Английская Википедия:Gan Yang

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 08:56, 11 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Chinese political philosopher (born 1952)}} {{Use British English|date=August 2019}}{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}} {{family name hatnote|Gan ({{noitalics|{{lang|zh|甘}}}})|lang=Chinese}} {{Infobox academic | honorific_prefix = Professor | name = Gan Yang | honorific_suffix = | image = | image_size = |...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use British EnglishШаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Family name hatnote Шаблон:Infobox academic Шаблон:Contemporary Chinese political thought Шаблон:Conservatism in China Gan Yang (born 1952; Шаблон:Zh) is a Chinese political philosopher, "Confucian socialist". He is dean of the Liberal Arts College at Sun Yat-sen University, and was formerly professor of political philosophy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Career

Born in 1952 in Shenyang, Gan was raised in Hangzhou, Fujian. Gan was a Red Guard in the early years of the Cultural Revolution, but became disillusioned with the movement and was sent to labour in the Greater Khingan Mountains in 1970. He was admitted to Heilongjiang University after the death of Mao Zedong, graduating in 1982. Gan then pursued graduate studies in philosophy at Peking University, where he was a classmate of Liu Xiaofeng. At Beijing he developed an interest in continental philosophy, particularly the thought of Martin Heidegger and the Neo-Kantians.Шаблон:Sfn He graduated with a master's degree in 1985 and played an important role in disseminating Western philosophy in China in the late 1980s.Шаблон:Sfn

In 1989, Gan enrolled as a PhD student under the Committee of Social Thought at the University of Chicago, but left Chicago ten years later without a doctorate.Шаблон:Sfn He was appointed professor of political philosophy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong,Шаблон:Sfn then moved to Sun Yat-sen University as dean of the Liberal Arts College in 2009, where he presided over a general reform of liberal arts at the university on Straussian lines,Шаблон:Sfn emphasising Chinese, Latin, and Ancient Greek classics.Шаблон:Sfn

Gan was described in 2013 as "one of the most prominent political philosophers of contemporary China".Шаблон:Sfn

Views

Perception from Others

Gan started his academic career as a liberalШаблон:Sfn and a disciple of Western Enlightenment philosophy, but, influenced by Ernst Cassirer, he began to alter his views in 1987, cautioning that there were Western philosophers who had exposed the limits of reason as a philosophical principle. Gan then adopted a more culturally conservative position, arguing that a return to Confucianism was necessary to counterbalance the negative aspects of modernisation in China.Шаблон:Sfn For Gan at this stage of his thinking, freedom at the individual level was a higher concern than democracy and science, the two catchwords of the May Fourth Movement: Chinese intellectuals had so far "never dared to regard 'the freedom of individuals' as the first principle".Шаблон:Sfn He initially supported the Chinese democracy movement and the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.Шаблон:Sfn

After moving to Chicago in 1989, Gan became increasingly influenced as a student of Allan Bloom by American conservative philosophy and the thought of Leo Strauss. In a preface to a Chinese translation of Strauss's Natural Right and History in 2003, Gan drew on Strauss's thought to argue that the predominant danger of persecution in philosophy was not the persecution of the philosopher by an unphilosophical wider society, but the persecution of the multitude by the philosopher. Modern philosophy has "gone mad", Gan states, and is promoting the continual remaking of politics according to competing philosophical abstractions;Шаблон:Sfn in light of the "politicization of philosophy" and the "philosophization of politics",Шаблон:Sfn philosophy has become a disease which must be controlled.Шаблон:Sfn

In the 1990s, Gan shortly joined the emerging Chinese New Left.[1]

After 2000 announced his support for the establishment of a "socialist Confucian republic".Шаблон:Sfn According to Gan, the ideal of a Confucian socialist republic is already embodied in the official name of the People's Republic of China: the title of "People's Republic" demarcates the country as a socialist republic constituted by workers and peasants and not a capitalist state, while the name "China" itself invokes the Confucian tradition of Chinese civilisation.Шаблон:Sfn

Commenting upon China's reform process, Gan has criticised linear models of economic development and suggested that the model of Township and Village Enterprises in the Chinese countryside offers an alternative vision of modernity to the Western capitalist world order.Шаблон:Sfn While other scholars such as Qin Hui dismissed the importance of the TVEs,Шаблон:Sfn Gan suggested that by avoiding the pronounced urban–rural divide characteristic of Western industrialisation, cooperative forms of industry like the TVEs could effect a more dispersed form of development that would preserve traditional rural industries in China.Шаблон:Sfn

Gan has been influenced both by Western postmodernists, such as Michel Foucault, and by Western Marxism, including the thought of Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse.Шаблон:Sfn

Self-Perception

Gan stated: "I am more concerned with how to re-cultivate a healthy conservative mentality and attitude in a post-revolutionary society, a conservative, gradualist reforming way of looking at current issues and social change."[2] Some labelled Gan as part of the Chinese New Left, which he "never truly accepted"[3] and even "resented".[4]

Works in English

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

Шаблон:Refbegin

Шаблон:Refend

External links

Шаблон:Scholia

Шаблон:Chinese New Left Шаблон:Authority control

  1. Шаблон:Cite journal
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. Lian, Z. (2008). L'éphémère et l'essentiel sur la philosophie politique chinoise contemporaine. Diogène, 221, 170-183. https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.221.0170
  4. Шаблон:Cite journal