Английская Википедия:Dwight H. Sullivan

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 00:07, 1 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{notability|bio|date=August 2013}} '''Dwight H. Sullivan''' is an American military officer and lawyer.{{ref|DukeLaw}} From 2005 to 2007, he served as the Chief Defense Counsel for the Office of Military Commissions. In 2007, he became a civilian lawyer working for the Air Force doing death penalty defense appellate work.{{ref|Tamber}}...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Notability Dwight H. Sullivan is an American military officer and lawyer.Шаблон:Ref From 2005 to 2007, he served as the Chief Defense Counsel for the Office of Military Commissions. In 2007, he became a civilian lawyer working for the Air Force doing death penalty defense appellate work.Шаблон:Ref Sullivan is a colonel in the United States Marine Corps Reserve. He is a graduate of the University of Maryland and the University of Virginia School of Law.Шаблон:Ref Prior to his role in defending the Guantanamo Bay detainees he worked with the Maryland office of the American Civil Liberties Union.Шаблон:Ref

Work on CAAFlog

Sullivan is the founder of CAAFlog, a blog devoted to current topics in U.S. military law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). CAAFlog derives the first part of its name from the acronym for the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), an intermediate appellate court with jurisdiction over certain courts-martial in accordance with Article 67 of the UCMJ (Title 10, United States Code, Section 867).Шаблон:Ref CAAFlog currently features over a dozen contributors with experience in the field of U.S. military law.Шаблон:Ref

In 2008, Sullivan spotted an error in the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana.Шаблон:Ref The court wrote that no U.S. federal jurisdiction authorized the death penalty for child rape,Шаблон:Ref but Sullivan pointed out that this was not true because Congress had specifically authorized the death penalty for such offenses as part of the 2006 amendments to the UCMJ. The Supreme Court requested briefs on the issue and subsequently modified its opinion to address the error, but the court denied a rehearing and declined to alter its decision.Шаблон:RefШаблон:Ref

References

  1. Шаблон:Note Duke Law Students, Professor Assist Guantanamo Defense Team: Law students will research and write briefs and help craft strategy for the military lawyers defending Guantanamo Bay detainees, Duke University, November 11, 2005.
  2. Шаблон:Note Caryn Tamber, Patriot Acts, Daily Record, July 22, 2007.
  3. Шаблон:Note Caryn Tamber, Patriot Acts, Daily Record, July 22, 2007.
  4. Шаблон:Note Legal Row Erupts Over New Abu Ghraib Photos, antiwar.com, July 26, 2005.
  5. Шаблон:NoteArticle 67, UCMJ.
  6. Шаблон:Note 'Blawgs' directory, Am. Bar Ass'n Journal.
  7. Шаблон:Note Blogger Points Out Substantial Error in Supreme Court Decision, Am. Bar Ass'n Journal, July 2, 2008.
  8. Шаблон:Note Kennedy v. Louisiana, 128 S.Ct. 2641 (2008), June 25, 2008.
  9. Шаблон:Note Kennedy v. Louisiana statement re denial of rehearing, 129 S.Ct. 1 (2008), October 1, 2008.
  10. Шаблон:Note Kennedy v. Louisiana, notes.

External links