Английская Википедия:Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 08:31, 31 января 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Judgement of the High Court of Australia}} {{Use Australian English|date=January 2018}} {{Use dmy dates|date=January 2018}} {{More footnotes|date=January 2018}} {{Infobox court case | name = Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria | court = High Court of Australia | image = Coat of Arms of Australia.svg | date decided = 17 De...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use Australian English Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:More footnotes Шаблон:Infobox court case

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria,[1] is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with Section 90 of the Constitution of Australia. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria,[2] Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

  • Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law: commentary and materials, 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney.

  Шаблон:Australia-law-stub