Английская Википедия:Coromandel lacquer

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description

Файл:Médailler en laque de Coromandel (musée du cabinet des médailles, BNF) (7365169420).jpg
Coromandel lacquer, probably originally from a screen, worked up into a cabinet for medals in France in the 1720s

Coromandel lacquer is a type of Chinese lacquerware, latterly mainly made for export, so called only in the West because it was shipped to European markets via the Coromandel coast of south-east India, where the Dutch East Indies Company (VOC) and its rivals from a number of European powers had bases in the 18th century.[1] The most common type of object made in the style, both for Chinese domestic use and exports was the Coromandel screen, a large folding screen with as many as twelve leaves, coated in black lacquer with large pictures using the kuan cai (literally "incised colors") technique, sometimes combined with mother of pearl inlays. Other pieces made include chests and panels.[2]

But in Europe cabinet-makers often cut the screens into a number of panels, which were inserted into pieces of furniture made locally in the usual European shapes of the day, or mounted within wood panelling on walls.[3] This was often also done with Japanese lacquer in rather different techniques, but "Coromandel" should only be used to refer to Chinese lacquer. The peak of the fashion for panelling rooms was the late 17th century.[4] By the 18th century, Chinese wallpaper began to reach Europe, and generally replaced lacquer panels as a cover for walls.[5]

Файл:Miscellany in the Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild - screen.jpg
Screen with figures in pavilions and a main border with a "hundred antiques", in the Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild

At the time of the first imports in the 17th century, Coromandel lacquer was known in English as "Bantam ware" or "Bantam work" after the VOC port of Bantam on Java, modern Bantem, Indonesia.[6] The first recorded use of "Coromandel lacquer" is in French, from a Parisian auction catalogue of 1782.[7]

Technique and iconography

Файл:Cina, paravento in stile coromandel, lacca, madreperla, tartaruga e oro, 1750-1800 ca. 01.jpg
Screen with a courtly progress in lacquer, mother of pearl, tortoiseshell and gold, 1750–1800

A combination of lacquer techniques are often used in Coromandel screens, but the basic one is kuan cai or "incised colors",[8] which goes back to the Song dynasty. In this the wood base is coated with a number of thick layers of black or other dark lacquer, which are given a high polish. In theory the shapes of the pictorial elements are then cut out of the lacquer, though in screens where a high proportion of the area is taken up by the pictorial elements, some method of reserving the main elements and saving expensive lacquer was probably used. The areas for the picture elements might be treated in a variety of ways. The final surface might be painted in coloured lacquer, oil paints, or some combination, perhaps after building up the surface with putty, gesso, plaster, lacquer, or similar materials as filler, giving a shallow relief to figures and the like.[9]

A different technique was to use inlays of mother of pearl, which had been used on lacquer since at least the Song dynasty and revived in popularity in the 16th century, perhaps also using tortoiseshell, ivory, and metal, especially gold for touches. The mother of pearl was often engraved and stained with colours. The mother of pearl technique was, at least initially, more expensive and produced for the court (who also used screens painted by court artists), and the filled technique apparently developed for a wealthy clientele outside the court. The screens seem to have been mostly made in Fujian province in south China, traditionally a key area for lacquer manufacturing.[10]

Up to thirty layers of lacquer could be used. Each layer could have pictures and patterns incised, painted, and inlaid, and this created a design standing out against a dark background. The screens were made in China and appeared in Europe during the 17th century,[11] remaining popular into the 18th.

Файл:Commode - Bernard II van Risamburgh - Münchner Residenz - DSC07492.JPG
Bernard II van Risamburgh commode, 1730–1733

The main designs are typically of two major groups: firstly courtly "figures in pavilions", often showing "spring in the Han palace", and secondly landscape designs, often with emphasis on birds and animals.[12] Some screens illustrate specific episodes from literature or history. Typically borders run above and below the main scene. These often show the "hundred antiques" design of isolated "scholar's objects", antique Chinese objets d'art, sprays of flowers, or a combination of the two.[13] There are often smaller borders between the main image and these, and at the edges. Sometimes both sides of the screen are fully decorated, usually on contrasting subjects. The earlier examples made for the Chinese market often have inscriptions recording their presentation as gifts on occasions such as birthdays;[14] they came to represent a standard present on the retirement of senior officials.[15] According to the V&A, "So far all known dated kuan cai screens are from the Kangxi period" (1654–1722).[16] Later pieces were mostly made for European markets and are of lower quality, many rather crude.[17]

Treatment in Europe

Файл:Miscellany in the Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild - DSC04663.JPG
Another screen, mainly in mother of pearl, with figures in pavilions, in the Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild

At the peak period in the decades around 1700 the main customers for screens shipped by the VOC were the English. The original fashion may have been Dutch; it was brought to England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and to Germany by the princely marriages of the daughters of Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange and his wife Amalia of Solms-Braunfels. Small rooms panelled in lacquer, "lacquer cabinets", were built in Berlin in 1685–95, Munich in 1693 with another in 1695, and Dresden in 1701.[18] This fashion seems to have died away rapidly after 1700, probably largely replaced in England with tapestries using similar Asiatic iconography for royalty and the top of the market (examples remain at Belton House), and then later wallpaper.[19]

None of the English or rooms panelled in lacquer have survived, but the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam has a room from the Stadtholder's palace at Leeuwarden, which has recently been restored and placed on display (Phillips Wing).[20] In the Netherlands the English speciality of gilded leather with impressed oriental designs was imported for grand houses around the 1720s. The Europeans were vague on the differences between Chinese, Japanese, Indian and other East Asian styles, and English tapestry-makers replicated the feel of Coromandel lacquer subjects with the individual figures adapted from Mughal miniatures they had to hand.[21]

Interest then turned to incorporating lacquer panels, whether imported as such or cut down from screens, into pieces of furniture, on a carcass of European wood in "Japanning" imitation lacquer, lavishly ornamented with ormolu mounts.[22] Bernard II van Risamburgh, who initialled his pieces "B.V.B.R." was a leading Parisian ébéniste in the mid-18th century, among those who often incorporated both Chinese and Japanese lacquer into his pieces, the latter usually in the black and gold maki-e style.[23] Such pieces were sawn through, if decorated on both sides, and sometimes needed to be slowly bent into a curved shape for bombe commodes and other pieces. Madame de Pompadour was especially keen on Asian lacquer panels in furniture, and was probably largely responsible for the very high prices recorded for such pieces, sometimes 10 times or more the price of ordinary furniture of equivalent quality.[24]

After the fashion for Coromandel lacquer died away in the 18th century, demand for screens remained fairly low until a revival in the 1880s, when it revived as part of a general taste for Oriental art, led by blue and white porcelain.[25] The Victoria and Albert Museum paid £1,000 for a screen in 1900,[26] whereas one in the famous Hamilton Palace Sale of 1882 had only fetched £189.[27] In Vita Sackville-West's novel The Edwardians, published in 1930 but set in 1905–10, a "coromandel screen" is mentioned as being in a room that is "impersonal, conventional, correct", typifying the style of those who "unquestioningly followed the expensive fashion".[28] By the 20th century screens were again being manufactured in China, and imported via Hong Kong for dealers.[29]

In the 20th century, the famous fashion designer Coco Chanel (1883–1971) was an avid collector of Chinese folding screens, especially the Coromandel screens, and is believed to have owned 32 folding screens of which eight were housed in her apartment at 31 rue Cambon, Paris.[30] She once said:

I've loved Chinese screens since I was eighteen years old. I nearly fainted with joy when, entering a Chinese shop, I saw a Coromandel for the first time. Screens were the first thing I bought.[31]

Having rather dwindled, prices for Coromandel screens revived somewhat with the influx of Chinese money into the art market, and a screen fetched well over estimate at $US 602,500 in 2009, then the record price, selling to a dealer from Asia.[32]

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Commonscat

Further reading

  • W. G. de Kesel and G. Dhont, Coromandel: Lacquer Screens, 2002, Ghent

  1. N. S. Brommelle, Perry Smith (eds), Urushi: Proceedings of the Urushi Study Group, June 10–27, 1985, Tokyo, p. 254, 1988, Getty Publications, Шаблон:ISBN, 9780892360963, fully online
  2. Rawson, 360
  3. Alayrack-Fielding, 83; Osborne, 205
  4. Van Campen, 137
  5. Alayrack-Fielding, 83
  6. Alayrack-Fielding, 82–83; Osborne, 205; V&A 130–1885
  7. V&A 130–1885
  8. Clunas, 61
  9. Pedersen; Osborne, 205; Alayrack-Fielding, 83: Watt and Ford, 3–6, 23–26, 34, 36
  10. Pedersen; Osborne, 205; Alayrack-Fielding, 83: Watt and Ford, 3–6, 23–26, 34, 36; Pelham
  11. Coromandel screen. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 23 September 2011
  12. V&A 130–1885
  13. V&A 130–1885
  14. Kerr, 118
  15. Clunas, 61
  16. V&A 130–1885
  17. Rawson, 360
  18. van Campen, 140
  19. van Campen, 136–137, 140–145
  20. Rijksmuseum page; van Campen 136–137, Jan Dorscheid, Paul Van Duin, Henk Van Keule, in: Gabriela Krist, Elfriede Iby (eds), Investigation and Conservation of East Asian Cabinets in Imperial Residences (1700–1900): Lacquerware & Porcelain, (Conference 2013 Postprints), pp. 239–259, 2015, Böhlau Verlag, Vienna, [1]
  21. van Campen, 136–137, 140–145
  22. van Campen, 142–145
  23. European Furniture in The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Highlights of the Collection, 2006, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Шаблон:ISBN, 9780300104844, google books; Metropolitan Museum of Art, Europe in the Age of Monarchy, p. 154, 1987, Шаблон:ISBN, 9780870994494, google books; Alayrack-Fielding, 82–83
  24. Reitlinger, 25–27
  25. Reitlinger, Chapter 7 on the general revival, 219–220 on lacquer
  26. van Campen, 145; a different screen to "V&A 130–1885".
  27. van Campen, 145
  28. van Campen, 145 (quoted), 146
  29. van Campen, 149
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite book Cited in: Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Moonan, Wendy, "Asian antique sales rocket in New York", Japan Times, 2 October 2009