Английская Википедия:History of baptism
Шаблон:Religious text primary Шаблон:Use mdy dates
John the Baptist, who is considered a forerunner to Christianity, used baptism as the central sacrament of his messianic movement. Christians consider Jesus to have instituted the sacrament of baptism. The earliest Christian baptisms were by immersion.[1] By the third and fourth centuries, baptism involved catechetical instruction as well as chrismation, exorcisms, laying on of hands, and recitation of a creed. In the West, affusion became the normal mode of baptism between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries, though immersion was still practiced into the sixteenth. In the sixteenth century, Martin Luther retained baptism as a sacrament, but Swiss reformer Huldrych Zwingli considered baptism and the Lord's supper to be symbolic. Anabaptists denied the validity of infant baptism, which was the normal practice when their movement started and practiced believer's baptism instead. Several groups related to Anabaptism, notably the Baptists and Dunkards, soon practiced baptism by immersion as following the Biblical example.
Background in Jewish ritual
Шаблон:Main Although the term "baptism" is not used to describe the Jewish rituals, the purification rites in Halakha, Jewish law and tradition, called tvilah, have some similarity to baptism, and the two have been linked. The tvilah is the act of immersion in naturally sourced water, called a mikva.[2]Шаблон:Unreliable source?[3] In the past Hebrew Bible and other Jewish texts, immersion in water for ritual purification was established for restoration to a condition of "ritual purity" in specific circumstances. For example, Jews who (according to the Law of Moses) became ritually defiled by contact with a corpse had to use the mikvah before being allowed to participate in the Holy Temple. Immersion is required for converts to Judaism.[4] Immersion in the mikvah represents a change in status in regards to purification, restoration, and qualification for full religious participation in the life of the community, ensuring that the cleansed person will not impose uncleanness on property or its owners.[5]Шаблон:Primary source inline[6] It did not become customary,[7] however, to immerse converts to Judaism until after the Babylonian Captivity (586–539 BCE).[8] This change of status by the mikvah could be obtained repeatedly, while Christian baptism, like circumcision, is, in the general view of Christians, unique and not repeatable.[9] Even the so-called rebaptism by some Christian denominations is not seen by them as a repetition of an earlier valid baptism and is viewed by them as not itself repeatable.Шаблон:Citation needed
During the Second Temple period (Шаблон:Circa 516 BCE–70 CE), the Greek noun baptmos was used to refer to ritual washing in Hellenistic Judaism.Шаблон:Citation needed
Hemerobaptists
Шаблон:Main Hemerobaptists (Heb. Tovelei Shaḥarit; 'Morning Bathers') were an ancient religious sect that practiced daily baptism. They were likely a division of the Essenes.[10] In the Clementine Homilies (ii. 23), John the Baptist and his disciples are mentioned as Hemerobaptists. The Mandaeans have been associated with the Hemerobaptists on account of both practicing frequent baptism and Mandaeans believing they are disciples of John.[11][12][13]
Mandaeans
Mandaeans revere John the Baptist and practice frequent full immersion baptism (masbuta) as a ritual of purification, not of initiation. Mandaeans abhor circumcision and are possibly the earliest people to practice baptism and may have originated Gnosticism.[14]Шаблон:Rp[15][16] Early religious concepts and terminologies recur in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and yardena (Jordan) has been the name of every baptismal water in Mandaeism.[17] The Mandaic language is a dialect of southeastern Aramaic with Palestinian and Samaritan Aramaic,[18][19] as well as Akkadian influences and is closely related to Syriac and especially Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. They formally refer to themselves as Nasurai (Nasoraeans).[12] According to Mandaean sources such as the Haran Gawaita, the Nasurai inhabited the areas around Jerusalem and the River Jordan in the 1st century AD.[14][12]
Elkesaites
Шаблон:Main The Elkesaites were a Judeo-Christian baptismal sect that originated in the Transjordan and were active between 100 and 400 CE.[20] The members of this sect, like the Mandaeans, performed frequent baptisms for purification and had a Gnostic disposition.[20][16]Шаблон:Rp The sect is named after its leader Elkesai.[21]
Sethians
Шаблон:Main The Sethians were one of the main currents of Gnosticism during the 2nd and 3rd century CE. According to John D. Turner, it originated in the 2nd-century CE as a fusion of two distinct Hellenistic Judaic philosophies and was influenced by Christianity and Middle Platonism.Шаблон:Sfn The Sethian baptismal rite is known as the Five Seals, in which the initiate is immersed five times in running water.[22] According to Buckley (2010), "Sethian Gnostic literature ... is related, perhaps as a younger sibling, to Mandaean baptism ideology."[23]
Valentinians
Шаблон:Main Valentinianism was one of the major Gnostic Christian movements. Founded by Valentinus in the 2nd century CE, its influence spread widely, not just within Rome but also from Northwest Africa to Egypt through to Asia Minor and Syria in the East.[24] A Mandaean baptismal formula was adopted by Valentinian Gnostics in Rome and Alexandria in the 2nd century CE.[14]Шаблон:Rp
Early Christianity
John the Baptist adopted baptism as the central sacrament in his messianic movement,[25] seen as a forerunner of Christianity.Шаблон:Citation needed
Baptism has been part of Christianity from the start, as shown by the many mentions in the Acts of the Apostles and the Pauline epistles. Christians consider Jesus to have instituted the sacrament of baptism. How explicit Jesus' intentions were and whether he envisioned a continuing, organized Church is a matter of dispute among scholars.Шаблон:Sfn
There is a scholarly consensus that the earliest Christian baptism was normally by immersion,[26]Шаблон:Sfn[27]Шаблон:Sfn or at least that this is probable.Шаблон:Efn Some interpret this as meaning total immersion or submersion beneath the water. Among those who take this view are Thomas Schreiner,Шаблон:Sfn Everett Ferguson,Шаблон:Sfn Di Berardino,[28] Tischler,[29] and Lang.[30] Others understand immersion as not necessarily implying submersion beneath the water. Kirsten Marie Hartvigsen distinguishes between immersion and submersion and considers both as possible early-Christian forms of baptism,Шаблон:Sfn as does Christian Strecker.Шаблон:Sfn Laurie Guy says: "The church most likely practiced full immersion, partial immersion and affusion at various times and places in the early centuries, with sprinkling being practiced rarely (and probably only for medical reasons) during that time period."[31] Robin M. Jensen describes the early Christian baptismal ritual as having for basis "immersion in water (or a thorough soaking by pouring)",Шаблон:Sfn and describes the primitive, first-century ritual as having encompassed both "application of water (whether by immersion or by some other means) and an imposition of hands", adding that "'Baptism' originally conveyed the sense of water's application (if not also immersion) in its very definition".Шаблон:Sfn Other recent studies that see total immersion (submersion) as not the only form of baptism utilized by early Christians include Steven J. Schloeder,[32] Charles Thomas,[33] Stanley J. Grenz,[34] and also the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church,[35] and the Oxford Dictionary of the Bible.[36]
The theology of baptism attained precision in the 3rd and 4th centuries.[37] While instruction was at first given after baptism, believers were given increasingly specific instructions before being baptized, especially in the face of heresies in the 4th century.[38] By the fourth and fifth centuries, baptism had become a several-week-long rite leading up to the actual baptismal washing on Easter. During this time, catechumens attended several meetings of intensive catechetical instruction, often by the bishop himself, and often accompanied by special prayers, exorcisms, and other rites.Шаблон:Sfn Catechumens recited the Creed on Holy Saturday to show that they had completed their catechetical instruction.Шаблон:Sfn At dawn following the Paschal Vigil starting the night of Holy Saturday, they were taken to the baptistry where the bishop consecrated the water with a long prayer recounting the types of baptisms. The catechumens disrobed, were anointed with oil, renounced the devil and his works, confessed their faith in the Trinity, and were immersed in the font. They were then anointed with chrism, received the laying on of hands, clothed in white, and led to join the congregation in the Easter celebration.Шаблон:Sfn By then, postponement of baptism had become general, and a large proportion of believers were merely catechumens (Constantine was not baptized until he was dying); but as baptisms of the children of Christians, using an adaptation of the rite intended for adults, became more common than baptisms of adult converts, the number of catechumens decreased.[38]
As baptism was believed to forgive sins, the issue of sins committed after baptism arose. SomeШаблон:Who insisted that apostasy, even under threat of death, and other grievous sins cut one off forever from the Church. As indicated in the writings of Saint Cyprian, others favoured readmitting the "lapsi" easily. The rule that prevailed was that they were readmitted only after undergoing a period of penance that demonstrated sincere repentance.Шаблон:Citation needed
What is now generally called the Nicene Creed, longer than the text adopted by the First Council of Nicaea of 325, and known also as the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed because of its adoption in that form by the First Council of Constantinople in 381, was probably the baptismal creed then in use in Constantinople, the venue of the 381 Council.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Page needed
Infant Baptism
Whether the earliest Christians practiced infant baptism, and thus whether modern Christians should do so, has remained a subject of debate between Christian scholars[37] at least since the earliest clear reference to the practice by Tertullian in the early third century. Some claim that Biblical baptism can be interpreted and thus relative, others support the Biblical literal baptism as a public and personal testimony, without intermediaries, in the case of infants that cannot talk for themselves yet.[39]
Early Middle Ages
Against Pelagius, Augustine insisted that baptism was necessary for salvation even for virtuous people and for children. The baptismal rite was significantly simplified during the sixth, seventh, and eighth centuries as fewer and fewer of those baptized were converts from paganism. The rite became much less important and was conducted very quickly. Prebaptismal catechesis was abandoned, and baptism was usually conducted shortly after birth.Шаблон:Sfn
Middle Ages
In 895, the provincial Council of Tribur commented on the traditional teaching that the triple immersion in baptism was an imitation of Christ for the three days he spent in the tomb, and the rising from the water an imitation of the resurrection of Jesus.[40] The linking of the baptismal immersion in and rising from the water with the burial and resurrection of Jesus arguably goes back to Saint Paul,[41] and the linking of the triple immersion with the three days in the tomb is found in Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 313–86) and Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335 – after 394).[42]
The 12th century saw the meaning of the word "sacrament" narrowed down and restricted to seven rites, among them that of baptism, while other symbolic rites came to be called "sacramentals".Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Page needed
In the period between the 12th and the 14th centuries, affusion became the usual manner of administering baptism in Western Europe, though immersion continued to be found in some places even as late as the 16th century.[43] Throughout the Middle Ages, there was therefore considerable variation in the kind of facility required for baptism, from the baptismal pool large enough to immerse several adults simultaneously of the 13th century Baptistery at Pisa, to the half-metre deep basin in the 6th century baptistery of the old Cologne Cathedral.[44]
Both East and West considered washing with water and the Trinitarian baptismal formula necessary for administering the rite. Scholasticism referred to these two elements as the matter and the form of the sacrament, employing terms taken from the then prevailing Aristotelian philosophy. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, while teaching the necessity of both elements, nowhere uses these philosophical terms when speaking of any of the sacraments.Шаблон:Efn
Reformation
Шаблон:Main Шаблон:Lutheranism In the 16th century, Martin Luther considered baptism to be a sacrament.[45] For the Lutherans, baptism is a "means of grace" through which God creates and strengthens "saving faith" as the "washing of regeneration"[46][47] in which infants and adults are reborn.[48]Шаблон:Primary source inline Since the creation of faith is exclusively God's work, it does not depend on the actions of the one baptized, whether infant or adult.[49] Even though baptized infants cannot articulate that faith, Lutherans believe that it is present all the same.[50][51] Because it is faith alone that receives these divine gifts, Lutherans confess that baptism "works forgiveness of sins, delivers from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who believe this, as the words and promises of God declare."[52] In the special section on infant baptism in his Large Catechism, Luther argues that infant baptism pleases God because persons so baptized were reborn and sanctified by the Holy Spirit.[53]
Swiss Reformer Huldrych Zwingli differed with the Lutherans by denying that baptism conveys grace to the baptized. Zwingli identified baptism and the Lord's supper as sacraments, but in the sense of an initiatory ceremony.Шаблон:Sfn
Anabaptists (a word that means "rebaptizers") rejected so thoroughly the tradition maintained by Lutherans as well as Catholics that they denied the validity of baptism outside their group. They "rebaptized" converts on the grounds that one cannot be baptized without wishing it, and an infant, who does not understand what happens in a baptism ceremony and who has no knowledge of the concepts of Christianity, is not really baptized. They saw as non-biblical the baptism of infants, who cannot confess their faith and who, not having yet committed any sins, are not in the same need of salvation. Anabaptists and other Baptist groups do not consider that they rebaptize those who have been baptized as infants, since, in their view, infant baptism is without effect. The Amish, Restoration churches (Churches of Christ/Christian Church), Hutterites, Baptists, Mennonites and other groups descend from this tradition. Pentecostal, charismatic and most non-denominational churches share this view as well.[54]
In Reformed baptismal theology, starting with John Calvin, baptism is seen as primarily God's offer of union with Christ and all his benefits to the baptized. This offer is believed to be intact even when it is not received in faith by the person baptized.Шаблон:Sfn Baptism also initiates one into the visible church and the covenant of grace.Шаблон:Sfn
See also
Related articles and subjects
- Anabaptist
- Baptism by fire
- Baptism of desire
- Baptism of Jesus
- Baptism in Mormonism
- Baptismal clothing
- Baptistery
- Believer's baptism
- Catechumen
- Chrismation
- Christifideles
- Conditional baptism
- Consolamentum
- Disciple (Christianity)
- Divine filiation
- Emergency baptism
- Jesus-Name doctrine
- Prevenient Grace
- Sacrament
- Theophany
People and ritual objects
- Baptismal font
- Baptistery
- Chrism
- Godparent
- Holy water
- Holy water in Eastern Christianity
- John the Baptist
- Mikvah
Notes
References
Bibliography
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation
Further reading
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite EB1911
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
External links
- Шаблон:Citation.
- Шаблон:Citation, dispensationally considered.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Bibleref2
- ↑ Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Chagigah, p. 12
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite EB1911
- ↑ 12,0 12,1 12,2 Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 14,0 14,1 14,2 Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen (2010). Turning the Tables on Jesus: The Mandaean View. In Шаблон:Cite book(pp94-11). Minneapolis: Fortress Press
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ 16,0 16,1 Drower, Ethel Stefana. The Mandaeans of Iraq and Iran. Oxford At The Clarendon Press, 1937.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Häberl, Charles,Шаблон:Cite journalJournal of the American Oriental Society 141.1 (2021) p171-184.
- ↑ 20,0 20,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Buckley, Jorunn J. (2010). Mandaean-Sethian connections. ARAM, 22 (2010) 495-507. Шаблон:Doi
- ↑ Green 1985, 244
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ 37,0 37,1 Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ 38,0 38,1 Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Bibleverse
- ↑ Шаблон:Citation.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite encyclopedia
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Martin Luther, Sermons I, ed. John W. Doberstein, vol. 51 of Luther’s Works. Accordance electronic ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1959), 182.
- ↑ Шаблон:Bibleverse
- ↑ Martin Luther, Career of the Reformer IV, ed. Lewis W. Spitz, vol. 34 of Luther’s Works. Accordance electronic ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1960), 113.
- ↑ Шаблон:Bibleverse
- ↑ Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert, eds. The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000), 462-463.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Robert Kolb. The Oxford Handbook of Martin Luther's Theology (Oxford Handbooks) (p. 314). OUP Oxford.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
