Английская Википедия:Holy War and Human Bondage

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 14:05, 22 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{italictitle}} '''''Holy War and Human Bondage: Tales of Christian‐Muslim Slavery in the Early‐Modern Mediterranean''''' is a 2009 non-fiction book by Robert Davis, published by Praeger. It discusses intra-Christian slavery and slavery of Muslims by Christians. According to Jeff Grabmeier of Ohio State University, the book received less overall...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Italictitle Holy War and Human Bondage: Tales of Christian‐Muslim Slavery in the Early‐Modern Mediterranean is a 2009 non-fiction book by Robert Davis, published by Praeger.

It discusses intra-Christian slavery and slavery of Muslims by Christians. According to Jeff Grabmeier of Ohio State University, the book received less overall attention compared to Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters.[1]

Eric R. Dursteler of Brigham Young University stated that the work "stands on its own and presents a more expansive and comprehensive, yet accessible, synthetic treatment of" its topic.[2] Dursteler stated that since several people taking slaves did not discriminate by religion on whether to take slaves, the "provocative" title "is a bit misleading."[2]

Content

Some chapters are longer and some are shorter, content characterized by Dursteler as "vignettes".[2]

According to Dursteler, "there is a solidly European focus to the book",[2] and that it is "only lightly informed by relevant Ottoman scholarship".[3] Consequently, the amount of content related to slaves who followed Islam is less compared to the content about slaves who followed Christianity.[2]

Reception

Dursteler had an overall favorable reception and that his criticisms were "relatively minor quibbles".[3]

Maria Fusaro of the University of Exeter, citing the one page-long "works cited", which she characterized as "exceedingly short", concluded that the book is "highly problematic".[4] According to Fusaro, while Davis stated in the introduction that he wished to tailor his work to a non-academic audience, Davis may have been conflicted on whether to do so.[4]

References

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

External links


Шаблон:Hist-book-stub

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 Dursteler, p. 216.
  3. 3,0 3,1 Dursteler, p. 217.
  4. 4,0 4,1 Fusaro, p. 728.