Английская Википедия:British Americans

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 00:18, 12 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Americans of British birth or descent}} {{See also|Americans in the United Kingdom|Anglo-Americans}} {{Use mdy dates|date=February 2023}} {{Use American English|date=February 2023}} {{Infobox ethnic group | group = British Americans | image_flag = | population = Americans with majority British ancestry<br />'''90,573,000''' (2015)<ref>{{cite...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:See also Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Use American English Шаблон:Infobox ethnic group

British Americans usually refers to Americans whose ancestral origin originates wholly or partly in the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland and also the Isle of Man and Channel Islands). It is primarily a demographic or historical research category for people who have at least partial descent from peoples of Great Britain and the modern United Kingdom, i.e. English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh, Scotch-Irish, Orcadian, Manx, Cornish Americans, White Americans, and European Americans.

Based on 2020 American Community Survey estimates, 1,934,397 individuals identified as having British ancestry, while a further 25,213,619 identified as having English ancestry, 5,298,861 Scottish ancestry and 1,851,256 Welsh ancestry. The total of these groups, at 34,298,133, was 10.5% of the total population. A further 31,518,129 individuals identified as having Irish ancestry, but this is not differentiated between modern Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Figures for Manx and Cornish ancestries are not separately reported, although Manx was reported prior to 1990, numbering 9,220 on the 1980 census. This figure also does not include people reporting ancestries in countries with majority or plurality British ancestries, such as Canadian, South African, New Zealander (21,575) or Australian (105,152).[1] There has been a significant drop overall, especially from the 1980 census where 49.59 million people reported English ancestry.

Demographers regard current figures as a "serious under-count", as a large proportion of Americans of British descent have a tendency to simply identify as 'American' since 1980 where over 13.3 million or 5.9% of the total U.S. population self-identified as "American" or "United States", this was counted under "not specified".[2] This response is highly overrepresented in the Upland South, a region settled historically by the British.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Those of mixed European ancestry may identify with a more recent and differentiated ethnic group.[9] Of the top ten family names in the United States (2010), seven have English origins or having possible mixed British Isles heritage, the other three being of Spanish origin.[10]

Not to be confused are cases when the term is also used in an entirely different (although possibly overlapping) sense to refer to people who are dual citizens of both the United Kingdom and the United States.Шаблон:Citation needed

Sense of heritage

Файл:United Kingdom United States Locator.svg
Шаблон:Legend0UK  Шаблон:Legend0United States.

Americans of British heritage are often seen, and identify, as simply "American" due to the many historic, linguistic and cultural ties between Great Britain and the U.S. and their influence on the country's population. A leading specialist, Charlotte Erickson, found them to be ethnically "invisible".[11] This may be due to the early establishment of British settlements; as well as to non-English groups having emigrated in order to establish significant communities.[12]

Number of British Americans

Table below shows census results between 1980 (when data on ancestry was first collected) and the 2020 census. Response rates for the question on ancestry was 83.1% (1980) 90.4% (1990) and 80.1% (2000) for the total population of the United States.[13][14]

Файл:American Ancestrial Plurality (2010).png
British American plurality in light green. (2010)
Year Ethnic origin Population % of pop.
British; total 61,327,867 31.67
1980[15][16] English 49,598,035 26.34
Scottish 10,048,816 4.44
Welsh 1,664,598 0.88
Northern Irelander 16,418 0.01
Total 46,816,175 18.8
1990[17] English 32,651,788 13.1
Scottish 5,393,581 2.2
Scotch-Irish 5,617,773 2.3
Welsh 2,033,893 0.8
British 1,119,140 0.4
Total 36,564,465 12.9
2000[18] English 24,515,138 8.7
Scottish 4,890,581 1.7
Scotch-Irish 4,319,232 1.5
Welsh 1,753,794 0.6
British 1,085,720 0.4
Total 37,619,881 14.4
2010[19] English 25,927,345 8.4
Scottish 5,460,679 3.1
Scotch-Irish 3,257,161 1.9
Welsh 1,793,356 0.6
British 1,181,340 0.4
Total 58,649,411 TBA
2020[20][21] English 46,550,968 14.0
Scottish 8,422,613 TBA
Scots-Irish 794,478 TBA
Welsh 1,977,383 TBA
British 860,315 TBA
British Islander 43,654 TBA

Composition of Colonial America

Шаблон:Pie chart According to estimates by Thomas L. Purvis (1984), published in the European ancestry of the United States, gives the ethnic composition of the American colonies from 1700 to 1755. British ancestry in 1755 was estimated to be 63%, comprising 52% English and Welsh, 7.0% Scots-Irish, and 4% Scottish.[22]

Studies on origins, 1790

Шаблон:Multiple image The ancestry of the 3,929,214 population in 1790 has been estimated by various sources by sampling last names in the very first United States official census and assigning them a country of origin.[12] There is debate over the accuracy between the studies with individual scholars and the Federal Government using different techniques and conclusion for the ethnic composition.[23][12] A study published in 1909 titled A Century of Population Growth by the Census Bureau estimated the British origin combined were around 90% of the white population.[24][25][26]

Another source by Thomas L. Purvis in 1984[27] estimated that people of British ancestry made up about 62% of the total population or 74% of the white or European American population.[27] Some 81% of the total United States population was of European heritage.[28] Around 757,208 were of African descent with 697,624 being slaves.[29]

A Century of Population Growth (1909)

Estimated British American population in the Continental United States as of the 1790 Census.[30]

State or Territory
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Flagicon British Isles
Total
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Flagicon British
Total
Шаблон:Flagcountry
Шаблон:Flagicon English Шаблон:FlagiconШаблон:Efn Шаблон:Flagicon Scotch Шаблон:Flagicon Irish
# % # % # % # % # %
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 96.21% Шаблон:Nts 2.77% Шаблон:Nts 98.98% Шаблон:Nts 0.68% Шаблон:Nts 99.66%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 86.30% Шаблон:Nts 7.50% Шаблон:Nts 93.80% Шаблон:Nts 3.90% Шаблон:Nts 97.70%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 83.10% Шаблон:Nts 11.20% Шаблон:Nts 94.30% Шаблон:Nts 2.30% Шаблон:Nts 96.60%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 83.10% Шаблон:Nts 11.20% Шаблон:Nts 94.30% Шаблон:Nts 2.30% Шаблон:Nts 96.60%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 93.14% Шаблон:Nts 4.32% Шаблон:Nts 97.46% Шаблон:Nts 1.39% Шаблон:Nts 98.85%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 84.00% Шаблон:Nts 6.50% Шаблон:Nts 90.50% Шаблон:Nts 2.40% Шаблон:Nts 92.90%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 95.00% Шаблон:Nts 3.60% Шаблон:Nts 98.60% Шаблон:Nts 1.00% Шаблон:Nts 99.60%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 94.06% Шаблон:Nts 4.71% Шаблон:Nts 98.77% Шаблон:Nts 0.95% Шаблон:Nts 99.72%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 58.03% Шаблон:Nts 7.74% Шаблон:Nts 65.77% Шаблон:Nts 7.12% Шаблон:Nts 72.89%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 78.22% Шаблон:Nts 3.19% Шаблон:Nts 81.41% Шаблон:Nts 0.80% Шаблон:Nts 82.21%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 83.10% Шаблон:Nts 11.20% Шаблон:Nts 94.30% Шаблон:Nts 2.30% Шаблон:Nts 96.60%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 58.97% Шаблон:Nts 11.71% Шаблон:Nts 70.68% Шаблон:Nts 2.03% Шаблон:Nts 72.71%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 95.99% Шаблон:Nts 3.06% Шаблон:Nts 99.05% Шаблон:Nts 0.71% Шаблон:Nts 99.76%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 82.38% Шаблон:Nts 11.73% Шаблон:Nts 94.11% Шаблон:Nts 2.55% Шаблон:Nts 96.66%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 83.10% Шаблон:Nts 11.20% Шаблон:Nts 94.30% Шаблон:Nts 2.30% Шаблон:Nts 96.60%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 95.39% Шаблон:Nts 3.01% Шаблон:Nts 98.40% Шаблон:Nts 0.70% Шаблон:Nts 99.10%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 85.00% Шаблон:Nts 7.10% Шаблон:Nts 92.10% Шаблон:Nts 2.00% Шаблон:Nts 94.10%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 82.14% Шаблон:Nts 6.98% Шаблон:Nts 89.12% Шаблон:Nts 1.94% Шаблон:Nts 91.06%

Шаблон:Notelist

American Council of Learned Societies (1929)

The 1909 Century of Population Growth report came under intense scrutiny in the 1920s; its methodology was subject to criticism over fundamental flaws that cast doubt on the accuracy of its conclusions. The catalyst for controversy had been passage of the Immigration Act of 1924, which imposed numerical quotas on each country of Europe limiting the number of immigrants to be admitted out of a finite total annual pool. The size of each national quota was determined by the National Origins Formula, in part computed by estimating the origins of the colonial stock population descended from White Americans enumerated in the 1790 Census. The undercount of other colonial stocks like German Americans and Irish Americans would thus have contemporary policy consequences. When CPG was produced in 1909, the concept of independent Ireland did not even exist. CPG made no attempt to further classify its estimated 1.9% Irish population to distinguish Celtic Irish Catholics of Gaelic Ireland, who in 1922 formed the independent Irish Free State, from the Scotch-Irish descendants of Ulster Scots and Anglo-Irish of the Plantation of Ulster, which became Northern Ireland and remained part of the United Kingdom. In 1927, proposed immigration quotas based on CPG figures were rejected by the President's Committee chaired by the Secretaries of State, Commerce, and Labor, with the President reporting to Congress "the statistical and historical information available raises grave doubts as to the whole value of these computations as the basis for the purposes intended."[31] Among the criticisms of A Century of Population Growth:

  • CPG failed to account for Anglicization of names, assuming any surname that could be English was actually English
  • CPG failed to consider first names even when obviously foreign, assuming anyone with a surname that could be English was actually English
  • CPG failed to consider regional variation in ethnic settlement e.g. surname Root could be assumed English in Vermont (less than 1% German), but more commonly a variant of German Roth in states with large German American populations like populous Pennsylvania (home to more Germans than the entire population of Vermont)
  • CPG started by classifying all names as Scotch, Irish, Dutch, French, German, Hebrew, or other. All remaining names which could not be classed with one of the 6 other listed nationalities, nor identified by the Census clerk as too exotic to be English, were assumed to be English
  • CPG classification was an unscientific process by Census clerks with no training in history, genealogy, or linguistics, nor were scholars in those fields consulted
  • CPG estimates were produced by a linear process with no checks on potential errors nor opportunity for peer review or scholarly revision once an individual clerk had assigned a name to a nationality

Concluding that CPG "had not been accepted by scholars as better than a first approximation of the truth", the Census Bureau commissioned a study to produce new scientific estimates of the colonial American population, in collaboration with the American Council of Learned Societies, in time to be adopted as basis for legal immigration quotas in 1929, and later published in the journal of the American Historical Association, reproduced in the table below. Note: as in the original CPG report, the "English" category encompassed England and Wales, grouping together all names classified as either "Anglican" (from England) or "Cambrian" (from Wales).[31]

Шаблон:Small[31]

State or Territory
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Flagicon British Isles
Total
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Flagicon British
Total
Шаблон:Flag
Шаблон:Flagicon English Шаблон:FlagiconШаблон:Efn Шаблон:Flagicon Scotch Шаблон:FlagiconScotch-Irish
# % # % # % # % # %
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 67.00% Шаблон:Nts 2.20% Шаблон:Nts 69.20% Шаблон:Nts 1.80% Шаблон:Nts 71.00%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 60.00% Шаблон:Nts 8.00% Шаблон:Nts 68.00% Шаблон:Nts 6.30% Шаблон:Nts 74.30%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 57.40% Шаблон:Nts 15.50% Шаблон:Nts 72.90% Шаблон:Nts 11.50% Шаблон:Nts 84.40%
Шаблон:Flag & Шаблон:FlagiconTenn. Шаблон:Nts 57.90% Шаблон:Nts 10.00% Шаблон:Nts 67.90% Шаблон:Nts 7.00% Шаблон:Nts 74.90%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 60.00% Шаблон:Nts 4.50% Шаблон:Nts 64.50% Шаблон:Nts 8.00% Шаблон:Nts 72.50%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 64.50% Шаблон:Nts 7.60% Шаблон:Nts 72.10% Шаблон:Nts 5.80% Шаблон:Nts 77.90%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 82.00% Шаблон:Nts 4.40% Шаблон:Nts 86.40% Шаблон:Nts 2.60% Шаблон:Nts 89.00%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 61.00% Шаблон:Nts 6.20% Шаблон:Nts 67.20% Шаблон:Nts 4.60% Шаблон:Nts 71.80%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 47.00% Шаблон:Nts 7.70% Шаблон:Nts 54.70% Шаблон:Nts 6.30% Шаблон:Nts 61.00%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 52.00% Шаблон:Nts 7.00% Шаблон:Nts 59.00% Шаблон:Nts 5.10% Шаблон:Nts 64.10%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 66.00% Шаблон:Nts 14.80% Шаблон:Nts 80.80% Шаблон:Nts 5.70% Шаблон:Nts 86.50%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 35.30% Шаблон:Nts 8.60% Шаблон:Nts 43.90% Шаблон:Nts 11.00% Шаблон:Nts 54.90%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 71.00% Шаблон:Nts 5.80% Шаблон:Nts 76.80% Шаблон:Nts 2.00% Шаблон:Nts 78.80%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 60.20% Шаблон:Nts 15.10% Шаблон:Nts 75.30% Шаблон:Nts 9.40% Шаблон:Nts 84.70%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 76.00% Шаблон:Nts 5.10% Шаблон:Nts 81.10% Шаблон:Nts 3.20% Шаблон:Nts 84.30%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 68.50% Шаблон:Nts 10.20% Шаблон:Nts 78.70% Шаблон:Nts 6.20% Шаблон:Nts 84.90%
Шаблон:Sort Шаблон:Nts 60.94% Шаблон:Nts 8.21% Шаблон:Nts 69.15% Шаблон:Nts 5.99% Шаблон:Nts 75.14%
Шаблон:Sort Шаблон:Nts 29.81% Шаблон:Nts 4.08% Шаблон:Nts 33.89% Шаблон:Nts 2.92% Шаблон:Nts 36.81%
Шаблон:Sort Шаблон:Nts 11.20% Шаблон:Nts 1.53% Шаблон:Nts 12.73% Шаблон:Nts 1.10% Шаблон:Nts 13.83%
Шаблон:Flagicon Spanish America Шаблон:Nts 2.54% Шаблон:Nts 0.35% Шаблон:Nts 2.89% Шаблон:Nts 0.25% Шаблон:Nts 3.14%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 60.10% Шаблон:Nts 8.09% Шаблон:Nts 68.19% Шаблон:Nts 5.91% Шаблон:Nts 74.10%

Шаблон:Notelist

1980

The 1980 census was the first that asked people's ancestry.[32] The 1980 United States Census reported 61,327,867 individuals or 31.67% of the total U.S. population self-identitfied as having British descent. In 1980 16,418 Americans reported ‘Northern Islander’. No Scots-Irish (descendants of Ulster-Scots) ancestry was recorded, however over ten million people identified as Scottish.[33] This figure fell to over 5 million each in the following census when the Scotch-Irish were first counted.[34]

1990

Over 90.4% of the United States population reported at least one ancestry, 9.6% (23,921,371) individuals as "not stated" with a total of 11.0% being "not specified".[35] Additional responses were Cornish (3,991), Northern Irish 4,009 and Manx 6,317.[36]

2000

Most of the population who stated their ancestry as "American" (20,625,093 or 7.3%) are said to be of old colonial British ancestry.[37]

2000 Census[38]
Ancestry Number % of total
German 42,885,162 15.2
African 36,419,434 12.9
Irish 30,594,130 10.9
English 24,515,138 8.7
Mexican 20,640,711 7.3
Italian 15,723,555 5.6
French 10,846,018 3.9
Hispanic 10,017,244 3.6
Polish 8,977,444 3.2
Scottish 4,890,581 1.7
Dutch 4,542,494 1.6
Norwegian 4,477,725 1.6
Scotch-Irish 4,319,232 1.5
United States 281,421,906 100

Geographical distribution

Шаблон:Multiple image Following are the top 10 highest percentage of people of English, Scottish and Welsh ancestry, in U.S. communities with 500 or more total inhabitants (for the total list of the 101 communities, see references)[39][40][41]

English

  1. Hildale, UT 66.9%
  2. Colorado City, AZ 52.7%
  3. Milbridge, ME 41.1%
  4. Panguitch, UT 40.0%
  5. Beaver, UT 39.8%
  6. Enterprise, UT 39.4%
  7. East Machias, ME 39.1%
  8. Marriott-Slaterville, UT 38.2%
  9. Wellsville, UT 37.9%
  10. Morgan, UT 37.2%

Scottish

  1. Lonaconing, MD town 16.1%
  2. Jordan, IL township 12.6%
  3. Scioto, OH township 12.1%
  4. Randolph, IN township 10.2%
  5. Franconia, NH town 10.1%
  6. Topsham, VT town 10.0%
  7. Ryegate, VT town 9.9%
  8. Plainfield, VT town 9.8%
  9. Saratoga Springs, UT town 9.7%
  10. Barnet, VT town 9.5%

Welsh

  1. Malad City, ID city 21.1%
  2. Remsen, NY town 14.6%
  3. Oak Hill, OH village 13.6%
  4. Madison, OH township 12.7%
  5. Steuben, NY town 10.9%
  6. Franklin, OH township 10.5%
  7. Plymouth, PA borough 10.3%
  8. Jackson, OH city 10.0%
  9. Lake, PA township 9.9%
  10. Radnor, OH township 9.8%

2020 state totals

As of 2020, the distribution of British Americans (combined English, Welsh, Scottish, Scotch-Irish, and British ancestry self-identification) across the 50 states and DC is as presented in the following table:

Estimated British American population by state[42][43]
State Number Percentage
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.13%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.97%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.28%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.03%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.12%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 15.67%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.49%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.99%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.97%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 10.29%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 11.69%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 6.02%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 23.59%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.18%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.35%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.53%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 14.56%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 15.46%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 7.77%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 26.78%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 10.65%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.89%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.62%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.13%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 10.95%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 13.07%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 17.62%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.14%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 10.49%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 23.75%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 6.82%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 9.87%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 7.17%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 15.58%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 6.64%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 12.92%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.99%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 17.51%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.46%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 13.51%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 14.70%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.77%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 14.83%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 9.32%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 33.15%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 24.45%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 14.75%
Шаблон:Flagcountry Шаблон:Nts 16.00%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 16.24%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 8.11%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 19.16%
Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Nts 11.40%

History

Overview

The British diaspora consists of the scattering of British people and their descendants who emigrated from the United Kingdom. The diaspora is concentrated in countries that had mass migration such as the United States and that are part of the English-speaking world. A 2006 publication from the Institute for Public Policy Research estimated 5.6 million British-born people lived outside of the United Kingdom.[44][45]

After the Age of Discovery, the British were one of the earliest and largest communities to emigrate out of Europe, and the British Empire's expansion during the latter half of the 18th century and first half of the 19th century saw an "extraordinary dispersion of the British people", with particular concentrations "in Australasia and North America".[46]

The British Empire was "built on waves of migration overseas by British people",[47] who left the United Kingdom and "reached across the globe and permanently affected population structures in three continents".[46] As a result of the British colonization of the Americas, what became the United States was "easily the greatest single destination of emigrant British".[46]

Historically in the 1790 United States census estimate and presently in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand "people of British origin came to constitute the majority of the population" contributing to these states becoming integral to the Anglosphere.[47] There is also a significant population of people with British ancestry in South Africa.Шаблон:Citation needed

Colonial period

Шаблон:Main An English presence in North America began with the Roanoke Colony and Colony of Virginia in the late-16th century, but the first successful English settlement was established in 1607, on the James River at Jamestown. By the 1610s, an estimated 1,300 English people had traveled to North America, the "first of many millions from the British Isles".[48] In 1620, the Pilgrims established the English imperial venture of Plymouth Colony, beginning "a remarkable acceleration of permanent emigration from England" with over 60% of trans-Atlantic English migrants settling in the New England Colonies.[48] During the 17th century, an estimated 350,000 English and Welsh migrants arrived in North America, which in the century after the Acts of Union 1707 was surpassed in rate and number by Scottish and Irish migrants.[49]

Файл:Declaration of Independence (1819), by John Trumbull.jpg
John Trumbull's famous painting, Declaration of Independence. Most of the Founding Fathers had British ancestors.

The British policy of salutary neglect for its North American colonies intended to minimize trade restrictions as a way of ensuring they stayed loyal to British interests.[50] This permitted the development of the American Dream, a cultural spirit distinct from that of its European founders.[50] The Thirteen Colonies of British America began an armed rebellion against British rule in 1775 when they rejected the right of the Parliament of Great Britain to govern them without representation; they proclaimed their independence in 1776, and subsequently constituted the first thirteen states of the United States of America, which became a sovereign state in 1781 with the ratification of the Articles of Confederation. The 1783 Treaty of Paris represented Great Britain's formal acknowledgment of the United States' sovereignty at the end of the American Revolutionary War.[51]

In the original Thirteen Colonies, most laws contained elements found in the English common law system.Шаблон:Citation needed

The vast majority of the Founding Fathers of the United States were of mixed British extraction. Most of them were of English descent, with smaller numbers of those of Scottish, Irish or Scots-Irish, and Welsh ancestry. A minority were of high social status and can be classified as White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP). Many of the prewar WASP elite were Loyalists who left the new nation.[52]

Файл:The Great Rapprochement.jpg
Uncle Sam embracing John Bull, while Britannia and Columbia hold hands and sit together in the background (1898).

Immigration after 1776

British immigration to the U.S. 1820–2000
Period Arrivals Period Arrivals Period Arrivals
1820–1830 27,489 1901–1910 525,950 1981–1990 159,173
1831–1840 75,810 1911–1920 341,408 1991–2000 151,866
1841–1850 267,044 1921–1930 339,570
1851–1860 423,974 1931–1940 31,572
1861–1870 606,896 1941–1950 139,306
1871–1880 548,043 1951–1960 202,824
1881–1890 807,357 1961–1970 213,822
1891–1900 271,538 1971–1980 137,374
Total arrivals: 5,271,016[53][54][55][56]

Nevertheless, longstanding cultural and historical ties have, in more modern times, resulted in the Special Relationship, the exceptionally close political, diplomatic and military co-operation of United Kingdom – United States relations.[57] Linda Colley, a professor of history at Princeton University and specialist in Britishness, suggested that because of their colonial influence on the United States, the British find Americans a "mysterious and paradoxical people, physically distant but culturally close, engagingly similar yet irritatingly different".[58]

For over two centuries (1789–2009) of early U.S. history, all Presidents with the exception of two (Van Buren and Kennedy) were descended from the varied colonial British stock, from the Pilgrims and Puritans to the Scotch-Irish and English who settled the Appalachia.[59]

Cultural contributions

Much of American culture shows influences from nation states of British culture. Colonial ties to Great Britain spread the English language, legal system and other cultural attributes.[60] Historian David Hackett Fischer has posited that four major streams of immigration from the British Isles in the colonial era contributed to the formation of a new American culture, summarized as follows:

Fischer's theory acknowledges the presence of other groups of immigrants during the colonial period, both from the British Isles (the Welsh and the Highland Scots) and not (Germans, Dutch, and French Huguenots), but believes that these did not culturally contribute as substantially to the United States as his main four.

Historical influence

Apple pieNew England was the first region to experience large-scale English colonization in the early 17th century, beginning in 1620, and it was dominated by East Anglian Calvinists, better known as the Puritans. Baking was a particular favorite of the New Englanders and was the origin of dishes seen today as quintessentially "American", such as apple pie and the oven-roasted Thanksgiving turkey.[65] "As American as apple pie" is a well-known phrase used to suggest that something is all-American.

Automakers

BuickDavid Dunbar Buick was a Scottish-born American, a Detroit-based inventor, best known for founding the Buick Motor Company.Шаблон:Citation needed

Motorcycle manufacturer

Файл:Founders of Harley-Davidson The North Shore Bulletin Dec 1920.jpg
Founders of Harley-Davidson, from left: William A. Davidson, Walter Davidson Sr., Arthur Davidson and William S. Harley.

Harley-Davidson – The Davidson brothers were of Scottish descent (William. A., Walter and Arthur Davidson) and William S. Harley of English descent. Along with Indian Motorcycle Manufacturing Company was the largest and most recognizable American motorcycle manufacturer.[66]

Sports

Шаблон:Main Baseball – The earliest recorded game of base-ball for which the original source survives, involved the family of George II of Great Britain, played indoors in London in November 1748. The Prince is reported as playing "Bass-Ball" again in September 1749 in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, against Lord Middlesex.[67] The English lawyer William Bray wrote in his diary that he had played a game of baseball on Easter Monday 1755 in Guildford, also in Surrey.[68][69] English lawyer William Bray recorded a game of baseball on Easter Monday 1755 in Guildford, Surrey; Bray's diary was verified as authentic in September 2008.[70][71] This early form of the game was apparently brought to North America by British immigrants. The first appearance of the term that exists in print was in "A Little Pretty Pocket-Book" in 1744, where it is called Base-Ball. Today, rounders, which has been played in England since Tudor times, holds a similarity to baseball. Although, literary references to early forms of "base-ball" in the United Kingdom pre-date use of the term "rounders".[72]

In addition to baseball, American football is a sport that developed from soccer and Rugby, which are both sports that originated in the British Isles.[73]

Bowling or ten-pin bowling derived from Nine-Pins (nine-pin bowling) brought over by early British settlers.

Continental Colors, 1775–1777

Файл:Flag of the United States (1776–1777).svg
The "Grand Union Flag" which served as the U.S. national flag from 1776 to 1777; the thirteen stripes represent the original Thirteen Colonies.

The Grand Union Flag is considered to be the first national flag of the United States.[74] The design consisted of 13 stripes, red and white, representing the original Thirteen Colonies, the canton on the upper left-hand corner bearing the British Union Flag, the red cross of St. George of England with the white cross of St. Andrew of Scotland. The flag was first flown on December 2, 1775, by John Paul Jones (then a Continental Navy lieutenant) on the ship Alfred in Philadelphia).[74]

Place names

Шаблон:Unreferenced section

Alabama

California

Connecticut

Delaware

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

New Hampshire

New York

North Carolina

Pennsylvania

Texas

Utah

Virginia

In addition, some places were named after the kings and queens of the former kingdoms of England and Ireland. The name Virginia was first applied by Queen Elizabeth I (the "Virgin Queen") and Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584.,[84] the Carolinas were named after King Charles I and Maryland named so for his wife, Queen Henrietta Maria (Queen Mary). The Borough of Queens in New York was named after Catherine of Braganza (Queen Catherine), the wife of the King Charles II.[85]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Scholarly sources

  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Bridenbaugh, Carl. Vexed and Troubled Englishmen, 1590–1642 (1976).
  • Шаблон:Citation
  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Erickson, Charlotte. Invisible Immigrants: The Adaptation of English and Scottish Immigrants in Nineteenth-Century America (1972_.
  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Furer, Howard B., ed. The British in America: 1578–1970 (1972).
  • Шаблон:Cite book the standard reference source for all ethnic groups.
  • McGill, David W., and John K. Pearce. "American families with English ancestors from the colonial era: Anglo Americans." in Ethnicity and family therapy (1996): 451–466; reviews modern social psychology of family types.
  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Shepperson, Wilbur S. British emigration to North America: projects and opinions in the early Victorian period (1957), examines opinion in Britain. online
  • Tennenhouse, Leonard. The Importance of Feeling English: American Literature and the British Diaspora, 1750–1850 (2007).
  • Van Vugt, William E. "British (English, Scottish, Scots Irish, and Welsh) and British Americans, 1870–1940’." in Elliott Barkan, ed., Immigrants in American History: Arrival, Adaptation, and Integration (2013): 4:237+.
  • Van Vugt, William E. British Buckeyes: The English, Scots, and Welsh in Ohio, 1700–1900 (2006).

External links

Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:European Americans Шаблон:British diaspora Шаблон:United States topics

  1. B04006 – 2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate
  2. Ancestry of the Population by State: 1980 (Supplementary Report PC80-S1-10) Issued: April 1983
  3. Ethnic Landscapes of America – By John A. Cross
  4. Census and you: monthly news from the U.S. Bureau... Volume 28, Issue 2 – By United States. Bureau of the Census
  5. Dominic J. Pulera. Sharing the Dream: White Males in a Multicultural America.
  6. Reynolds Farley, 'The New Census Question about Ancestry: What Did It Tell Us?', Demography, Vol. 28, No. 3 (August 1991), pp. 414, 421.
  7. Stanley Lieberson and Lawrence Santi, 'The Use of Nativity Data to Estimate Ethnic Characteristics and Patterns', Social Science Research, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1985), pp. 44–6.
  8. Stanley Lieberson and Mary C. Waters, 'Ethnic Groups in Flux: The Changing Ethnic Responses of American Whites', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 487, No. 79 (September 1986), pp. 82–86.
  9. Mary C. Waters, Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), p. 36.
  10. Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2010 Census – United States Census Bureau
  11. Charlotte Erickson, Invisible immigrants: the adaptation of English and Scottish immigrants in nineteenth-century America (1990)
  12. 12,0 12,1 12,2 Шаблон:Cite book
  13. Шаблон:Cite web
  14. Шаблон:Cite web
  15. Шаблон:Cite web
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite web
  18. Шаблон:Cite web
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Шаблон:Cite book
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. 27,0 27,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  28. Historical U.S. population by race Шаблон:Webarchive
  29. Шаблон:Cite book
  30. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок CPG1909 не указан текст
  31. 31,0 31,1 31,2 Шаблон:Cite book
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Шаблон:Cite web
  37. Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite book
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite web
  42. Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Шаблон:Cite news
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 Шаблон:Harvnb.
  47. 47,0 47,1 Шаблон:Harvnb.
  48. 48,0 48,1 Шаблон:Harvnb.
  49. Шаблон:Harvnb.
  50. 50,0 50,1 Шаблон:Citation
  51. Шаблон:Citation
  52. Richard D. Brown, "The Founding Fathers of 1776 and 1787: A collective view." William and Mary Quarterly (1976) 33#3: 465–480, especially pp 466, 478–79. online
  53. Almost All Aliens: Immigration, Race, and Colonialism in American History ... By Paul Spickard
  54. Statistical Abstract of the United States (Page: 89)
  55. Statistical Abstract of the United States Immigration by country of origin 1851–1940 (Page: 107)
  56. Statistical Abstract of the United States (Page: 92)
  57. Шаблон:Citation
  58. Шаблон:Harvnb.
  59. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America – By David Hackett Fischer (P. 839)
  60. Шаблон:Cite book
  61. Fischer, Albion's Seed, pp. 13–206
  62. Fischer, Albion's Seed pp. 207–418
  63. Fischer, Albion's Seed, pp. 419–604
  64. Fischer, Albion's Seed, pp. 605–782
  65. Fischer, pp. 74, 114, 134–39.
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. Шаблон:Cite news
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. Шаблон:Cite news
  71. Шаблон:Cite web
  72. Шаблон:Cite news
  73. Шаблон:Cite web
  74. Шаблон:Cite web
  75. Шаблон:Cite web
  76. Шаблон:Cite web
  77. Шаблон:Cite web
  78. Шаблон:Cite web
  79. Шаблон:Cite book
  80. Petition for the Establishment of Lancaster County Шаблон:Webarchive, February 6, 1728/9
  81. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link
  82. 83,0 83,1 83,2 83,3 83,4 Шаблон:Cite book
  83. In 1584 Sir Walter Raleigh sent Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe to lead an exploration of what is now the North Carolina coast, and they returned with word of a regional "king" named "Wingina." This was modified later that year by Raleigh and the Queen to "Virginia", perhaps in part noting her status as the "Virgin Queen." Шаблон:Cite book
  84. Шаблон:Cite web