Английская Википедия:Epistemic cultures

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 03:14, 4 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Concept of diversity of scientific activity according to field, questioning the unity of science}} '''Epistemic cultures''' (often used in plural form) is a concept developed in the nineties by anthropologist Karin Knorr Cetina in her book ''Epistemic Cultures, how the sciences make knowledge.''<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Epistemic cultures : how the sc...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Epistemic cultures (often used in plural form) is a concept developed in the nineties by anthropologist Karin Knorr Cetina in her book Epistemic Cultures, how the sciences make knowledge.[1] Opposed to a monist vision of scientific activity (according to which, would exist a unique scientific method), Knorr Cetina defines the concept of epistemic cultures as a diversity of scientific activities according to different scientific fields, not only in methods and tools, but also in types of reasonings, ways to establish evidence, and relationships between theory and empiry. Knorr Cetina's work is seminal in questioning the so-called unity of science.Шаблон:Citation needed

Knorr Cetina's anthropology

In practice, Knorr Cetina compares two contemporary important scientific fields:[1] High energy physics and molecular biology. She worked as an anthropologist within two laboratories, along the line of the laboratory anthropology work by Latour and Woolgar.[2] Her anthropological work is comparative and the two chosen scientific fields are highly mediaticized and easily distinguishable.

Epistemic cultures as a philosophical concept has been perused by numerous philosophical, anthropological or historical studies of science.[3][4]

Two distinct publication regimes

High energy physics and molecular biology are very different as scientific fields belonging to two different epistemic cultures. They also are very different in terms of academic authorship. Biagioli describes this difference in terms of publications culture regarding number of authors per paper, distribution of contributorship within authors, preprint policy and he precisely chooses to oppose the very same domains.[5]

References

Шаблон:Reflist


Шаблон:Sci-hist-stub Шаблон:Socio-stub Шаблон:Science-philo-stub