Английская Википедия:Counselman v. Hitchcock
Материал из Онлайн справочника
Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case
Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule.[1][2]
References
External links
Категории:
- Английская Википедия
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court
- 1892 in United States case law
- United States Fifth Amendment self-incrimination case law
- Legal history of Illinois
- Страницы, где используется шаблон "Навигационная таблица/Телепорт"
- Страницы с телепортом
- Википедия
- Статья из Википедии
- Статья из Английской Википедии