Английская Википедия:Carbon Tracker

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 01:13, 15 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|UK Climate Change think tank}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2020}} {{Infobox organization | name = Carbon Tracker | native_name = | native_name_lang = | named_after = | image = | image_size = | alt = | caption = | logo = | logo_size = | logo_alt...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox organization

Carbon Tracker is a London-based not-for-profit think tank researching the impact of climate change on financial markets.

Carbon Tracker popularized the notion of a carbon bubble, which describes the incompatibility between the continued development of fossil fuel projects and combating climate change.[1][2]

History and work

Carbon Tracker was founded by UK fund manager Mark Campanale, with Jeremy Leggett serving as chairman.[3] The organisation's first two reportsШаблон:SndUnburnable Carbon (2011) and Unburnable Carbon (2013)Шаблон:Sndargued that up to two-thirds of the world's known reserves and resources of oil, coal and gas could not be burned while avoiding dangerous levels of climate change. As summarized by Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf: "The conclusion is quite simple: burning known reserves of fossil fuels is incompatible with meeting the climate targets governments have set themselves."[4]

The Paris Agreement, adopted internationally in December 2015, aims to keep the global average temperature rise below 2 °C of warming, to avoid and reduce some of the most severe risks and impacts of climate change. But this requires carbon dioxide levels emitted in the atmosphere by 2050 to not exceed a "carbon budget" of up to 900 gigatonnes.[5] Drawing on research from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Carbon Tracker's reports showed that the world's reserves and resources of coal, oil and gas, if burned, would emit more than three times this amount: approximately 2800 gigatonnes. This raises the possibility that, by financing the development and production of fossil fuels that might never be consumed, investors are exposed to the risk of "stranded assets", rendered unprofitable by climate regulations and technological alternatives such as renewable energy.[6] Reuters described this idea – that investors were financing a "carbon bubble" – as having become 'part of "the climate change lexicon"; it has formed the basis for warnings about "stranded assets" by Bank of England Governor Mark Carney and inspired groups like Norway's sovereign wealth fund to divest billions in fossil fuel holdings'.[7]

Carbon Tracker's subsequent research investigated the implications of lower demand and low-carbon scenarios for the different fossil fuels of fossil fuels against lower demand, price and carbon emissions scenarios.[8][9][10][11]

Mark Carney echoed Carbon Tracker's warning on stranded assets in a 2015 speech to London insurers.[12] followed by the launch of a task force on climate-related financial disclosures under the auspices of the Financial Stability Board.[13]

Reports

Carbon Tracker's reports include:[14]

In the media

In 2012, a Rolling Stone article by writer and campaigner Bill McKibben presented Carbon Tracker's research on the carbon bubble to a wider audience[31][32] The article led McKibben to start a campaign calling for fossil fuel divestment which, as of December 2015, saw organisations managing over $5.46 trillion committing to partial or total divestment.[33][34]

Carbon Tracker's analysis has been cited by investment banks HSBC,[35] Citi[36] and JP Morgan,[37] consultancies such as Accenture,[38] and the Dutch Central Bank.[39] It has also provoked a range of responses from major oil companies: ExxonMobil has stated it is 'confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become "stranded."' [40] Chevron, while admitting that "certain high-cost assets around the world could be impacted by a hypothetical GHG-constrained case", has similarly argued that the risk of stranded assets is "manageable".[41] Different positions have also been expressed by BP[42] and Statoil.[43]

According to the Carbon Tracker Initiative report in March 2020 wind farms and solar plants will soon be cheaper than running existing coal-fired power stations and coal power would struggle if markets were priced fairly.[44]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

  1. Jackie Wills, "Carbon Tracker has changed the financial language of climate change" Шаблон:Webarchive, The Guardian, 15 May 2014 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  2. Katharine Earley, "Carbon Tracker measures oil and coal risk for investors" Шаблон:Webarchive, The Guardian, 30 April 2015 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  3. Шаблон:Cite web
  4. Шаблон:Cite news
  5. Malte Meinshausen, Nicolai Meinshausen, William Hare, Sarah Raper, Katja Frieler, Reto Knutti, David Frame and Myles Allen, "Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C" Шаблон:Webarchive, Nature, volume 458, pages 1158–1163, 2009.
  6. Шаблон:Cite web
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite web
  9. Шаблон:Cite web
  10. "New coal mines uneconomic as China demand growth slows: Report", Economic Times, 22 September 2014Шаблон:Dead link
  11. Шаблон:Cite web
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Шаблон:Cite web
  14. Brochure Шаблон:Webarchive, Carbon Tracker Initiative (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  15. Шаблон:Cite web
  16. "Climate rules could put $1.1 trl in oil investment at risk -report", Reuters, 7 May 2014Шаблон:Dead linkШаблон:Nnbsp
  17. Шаблон:Cite web
  18. Шаблон:Cite web
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Шаблон:Cite web
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. "Cheaper renewables to halt coal and oil demand growth from 2020: research", Reuters, February 2, 2017Шаблон:Dead linkШаблон:Cbignore
  27. Шаблон:Cite book Registration required to download.
  28. Шаблон:Cite book Шаблон:Url. Registration required to download.
  29. Шаблон:Cite book Registration required to download.
  30. Шаблон:Cite web Landing page.
  31. Bill McKibben "Global Warming's Terrifying New Math: Three simple numbers that add up to global catastrophe – and that make clear who the real enemy is" Шаблон:Webarchive, Rolling Stone, 19 July 2012 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  32. Matthew C. Nisbet (March 2013). "Nature's Prophet: Bill McKibben as Journalist, Public Intellectual and Activist" (PDF) Шаблон:Webarchive Discussion Paper Series #D-78. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, School of Communication and the Center for Social Media American University. p. 17.
  33. "I did base that article, and the subsequent divestment campaign, on CTI's numbers," he [Bill McKibben, n.b.] tells RTCC in an email." www.climatechangenews.com/2015/08/18/terrifying-math-how-carbon-tracker-changed-the-climate-debate/
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Шаблон:Cite web
  37. JP Morgan North American Equity Research, Clean Tech Monitor, 1 October 2013
  38. Шаблон:Cite web
  39. http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/TimeforTransition_tcm47-338545.pdf?2016100316Шаблон:Dead link
  40. " http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/energy-and-environment/report---energy-and-carbon---managing-the-risks.pdf Шаблон:Webarchive
  41. Шаблон:Cite web
  42. Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Wind and solar plants will soon be cheaper than coal in all big markets around world Шаблон:Webarchive 12 March 2020