Английская Википедия:Handels-og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 01:35, 19 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Infobox European case |short_name= Danfoss |court= ECJ |SubmitDate= 05 April |SubmitYear=1988 |DecideDate= 17 October |DecideYear= 1989 |FullName=Handels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss |CelexID= |CaseNumber= 109/88 |ECLI= ECLI:EU:C:1989:383 |Chamber= Full court |Nationality= Denmark |Procedural= |JudgeRapporteur=...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Infobox European case Handels-og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss (1989) C-109/88 is an EU labour law case, which held that if an employer is to justify indirect discrimination, measures taken must be directly related to being able to do the job.

Facts

Pay in the workplace was set according to adaptability, training and seniority. The effect was that women were paid less.

Judgment

ECJ held that adaptability to variable hours, place of work or training was justifiable only if these criteria were ‘of importance for the performance of specific tasks entrusted to the employee’. However, it also added that, ‘length of service goes hand in hand with experience and since experience generally enables the employee to perform his duties better, the employer is free to reward it without having to establish the importance it has in the performance of specific tasks entrusted to the employee’.

See also

Шаблон:Clist eu equality Шаблон:Clist justification

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist