Английская Википедия:Deutsche Telekom AG v Commission

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 20:41, 26 февраля 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Unreferenced|date=September 2023}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} {{Infobox Court Case | name = Deutsche Telekom AG v Commission | court = Court of Justice | image = File:Bonn DTAG2.jpg | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = (2010) [http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62008CJ0280&lang1=en&type=TXT&ancre= C-2...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Unreferenced

Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox Court Case

Deutsche Telekom AG v Commission (2010) C-280/08 is a European competition law case relevant for UK enterprise law, concerning telecommunications.

Facts

Deutsche Telekom AG claimed the Commission had wrongly found it abused its dominant position under TFEU article 102, in charging higher prices to access its local loop: the physical circuit connecting the network termination point at a subscriber's premises to the main distribution frame or equivalent facility in the fixed public telephone network. Under German law and the Telecommunications Directives, DT was required to give access to competitors. The Commission said it was charging competitors more than its own retail end-user customers. The margin between the wholesale access price and its retail prices was not enough to cover downstream costs. DT's prices were approved by the German telecomms regulator (RegTP). The Commission said once a margin squeeze was shown, it was unnecessary to assess the effects on competition. This was already an abuse. Deutsche Telekom argued there could be no abuse because its prices were approved by the Regulator.

The General Court upheld the Commission's decision. It said the abuse was an unfair ‘spread’ between wholesale and retail prices. Margin squeezing was a separate abuse from predatory pricing.

Judgment

The CJEU upheld the General Court.

Шаблон:Cquote

See also

Шаблон:Clist communications

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist