Английская Википедия:Fleming v Beevers

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 06:36, 8 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} {{Infobox court case | name = Fleming v Beevers | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 4 November 1993 | full name = Fleming v Beevers | citations = [1994] 1 NZLR 385 | judges = Cooke P, Gault J, Tipping J...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use dmy dates

Шаблон:Infobox court case Fleming v Beevers [1994] 1 NZLR 385 is a cited case in New Zealand law regarding the doctrine of part performance.[1][2]Шаблон:Page needed[3]Шаблон:Page needed

Background

Fleeming and Beevers were in a de facto relationship for over 20 years. In 1989, the couple purchased a house in Queenstown, with Beevers financing his half by cashing in his superannuation policy, and Fleeming borrowing the money for her half, which needed a guarantee from Beevers to secure the loan.

During the conveyancing process, both parties promised to leave their share in the house to the other partner in their will.

Beevers died a few months after buying the house and without drafting a new will. Without a new will, his share of the house would have been disposed under his last will, which left everything to his three children from his previous marriage, with nothing left to Fleeming.

Fleeming sued the estate for Beevers' half share in the house, as well as for a piano that he had promised to leave her.

Held

The court awarded Fleming the share in the house, but not the piano.

References

Шаблон:Reflist


Шаблон:NewZealand-case-law-stub