Английская Википедия:Buchan v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 11:56, 12 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} {{Infobox court case | name = Buchan v SS for Trade and Industry | court = | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = Buchan and Ivey v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry | citations = [1997] IRLR 80 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Insolvency protection }} '''''Bu...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox court case

Buchan and Ivey v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1997] IRLR 80 is a UK insolvency law and labour law case, concerning the protection of employees' salaries on their employer's insolvency.

Facts

Two directors held the company's shares. They made a claim against the National Insurance Fund, for statutory redundancy under the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 (now the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 160). The Employment Tribunal held that because directors could block decisions at board level, including decisions over their dismissal, they were not employees.

Judgment

Mummery J for the Employment Appeal Tribunal held the purpose of the legislation is not to help people whose businesses have failed. Therefore, he upheld the tribunal, that the directors could not claim reimbursement from National Insurance.

Шаблон:Cquote

See also

Шаблон:Clist labour insolvency

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References