Английская Википедия:Civic Platform

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 08:09, 19 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Political party in Poland}} {{about|a political party in Poland|the political party in Russia with the same name in English|Civic Platform (Russia)}} {{use dmy dates|date=December 2023}} {{Infobox political party | name = Civic Platform of<br>the Republic of Poland | native_name = Platforma Obywatelska<br>Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej | native_name_lang...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox political party Civic Platform (Шаблон:Lang-pl, PO)[nb 1] is a centre-right liberal political party in Poland. Since 2021, it has been led by Donald Tusk, who previously led it from 2003 to 2014 and was president of the European Council from 2014 to 2019.

It was formed in 2001 by splinter factions from the Solidarity Electoral Action, the Freedom Union and the Conservative People's Party, and it later placed second in the 2001 Polish parliamentary election. It remained at the opposition until the 2007 Polish parliamentary opposition, when it overtook Law and Justice, won 209 seats, and Tusk was elected as prime minister of Poland. Following the Smolensk air disaster in 2010, Bronisław Komorowski served as acting president of Poland and later won the 2010 Polish presidential election. Tusk continued to serve as prime minister and leader of Civic Platform until he resigned in 2014 to assume the post of the president of the European Council. The party was defeated in the 2015 Polish parliamentary and presidential elections. It placed second in the 2019 Polish parliamentary election, and its 2020 Polish presidential election candidate, Rafał Trzaskowski, won 49% of the popular vote in the second round and lost the election to Andrzej Duda.

Initially positioned as a Christian democratic party with strong economically liberal tendencies, it soon adopted liberal conservatism throughout the 2000s. During its time in power, it was aligned with more pragmatic and centrist views, and was characterized as a catch-all party. In the 2010s, the Civic Platform adopted more socially liberal policies, aligned itself with conservative liberalism, and it has since been positioned in the centre and leaning towards the centre-right. It has also strongly advocated for Poland's membership in the European Union and NATO. It is a member of the European People's Party.

The party heads the Civic Coalition, which was founded in 2018. Since its creation, it has shown strong electoral performances in Warsaw, the west, and the north of Poland. Since the 2000s, the Civic Platform has established itself as one of the dominant political parties in Poland.

History

The Civic Platform was founded in 2001 as economically liberal, Christian-democratic split from existing parties. Founders Andrzej Olechowski, Maciej Płażyński, and Donald Tusk were sometimes jokingly called "the Three Tenors" by Polish media and commentators. Olechowski and Płażyński left the party during the 2001–2005 parliamentary term, leaving Tusk as the sole remaining founder, and current party leader.

In the 2001 general election, the party secured 12.6% of the vote and 65 deputies in the Sejm, making it the largest opposition party to the government led by the Democratic Left Alliance (SLD). In the 2002 local elections, PO stood together with Law and Justice in 15 voivodeships (in 14 as POPiS, in Podkarpacie with another centre-right political parties). They stood separately only in Mazovia.

In 2005, PO led all opinion polls with 26% to 30% of public support. However, in the 2005 general election, in which it was led by Jan Rokita, PO polled only 24.1% and unexpectedly came second to the 27% garnered by Law and Justice (PiS). A centre-right coalition of PO and PiS (nicknamed POPiS) was deemed most likely to form a government after the election. Yet the putative coalition parties had a falling out in the wake of the fiercely contested Polish presidential election of 2005.

Lech Kaczyński (PiS) won the second round of the presidential election on 23 October 2005 with 54% of the vote, ahead of Tusk, the PO candidate. Due to the demands of PiS for control of all the armed ministries (the Defence Ministry, the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and the office of the Prime Minister, PO and PiS were unable to form a coalition. Instead, PiS formed a coalition government with the support of the League of Polish Families (LPR) and Self-Defense of the Republic of Poland (SRP). PO became the opposition to this PiS-led coalition government.

The PiS-led coalition fell apart in 2007 amid a corruption scandal involving Andrzej Lepper and Tomasz Lipiec[1] and internal leadership disputes. These events led to new elections, and in the 21 October 2007 parliamentary election PO won 41.51% of the popular vote and 209 out of 460 seats in the Sejm and 60 out of 100 seats in the Senate of Poland. Civic Platform, now the largest party in both houses of parliament, subsequently formed a coalition with the Polish People's Party (PSL).

At the 2010 Polish presidential election, following the Smolensk air disaster which killed the incumbent Polish president Lech Kaczyński, Tusk decided not to present his candidature, considered an easy possible victory over PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński. During the PO primary elections, Bronisław Komorowski defeated the Oxford-educated, PiS defector Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski. At the polls, Komorowski defeated Jarosław Kaczyński, ensuring PO dominance over the current Polish political landscape.[2]

In November 2010, local elections granted Civic Platform about 30.1 percent of the votes and PiS at 23.2 percent, an increase for the former and a drop for the latter compared to the 2006 elections.[2] PO succeeded in winning four consecutive elections (a record in post-Communist Poland), and Tusk remains as kingmaker. PO's dominance is also a reflection of left-wing weakness and divisions on both sides of the political scene, with PiS suffering a splinter in Autumn 2010.[2] Civic Platform won the plurality of votes in the 9 October 2011 parliamentary election, gaining 39.18% of the popular vote, 207 of 460 seats in the Sejm, and 63 out of 100 seats in the Senate.[3]

In the 2014 European elections, Civic Platform came first place nationally, achieving 32.13% of the vote and returning 19 MEPs.[4] In the 2014 local elections, PO achieved 179 seats, the highest single number.[5] In the 2015 presidential election, PO endorsed Bronisław Komorowski, a former member of PO from 2001 till 2010. He lost the election receiving 48.5% of the popular vote, while Andrzej Duda won with 51.5%.[6]

In the 2015 parliamentary election, PO came in second place, after PiS, achieving 24.09% of the popular vote, 138 out of 460 seats in the Sejm, and 34 out of 100 seats in the Senate.[7] In the 2018 local elections, PO achieved 26.97% of the votes, coming second after PiS.[8] In the 2019 European elections, PO participated in the European Coalition electoral alliance which achieved 38.47%, coming second after PiS.[9] On October 1, 2023, it held The Million Hearts march in Warsaw.[10]

Ideology

Файл:Marsz 4 czerwca 2023 - Platforma Obywatelska banner.jpg
Civic Platform banner carried during the opposition march on 4 June 2023

The Civic Platform has been mainly described as a centrist,[11] or centre-right,Шаблон:Refn political party. Due to the peculiarity of Polish politics, as a major liberal opponent of the conservative PiS, the party is also classified as centre-left.[12] It has also been described as liberal-conservative,[13][14][15] Christian democratic,[16][17][18][19] conservative,[20][21] conservative-liberal,[22][23] classical-liberal,[24] liberal,[25] and social-liberal.[26][27] It was also described as pragmatic and big tent.[28][29][30] It supports Poland's membership in the European Union.[31]

Since 2007, when Civic Platform formed the government, the party has gradually moved from its Christian-democratic stances, and many of its politicians hold more liberal positions on social issues. In 2013, the Civic Platform's government introduced public funding of in vitro fertilisation program. Civic Platform also supports civil unions for same-sex couples but is against same-sex marriage and the adoption of children by same-sex couples. The party also currently supports liberalisation of the abortion law,[32] which it had opposed while in government.[33]

PO was described as neoliberal,[34][35][36][37] economically liberal,[21][38] and fiscally conservative.[39] Despite this and declaring in the parliamentary election campaign the will to limit taxation in Poland,[21] it increased the excise imposed on diesel oil, alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and oil.[40][41] The party refrained from implementing the flat tax, instead increasing value-added tax from 22% to 23% in 2011.[42] The party also eliminated many tax exemptions.[43][44][45] In response to the climate crisis, the Civic Platform has promised to end the use of coal for energy in Poland by 2040.[46]

After becoming the biggest opposition party, the Civic Platform became more culturally liberal and populist.[47][48][49][50] This tendency is especially popular among the younger generation of the party's politicians, such as mayor of Warsaw and presidential candidate Rafał Trzaskowski. The party has also changed its opinion about the social programmes of PiS, starting to support them.[51][52][53]

Political support

Шаблон:See also

Файл:Präsidentschaftswahl Polen 2010 Runde 1.svg
Civic Platform's support is concentrated in the west and north of the country. Areas voting for Bronisław Komorowski in 2010 are shaded orange above.

As of 2020, the party enjoyed the greatest support in large cities and among people with higher education and in managerial positions, while in terms of age, the electorate was evenly distributed,[54] and the electoral base of the Civic Platform lay in middle-aged, highly educated gold-collar and white-collar workers of the middle and upper-middle classes.[54] As of 2020, the Civic Platform electorate was made up of more women than men, was disproportionally represented by middle-aged, urban and middle-class voters, and was characteristed by higher levels of education, higher position in the socio-professional structure, as well as moderate religiosity and Roman Catholicism.[55] The party consistently enjoyed overwhelming support of workers such as directors, managers and specialists, business owners and co-owners, and administrative workers.[54] At the same time, the party underperformed amongst blue-collar workers, young voters, farmers and students, as well as unemployed voters.[54] In regards to age, Civic Platform performed the best amongst voters aged 40–49, while also performing strongly among 30-39 and 50-59 year olds. The party performs the worst amongst the oldest (aged 60 or more) and the youngest (aged 29 or less) voters.[54] The party strongly appealed to urban voters, as almost a half of voters living in big cities (500,000 people or more) vote for Civic Platform; support for the party remains strong in middle-sized cities but strongly declines in small towns and the countryside, as on average only 15% of rural voters support it.[54]

As of 2016, an overwhelming majority of party's supporters (83%) were Roman Catholics, and 44% of these voters partook in religious practices at least once a week.[56] as of 2016, the party was supported by the Christian left, as well as liberal and moderate Catholics,[56] while most of conservative Catholics in Poland support Law and Justice instead.[56] Churchgoing Catholics are roughly evenly split between Civic Platform and Law and Justice, with a significant minority of churchgoers supporting Polish People's Party as well.[56] Catholics who support Civic Platform "oppose, on the one hand, the state's enforcement of religious norms and, on the other, do not condone their violation".[57] This is largely consistent with the party's attitude towards religion, which combines a moderately conservative and politically Catholic programme with left-wing economic slogans, supported by Catholic social teaching and the teaching of John Paul II contained in the encyclical Centesimus annus.[57]

As of 2020, most of Civic Platform's electorate identified as liberal conservatives, centrists and moderate conservatives.[58] No tendency dominates, as the party's supporters are roughly evenly split between political tendencies - 35% of party's supporters identify with political centre, 28% as left-wing, and 24% as right-wing.[58] Throghout the 2010s, Civic Platform had been losing left-wing supporters due to the re-emergence of Lewica as well as Janusz Palikot's defection from the party.[58] The party also faced a challenge from Nowoczesna, whose vote "came largely from former Civic Platform supporters, disappointed with its failure to shake off its social conservatism".[59] According to Janusz Jartyś of the University of Szczecin, the ideological base of Civic Platform are "national-conservative, liberal and social-democratic voters", with each faction expecting "at least partial implementation of their demands, stability in the governance of the country and social peace".[60] According to Søren Riishøj, the party is also unpopular amongst the traditionally social-democratic voters, who are opposed to Europeanisation and globalisation, and are critical of the Civic Platform's "almost U.S. type of election campaign."[61]

As of 2021, according to CBOS, Civic Platform was overwhelmingly popular amongst pro-European voters, with almost 80% of party's supporters wishing to cooperate with the European Union more.[62] The party is generally supported by moderates, as most of the party's voters wish for a "compromise" on issues such as abortion.[62] Economically, the party is supported by pro-business and welfare-oriented voters alike; while most of Civic Platform's supporters believe that Poland should become a welfare state, they are evenly split on issues such as progressive taxation and flat tax, and nationalization vs. privatization.[62] The party has also enjoyed the support of regionalists, autonomists and voters supportive of decentralization and localism in general.[62] Over 90% of Civic Platform supporters believe that local governments should have more power and that the national government should devolve its power to the regional governments of gminas and voivodeships.[62] The party is supported by Silesian regionalists,[63] and had organized joint electoral lists with Silesian parties like Silesian Autonomy Movement and Silesian Regional Party.[64] Local politicians of the Civic Platform in Silesia are often associated with Silesian regionalism as well.[65] The party also enjoys support from the Kashubians and their local autonomist movement,[66] with the co-founder of the party, Donald Tusk, having expressed his support for autonomous Kashubia in 1992.[67]

In March 2023, Tusk stated that Silesian should be considered a language rather than an ethnolect as it has unique literature and grammar, and promised to recognise Silesian as an official, statutory language of Upper Silesia.[68][69] Tusk also declared that he was a regionalist.[68]

Leadership

No. Image Name Tenure
1 Файл:Maciej Płażyński 2.jpg Maciej Płażyński 18 October 2001–
1 June 2003
2 Файл:Donald Tusk (6165309851) (cropped).jpg Donald Tusk 1 June 2003–
8 November 2014
3 Файл:Ewa Kopacz debata z Szydło (19.10.2015).jpg Ewa Kopacz 8 November 2014–
26 January 2016
4 Файл:Grzegorz Schetyna Sejm 2019.jpg Grzegorz Schetyna 26 January 2016–
29 January 2020
5 Файл:Borys Budka Sejm 2016.JPG Borys Budka 29 January 2020–
3 July 2021
(2) Файл:EPP Summit, 29 June, Brussels (53287183894) (cropped) no mic.png Donald Tusk since 3 July 2021

Election results

Sejm

Election year Leader # of
votes
% of
vote
# of
overall seats won
+/– Government
2001 Maciej Płażyński 1,651,099 12.7 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:No2
Шаблон:No2
Шаблон:No2
2005 Donald Tusk 2,849,259 24.1 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 68 Шаблон:No2
Шаблон:No2
2007 6,701,010 41.5 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 76 Шаблон:Yes2
2011 5,629,773 39.2 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 2 Шаблон:Yes2
2015 Ewa Kopacz 3,661,474 24.1 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 69 Шаблон:No2
2019 Grzegorz Schetyna 5,060,355 27.4 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 36 Шаблон:No2
As part of Civic Coalition, which won 134 seats in total.
2023 Donald Tusk 6,629,402 30.7 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 25 Шаблон:Yes2
As part of Civic Coalition, which won 157 seats in total.

Senate

Election year # of
votes
% of
vote
# of
overall seats won
+/– Majority
2001 6,582,224 24.34 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:No2
As part of the Senate 2001 coalition, which won 15 seats.
2005 4,090,497 16.94 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 32 Шаблон:Partial2
Шаблон:No2
2007 12,734,742 39.14 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 26 Шаблон:Yes2
2011 5,173,300 35.60 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 3 Шаблон:Yes2
2015 4,323,789 28.85 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 29 Шаблон:No2
2019 4,481,803 24.62 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Steady 0 Шаблон:Yes2
As part of the Civic Coalition, which won 43 seats.
2023 5,107,360 23.86 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 2 Шаблон:Yes2
As part of the Senate Pact 2023, which won 65 seats.

Presidential

Election year Candidate 1st round 2nd round
# of overall votes % of overall vote # of overall votes % of overall vote
2005 Donald Tusk 5,429,666 36.3 (#1) 7,022,319 46.0 (#2)
2010 Bronisław Komorowski 6,981,319 41.5 (#1) 8,933,887 53.0 (#1)
2015 Supported Bronisław Komorowski 5,031,060 33.8 (#2) 8,112,311 48.5 (#2)
2020 Rafał Trzaskowski 5,917,340 30.5 (#2) 10,018,263 48.9 (#2)

Regional assemblies

Election year % of
vote
# of
overall seats won
+/–
2002 12.1 (#4) Шаблон:Composition bar
In coalition with Law and Justice (POPiS).
2006 27.2 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar
2010 30.9 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 36
2014 26.3 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 43
2018 27.1 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 15
As the Civic Coalition.

European Parliament

Election year # of
votes
% of
vote
# of
overall seats won
+/–
2004 1,467,775 24.1 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar
2009 3,271,852 44.4 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Increase 10
2014 2,271,215 32.1 (#1) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 6
2019 5,249 935 38,47 (#2) Шаблон:Composition bar Шаблон:Decrease 5
As the European Coalition.

Voivodeship Marshals

Name Image Voivodeship Date Vocation
Elżbieta Polak Файл:Elzbieta Polak.JPG Lubusz Voivodeship 29 November 2010
Marek Woźniak Файл:Marek Wozniak 546.JPG Greater Poland Voivodeship 10 October 2005
Piotr Całbecki Файл:Całbecki.JPG Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship 24 January 2006
Olgierd Geblewicz Файл:Olgierd Geblewicz fran Parliamentary Forum of the Southern Baltic Sea talar vid BSPC-s mote i Visby 2008-09-01.jpg West Pomeranian Voivodeship 7 December 2010
Mieczysław Struk Файл:Mieczysław Struk (2010).JPG Pomeranian Voivodeship 22 February 2010
Andrzej Buła Файл:Andrzej Buła.jpg Opole Voivodeship 12 November 2013
Mariusz Frankowski Masovian Voivodeship 13 December 2023

Notable politicians

See also

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

External links

Шаблон:Polish political parties Шаблон:European People's Party Шаблон:Authority control


Ошибка цитирования Для существующих тегов <ref> группы «nb» не найдено соответствующего тега <references group="nb"/>

  1. Шаблон:Cite news
  2. 2,0 2,1 2,2 Warsaw Business Journal Шаблон:Webarchive
  3. Шаблон:Cite web
  4. Шаблон:Cite web
  5. Шаблон:Cite web
  6. Шаблон:Cite web
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite web
  9. Шаблон:Cite web
  10. Шаблон:Cite news
  11. PO has often been described as centrist:
  12. PO has often been described as centre-left:
  13. Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. Шаблон:Bulleted list
  16. Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Шаблон:Cite book
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite book
  21. 21,0 21,1 21,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Bulleted list
  24. Шаблон:Cite book
  25. Шаблон:Bulleted list
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite book
  28. Шаблон:Cite web
  29. Шаблон:Cite web
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite book
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite journal
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. Шаблон:Cite journal
  37. PO has often been described as neoliberal:
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Шаблон:Cite news
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite web
  42. Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Шаблон:Cite web
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Шаблон:Cite web
  47. Шаблон:Cite journal
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite news
  50. Шаблон:Cite journal
  51. Шаблон:Cite web
  52. Шаблон:Cite web
  53. Шаблон:Cite web
  54. 54,0 54,1 54,2 54,3 54,4 54,5 Шаблон:Cite journal
  55. Шаблон:Cite journal
  56. 56,0 56,1 56,2 56,3 Шаблон:Cite book
  57. 57,0 57,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. 58,0 58,1 58,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  59. Шаблон:Cite journal
  60. Шаблон:Cite journal
  61. Шаблон:Cite journal
  62. 62,0 62,1 62,2 62,3 62,4 Шаблон:Cite journal
  63. Шаблон:Cite news
  64. Шаблон:Cite news
  65. Шаблон:Cite web
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. 68,0 68,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  69. Шаблон:Cite news