Английская Википедия:Counselman v. Hitchcock

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 23:10, 21 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} {{Infobox SCOTUS case |Litigants=Counselman v. Hitchcock |ArgueDateA=December 9 |ArgueDateB=10 |ArgueYear=1891 |DecideDate=January 11 |DecideYear=1892 |FullName=Counselman v. Hitchcock |USVol=142 |USPage=547 |ParallelCitations=12 S. Ct. 195; 35 L. Ed. 1110; 1892 U.S. LEXIS 1990; 3 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 2529 |Prior=Appeal from...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case

Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule.[1][2]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:US4thAmendment


Шаблон:SCOTUS-stub