Английская Википедия:Democratic Underground

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 07:49, 26 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Short description|Online political community}} {{Use American English|date=October 2020}} {{Use mdy dates|date=October 2020}} {{Infobox website | name = Democratic Underground | url = {{URL|https://www.democraticunderground.com}} | launch_date = {{start date and age|2001|1|20}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com|title=Dem...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use American English Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox website

Democratic Underground is an online community for members of the United States Democratic Party. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office.[1]

History

Шаблон:Recentism Шаблон:Expand section On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on pro-Trump trolls.[2]

Criticism

Discussions from posters at DU have drawn criticism. One example of this was the dialog about the 2004 tsunami disaster, in which a few posts explored the possibility of "earthquake weapons". The posts were reported on by The New York Times[3] and Fox News.[4] An administrator also sent a letter to the Times, which was printed.[5]

The site also saw criticism when, in 2003, a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq.[6]

Copyright infringement lawsuit

Шаблон:Main

In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The suit was brought by Righthaven, an entity that finds Review-Journal quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement.[7] In response to the lawsuit, DU asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was fair use, and counterclaimed against Righthaven for fraud, barratry, and champerty.[8] DU is being represented in the case pro bono by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, attorneys from the firm of Winston & Strawn, and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers.[8] After Righthaven lost a similar suit against Realty One Group over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against DU.[9]

On June 14, 2011, Judge Roger L. Hunt ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.[10]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links