Английская Википедия:Coniocarpon

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 04:12, 21 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Genus of lichens}} {{Use dmy dates|date=December 2023}} {{Automatic taxobox | image = Arthonia cinnabarinum - Flickr - pellaea.jpg | image_caption = ''Coniocarpon cinnabarinum'' | taxon = Coniocarpon | authority = DC. (1805) | type_species = ''Coniocarpon cinnabarinum'' | type_species_authority = DC. (1805) | subdivision_ranks = Species | subdivision = see t...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Automatic taxobox

Coniocarpon is a genus of lichen-forming fungi in the family Arthoniaceae.[1] It has eight species of corticolous (bark-dwelling) lichens.[2] This genus is distinct for its crystalline orange, red, and purple quinoid pigments in the ascomata that turn purple in potassium hydroxide solution, its colourless, transversely septate ascospores with large apical cells, and its rounded to Шаблон:Lichengloss ascomata (fruiting bodies).

Taxonomy

The genus was circumscribed by Augustin Pyramus de Candolle in 1805.[3] The genus was rejected against Arthonia as proposed in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants in Appendices I–VII.[4] In 2014 however, Coniocarpon was resurrected by Andreas Frisch and colleagues for the Arthonia cinnabarina species complex, based on the results of molecular phylogenetics analysis, which showed that it formed a clade with the genus Reichlingia.[5] The type species of the genus, Coniocarpon cinnabarinum, had previously been designated by Rolf Santesson in 1952.[6]

Description

The genus Coniocarpon, as revitalized by Frisch and colleagues in 2014, comprises lichens with a smooth thallus that is either immersed or slightly protruding, typically pale brown and often outlined by a dark line. Its Шаблон:Lichengloss is of the Шаблон:Lichengloss type. The apothecia (fruiting bodies) of these lichens are irregularly rounded to weakly lobed, either Шаблон:Lichengloss or Шаблон:Lichengloss, and emerge singly or in clusters. The Шаблон:Lichengloss is brown, consisting of compressed, vertically aligned Шаблон:Lichengloss hyphae, which sometimes form short hairs on the outer margin and may have old bark cells attached.[7]

The Шаблон:Lichengloss of the apothecia is dark, ranging from flat to slightly convex, and may have a white Шаблон:Lichengloss surface, sometimes overlaid with an orange-red Шаблон:Lichengloss, with margins that are level with the disc and may also be prominently orange-red pruinose, containing crystals. The Шаблон:Lichengloss is brown, composed of branched tips of paraphysoidal hyphae that extend horizontally above the asci. The hymenium is colourless and strongly Шаблон:Lichengloss, with a Шаблон:Lichengloss of densely branched and netted Шаблон:Lichengloss. The Шаблон:Lichengloss is also colourless.[7]

The asci of Coniocarpon are of the Arthonia-type, Шаблон:Lichengloss to Шаблон:Lichengloss in shape, and typically contain eight spores. Its Шаблон:Lichengloss are colourless, Шаблон:Lichengloss with an enlarged apical cell, turning pale brown with granular ornamentation at maturity. Chemically, the exciple and epithecium react blue upon staining with solutions of iodine and potassium iodide, while the hymenium and hypothecium react red with iodine and blue with potassium iodide. The orange-red crystals dissolve in potassium hydroxide solution to form a transient, purplish solution.[7]

Species

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Taxonbar

  1. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Wijayawardene et al. 2022 не указан текст
  2. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок CoL не указан текст
  3. 3,0 3,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Lamarck & De Candolle 1805 не указан текст
  4. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок ICNafp 2018 не указан текст
  5. 5,0 5,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Frisch et al. 2014 не указан текст
  6. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Santesson 1952 не указан текст
  7. 7,0 7,1 7,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Cannon et al. 2020 не указан текст
  8. 8,0 8,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Van den Broeck et al. 2018 не указан текст
  9. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Kalb et al. 2012 не указан текст
  10. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Frisch et al. 2020 не указан текст
  11. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Aptroot et al. 2022 не указан текст
  12. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Aptroot & da Silva Cáceres 2018 не указан текст
  13. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Perlmutter et al. 2023 не указан текст