Английская Википедия:ISKCON Revival Movement

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 13:41, 24 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{short description|Gaudiya Vaishnavite movement}} {{Infobox organization | name = International Society for Krishna Consciousness Revival Movement | abbreviation = IRM | predecessor = International Society for Krishna Consciousness | type = religious movement | status = | purpose = Restoring the original Hare...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description

Шаблон:Infobox organization Шаблон:Vaishnavism Шаблон:Redirect

The ISKCON Revival Movement (IRM) was formed as a pressure group in 2000 to revive and reform ISKCON on the basis of the directives for succession given by Srila Prabhupada, the founder of ISKCON.Шаблон:Sfn IRM opposes both the zonal guru system and its replacement multiple-guru system as unauthorized innovations.Шаблон:Sfn

IRM's aim and followership

The IRM’s followers consist of both current and former ISKCON members, ISKCON Life Members, and members of the Hindu community at large. The IRM’s ultimate goal is to rebuild an ISKCON movement operating as Srila Prabhupada intended, with him as the sole guru and authority.Шаблон:Sfn

Zonal and multiple-guru systems

According to IRM, the founder revealed, in a philosophical treatise called “The Final Order” [1] issued on July 9, 1977, a signed directive appointing 11 of his senior managers to act as ritviks (officiating priests) to initiate new recruits into the ISKCON movement on his behalf. According to IRM, all future disciples within ISKCON were supposed to revere Srila Prabhupada as their guru, not any successor. However, shortly after Srila Prabhupada’s departure on November 14, 1977, these ritviks ignored the directive; instead, they divided the world into 11 zones, each claiming to be the guru or spiritual successor in a different area. By early 1978 the 11 ritviks had begun to initiate disciples on their own behalf, acting as gurus for the movement.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Over time, a number of the gurus suffered lawsuits, suicide, and other problems. The movement was plunged into confusion and acrimony. By the mid-1980s the Governing Body Commission (GBC), which managed ISKCON, issued a new interpretation of Srila Prabhupada's directive. What he had really wanted, it said, was for all disciples to become initiating gurus, not just the 11 ritviks. Today new gurus are added to the roster via a majority vote by the GBC at its annual meetings in Mayapur. Currently ISKCON gurus number around 80.Шаблон:Sfn

IRM's opposition to zonal and multiple-guru systems

IRM contends that both the zonal guru system and its replacement multiple-guru system are unauthorized innovations. Citing GBC resolutions and management directives approved by Srila Prabhupada, the IRM insists that ISKCON will continue to flounder as long as it fails to comply with the orders of Srila Prabhupada.Шаблон:Sfn

The IRM publishes a free international magazine, Back to Prabhupada. They have met with considerable opposition from those supporting the current multiple-guru system in ISKCON. Шаблон:Sfn According to the scholar, Jan Brzezinski, the ritvik model of the movement opens the door on an organization with no need any charismatic leadership.Шаблон:Sfn

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

Secondary sources
Primary sources

External links

Шаблон:Chaitanya sampradaya Шаблон:Modern Gaudiya Vaishnavas Шаблон:Hindu reform movements