Английская Википедия:Alt-tech

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Use mdy dates

Alt-tech are social media platforms and Internet service providers that have become popular among the alt-right, far-right, and others who espouse extremism or fringe theories, often because they employ less stringent content moderation than mainstream platforms.[1][2][3] The term "alt-tech" is a portmanteau of "alt-right" and "Big Tech". In the 2010s, some prominent conservatives and their supporters began to use alt-tech platforms because they had been banned from other social media platforms.[3][4][5][6] Alt-tech platforms describe themselves as protectors of free speech and individual liberty, which researchers and journalists have alleged may be a cover for antisemitism and terrorism.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

History

Alt-tech websites were first described in the 2010s. They became popular leading up to the early 2020s due to deplatforming, banning (including shadow banning), and other restrictions imposed on extremists by Big Tech companies. Some right-wing groups claim that these companies censor their views.[1][6] After the Unite the Right rally in August 2017, technology companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter were criticized for deplatforming white supremacists.[14] Hope not Hate researcher Joe Mulhall identified the deplatforming of Britain First in 2018, and Tommy Robinson in 2019, as two major events that spurred British social media users to join alternative platforms.[4][15][16] Ethan Zuckerman and Chand Rajendra-Nicolucci further referenced the August 2018 deplatforming of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones as a pivotal moment.[17]

In October 2018, alt-tech platform Gab received extensive public scrutiny following the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, after it was found that the sole suspect of the attack, Robert Gregory Bowers, had posted a message on Gab indicating an immediate intent to cause harm before the shooting.[18][19] Bowers had a history of making extreme, antisemitic postings on the site.[20] After the shooting, Gab briefly went offline when it was dropped by its hosting provider and denied service by several payment processors.[21][22][23]

The popularity of alt-tech platforms surged in January 2021, when United States president Donald Trump, and many of his prominent followers, were suspended from Twitter and other platforms. Parler, a website with a large proportion of Trump supporters among its userbase, was taken offline when Amazon Web Services suspended their hosting several days after the January 6 storming of the United States Capitol.[24] It was restarted with a new host on February 15, 2021.[25]

In July 2021, an example of alt-tech hardware was announced as the "Freedom Phone"—a smartphone that promoted privacy-oriented features and an "uncensorable" app store. It was found that the device was merely a white-label version of a Chinese smartphone produced by Umidigi, with a modified Android firmware pre-loaded with apps popular among the target audience, and a rebranded version of an open source client for Google Play Store (rather than the independent app store implied in its promotional materials).[26][27]

By 2022, The New York Times and The Guardian described a crowded marketplace of alt-tech platforms.[28][29] The Times noted that alt-tech platforms claiming censorship by Twitter, such as Gettr, Parler, and Rumble have mostly advertised themselves on Twitter.[28]

In February 2022, Trump launched a Twitter alternative, Truth Social, after establishing a messaging platform outside of Twitter,[28][29] such as a now discontinued Trump blog.[30] During development, Truth Social did not at first acknowledge using Mastodon's open source code, and was given an ultimatum by Mastodon,[31] quietly admitting to the use of Mastodon code later on.[31][32][33] Truth Social's launch was accompanied by substantial technical difficulties.[34][32] The platform's terms of service include an incongruous clause that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site."[32][35] According to a report from consumer rights group Public Citizen, alt tech platforms with a supposed focus on free speech include the censorship of some liberal and conservative viewpoints, as well as the routine content moderation on other platforms, creating an "echo chamber". Based on the report, Truth Social was found to shadowban users that disagree with the site's narrative as well as a swathe of other content including some conservative content. "Truth Social" has banned content mentioning liberal views on abortion and the Congressional hearings on the January 6th Capitol attack.[36][37][38]

Research

Deen Freelon and colleagues, publishing in Science in September 2020, wrote that some alt-tech websites are specifically dedicated to serving right-wing communities, naming 4chan (founded in 2003), 8chan (2013), Gab (2016), BitChute (2017) and Parler (2018) as examples. They noted that others were more ideologically neutral, such as Discord and Telegram.[1] Discord and Telegram have been used by QAnon conspiracy theorists to promote terrorism, which contributed to the January 6th attack.[13] Discord later worked to remove right-wing extremists from its userbase, and became a more mainstream platform.[39] Joe Mulhall, a senior researcher for the UK anti-racism organization Hope Not Hate, also distinguishes groups of alt-tech platforms: he says that some of them, such as DLive and Telegram, are "co-opted platforms" which have become widely popular among the far-right because of their minimal moderation; others including BitChute, Gab, and Parler are "bespoke platforms" which were created by people who themselves have "far-right leanings".[2] Ethan Zuckerman and Chand Rajendra-Nicolucci, in contrast, described alt-tech services in explicitly political terms in a 2021 article for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University:

Шаблон:Blockquote

Researchers have also found that alt-tech platforms can also be used by far-right extremists for mobilization and recruitment purposes, which is more dangerous than just spreading their viewpoints.[40]

Austrian researcher Julia Ebner has described alt-tech platforms as "ultra-libertarian".[41]

Platforms

List of alt-tech platforms

Type Alt-tech company Citations Status
Microblogging Gab [1][3][6][42][43]
Gettr [44][45][43]
Parler [1][4][42][46] Inactive
Truth Social [45][43]
Online video platform BitChute [1][42][47]
DLive [24][48]
DTube [47]
Odysee [49][50]
PewTube [3][6] Defunct
Rumble [24][46]
TokenTube [51]
Triller [46]
Crowdfunding GiveSendGo [52][53]
Hatreon [6][17] Defunct
SubscribeStar [54][55]
WeSearchr [5] Defunct
Social networking service MeWe [24][46]
Minds [42][56]
Slug [57]
Telegram [58][24]
Thinkspot [59][60][61][62]
WrongThink [3]
News aggregator Patriots.win [63]
Voat [5][46] Defunct
Wiki encyclopedia Infogalactic [3][5]
Metapedia [64][65][66][67][68][69]
Imageboard 8kun [1][56]
Online dating service WASP Love [3]
Pastebin JustPaste.it [56]
Domain name registrar and
web hosting
Epik [7][70]
Civic engagement platform CloutHub [24]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Alt-right footer Шаблон:Authority control

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 Шаблон:Cite journal (freely available version)
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4 3,5 3,6 Шаблон:Cite news
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 5,3 Шаблон:Cite magazine
  6. 6,0 6,1 6,2 6,3 6,4 6,5 Шаблон:Cite web
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite web
  9. Шаблон:Cite web
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. Шаблон:Cite book
  12. Шаблон:Cite news
  13. 13,0 13,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. Шаблон:Cite book
  15. Шаблон:Cite news
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. 17,0 17,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zuckerman не указан текст
  18. Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite news
  20. Шаблон:Cite news
  21. Шаблон:Cite news
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite news
  24. 24,0 24,1 24,2 24,3 24,4 24,5 Шаблон:Cite news
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite news
  28. 28,0 28,1 28,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  29. 29,0 29,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  32. 32,0 32,1 32,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  36. Шаблон:Cite web
  37. Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite web
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite book
  41. Шаблон:Cite journal
  42. 42,0 42,1 42,2 42,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  43. 43,0 43,1 43,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Шаблон:Cite web
  45. 45,0 45,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 46,3 46,4 Шаблон:Cite web
  47. 47,0 47,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite web
  50. Шаблон:Cite web
  51. Шаблон:Cite web
  52. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  53. Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Шаблон:Cite news
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. 56,0 56,1 56,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  57. Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. Шаблон:Cite journal
  59. Шаблон:Cite web
  60. Шаблон:Cite news
  61. Шаблон:Cite web
  62. Шаблон:Cite news
  63. Шаблон:Cite news
  64. Шаблон:Cite book
  65. Шаблон:Cite web
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. Шаблон:Cite web
  68. "Metapedia" als nationales Pendant zu "Wikipedia" Шаблон:Webarchive (i.e "Metapedia" as a nationalist counterpart to "Wikipedia") from: "Report by the NRW Office for the Protection of the Constitution for the year 2008" by the Ministry of Interior of North Rhine-Westphalia. pp. 59f. Шаблон:In lang
  69. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  70. Шаблон:Cite web