Английская Википедия:Censorship in the Maldives

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 04:09, 16 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Censorship by country}} The Maldives ranks from the middle to the top third of international indexes of press freedom, indicating a large degree of freedom. Media discussion of religion, however, remains tightly restricted. ==Indexes== In the 2011 Freedom House Freedom of the Press annual report, the Maldives scores a 50, or "partly free...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Censorship by country The Maldives ranks from the middle to the top third of international indexes of press freedom, indicating a large degree of freedom. Media discussion of religion, however, remains tightly restricted.

Indexes

In the 2011 Freedom House Freedom of the Press annual report, the Maldives scores a 50, or "partly free".[1] In 2010, Reporters Without Borders ranked the Maldives as having the 52nd freest press in the world (of 178 ranked nations).[2]

Ismail Khilath Rasheed controversy

In November 2011, the blog of journalist Ismail Khilath Rasheed was shut down by Communications Authority of the Maldives (CAM) on the order of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, on the grounds that the site contained "anti-Islamic material".[3] Rasheed, a self-professed Sufi Muslim, had argued for greater religious tolerance.[4] The blog closing was condemned by Reporters Without Borders[2] and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay[5] as representing a rise in religious intolerance.

When Rasheed organized a rally in favor of greater religious freedom on 10 December, the rally was attacked and Rasheed's skull fractured.[4] He was subsequently arrested at the urging of the orthodox Sunni Adhaalath Party,[6] which also organized a counter-demonstration on 23 December to protect Islam. Rasheed was released on 10 January following protests by groups such as Amnesty International (which named him a prisoner of conscience[4]) and Reporters Without Borders[6] on his behalf.

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Asia topic