Английская Википедия:Commonwealth v. Mitchneck

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 19:07, 20 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Criminal case in Pennsylvania, United States}} {{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} {{Orphan|date=January 2017}} {{Infobox court case |name = Commonwealth v. Mitchneck |court = Superior Court of Pennsylvania |image = Seal of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.svg |imagesize = 250px |imagelink = |imageal...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Orphan Шаблон:Infobox court case Commonwealth v. Mitchneck, 130 Pa. Super. 433, 198 A. 463 (1938),[1] is a criminal case involving the meaning of theft and ownership.[2]Шаблон:Rp Mitchneck operated a coal mine. Mitchneck's employees signed orders directing Mitchneck to deduct amounts from their wages to pay their bills at a store.[2]Шаблон:Rp Mitchneck did not pay their bills.[2]Шаблон:Rp Mitchneck was convicted of fraudulent conversion of the employee's money.[2]Шаблон:Rp

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the conviction and ordered acquittal.[2]Шаблон:Rp The court found that although Mitchneck owed money to the employees, any money held by Mitchneck (if it ever existed) did not yet belong to the employees, since it never entered into their hands in order to transfer ownership.[2]Шаблон:Rp The court held that criminal court cannot be used as a substitute for civil court to collect a debt.[2]Шаблон:Rp

The court wrote,

"The defendant...had not received, nor did he have in his possession, any money belonging to his employees. True, he owed them money, but that did not transfer to them the title and ownership of the money... The money, if Mitchneck actually had it, of which there was no proof, was still his own, but, after he accepted the assignments, he owed the money to [the store] instead of to [the employees]... Failure to pay the amount due to the new creditor was not fraudulent conversion... Defendant's liability for the unpaid wages due to his employees was, and remained, civil, not criminal. His liability for the amounat due [to the store] after his agreement... was likewise civil and not criminal..."[3]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты
Магазины
Хостинг
Разное

  1. ↑ Commonwealth v. Mitchneck, 130 Pa. Super. 433; 198 A. 463 (1938). Шаблон:PD-notice
  2. ↑ 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, Шаблон:ISBN, [1]
  3. ↑ Mitchneck, 130 Pa. Super. at 436.
Источник — http://wikihandbk.com/ruwiki/index.php?title=Английская_Википедия:Commonwealth_v._Mitchneck&oldid=14034179