[1]Шаблон:Rp to which Ritheus answers "Henoch and Elias". Adrianus then asks where they live, to which Ritheus replies,

Ic þe secge, Malifica and Intimphonis; þæt is on simfelda and on sceanfelda[1]Шаблон:Rp [I tell you, Malifica and Intimphonis; that is in Simfelda and in Sceanfelda].[1]Шаблон:Rp

Cross and Hill suggest that the name Intimphonis and sceanfelda may be accounted for by the fact that two glosses in works by Aldhelm would gloss the verbally-similar Latin In tempis to the verbally-similar Old English on scenfeldum. They further suggest that simfelda may be a scribal mistranscription of sinnfelda ('place of sin', from sinn), thus likening it conceptually to Malifica, which seems to echo Latin maleficium ('sin, vice, injury').[1]Шаблон:Rp

Wright reads sceanfelda as scinfelda,[1]Шаблон:Rp which Roberts speculates may derive from the noun scinn 'spectre'.[7] Another reading is Kemble's sunfelda[1]Шаблон:Rp (including sun, perhaps from 'son' or 'sun').

Neorxnawang

Шаблон:Main The first question of the dialogue, Adrianus asks Saga me hu lange wæs Adam on neorxnawange[1]Шаблон:Rp ("tell me how long Adam was [on the neorxnawange]"[1]Шаблон:Rp), a contested term often used to express the concept of 'Paradise' in the Old English corpus. The same question is asked in the prose version of Solomon and Saturn, as the variant form neorxenawang.[1]Шаблон:Rp

Naming animals

Belda the fish

In question 24, Adrianus asks which creatures are hermaphroditic.[1]Шаблон:Rp Ritheus tells him these are "Belda the fish in the sea [...] Viperus the serpent and Corvus the bird". Cross and Hill argue that Belda is a scribal corruption of Latin belua ('beast'). The reading of belua as a type of sea-beast may also be a misunderstanding of the Latin etymon, since belua is a name for the hyena in earlier Latin texts - an animal understood to be bisexual (and hence symbolically hermaphroditic) at the time of their composition.[1]Шаблон:Rp

Leviathan

In question 6, Adrianus asks where the sun shines at night. One of Ritheus' three answers is that it shines "on the belly of the whale which is called Leviathan".[1]Шаблон:Rp

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Old English prose

  1. 1,00 1,01 1,02 1,03 1,04 1,05 1,06 1,07 1,08 1,09 1,10 1,11 1,12 1,13 1,14 1,15 1,16 1,17 1,18 1,19 1,20 1,21 Шаблон:Cite book
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 Bisher, E. F. (1988). Heterogeneous religious expression in the Old English "Solomon and Saturn" dialogues. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  6. 6,0 6,1 6,2 Шаблон:Cite book
  7. Шаблон:Cite journal