Английская Википедия:Hills v. Gautreaux

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 15:45, 21 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} {{Infobox SCOTUS case |Litigants=Hills v. Gautreaux |ArgueDate=January 20 |ArgueYear=1976 |DecideDate=April 20 |DecideYear=1976 |FullName=Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v Gautreaux et al. |USVol=425 |USPage=284 |ParallelCitations=96 S. Ct. 1538; 47 L. Ed. 2d 792 |Prior=Appeal from the United States Court o...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case Hills v. Gautreaux, 425 U.S. 284 (1976), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.

In this case, a number of Chicago families living in housing projects were awarded Section 8 vouchers allowing them to move to the suburbs in compensation for the housing project's substandard conditions. Carla Anderson Hills was the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; the eponymous lead respondent was Dorothy Gautreaux (1927–1968).[1] The court ruled that the department had violated the Fifth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The significance of the case lies in the sociological conclusions that can be drawn from it. A number of families chose to move, while others stayed, and Northwestern University researchers studying the two populations concluded that low-income women who moved to the suburbs "clearly experienced improved employment and earnings, even though the program provided no job training or placement services."[2] The disparity arguably proves that concentrated poverty is self-perpetuating and simply alleviating this concentration offers an avenue for improving the quality of life of those affected by urban poverty.

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:US5thAmendment


Шаблон:SCOTUS-case-stub