Английская Википедия:Barrett v IBC International Ltd

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 14:48, 6 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} {{Orphan|date=April 2015}} {{Infobox court case | name = Barrett v IBC International Ltd | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 21 July 1995 | full name = Barrett v IBC International Ltd | citations = [1995] 3 NZLR 160 | judges = Cooke P, Michae...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Orphan

Шаблон:Infobox court case Barrett v IBC International Ltd [1995] 3 NZLR 160 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the legal concept of certainty regarding contract formation.[1][2]

Background

For the sum of $2, Barrett gave IBC International an option to purchase their property within the following 180 days. However, the settlement date in the contract merely stated it "to be mutually agreed upon exercise of option".

When IBC subsequently tried to purchase the property under this option, Barrett said the option was unenforceable, given the date of settlement was not agreed to in the option contract.

Held

The court held that as the date of settlement was uncertain, the option contract was not legally binding.

References

Шаблон:Reflist


Шаблон:NewZealand-case-law-stub