Английская Википедия:Iron Duke engine

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Версия от 01:06, 27 марта 2024; EducationBot (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «{{Английская Википедия/Панель перехода}} {{about|the automobile engine|the steam locomotive|GWR Iron Duke Class}} {{more citations needed|date=January 2014}} {{Infobox automobile engine | image = Iron Duke^ 2.5L four cylinder engine - Flickr - dave 7.jpg | name = Iron Duke | aka = Tech IV (1982-1990) | manufacturer = General Motors | production = 1977–1993 | predecessor = GM 2300 engine | successor = GM 122 engine...»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая версия | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая версия → (разн.)
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:About Шаблон:More citations needed Шаблон:Infobox automobile engine

The Iron Duke engine (also called 151, 2500, Pontiac 2.5, and Tech IV) is a Шаблон:Convert straight-4 piston engine built by the Pontiac Motor Division of General Motors from 1977 until 1993. Originally developed as Pontiac's new economy car engine, it was used in a wide variety of vehicles across GM's lineup in the 1980s as well as supplied to American Motors Corporation (AMC). The engine was engineered for fuel efficiency, smooth operation, and long life, not for performance.[1] Total Duke engine production is estimated to be between 3.8 and 4.2 million units.[2]

Шаблон:TOC limit

Development

At the time of the 1973 oil crisis the only engines Pontiac built were Шаблон:Convert, Шаблон:Convert, and Шаблон:Convert versions of their V8 engine. Recognizing that future products would need to be smaller and more fuel-efficient, Pontiac engineers were tasked with developing a new engine that would be suitable for these future products.[3] The engineers considered developing smaller displacement versions of the existing V8, a V6 derived from the V8, a V4 derived from the V8, and an inline-four derived from one of the cylinder banks of the V8 (in the same fashion as the 1961 Pontiac Tempest's "Trophy 4" engine), but ultimately decided to create an entirely new four-cylinder engine.Шаблон:R

The development team's design goals were to minimize noise and vibration while maximizing durability, drivability, fuel economy, and "usable" power at lower engine speeds.Шаблон:R They began by analyzing other four-cylinder engines in production at General Motors at the time, and they found that GM do Brasil's Шаблон:Convert version of the Chevrolet 153 cu in four-cylinder—with a shorter Шаблон:Convert stroke and longer Шаблон:Convert connecting rods—had significantly reduced secondary vibration as compared to the original Chevrolet design and the newer 2.3 L four-cylinder from the Chevrolet Vega.Шаблон:R This obviated the need for counter-rotating balance shafts, which would have increased the weight, complexity, and cost of the engine.Шаблон:R Despite sharing the same bore, stroke, and cylinder spacing as the Brazilian engine, the majority of parts are not interchangeable.Шаблон:R

Focusing on making power at lower engine speeds was a deliberate consideration in order to meet the rest of the design goals. Careful consideration was made to the design of the intake manifold and exhaust gas recirculation system to ensure power output from each cylinder was equalized. Power consumption of the water and oil pumps were reduced, and the piston rings, cylinder bores, and crankshaft journals were designed to minimize friction.Шаблон:R

To maximize durability the engine block was made of cast iron with five main bearings, rather than the relatively fragile cast aluminum block used by the 2.3 L Vega engine. (Even with the cast iron block the Iron Duke only weighed about 20 pounds more.) The 2.3 L engine's belt-driven overhead camshaft was eschewed in favor of an overhead valve design with timing gears. Specially-designed bolts that stretch slightly farther than a conventional bolt were used to secure the intake and exhaust manifolds to the cylinder head, to allow slight movement while maintaining the seal of the gaskets in order to prevent cracking the manifolds as they expand with heat.Шаблон:R

A two-stage, two-barrel carburetor with electric choke was used to improve performance in cold starts, while heat shields incorporated underneath the carburetor and between the intake and exhaust manifolds were used to prevent heat soaking the gasoline in the carburetor thereby improving performance in hot weather. Recognizing that cars with four-cylinder engines equipped with air conditioning tended to experience drivability issues in hot weather, other improvements were made including a cut-off switch that shut the compressor off at wide open throttle and a delay incorporated into the air conditioning's circuitry to prevent the compressor from engaging until twelve seconds after the engine was started.Шаблон:R

Early applications

The Iron Duke's first applications were in the 1977 Astre and Sunbird subcompact cars, replacing the 2.3 L Vega engine, and in the compact Phoenix. As these cars were originally designed for Chevrolet engines, the Iron Duke also used the Chevrolet bell housing bolt pattern, instead of the Buick-Oldsmobile-Pontiac V8 pattern. The following year use of the engine expanded to the Sunbird's Chevrolet and Oldsmobile twins, the Monza and Starfire.

For the 1979 model year, the engine was extensively redesigned. The original reverse-flow cylinder head was replaced by a crossflow design, a new two-barrel carburetor called "Vara-Jet" was introduced, the distributor was relocated, and the size of the oil pan was reduced. The only parts carried over from the 1978 engines were the connecting rods.[4] Peak power increased to 90 hp.

For 1980 the Iron Duke engine was redesigned to be mounted transversely, to suit the new front-drive General Motors "X-body" cars. The bellhousing bolt pattern was revised to match that of the new 60° V6 engine.

Файл:1982 AMC Spirit liftback in Vintage Red metallic at PA meet 7of8.jpg
1982 AMC Spirit with Iron Duke

GM also began selling the engine to American Motors Corporation (AMC) starting with the 1980 model year. It was the base engine in Spirit, Concord, and Eagle automobiles, as well as in base-model Jeep CJs.[5] The engines purchased by AMC continued to use the Chevrolet V8 bellhousing pattern. The four-cylinder engine was discontinued from AMC's rear-wheel drive models after 1982. During 1983, the all-wheel drive Eagle base engine switched from the Iron Duke to a new, AMC-developed Шаблон:Convert four-cylinder. The 1980 through 1983 Jeep CJs were also available with the Iron Duke as the base engine.[6]

Year Power Torque
1978 Шаблон:Convert @ 4400 rpm[7]Шаблон:Rp Шаблон:Convert @ 2800 rpmШаблон:R
1979 Шаблон:Convert Шаблон:Convert
1980 Шаблон:Convert @ 4000 rpm[8]Шаблон:Rp Шаблон:Convert @ 2400 rpmШаблон:R
1981 Шаблон:Convert @ 4000 rpm[9] Шаблон:Convert @ 2400 rpmШаблон:R

Шаблон:Hidden begin

Шаблон:Hidden end

Tech IV

"Tech IV" decal
"Tech IV" decal

Iron Dukes were fitted with fuel injection (TBI, via a single injector in the throttle body) in 1982. This version was christened the Tech IV, though Car and Driver later ridiculed it as the low-Tech IV.Шаблон:Citation needed Power output increased to Шаблон:Convert.[10]

This was replaced by a swirl-port head with 9.0:1 (instead of 8.25:1) compression ratio in 1984 for a Шаблон:Convert gain. Other additions for 1985 included roller lifters, improved bearings, and a new crankshaft. Several significant changes were made in 1987, which included: an improved cylinder head, intake manifold, and throttle-body fuel injection module; a more-modern serpentine belt with an automatic spring-loaded tensioner for the accessories; and a Distributorless Ignition System (DIS). This revision to the engine increased power to Шаблон:Convert. In 1988, a balance shaft was added to smooth engine vibrations. Up to this point, the engine incorporated a 'dogbone' upper front engine mount secured to the cowling of the vehicle's hood latch, aiding in controlling the vibration. Further improvements in later years included new pistons, rods, crankshaft, and an in-pan oiling system. The most powerful variant of the Tech IV raised the rev limit to 5500 rpm, and achieved Шаблон:Convert. The Tech IV uses the same bellhousing pattern as the 2.8 L 60-Degree V6. Over the years, the Tech IV engine has proved to be a reliable workhorse for owners when not pushed to its limits. All 1978-1990 Iron Duke engines used a micarta camshaft gear that meshed directly with a steel gear on the crankshaft. 1991-92 VIN R and U engines used a timing chain instead.

The Grumman LLV (Long Life Vehicle) built from 1987 until 1994 for the United States Postal Service for use in mail delivery were initially powered by the Iron Duke engine. The Postal Service specifications called for a 24-year service life and those with 2.5 L engine have surpassed expectations.[11]

Шаблон:Hidden begin

Шаблон:Hidden end

Super Duty

Super Duty Engine Displacements
Displacement Stroke
Шаблон:Cvt Шаблон:Convert
Шаблон:Cvt Шаблон:Convert
Шаблон:Cvt Шаблон:Convert
Шаблон:Cvt Шаблон:Convert
Шаблон:Cvt Шаблон:Convert

The Iron Duke block formed the basis of Pontiac's Super Duty four-cylinder racing engines of the 1980s, the last in a line of high-performance Pontiac Super Duty engines. The engines were featured in NASCAR's Charlotte/Daytona Dash Series, the IMSA GT Championship (in GTP and GTU class cars), and even in American Power Boat Association racing boats. Super Duty engines continued to be used in ARCA racing until well into the 2000s.

In addition to parts matching the Iron Duke's stock 2.5 L displacement other crankshafts and their corresponding connecting rods were offered by Pontiac Motorsports, resulting in displacements ranging from 2.1 L to 3.2 L. A 2.7 L, Шаблон:Convert Super Duty engine powered the 1984 Fiero Indy Pace Car to over Шаблон:Convert during the race, but Super Duty engines were never available in factory-built GM vehicles. However, GM sold the Super-Duty-specific parts at authorized dealers and all of the parts required to convert a stock Iron Duke engine to a Super Duty version were available.

Kansas Racing Products continued to make the engines in the early 21st century after buying rights to make them from GM.

Cosworth also produced a 16-valve, double-overhead cam head for the 3.0 L version of the racing engine (Cosworth Project DBA, 1987).[12]

References

  • 1979 Chevy Monza Brochure

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Commons cat

Шаблон:GM late engine timeline