Английская Википедия:Holtzman Inkblot Technique

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 13:22, 22 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Projective personality test}} {{Multiple issues| {{one source|date=October 2017}} {{missing|whether or not the technique is considered scientifically valid, and whether or not it is still used, and how the test is given|date=May 2021}} }} {{Infobox diagnostic | Name = Holtzman Inkblot Technique | Image = Holtzman 14B.svg| Caption = From Holtz...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Multiple issues

Шаблон:Infobox diagnostic

The Holtzman Inkblot Technique (HIT), also known as the Holtzman Inkblot Test, is an ink blot test aimed at detecting personality and was conceived by Wayne H. Holtzman and colleagues. It was first introduced in 1961 as a projective personality test similar to the Rorschach test. The HIT is a standardized measurement. The Holtzman Inkblot Test was developed as an attempt to address some controversial issues surrounding the Rorschach test.[1]

Purpose

Файл:Holtzman 13B.svg
Holtzman inkblots interpretation are graded according to a number of pre-defined criteria.

The Holtzman Inkblot Test (HIT) was invented as an attempt to address some issues surrounding the Rorschach Inkblot Test. The HIT was used to assess the personal structure of the subject.[2]

Scoring

The scoring includes 22 variables covering the aspects of the patient's response to the inkblot. Many different variables apply when scoring.[3]

22 variables and abbreviations applied

No.[4] Variable Abbrev. Description
1 Reaction Time (RT) the time in seconds from the presentation of the inkblot to the beginning of the first response
2 Rejection (R) score 1 when subject returns inkblot to examiner without giving a scorable response; otherwise score 0
3 Location (L) tendency to break down blot into smaller fragments. score 0=use of whole blot, 1=large area, 2=smaller area
4 Space (S) score 1=true figure-ground reversals; score 0 otherwise
5 Form Definiteness (FD) the definiteness of the form of the concept reported, regardless of the goodness of fit to the inkblot. a 5-point scale with 0=very vague and 4=very specific
6 Form Appropriateness (FA) the goodness of fit of the form of the precept to the form of the inkblot. Score 0=poor 1=fair, 2=good
7 Color (C) the apparent primacy of color, including black, gray and white, as a response-determinate. score 0=no use of color, 1=secondary to form, 2=primary determinant with some form present, 3=primary determinant
8 Shading (Sh) the apparent primacy of shading as response determinant. 0=no use of shading, 1=secondary to form, 2=used as primary determinant but some form is present, 3= primary determinant
9 Movement (M) the energy level of movement or potential movement ascribed to the percept, regardless of content. 0=none, 1=static potential, 2=casual, 3=dynamic, 4=violent movement
10 Pathognomic Verbalization (V) degree of autistic, bizarre thinking evident in the response as rated on a five scale.
11 Integration (I) score 1=organization of 2 or more adequately perceived blot elements into a larger whole
12 Human (H) degree of human quality in the content of response
13 Animal (A) degree of animal quality in the content
14 Anatomy (At) degree of "gut-like" quality in the content
15 Sex (Sx) degree of sexual quality in the content
16 Abstract (Ab) degree of abstract quality in the content
17 Anxiety (Ax) degree of anxiety or fantasy content as indicated by emotions and attitudes, expressive behavior, symbolism, or cultural stereotypes of fear.
18 Hostility (Hs) signs of hostility or fantasy content
19 Barrier (Br) reference to any protective covering, shell, membrane or skin that may be symbolically related to the perception of body image boundaries.
20 Penetration (Pn) concept that may be symbolic of an individual's feeling that his body exterior is of little protective value and can be easily penetrated
21 Balance (B) overt concern for the symmetry-asymmetry feature of the inkblot.
22 Popular (P) percept occurred at least 14% of the time among normal subjects

Test standardization

Holtzman and Swartz (1983) undertook a review of 25 years of research on the standardization of the HIT. They reported that:

Шаблон:Quote box

See also

Шаблон:Collist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Psychologic and psychiatric evaluation and testing