Английская Википедия:Badshot Lea Long Barrow

Содержание

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Badshot Lea Long Barrow, also known as Farnham Long Barrow, was an unchambered long barrow located near the village of Badshot Lea in the south-eastern English county of Surrey. It was probably constructed in the fourth millennium BCE, during Britain's Early Neolithic period.

Archaeologists have established that the monument was built by pastoralist communities shortly after the introduction of agriculture to Britain from continental Europe. Although representing part of an architectural tradition of long barrow building that was widespread across Neolithic Europe, the Badshot Lea Long Barrow is the only known example in Surrey. The nearest examples are the Medway Megaliths, clustered around the River Medway in Kent, and the long barrows of Sussex.

Built out of earth, the long barrow consisted of a tumulus flanked by side ditches. A timber post was embedded into the eastern end of the mound. By the mid-1930s, chalk quarrying adjacent to the long barrow had destroyed much of its southern side. In 1936, local resident W. F. Rankine discovered ox bones and stone arrow-heads in the vicinity of the site. An excavation was launched under the directorship of Alexander Keiller and Stuart Piggott, who sought to investigate the remains of the long barrow before it was destroyed by further quarrying.

Location

The Badshot Lea Long Barrow, which has also been called the Farnham Long Barrow,Шаблон:Sfn was located near to Badshot Farm in the parish of Runfold, Surrey.Шаблон:Sfnm Standing on the western end of the Hog's Back ridge,Шаблон:Sfn it was on a slope of Upper Chalk overlooking the Blackwater Gravels below.Шаблон:Sfn It stood at approximately Шаблон:Convert above sea level.Шаблон:Sfn

Context

In 1987, the archaeologists David Field and Jonathan Cotton stated Badshot Lea Long Barrow was "the most impressive Neolithic feature yet located within the historic county" of Surrey.Шаблон:Sfn There are few known Neolithic monuments in Surrey, with most information about the area during the Neolithic period deriving from discoveries of worked flint scatters.Шаблон:Sfn Among the other known monuments from this period are a causewayed enclosure at Staines and a cursus monument at Stanwell.Шаблон:Sfn

Archaeologists believe that the primary importance of Badshot Lea Long Barrow is its location, isolated from other known examples of long barrows.Шаблон:Sfnm The nearest known long barrows are at Freefolk (22 miles to the west), Hinton Ampner (20 miles to the west/southwest), Old Winchester Hill (22 miles to the west/southwest) and Up Marden (21 miles to the west/southwest).Шаблон:Sfn The next nearest group are the Medway Megaliths, a cluster of chambered long barrows in northwest Kent, which are located approximately Шаблон:Convert away.Шаблон:Sfnm The archaeologist Ronald Jessup suggested that the North Downs Trackway might have served as a link between these different locations.Шаблон:Sfn Three earthen long barrows—Julliberrie's Grave, Jacket's Field Long Barrow, and Shrub's Wood Long Barrow—are also found near the River Stour in Kent, approximately Шаблон:Convert from the Badshot Lea Long Barrow.Шаблон:Sfn The archaeologist Ian Kinnes classed the Badshot Lea example alongside the Preston Candover Long Barrow in Hampshire as the two known examples located on the North Downs.Шаблон:Sfn

Material recovered from primary silts in the ditches of the Badshot Lea Long Barrow included charcoal produced from burnt hazel as well as a molluscan assemblage including snails which favoured damp scrub conditions. This evidence indicates the nature of the environment around the long barrow shortly after it was constructed in the Early Neolithic period.Шаблон:Sfn

Design and construction

Badshot Lea Long Barrow was an earthen long barrow.Шаблон:Sfn At the time of the site's excavation during the 1930s, the tumulus had been completely destroyed. Excavators believed that extensive agricultural activity had largely levelled it,Шаблон:Sfnm although most of it had also been quarried away from the south.Шаблон:Sfn The excavators believed that this tumulus was once approximately Шаблон:Convert in length,Шаблон:Sfnm and that it had probably been higher at the eastern end than the western end.Шаблон:Sfn No human bone was found at the site.Шаблон:Sfn

The northern and southern sides of the tumulus were flanked with flat-bottomed, parallel ditches.Шаблон:Sfnm It was from these that the chalk used to build up the mound may have been dug.Шаблон:Sfn Excavators found that the northern ditch measured Шаблон:Convert in length and that its depth varied; at the western end it measured Шаблон:Convert below the 1930s turf-level, while at the eastern end it measured Шаблон:Convert beneath that depth.Шаблон:Sfn By the 1930s, most of the southern ditch had been destroyed by quarrying, preventing archaeologists from determining its exact dimensions.Шаблон:Sfn However, the lack of any evidence for such a ditch on an area to the south-west of the tumulus led the excavators to suggest that the southern ditch was shorter than its northern counterpart.Шаблон:Sfn They also estimated that the average width between the northern and southern ditches was approximately Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn

At the eastern end of the monument, the northern and southern ditches did not meet, but left a causeway measuring Шаблон:Convert between them.Шаблон:Sfn In the middle of this causeway was a posthole cut Шаблон:Convert into the undisturbed chalk. This would have held a wooden post which was probably contemporary with the rest of the structure.Шаблон:Sfnm Given how shallow the posthole was, it was probably that the eastern end of the earthen mound had also helped to support the original timber post.Шаблон:Sfn The site's excavators believed that this post served no structural purpose and thus probably had a ritual function.Шаблон:Sfnm The excavators also noted that evidence for a very similar post had been found in the end of the Long Barrow 163A at Thickthorn Down in Dorset.Шаблон:Sfnm

Finds

In the primary silting in the surviving part of the southern ditch, excavators recovered three small fragments of unadorned pottery, which they attributed to a period they called "Neolithic A."Шаблон:Sfn Radiocarbon dating of material recovered from this primary fill produced dates of 2530 BCE and 2650 BCE.Шаблон:Sfn

Above this primary layer of silting was a deep layer of sandy red-brown loam that filled much of the southern ditch.Шаблон:Sfn Found in this were fragments of a black ware vessel and one or two sherds of a pale ware vessel,Шаблон:Sfn as well as fragments of a vessel that the excavators believed was Early Bronze Age in date.Шаблон:Sfn In the same layer as the "Neolithic B" pottery from this ditch were also found the cutting edge of a broken polished flint axe and three stone scrapers.Шаблон:Sfnm

The sandy red-brown loam that filled the southern ditch was also found filling much of the northern ditch.Шаблон:Sfn This layer contained many ceramic sherds which the archaeologists attributed to the period "Neolithic B",Шаблон:Sfn later identified as Mortlake ware.Шаблон:Sfn Many of the sherds of this type found in the northern ditch all belonged to the same vessel. As the sherds were distributed throughout the loam layer, it was believed that this deposit must have entered the ditch in an exceedingly rapid manner.Шаблон:Sfn This broken vessel had a bevelled rim and hollow neck. Decoration was provided by twisted cord impressions as well as a series of criss-cross lines incised into the clay, probably with a flint flake.Шаблон:Sfn The hollow of the neck of the vessel also included some small finger-tip impressions, while the interior of the rim included a series of pendant semicircles possibly made by pressing a bird-bone into the clay.Шаблон:Sfn

Also in the northern ditch were sherds of a large vessel which had been decorated with the impressions of a twisted cord.Шаблон:Sfn Excavation of the northern ditch also recovered two flint arrow-heads. One of these was leaf-shaped and unbroken; the other was broken, with only the point remaining.Шаблон:Sfn These arrow-heads were found in association with the bones of ox as well as the bones and antlers of red deer.Шаблон:Sfn Radiocarbon dating of some of this bone carried out during the 1980s produced dates of 2650 BCE and 2470 BCE.Шаблон:Sfn

Archaeological investigation

Файл:Guildford Museum Entrance.jpg

Finds from the excavation of the long barrow have been placed on display in Guildford Museum

Prior to 1936, much of the southern ditch and the tumulus of Badshot Lea Long Barrow had been destroyed by a chalk quarrying operation.Шаблон:Sfn That year, plans were put forward to extend the quarry northward, obliterating what was left of the Neolithic monument.Шаблон:Sfn A resident of Badshot Lea, W. F. Rankine,Шаблон:Efn investigated the area due to be quarried, recovering ox bones and two leaf-shaped stone arrow heads.Шаблон:Sfn

Rankine brought his discoveries to the attention of W. G. Lowther, a member of the Society of Antiquaries of London. Lowther then visited the site and determined that it had archaeological value. He approached the Morven Institute of Archaeological Research to see if they would organise an excavation.Шаблон:Sfn The Institute then launched an excavation directed by Alexander Keiller and Stuart Piggott, who were assisted by Lowther, the Institute’s foreman W. E. V. Young, and a team of labourers paid for by the Surrey Archaeological Society.Шаблон:Sfn Permission to conduct the excavation on land that was part of Badshot Farm was provided by its owner, Mr Tice, who ensured that the quarrying was delayed to allow the archaeologists time to complete their investigation.Шаблон:Sfn

As ditches were the only feature that was clearly visible, the excavators initially believed that they were dealing with a Neolithic causewayed enclosure. As they continued, they realised that the ditches had once flanked a long barrow which was now barely evident.Шаблон:Sfn Most of the long barrow had already been destroyed by the quarrying, but a cross-section of the eastern face was exposed.Шаблон:Sfn Keiller and Piggott subsequently wrote up an excavation report on the long barrow which was published by Surrey Archaeological Society as part of their 1939 volume, A Survey of the Prehistory of the Farnham District (Surrey).Шаблон:Sfn Surrey Archaeological Society loaned a ceramic vessel recovered at the site to Guildford Borough Council, who put it on display in Guildford Museum. During the 1980s, several animal bones recovered during the excavation were subject to radiocarbon dating.Шаблон:Sfn

References

Bibliography

• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book
• Шаблон:Cite book

External links

• Badshot Lea Long Barrow at The Megalithic Portal
• Badshot Lea Long Barrow at Exploring Surrey's Past