Английская Википедия:Analytic torsion

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 17:14, 30 января 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Topological invariant of manifolds that can distinguish homotopy-equivalent manifolds}} In mathematics, '''Reidemeister torsion''' (or '''R-torsion''', or '''Reidemeister–Franz torsion''') is a topological invariant of manifolds introduced by Kurt Reidemeister {{Harv|Reidemeister|1935}} for 3-manifolds and generalized to higher dimensions by {{...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description In mathematics, Reidemeister torsion (or R-torsion, or Reidemeister–Franz torsion) is a topological invariant of manifolds introduced by Kurt Reidemeister Шаблон:Harv for 3-manifolds and generalized to higher dimensions by Шаблон:Harvs and Шаблон:Harvs. Analytic torsion (or Ray–Singer torsion) is an invariant of Riemannian manifolds defined by Шаблон:Harvs as an analytic analogue of Reidemeister torsion. Шаблон:Harvs and Шаблон:Harvs proved Ray and Singer's conjecture that Reidemeister torsion and analytic torsion are the same for compact Riemannian manifolds.

Reidemeister torsion was the first invariant in algebraic topology that could distinguish between closed manifolds which are homotopy equivalent but not homeomorphic, and can thus be seen as the birth of geometric topology as a distinct field. It can be used to classify lens spaces.

Reidemeister torsion is closely related to Whitehead torsion; see Шаблон:Harv. It has also given some important motivation to arithmetic topology; see Шаблон:Harv. For more recent work on torsion see the books Шаблон:Harv and Шаблон:Harvs.

Definition of analytic torsion

If M is a Riemannian manifold and E a vector bundle over M, then there is a Laplacian operator acting on the k-forms with values in E. If the eigenvalues on k-forms are λj then the zeta function ζk is defined to be

<math>\zeta_k(s) = \sum_{\lambda_j>0}\lambda_j^{-s}</math>

for s large, and this is extended to all complex s by analytic continuation. The zeta regularized determinant of the Laplacian acting on k-forms is

<math>\Delta_k=\exp(-\zeta^\prime_k(0))</math>

which is formally the product of the positive eigenvalues of the laplacian acting on k-forms. The analytic torsion T(M,E) is defined to be

<math>T(M,E) = \exp\left(\sum_k (-1)^kk \zeta^\prime_k(0)/2\right) = \prod_k\Delta_k^{-(-1)^kk/2}.</math>

Definition of Reidemeister torsion

Let <math>X</math> be a finite connected CW-complex with fundamental group <math>\pi := \pi_1(X)</math> and universal cover <math>{\tilde X}</math>, and let <math>U</math> be an orthogonal finite-dimensional <math>\pi</math>-representation. Suppose that

<math>H^\pi_n(X;U) := H_n(U \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}[\pi]} C_*({\tilde X})) = 0</math>

for all n. If we fix a cellular basis for <math>C_*({\tilde X})</math> and an orthogonal <math>\mathbf{R}</math>-basis for <math>U</math>, then <math>D_* := U \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}[\pi]} C_*({\tilde X})</math> is a contractible finite based free <math>\mathbf{R}</math>-chain complex. Let <math>\gamma_*: D_* \to D_{*+1}</math> be any chain contraction of D*, i.e. <math>d_{n+1} \circ \gamma_n + \gamma_{n-1} \circ d_n = id_{D_n}</math> for all <math>n</math>. We obtain an isomorphism <math>(d_* + \gamma_*)_\text{odd}: D_\text{odd} \to D_\text{even}</math> with <math>D_\text{odd} := \oplus_{n \, odd} \, D_n</math>, <math>D_\text{even} := \oplus_{n \, \text{even}} \, D_n</math>. We define the Reidemeister torsion

<math>\rho(X;U) := |\det(A)|^{-1} \in \mathbf{R}^{>0}</math>

where A is the matrix of <math>(d_* + \gamma_*)_\text{odd}</math> with respect to the given bases. The Reidemeister torsion <math>\rho(X;U)</math> is independent of the choice of the cellular basis for <math>C_*({\tilde X})</math>, the orthogonal basis for <math>U</math> and the chain contraction <math>\gamma_*</math>.

Let <math>M</math> be a compact smooth manifold, and let <math>\rho\colon\pi(M)\rightarrow GL(E)</math> be a unimodular representation. <math>M</math> has a smooth triangulation. For any choice of a volume <math>\mu\in\det H_*(M)</math>, we get an invariant <math>\tau_M(\rho:\mu)\in\mathbf{R}^+</math>. Then we call the positive real number <math>\tau_M(\rho:\mu)</math> the Reidemeister torsion of the manifold <math>M</math> with respect to <math>\rho</math> and <math>\mu</math>.

A short history of Reidemeister torsion

Reidemeister torsion was first used to combinatorially classify 3-dimensional lens spaces in Шаблон:Harv by Reidemeister, and in higher-dimensional spaces by Franz. The classification includes examples of homotopy equivalent 3-dimensional manifolds which are not homeomorphic — at the time (1935) the classification was only up to PL homeomorphism, but later Шаблон:Harvs showed that this was in fact a classification up to homeomorphism.

J. H. C. Whitehead defined the "torsion" of a homotopy equivalence between finite complexes. This is a direct generalization of the Reidemeister, Franz, and de Rham concept; but is a more delicate invariant. Whitehead torsion provides a key tool for the study of combinatorial or differentiable manifolds with nontrivial fundamental group and is closely related to the concept of "simple homotopy type", see Шаблон:Harv

In 1960 Milnor discovered the duality relation of torsion invariants of manifolds and show that the (twisted) Alexander polynomial of knots is the Reidemeister torsion of its knot complement in <math>S^3</math>. Шаблон:Harv For each q the Poincaré duality <math>P_o</math> induces

<math>P_o\colon\operatorname{det}(H_q(M))\overset{\sim}{\,\longrightarrow\,}(\operatorname{det}(H_{n-q}(M)))^{-1}</math>

and then we obtain

<math>\Delta(t)=\pm t^n\Delta(1/t).</math>

The representation of the fundamental group of knot complement plays a central role in them. It gives the relation between knot theory and torsion invariants.

Cheeger–Müller theorem

Let <math>(M,g)</math> be an orientable compact Riemann manifold of dimension n and <math>\rho\colon \pi(M)\rightarrow\mathop{GL}(E)</math> a representation of the fundamental group of <math>M</math> on a real vector space of dimension N. Then we can define the de Rham complex

<math>\Lambda^0\stackrel{d_0}{\longrightarrow}\Lambda^1\stackrel{d_1}{\longrightarrow}\cdots\stackrel{d_{n-1}}{\longrightarrow}\Lambda^n</math>

and the formal adjoint <math>d_p</math> and <math>\delta_p</math> due to the flatness of <math>E_q</math>. As usual, we also obtain the Hodge Laplacian on p-forms

<math>\Delta_p=\delta_{p+1} d_p+d_{p-1}\delta_{p}.</math>

Assuming that <math>\partial M=0</math>, the Laplacian is then a symmetric positive semi-positive elliptic operator with pure point spectrum

<math>0\le\lambda_0\le\lambda_1\le\cdots\rightarrow\infty.</math>

As before, we can therefore define a zeta function associated with the Laplacian <math>\Delta_q</math> on <math>\Lambda^q(E)</math> by

<math>\zeta_q(s;\rho)=\sum_{\lambda_j >0}\lambda_j^{-s}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int^\infty_0 t^{s-1}\text{Tr}(e^{-t\Delta_q} - P_q)dt,\ \ \ \text{Re}(s)>\frac{n}{2}</math>

where <math>P</math> is the projection of <math>L^2 \Lambda(E)</math> onto the kernel space <math>\mathcal{H}^q(E)</math> of the Laplacian <math>\Delta_q</math>. It was moreover shown by Шаблон:Harv that <math>\zeta_q(s;\rho)</math> extends to a meromorphic function of <math>s\in\mathbf{C}</math> which is holomorphic at <math>s=0</math>.

As in the case of an orthogonal representation, we define the analytic torsion <math>T_M(\rho;E)</math> by

<math>T_M(\rho;E) = \exp\biggl(\frac{1}{2}\sum^n_{q=0}(-l)^qq\frac{d}{ds}\zeta_q(s;\rho)\biggl|_{s=0}\biggr).</math>

In 1971 D.B. Ray and I.M. Singer conjectured that <math>T_M(\rho;E)=\tau_M(\rho;\mu)</math> for any unitary representation <math>\rho</math>. This Ray–Singer conjecture was eventually proved, independently, by Шаблон:Harvs and Шаблон:Harvtxt. Both approaches focus on the logarithm of torsions and their traces. This is easier for odd-dimensional manifolds than in the even-dimensional case, which involves additional technical difficulties. This Cheeger–Müller theorem (that the two notions of torsion are equivalent), along with Atiyah–Patodi–Singer theorem, later provided the basis for Chern–Simons perturbation theory.

A proof of the Cheeger-Müller theorem for arbitrary representations was later given by J. M. Bismut and Weiping Zhang. Their proof uses the Witten deformation.

References

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты
Магазины
Хостинг
Разное

Источник — http://wikihandbk.com/ruwiki/index.php?title=Английская_Википедия:Analytic_torsion&oldid=13127192