Английская Википедия:Columbia-class submarine

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 11:34, 20 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|US Navy nuclear ballistic missile submarine class}} {{use dmy dates|date=December 2020}} {|{{Infobox ship begin | display title = ''Columbia''-class submarine | infobox caption = yes }} {{Infobox ship image | Ship image = File:Artist rendering of a Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, 2019 (190306-N-N0101-125).jpg | Ship caption = Artist's rendering of the pl...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates

Шаблон:Infobox ship imageШаблон:Infobox ship class overviewШаблон:Infobox ship characteristics

The Columbia-class (formerly known as the Ohio Replacement Submarine and SSBN-X Future Follow-on Submarine) is an upcoming class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines designed to replace the Шаблон:Sclass of the United States Navy.[1] Construction of the first submarine began on 1 October 2020.[2] It is scheduled to enter service in 2031.[3][4][5]

On 3 June 2022, the Navy announced that this first boat will be named USS District of Columbia (SSBN-826), because there currently exists an attack submarine named USS Columbia (SSN-771).[6] In the announcement, the Navy continued to refer to the class as the Columbia class.[7]

Overview

The Columbia class is to replace the Ohio class of ballistic missile submarines, whose remaining boats are to be decommissioned, one per year, beginning in 2028.Шаблон:Cn The Columbia class will take over the role of submarine presence in the United States’ strategic nuclear force.[8]

Electric Boat designed the new class with help from Newport News Shipbuilding. A total of 12 submarines are planned,[9] and construction of the lead boat began in 2021. Each submarine will have 16 missile tubes, each carrying one UGM-133 Trident II D5LE missile. (The ninth and later Columbias are to receive the upgraded D5LE2s.)[10][11] The submarines will be Шаблон:Convert long and Шаблон:Convert in diameter, as long as the Ohio-class design, and Шаблон:Convert larger in diameter.[8]

In studies to determine how many submarines would be needed for the United States' strategic nuclear force, the U.S. Navy looked at the number of missiles required to be at sea and on station at any given time, the number of missiles each submarine should be armed with and the likelihood that a submarine will remain undiscovered by the enemy and be capable of launching its missiles. Also taken into consideration was how the maintenance schedule of each submarine will affect that boat’s availability to be deployed on mission.[12] Cost-reduction studies explored design and construction possibilities, including adding missile tubes to the design of the Шаблон:Sclass attack submarine, building Ohio class replacement submarines using updated Ohio-class designs, and developing an entirely new Ohio Replacement Submarine design.[8][13]

Файл:SSBN-X.jpg
Ohio Replacement Submarine

Using the information from these studies, the Navy concluded that a new design would be the least expensive option that could meet all of the technical requirements.[12] For example, while both the modified Virginia-class and updated Ohio-class design options would have required an expensive mid-life refueling,[8] each Columbia-class nuclear core will last as long as the submarine is in service.[14][15]

The design and technology development of the Columbia class is projected to cost $4.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars), although technology and components from the Ohio and Virginia classes are to be included where possible, to save money. The cost to build District of Columbia, the lead boat of the class, will be an estimated $6.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars).[8] The Navy has a goal of reducing the average cost of the remaining 11 planned hulls in the class to $4.9 billion each (fiscal 2010 dollars).[14] The total lifecycle cost of the entire class is estimated at $347 billion.[14] The high cost of the submarines is expected to cut deeply into Navy shipbuilding.[16]

In April 2014, the Navy completed a 300-page specification report for the Ohio Replacement Program submarines. There are 159 specifications including weapons, escape routes, fluid systems, hatches, doors, seawater systems, and a set length of Шаблон:Convert, partly to allow for sufficient volume inside the pressure hull.[17]

In March 2016, the U.S. Navy chose General Dynamics Electric Boat as the prime contractor and lead design yard.[18] Electric Boat, which built all 18 Ohio-class submarines,[19] will do most of the work on all 12 Columbias, including final assembly.[20] Huntington Ingalls Industries’ Newport News Shipbuilding will serve as the main subcontractor, participating in the design and construction and doing 22 to 23 percent of the work.[21]

In late 2016, some 3,000 Electric Boat employees were involved in the detailed-design phase of the program[22] and the procurement of the first submarine was scheduled for 2021.[8] Completion of the first submarine was scheduled for 2030, followed by its entry into service in 2031. All 12 submarines are expected to be completed by 2042 and remain in service until 2085.[8][17]

On 28 July 2016, it was reported that the first submarine of the class will be named Columbia, to commemorate the District of Columbia, the capital of the United States.[23] The Columbia class was officially designated on 14 December 2016, by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, and the lead submarine will be Шаблон:USS.[24] The Navy wanted to procure the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021.[25]

On 28 October 2020, U.S. Navy Secretary Kenneth J. Braithwaite announced that the second submarine would be named Шаблон:USS, after the U.S. state of the same name.[26]

On 7 June 2021, the U.S. Navy budget office announced that the total cost for District of Columbia would reach $15.03 billion, which includes planning costs for the entire program.[27] As of April 2023, the estimated construction cost of the twelve-boat program is $132 billion. Securing the supply chain and maintaining a skilled labor force are two major challenges for the program.[28]

General characteristics

Файл:Columbia-class submarine, NAVSEA concept.png
Graphic artist concept, 2012
Файл:Ohio Replacement Submarine cutaway 2014 Sea, Air, and Space Symposium.png
Cutaway image

Although still evolving, the following are some of the characteristics for the SSBN(X) design:[4][29]

  • Expected 42-year service life, including 124 deterrent patrols.[30]
  • Nuclear fuel core that will power the submarine for its entire expected service life, unlike the Ohio-class submarines, which require a mid-life nuclear refueling.[15]
  • Missile launch tubes that are the same size as those of the Ohio class, with a diameter of Шаблон:Convert and a height sufficient to accommodate a D-5 Trident II missile.
  • Beam at least as great as the Шаблон:Convert beam of the Ohio-class submarines
  • 16 missile launch tubes instead of 24 missile launch tubes on Ohio-class submarines.[8][31][32][33]
  • Although the SSBN(X) is to have fewer launch tubes than the Ohio-class submarine, SSBN(X) is expected to have a submerged displacement about the same as that of Ohio-class submarines

The U.S. Navy has also said that "owing to the unique demands of strategic relevance, SSBN(X)s must be fitted with the most up-to-date capabilities and stealth to ensure they are survivable throughout their full 40-year life span."[8]

In November 2012, the U.S. Naval Institute, citing Naval Sea Systems Command, revealed additional design information:[33]

  • X-shaped stern control surfaces (hydroplanes)
  • Sail-mounted dive planes
  • Electric drive
  • Off-the-shelf equipment developed for previous submarine designs (Virginia-class SSNs), including a pump-jet propulsor, anechoic coating and a Large Aperture Bow (LAB) sonar system.

The Columbia-class submarine may also be equipped with a Submarine Warfare Federated Tactical System (SWFTS), a cluster of systems that integrate sonar, optical imaging, weapons control etc.[34][35][36]

Propulsion

Шаблон:Main

In a bid to reduce life-cycle cost and acoustic signature,[37][38] Columbia is to run on electric drive—that is, it will use an electric motor to turn its propellers instead of the reduction gearing and mechanical drive systems used on earlier nuclear-powered submarines.[39][40] It will retain the nuclear reactor and steam turbines typical of U.S. Navy submarines. In such systems, the nuclear reactor heats water to steam, the turbines convert the heat in the steam into mechanical energy, and the generators convert that mechanical energy into electrical energy[41] for use by the propulsion motors and other onboard systems.[42][43]

Turbo-electric drives were successfully used on U.S. battleships and aircraft carriers in the first half of the 20th century,[44] and on the small nuclear-powered submarine Шаблон:USS in the late 1950s.[45] Another larger nuclear-powered submarine, Шаблон:USS, was equipped with a turboelectric drive but proved to be underpowered, unreliable, and maintenance-hungry.[46][47] Шаблон:As of, the only operational turboelectric-powered subs were the French Navy's Шаблон:Sclasss.[48]

In 2014, Northrop Grumman was chosen as the prime designer and manufacturer of the Columbia's turbine generator units.[42]

In 2014, Leonardo DRS was selected as the main propulsion motor and propulsion motor drive provider. The lead ship motor was delivered to Electric Boat in August 2022.[49]

Various types of electric motors have and are being developed for military and non-military vessels.[50] Types being considered for future U.S. submarines include permanent magnet motors (PMM) being developed by General Dynamics and Newport News Shipbuilding, and high-temperature superconducting synchronous motors, being developed by American Superconductors and General Atomics.[50][51][52] More recent data shows that the U.S. Navy appears to be focusing on permanent-magnet, radial-gap electric propulsion motors. The Шаблон:Sclass design switched from PMM to an advanced induction motor.[53] In 2013, permanent magnet motors were tested on the Large Scale Vehicle II for possible application on late-production Virginia-class submarines, as well as future submarines.[54][55] Siemens AG PMMs are used on Type 212 submarines in service with the German and Italian navies.[56]

The Royal Navy's Шаблон:Sclass, which is to replace the Шаблон:Sclass of ballistic missile submarines, may have submarine shaftless drive (SSD) with an electric motor mounted outside the pressure hull.[57]Шаблон:Unreliable source? SSD was evaluated by the U.S. Navy, but it remains unknown whether the Columbia class will have it.[58][59] On contemporary nuclear submarines, steam turbines are linked to reduction gears and a shaft rotating the propeller/pump-jet propulsor. With SSD, steam would drive electric turbogenerators, powered by steam turbines, that would be connected to a non-penetrating electric junction at the aft end of the pressure hull, with a watertight electric motor mounted externally, possibly an Integrated Motor Propulsor arrangement,[60] powering the pump-jet propulsor,[57] although SSD concepts without pump-jet propulsors also exist.[61] In 2015, an Ohio-Replacement scale model at the Navy League’s 2015 Sea-Air-Space Exposition suggested that the sub would have a pump-jet propulsor visually similar to the one used on Virginia class[62][33] perhaps as part of the Navy's stated desire to reuse Virginia components to reduce risk and cost of construction.[62][8]

Common missile compartment

In December 2008, General Dynamics Electric Boat Corporation was selected to design the Common Missile Compartment that will be used on the Ohio-class successor.[31] In 2012, the U.S. Navy announced plans for its SSBN(X) to share a common missile compartment (CMC) design with the Royal Navy's Dreadnought-class ballistic missile submarine.[8] The CMC will house SLBMs in "quad packs".[63][64]

List of boats

Name Hull Number Builder Ordered Laid down Launched Commissioned Homeport Status
Шаблон:USS SSBN-826 General Dynamics Electric Boat, Groton, CT 5 November 2020[65] 4 June 2022[65][66] Under construction[65]
Шаблон:USS SSBN-827 5 November 2020[67] Ordered[68]
SSBN-828

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Bibliography

External links

Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:Columbia class submarine Шаблон:US submarine classes after 1945 Шаблон:General Dynamics

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. NUCLEAR POSTURE REVIEW FINAL REPORT media.defense.gov
  4. 4,0 4,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  5. Шаблон:Cite web
  6. DC Congresswoman Pushes DC Statehood at Keel-Laying for Navy Submarine
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. 8,00 8,01 8,02 8,03 8,04 8,05 8,06 8,07 8,08 8,09 8,10 Шаблон:Cite web
  9. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок USNI12 не указан текст
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. Шаблон:Cite web
  12. 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite web
  14. 14,0 14,1 14,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  15. 15,0 15,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  16. Шаблон:Cite news
  17. 17,0 17,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  18. Шаблон:Cite web
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. "SECNAV Mabus to Officially Designate First ORP Boat USS Columbia (SSBN-826)". USNI News, 13 December 2016.
  25. "Report on the Columbia-class Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine Program". USNI News, 20 May 2020.
  26. Шаблон:Cite news
  27. Шаблон:Cite web
  28. Шаблон:Cite news
  29. OHIO Replacement Program Naval Submarine League ssbn.pl
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. 33,0 33,1 33,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. NAVSEA News. navy.mil
  37. Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite book
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite web
  42. 42,0 42,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Шаблон:Cite web
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Шаблон:Cite web
  47. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite web
  50. 50,0 50,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  51. Шаблон:Cite web
  52. Шаблон:Cite web
  53. Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. Шаблон:Cite web
  56. Шаблон:Cite web
  57. 57,0 57,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  58. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link
  59. Шаблон:Cite web
  60. Шаблон:Cite web
  61. Шаблон:Cite web
  62. 62,0 62,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  63. Шаблон:Cite web
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. 65,0 65,1 65,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. Шаблон:Cite web
  68. Шаблон:Cite web