Английская Википедия:Hamed v R

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 22:05, 18 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2013}} {{Use New Zealand English|date=August 2013}} {{Italic title}} {{Infobox court case |name = Hamed & Ors v. R |court = Supreme Court of New Zealand |image = |imagesize = |imagelink = |imagealt = |caption = |full name = |date decided = {{start date|201...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Use New Zealand English Шаблон:Italic title Шаблон:Infobox court case Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 101[1] was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes. The charges involved were related to the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids, as a result of the ruling, charges against all but four of the defendants were dropped.[2][3]

The ruling was initially suppressed from 24 March 2011 to September 2011. Very shortly after the lifting of the suppression, the Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011[4] was introduced and passed under urgency.[5]

References

Шаблон:Reflist


Шаблон:NewZealand-case-law-stub