Английская Википедия:Big Six (law firms)

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 07:00, 9 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Group of largest Australian law firms}} {{Use Australian English|date=March 2023}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2023}} The '''Big Six''' is a term that has traditionally referred to the six largest Australian '''law firms''', as assessed by revenue and lawyer head count.<ref>See sources: * {{cite web |title=The Australian Legal Profession |author=Harvard Law School |...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use Australian English Шаблон:Use dmy dates

The Big Six is a term that has traditionally referred to the six largest Australian law firms, as assessed by revenue and lawyer head count.[1][2] From the mid-1980s, the phrase was in regular use to distinguish the largest Australian firms, collectively, from their smaller competitors.[3] While informal, it was a widely-used descriptor, appearing in news items, industry commentary and scholarly articles.[4]

In 2012, four of the Big Six firms merged or formed association relationships with firms from other countries.[5] As the Australian legal scene has evolved since these changes, the term Big Six has become less applicable, although it is still in use in some media discussion.[6] Other terms, such as "top-tier law firm" are sometimes used in media coverage when the largest law firms in Australia, commonly a set of eight such firms,Шаблон:Efn are mentioned. Other labels used to refer to the largest, or most lucrative, law firms operating in Australia have been suggested, such as "global elite law firms" or "international business law firms".[7][8] The term "Big 8" has also made an appearance in business news coverage.[9]

History

Until 1981, legal practices in Australia were restricted to operation within one state; they relied on affiliation between interstate practices to attend to legal matters outside their own state. Following implementation of the Commonwealth Companies Act 1981 and its nationally-adopted "cooperative" ownership regulations, Australian law firms were permitted to operate nationwide. In the transition from regional law firms to fully-integrated, national partnership practices, mergers of large state-based firms, reduced the number of very large law practices in Australia to six, while significantly increasing the size of the largest Australian firms. It was in this context that the term came into general usage.[3][10]

The six firms

The following firms were generally seen as composing the Big Six (listed alphabetically):[11]

In 2012, three of these firms merged with, and one other began operating in association with, firms from other countries: United Kingdom firms in three cases, China in one.[5]

Following these major changes in the Australian legal scene, the Big Six term is sometimes viewed as less applicable;Шаблон:Citation needed top-tier law firms is one Шаблон:Citation needed span on occasion, for the largest, most profitable, law firms in Australia.[7]Шаблон:Failed verification[8]Шаблон:Failed verification

Historical size and rankings

The majority of the six firms were among the 100 largest law firms globally. In terms of revenue these were:

Firm 2010 rank[12] 2011 rank[13] 2012 rank[14]
MinterEllison 83 67 82
Mallesons Stephen Jaques 87 75 70
Allens Arthur Robinson 90 73 72
Freehills 91 70 58
Clayton Utz 97 83 77

Several of these predecessor firms have also been leading firms in the Asia-Pacific region generally. In 2007, Allens Arthur Robinson, Clayton Utz, Freehills, and Mallesons Stephen Jaques were the top five firms in the Asia Pacific region in mergers and acquisitions transactions, ranking above Magic Circle firm Linklaters.[15]

The Business Review Weekly (BRW) listed these firms in its "Top 500 Private Companies" tables based on gross income:[16] In the 2011−2012 Australian financial year, the law firms with the highest revenue were as follows:[17]

Rank Firm Revenue
1 Freehills $565,000,000
2 Clayton Utz $455,400,000
3 Allens $440,000,000
4 King & Wood Mallesons $424,000,000
5 MinterEllison $419,203,000
6 Ashurst Australia $398,000,000

Until its closure, BRW awarded its Client Choice Awards in the "Best law firm, revenue over $200 million" category to a law firm judged to deliver the best client service. In 2012 that firm was King & Wood Mallesons.[18]

The Australian Financial Review took over as the media partner for the Client Choice Awards after it acquired BRW.[19]

In 2013 the finalists for the award were (listed alphabetically):[20]

  • Ashurst Australia
  • Herbert Smith Freehills
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Norton Rose

Continued globalisation

From 1 March 2012, Blake Dawson traded as Ashurst Australia[21] until a full financial merger with Ashurst LLP on 1 November 2013; the full merger took place six months ahead of schedule.[22]

Mallesons Stephen Jaques operates as King & Wood Mallesons, after a merger and reorganisation with Chinese firm King & Wood, which has resulted in a Swiss association-structured association among what was the Australian and UK practice of Mallesons Stephen Jaques, a fully merged, combined Hong Kong practice, and a fully merged, combined mainland China practice consisting mainly of the existing King & Wood practice.[23] In 2013, King & Wood Mallesons further merged with London-headquartered Silver Circle law firm SJ Berwin,[24] although that practice ceased operations in 2017.[25][26][27]

Allens Arthur Robinson changed its name to Allens on 1 May 2012, and began to operate in association with the Magic Circle firm Linklaters. The association arrangements will see the firms operate with joint ventures in some parts of Asia, Allens practices merging into Linklaters practices in other parts, and the two firms operating jointly on certain matters.[28][29]

Freehills merged with London-headquartered Silver Circle law firm Herbert Smith, effective from 1 October 2012. The full financial merger created a single, global firm called Herbert Smith Freehills.[30][31]

Comparable terms in United Kingdom

Шаблон:Unreferenced section The Magic Circle is an informal term for UK-headquartered law firms with the largest revenues, the most international work and which consistently outperform the rest of the UK market on profitability. The Silver Circle is an informal term for perceived elite corporate law firms headquartered in the United Kingdom that are the main competitors for the magic circle.

The London-headquartered Magic Circle firms with operations in Australia, Clifford Chance and Allen & Overy, are not considered to be part of the same group as the Australian top tier law firms.

Following the mergers and association arrangements announced in 2012 and 2013, Freehills and Blake Dawson have become parts of UK-headquartered Silver Circle firms, while Allens is now in an association arrangement with a Magic Circle law firm.

See also

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Big Six Australian law firms

  1. See sources:
  2. Шаблон:Cite conference
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  4. For examples, see:
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  6. For examples of use of Big Six, post 2012, see:
  7. 7,0 7,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок finrev2019 не указан текст
  8. 8,0 8,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  9. Шаблон:Cite news
  10. Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. Шаблон:Cite news
  12. Шаблон:Cite news
  13. Шаблон:Cite news
  14. Шаблон:Cite news
  15. Шаблон:Cite news
  16. "Codes and definitions", "Private sector shows resilience", "Top 500 private companies" Business Review Weekly, 25 August 2011 [special issue], p. 50.
  17. Шаблон:Cite news
  18. Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite news
  20. Шаблон:Cite news
  21. "Blake Dawson Services Pty Ltd" (entry in database) in Company360 Шаблон:Webarchive, Dun & Bradstreet (Australia) Pty Ltd., accessed 2 March 2012; "Ashurst (formerly Blake Dawson Services) is a collaboration between former Australian commercial law firm Blake Dawson, and global firm Ashurst. Effective 1 March 2012, Blake Dawson will re-brand as Ashurst; a full financial merger is planned for 2014."
  22. Шаблон:Cite press release
  23. Chris Merritt, "Big three not worried by new arrivals", The Australian, 24 February 2012, p. 33: Шаблон:Blockquote
  24. Шаблон:Cite press release
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite web
  28. Шаблон:Cite web
  29. Шаблон:Cite news
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite news