Английская Википедия:FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 04:09, 6 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} {{Infobox SCOTUS case |Litigants=Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company |ArgueDate=December 10 |ArgueYear=1964 |DecideDate=April 5th |DecideYear=1965 |FullName=Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company |USVol=380 |USPage=374 |ParallelCitations=85 S. Ct. 1035; 13 L. Ed. 2d 904; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 230...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case

Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, 380 U.S. 374 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case.

Background

A Colgate-Palmolive advertisement claimed that its Palmolive Rapid Shave shaving cream was so good it could be used to shave sandpaper. The commercial showed sandpaper applied with shaving cream and then shaved.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complained that the ad was deceptive and a material misrepresentation because it was not sandpaper but rather sand sprinkled on glass. Colgate-Palmolive argued that the product really could shave sandpaper if left on long enough. Colgate-Palmolive sued arguing that the FTC had overstepped its authority.[1]

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court agreed with the FTC that the commercial was a material misrepresentation. The ruling forced advertisers to remain truthful in their product presentations. As a result, commercials often feature "dramatization" notifications.[2]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Colgate-Palmolive


Шаблон:SCOTUS-stub