Английская Википедия:Canadian Justice, Indigenous Injustice

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 13:26, 14 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|2019 nonfiction book by Kent Roach}} {{use dmy dates|date=December 2023}} {{Infobox book | name = Canadian Justice, Indigenous Injustice: The Gerald Stanley and Colten Boushie Case | orig title = | translator = | image = | caption = First edition | author = Kent Roach | cover_artist = | location = Montreal and Kings...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox book

Canadian Justice, Indigenous Injustice: The Gerald Stanley and Colten Boushie Case is a 2019 nonfiction book by Kent Roach, a law professor at the University of Toronto[1] about the trial of Gerald Stanley, who was found not guilty of the 2016 killing of Colten BoushieШаблон:Emdasha twenty-two-year-old resident of the Red Pheasant First Nation by an all-white jury in an infamous court case in Battleford, Saskatchewan. The book was published by McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Kent Roach

University of Toronto law professor, Kent Roach, who is the author of public policy booksШаблон:EmdashThe Supreme Court on Trial and Due Process and Victims' Rights which were on the short list for the Donner Prize,[2] wrote Canadian Justice, Indigenous Injustice in 2019.[3]

Reviews

A review in the Canadian Journal of Law and Society described the book as an "excellent scholarly book" and an "important historical document".[1]

A Canadian Law Library Review (CLLR) review of the 2022 paperback edition of the book, which included a new preface by Roach, said the book was a "valuable investigation" of how indigenous people experience the Canadian justice system.[4][5]

Roach focused on the "historical, political, social, and legal" aspects of the case, according to a Quill and Quire review.[6]

A 2021 review in the British Journal of Canadian Studies said that RoachШаблон:Emdashwhose book was informed by his previous books and his professional experienceШаблон:Emdashpresented an "excellent account of the infamous" court case.[7]

A CBC News' article cited the book, saying that the trial jurors did not receive enough instructions on how to handle a hang fire defence.[8]

The Boushie family raised concerns that Roach had written the book without consulting them.[9]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist