Английская Википедия:Galwan River
Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Use Indian English Шаблон:Infobox river Шаблон:Infobox Chinese The Galwan River flows from the disputed Aksai Chin area administered by China to the Union Territory of Ladakh, India. It originates near the caravan campsite Samzungling on the eastern side of the Karakoram range and flows west to join the Shyok River. The point of confluence is 102 km south of Daulat Beg Oldi. Shyok River itself is a tributary of the Indus River, making Galwan a part of the Indus River system.
The narrow valley of the Galwan River as it flows through the Karakoram mountains has been a flashpoint between China and India in their border dispute. In 1962, a forward post set up by India in the upper reaches of the Galwan Valley caused an "apogee of tension" between the two countries. China attacked and eliminated the post in the 1962 war, reaching its 1960 claim line. In 2020, China attempted to advance further in the Galwan Valley,[1][2][3] leading to a bloody clash on 16 June 2020.
Etymology
The river is named after Ghulam Rasool Galwan (1878–1925), a Ladakhi explorer and caravan manager of Kashmiri descent, who accompanied numerous expeditions of European explorers. The river appears with the Galwan name in Survey of India maps from 1940 onwards.[4] (It was earlier unlabelled.)
Folklore holds that in the 1890s, Galwan was part of a British expedition team exploring north of the Chang Chenmo valley, and when the team got caught in a storm Galwan found a way out through the Galwan valley. Harish Kapadia notes that this is one of the rare instances where a major geographical feature was named after a native explorer.[5][6]Шаблон:Efn
Geography
The Galwan river runs across the entire width of the Karakoram range at this location, for about Шаблон:Convert, where it cuts deep gorges along with its numerous tributaries.[7] At the eastern edge of this 30 mile range, marked by the Samzungling camping ground, the main channel of the Galwan river runs north–south, but several other streams join it as well. To the east of Samzungling, the mountains resemble an elevated plateau, which gradually slopes down to the Lingzi Tang Plains in the east. To the west of Samzungling lie numerous mountains of the Karakoram range, the majority of which are drained by the Galwan river through a multitude of tributaries.
At the northeastern edge of the Galwan River basin, the mountains form a watershed, sending some of their waters into the Karakash River basin. The watershed between the two river basins is difficult to discern, as noted by British cartographers.
To the south of the Galwan river, the Karakoram range divides into two branches, one that lies between the Kugrang and Changlung rivers (both tributaries of Chang Chenmo), and the other to the east of Changlung.[8]
Travel routes
The narrow gorge of the Galwan river prohibited human movement, and there is no evidence of the valley having been used as a travel route. Samzunling however formed an important halting point of a north–south caravan route (the westernmost "Changchenmo route") to the east of Karakoram range. One reaches Samzungling from the Changchenmo valley by following the channel of the Changlung river and crossing over to the Galwan river basin via the Changlung Pangtung LaШаблон:EfnШаблон:Sfnp Beyond Samzungling, one follows the Galwan channel to one of its sources, after which the Lingzi Tang plain is entered. The next halting point on the caravan route is Dehra Kompas.Шаблон:Sfnp Thus the upper Galwan Valley formed a key north–south communication link between the Chang Chenmo valley and the Karakash River basin.[9]
In modern times, the Chinese Wen Jia Road (Шаблон:Lang) traverses this route up to the Galwan River.[10] The eastern route through Nischu now carries the Tiankong Highway (Tianwendian–Kongka highway) and a new Galwan Highway links the two.[11]
Sino-Indian border dispute
There is no evidence of Qing China making any claims on the Aksai Chin plateau.[12] The Republic of China (1912–1949), having faced a revolution in Tibet in 1911, apparently made secret plans to acquire Aksai Chin plateau in order to create a road link between Xinjiang and Tibet. These plans began to get manifested in public maps only towards the end of its rule.[13] While the Republican Chinese claims included the Aksai Chin proper, they stopped at the foot of the Karakoram mountains, leaving all the rivers that flow into the Shyok River within India. (See map.) Communist China also published the "Big Map of the People's Republic of China" in 1956 with a similar boundary, now called the 1956 claim line. In the Galwan Valley, this line just skirted the Samzungling campsite, leaving the rest of the valley within India.[14][15]
However, in 1960 China advanced its claim line to the western end of the Galwan river, running along the crest of the mountain ridge adjoining the Shyok river valley.[15] The Chinese said little by way of justification for this advancement other than to claim that it was their "traditional customary boundary" which was allegedly formed through a "long historical process". They claimed that the line was altered in the recent past only due to "British imperialism".Шаблон:Efn[16][17][18]
Meanwhile, India continued to claim the entire Aksai Chin plateau.
1962 standoff
These claims and counterclaims led to a military standoff in the Galwan River valley in 1962.
The Indian Intelligence Bureau proposed in September 1961 that the Galwan Valley should be patrolled and posts established up in the valley because it was strategically connected to the Shyok Valley.[19] Nehru supported the proposal and the CGSШаблон:Efn B. M. Kaul ordered the setting up of a forward post. However, the terrain of the valley proved too difficult for the troops to proceed up the valley.Шаблон:Sfnp In April 1962, Kaul ordered that a southern route should be tried. By this time, the Chinese had announced that they were resuming patrols and it was also learnt that they had established a post at Samzungling. The Western Command's objections that the establishment of an Indian post would be a provocative act were overruled by the high command.[20]
A platoon of Indian Gorkha troops set out from Hot Springs in the Chang Chenmo Valley, and, by 5 July, arrived at the upper reaches of the Galwan Valley.Шаблон:Efn They established a post on a ridge overlooking the valley from the south, on the bank of a tributary that China calls "Shimengou".Шаблон:Efn[21] The post ended up cutting the lines of communication to a Chinese post downstream along the Galwan River, called 'Day 9'.Шаблон:Sfnp The Chinese interpreted it as a premeditated attack on their post, and surrounded the Indian post, coming within 100 yards of it.Шаблон:Efn The Indian government warned China of "grave consequences" and informed them that India was determined to hold the post at all costs. The post remained surrounded for four months and was supplied by helicopters.[22][23] The Central Intelligence Agency opined that the presence of the post temporarily blocked any further movement of the Chinese troops down the Galwan Valley.[24]
Scholar Taylor Fravel states that the standoff marked the "apogee of tension" for China's leaders.[25] A regimental level headquarters was organised under the chief of staff of the 10th Regiment to assume control of the Chinese forces in the Galwan region. Both Chairman Mao Zedong and the Chinese government were monitoring the situation at the highest level. Termed 'armed coexistence', detailed guidance was issued to the troops on the ground:Шаблон:Sfnp Шаблон:Blockquote The commanders at the front were ordered to report any unexpected situation arising, and ask for instructions without taking initiative on their own accord.Шаблон:Sfnp
Nevertheless, sporadic firing incidents occurred throughout the western front. At Galwan Valley itself, fire was exchanged on 2 September.Шаблон:Sfnp As a result of the standoff, the Chinese were compelled to withdraw some of the posts in the Galwan Valley because they could not be supplied. Indian leaders saw this as a sign of success for their forward policy.Шаблон:Sfnp
1962 war
By the time the Sino-Indian War started on 20 October 1962, the Indian post had been reinforced by a company of troops. The Chinese PLA bombarded it with heavy shelling and employed a battalion to attack it. The garrison suffered 33 killed and several wounded, while the company commander and several others were taken prisoner.[22][23] By the end of the war, China is said to have reached its 1960 claim line.[15] There is however no evidence that the Chinese troops trekked through the Galwan Valley to reach their claim line.Шаблон:Efn The elimination of the sole Indian post in the Galwan Valley (near the tributary called Shimengou) implied that they had control up to their claim line. The Indian post at the confluence of Galwan with the Shyok River was intact throughout the war and the Chinese never made any contact with it.[26]
The Chinese later claimed, implicitly, via a map annexed to a 1962 letter from then Chinese premier Zhou Enlai to heads of certain Afro-Asian nations, that they had reached the confluence of Galwan with the Shyok River.Шаблон:Efn However, the Afro-Asian nations, in their Colombo proposals for truce between China and India, drew the line very close to China's 1960 claim line. The Chinese still persist with the line on their maps, calling it the "Line of Actual Control of 1959".Шаблон:Efn
Infrastructure
Prior to the 1962 war, China had already constructed a road linking its bases at Kongka Pass and Heweitan. There was also a feeder road leading to the Samzungling area and covering the southern tributaries such as Shimengou.[27]
Following the war, there was no further activity in the Galwan Valley from either India or China, till about 2003. Between 2003 and 2008, China embarked on a large-scale infrastructure development exercise in the run-up to the Beijing Olympics.[28] Starting in 2010, the Aksai Chin Road (G219) was repaved at a cost of $476 million.[29] Along with it, numerous improvements to the border infrastructure within Aksai Chin also became visible.[30] The existing road to the Heweitan military base was improved and extended under a new name "Tiankong Highway". The feeder road into Galwan Valley was also upgraded to a paved all-weather road and renamed the "Galwan Highway" (Шаблон:Zh).
India also commissioned a road link to Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) at its northern frontier in 2001, scheduled to be completed by 2012. The road would start from the Shyok village and run along the western bank of the Shyok River and then move on to Depsang Plains near Murgo. The initial road did not meet the all-weather requirement, and it had to be rebuilt on an improved alignment later. The road was eventually completed in 2019 and named the Darbuk–Shyok–DBO Road (DS-DBO Road).[31] India also built a military outpost near the confluence of Galwan with the Shyok River, called 'KM 120'. It is said to have been a source of discomfort to China.[32]
2020 standoff
Шаблон:Further Шаблон:OSM Location map
China is said to have initiated the construction of a large number of "supporting facilities" in the Galwan Valley in September 2019.[33] These would include dams, bridges, camping grounds and power lines along the existing Galwan Highway, as well as an effort to extend the highway further towards the Line of Actual Control.
In April 2020, India started its own construction efforts to build a feeder road off the DS-DBO Road, along the last 4–5 km stretch of Galwan Valley on its side of the LAC. According to Zhao Lijian, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Indian forces started "unilaterally" building roads and bridges in the "Galwan region". They are said to have persisted with their efforts despite repeated protests from China, which allegedly "intensified cross-border troubles".[34] The Indian Army chief dismissed the complaints, saying, "There is no reason for anyone to object. They are doing development on their side, we are doing development on our side."[35][36]
The problem for China was that its own roadway was still quite far from the LAC.[37] On 5 May 2020, China initiated a standoff by deploying troops in tented posts all along the Galwan Valley.[38][39] The Chinese also brought in heavy vehicles and monitoring equipment, presumably in an effort to accelerate the road construction.[40] And the Chinese government mouthpiece Global Times initiated a high-pitched rhetoric.[41] India responded by moving its own troops to the area in equal measure.[42] The Chinese eventually set up a post at a 90-degree bend in the river, close to the official LAC, which the Indians regarded as Indian territory and a patrol point (PP-14). The bend was to eventually become the new border.[43]
To create a roadway through the narrow valley, the Chinese bulldozers dug out earth from the cliff sides, and used it to dredge the river bed. The river was constrained to flow in a narrow channel so that the rest of the river bed could be used for traffic and encampments.[44][45]
Eventually, the standoff led to a violent clash on 15 June near PP-14 in Galwan Valley. Twenty Indian Army soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese soldiers were killed.[46][47] The causes of the clash remain unclear, but there had been reports, starting 10 June, of a "limited pull-back" agreed by the two sides by 1 to 2 kilometres from the confrontation site.[48] According to a detailed report published by India Today the Chinese had reneged on the agreement and reinstated a post at PP-14, which led to a series of brawls on 15 June, lasting till midnight and causing deaths on both sides.[49]Шаблон:Efn A US Congressional review alleged that the Chinese government had planned the clash including its potential for fatalities.[50]
Following the clash, both the sides resumed their construction activity. India completed the contested bridge on the Galwan River by 19 June.[51] China extended its road till India's PP-14 by 26 June, in addition to erecting a full-blown post at the location. The Indians made no attempt to dismantle it a second time.[52]
The final deescalation happened in stages starting 6 July.[53] With China's occupation of PP-14, the effective LAC in the Galwan Valley has shifted by about one kilometre in China's favour.[54][55]
In popular culture
The web series 1962: The War in the Hills is inspired by the events that took place in the Galwan Valley during the 1962 war.[56]
See also
Notes
References
Bibliography
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
- Шаблон:Citation
Further reading
- Galwan, Ghulam Rassul (1923), Servant Of Sahibs, Cambridge, Шаблон:ISBN
- Pranab Dhal Samanta, Galwan River Valley: An important history lesson, The Economic Times, 29 June 2020.
External links
- Galwan River basin marked on OpenStreetMap, retrieved 16 October 2020.
- Galwan Highway, Galwan Valley Road marked on OpenStreetMap, retrieved 16 October 2020.
- Xicagou Highway and Wen Jia Road marked on OpenStreetMap, retrieved 16 October 2020.
- Claude Arpi, Latest Developments in the Aksai Chin (covers the Heweitan post of China), 6 October 2013.
- ↑ Ajai Shukla, A new and worrying chapter: Chinese intrusions in Ladakh gather pace Шаблон:Webarchive, Business Standard, 23 May 2020: "That means that, in sending thousands of PLA troops three-to-four kilometres into the Galwan Valley, China has violated its own claim line and occupied territory that Beijing itself has traditionally acknowledged to be Indian.... Indian troops in the area were taken by surprise when a large Chinese force crossed the LAC into the Galwan area in late April."
- ↑ Nitin J. Ticku, India, China Border Dispute in Ladakh as Dangerous as 1999 Kargil Incursions - Experts Шаблон:Webarchive, EurAsian Times, 24 May 2020: 'An Australia-based security analyst tweeted what he claimed were satellite images of "Chinese incursion" in Galwan.'
- ↑ Snehesh Alex Philip, Stand-off with China in Ladakh is India’s worst border tension since Kargil in 1999 Шаблон:Webarchive, The Print, 25 May 2020: "Now, news agency ANI has reported that Chinese troops have moved in “nearly 10-15 km from the Indian post KM 120” in the Galwan Valley, and have pitched tents and stationed themselves close to the post."
- ↑ 1940 Kashmir Jammu and Gilgit Agency by Survey of India (Wikimedia commons)
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Gaurav C Sawant, Exclusive: My great grandfather discovered Galwan Valley, China's claims are baseless, says Md Amin Galwan Шаблон:Webarchive, India Today, 20 June 2020.
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "The peculiarity of the Galwan theatre was that the main Karakoram Range in this region is better defined than in the Northern Sector. It is cut by the Galwan river at a place about 30 miles to the east of the Shyok-Galwan river junction."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "In the south it divides itself into two ranges. One separates the Kugrang river from the Changlung and the other runs along the left bank of the latter and is also called the Nischu Mountains. The first is named Karakoram I and the second Karakoram II."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "The other main route ran through Shamal Lungpa and Samzung Ling [Samzungling] to Dehra Compas, along the upper valley of the Qara Qash River to Qizil Jilga and Chungtosh, through the Qara Tagh Pass and the Chibra valley to Malikshah and Shahidulla."
- ↑ Wen Jia Road marked on the OpenStreetMap, retrieved 16 October 2020.
- ↑ Galwan Highway Шаблон:Webarchive marked on OpenStreetMap, retrieved 16 October 2020.
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "There is no evidence that under the Ch'ing dynasty China ever attempted to come further south than this [a pillar 64 miles south of the Suget Pass]. In other words, they accepted the Kuen Lun range as the frontier, and both Kashmir and the Government of India were equally willing to accept it..."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "As a part of India, it [Aksai Chin] formed an awkward salient projecting between Sinkiang and Tibet; to get rid of this salient must be an objective of Chinese policy whenever opportunity might offer".
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: 'However, the "Big Map of the People's Republic of China" published in 1956, reverted to the alignment shown on the 1947 Kuomintang map. It is important to note that Chou En-lai, in a letter of December 17, 1959, stated that the 1956 map "correctly shows the traditional boundary between the two countries in this sector."'
- ↑ 15,0 15,1 15,2 Шаблон:Harvp
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "When questioned on the divergence between the two maps, Chen Yi, the Chinese Foreign Minister, made the demonstrably absurd assertion that the boundaries as marked on both maps were equally valid. There is only one interpretation that could make this statement meaningful: this was an implied threat to produce another map claiming additional Indian territory if New Delhi continued in its stubborn refusal to cede Aksai Chin."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "Beijing insisted that there was no disparity between its maps of 1956 and 1960, a claim that only served to reinforce Delhi’s opinion that the Chinese were untrustworthy. By the summer of 1960 meaningful diplomacy juddered to a halt."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "The Chinese officials maintained ... [the] traditional customary line, reflected in their map, was formed gradually through a long historical process, mainly by the extent up to which each side had exercised administrative jurisdiction;... Without admitting any inconsistency they also argued that the line of actual control differed from the traditional customary line because of British imperialism and the recent pushing forward of India. These factors apparently could not contribute to the continuous process of change."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "In September, 1961, we prepared another note on the problems of frontier security and suggested that in Northern Ladakh we should reconnoitre the Galwan River Valley and open posts as far eastward as possible, because this valley was connected with the Shyok valley through which the Shyok River ran and finally joined the Indus in Pakistan-held territory. If the Chinese commanded the Galwan valley, it would give them easy access to Skardu, Gilgit, etc. and our routes to Murgo, Daulat Beg Oldi, Panamik would be cut."
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: He [General Daulet Singh] concluded that, in the circumstances, no Indian post could be established at Samzungling but Kaul overruled him. "The Galwan river was an axis along which the Chinese can make a substantial advance", he replied, and therefore they must be forestalled.'
- ↑ Shimengou stream Шаблон:Webarchive, mapped on OpenStreetMap, retrieved 23 February 2021.
- ↑ 22,0 22,1 Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ 23,0 23,1 Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "14 J&K Militia continued to hold Saser Brangsa, Murgo, Sultan Chushku and the junction of the Galwan and Shyok rivers."
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Harvp: "In 2003, China initiated a major highway renovation project, which led to an upgrading of 51,000 km of roads in Tibet by the Beijing Olympics in 2008.... According to official Indian estimates, the road development undertaken by Beijing has given it the capability to move 11,500 tonnes per day whereas only 200 tonnes per day are required to sustain major military operations for sustained periods."
- ↑ Ananth Krishnan, China spruces up highway through Aksai Chin Шаблон:Webarchive, The Hindu, 11 June 2012.
- ↑ R. N. Ravi, China's strategic push in Ladakh Шаблон:Webarchive, Rediff, 29 April 2013. Шаблон:ProQuest.
- ↑ Sushant Singh, Constructed on riverbed, road to China border being rebuilt Шаблон:Webarchive, The Indian Express, 4 June 2015.
- ↑ Snehesh Alex Philip, Stand-off with China in Ladakh is India’s worst border tension since Kargil in 1999 Шаблон:Webarchive, The Print, 25 May 2020. "Post KM 120 lies on the strategic Shyok-Daulat Beg Oldi road whose inauguration last year caused much discomfort to China."
- ↑ 加勒万河谷冲突我军因何占上风 这三点因素是关键 Шаблон:Webarchive (Three factors are the key to the conflict in the Kalwan Valley: why our army has the upper hand), news.sina.com, 21 June 2020. Machine-translated: 'In fact, as early as September last year, my country initiated the construction of a large number of supporting facilities for the river valley area, and the cross-border provocation by the Indian army did not affect the progress of Chinese highways. It is foreseeable that the People’s Liberation Army will follow up the same "infrastructure construction" as in the Donglang area to ensure that we can have permanent outposts and a better patrol environment in the highlands of the Kalwan River valley, and prevent the Indian army from reusing better geography.'
- ↑ Dongpo, 中国公布加勒万河谷流血冲突全过程：印度早前同意撤人拆越界建筑 Шаблон:Webarchive (China Announces the Whole Process of the Bleeding Conflict in the Calvin Valley), Deutsche Welle (Chinese), 20 June 2020. Machine-translated: "Since April this year, the Indian border defense forces have unilaterally continued to build roads, bridges and other facilities in the Galle Valley region. China has repeatedly made representations and protests on this, but the Indian side has intensified cross-border troubles."
- ↑ Shaurya Gurung, Sikkim and Ladakh incidents are not linked: Army Chief MM Naravane Шаблон:Webarchive, The Economic Times, 14 May 2020. Шаблон:ProQuest
- ↑ Sushant Singh, India builds road north of Ladakh lake, China warns of ‘necessary counter-measures’ Шаблон:Webarchive, The Indian Express, 21 May 2020. "The Chinese, sources said, have objected to construction of a new road which branches off the Darbuk-Shyok-Daulat Beg Oldie (DSDBO) road along the riverbank towards the LAC.... “Galwan is not a disputed area between India and China, unlike Pangong Tso. Both sides agree on the LAC and patrol accordingly. There was no transgression by Chinese patrols in the area in the past two years. The issue is the construction of the road, which is well inside our territory, and, therefore, their objection is hard to comprehend,” a source said."
- ↑ Henry Boyd, Meia Nouwens, Understanding the military build-up on the China–India border Шаблон:Webarchive, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 18 June 2020. "There is little indication that this detachment is equipped with armour or artillery, and the planned Chinese road along the valley remains unfinished, complicating the PLA’s ability to maintain a more substantial presence in this area for now."
- ↑ Manu Pubby, Troops rushed to Galwan amid Chinese buildup Шаблон:Webarchive, The Economic Times, 19 May 2020. Шаблон:ProQuest. "First reported by ET, the Galwan standoff, which started on May 5, has now triggered a reaction in China as well"
- ↑ Manu Pubby, Troops rushed to Galwan amid Chinese buildup Шаблон:Webarchive, The Economic Times, 19 May 2020. Шаблон:ProQuest. "The Chinese side has over 80 tents and has made temporary defensive positions, with reports coming in that fast response reinforcements have also been moved closer to the Galwan river."
- ↑ Sushant Singh, India builds road north of Ladakh lake, China warns of ‘necessary counter-measures’ Шаблон:Webarchive, The Indian Express, 21 May 2020.
- ↑ Manu Pubby, Troops rushed to Galwan amid Chinese buildup Шаблон:Webarchive, The Economic Times, 19 May 2020. Шаблон:ProQuest. 'Titled "Chinese troops tighten control in Galwan Valley after India trespasses Chinese territory", the article says India has built defensive fortifications and obstacles to "unilaterally change the current border control situation".'
- ↑ Sushant Singh, Chinese intrusions at 3 places in Ladakh, Army chief takes stock Шаблон:Webarchive, The Indian Express, 24 May 2020.
- ↑ Manu Pubby, Hakeem Irfan Rashid, Flashpoint Galwan: 'Y Nalla' turns new frontier as Chinese sever PP-14 access Шаблон:Webarchive, The Economic Times, 26 June 2020.
- ↑ Vinayak Bhat, How China channelled Galwan river to claim territory Шаблон:Webarchive, India Today, 21 June 2020. "The Chinese soon realised that there is no space for deployment of a large force along this waterway. Chinese engineers then thought of a unique method of claiming-- by canalising the Galwan river deeper with dozers and JCBs in order to restrict its size."
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web "Zooming in, you can see excavators at work. One is transferring earth from the mountain side. Another is working on the edge of the river bank. The construction teams also appear to have built several crossings over the river. And the width of the bank suggests that it can easily accommodate a two-lane road. Another 1.3km upstream there is a larger Chinese camp."
- ↑ Editor Of Beijing Mouthpiece Global Times Acknowledges Casualties For China Шаблон:Webarchive, NDTV, 16 June 2020.
- ↑ China Acknowledges 4 Deaths in Last Year’s Border Clash With India Шаблон:Webarchive, The New York Times, 19 February 2021: "The article [in PLA Daily] did not present the four deaths as an exhaustive count."
- ↑ Rajat Pandit, Slight troop pull-back by India & China from confrontation at Eastern Ladakh, but Pangong Tso remains a big hurdle Шаблон:Webarchive, The Times of India, 10 June 2020. Шаблон:ProQuest.
- ↑ Shiv Aroor, 3 separate brawls, 'outsider' Chinese troops & more: Most detailed account of the brutal June 15 Galwan battle Шаблон:Webarchive, India Today, 22 June 2020.
- ↑ China planned Galwan incident: US top panel Шаблон:Webarchive, mint, 2 December 2020.
- ↑ Shishir Gupta, HT Exclusive: Galwan river bridge that China tried to stop in Ladakh is complete, says official Шаблон:Webarchive, Hindustan Times, 19 June 2020.
- ↑ Brad Lendon, Maneeva Suri, Satellite images show buildup at site of deadly India-China border clash Шаблон:Webarchive, CNN, 26 June 2020. "[Nathan] Ruser said his analysis of satellite photos showed that since May the number of Chinese troops and vehicles within a kilometer of the border had gone from three to 46 while on the Indian side that number had decreased from 84 to 17."
- ↑ Vijaita Singh, Dinakar Peri, Chinese troops pull back 2 km from site of Galwan Valley clashes, some tents removed at Finger 4: govt. officials Шаблон:Webarchive, The Hindu, 6 July 2020.
- ↑ Ajai Shukla, Ladakh: Govt says 'intricate' discussions on disengagement continue Шаблон:Webarchive, Business Standard, 16 July 2020.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
