Английская Википедия:History of computed tomography
The history of X-ray computed tomography dates back to at least 1917 with the mathematical theory of the Radon transform[1][2] In the early 1900s an Italian radiologist named Alessandro Vallebona invented tomography (named "stratigrafia") which used radiographic film to see a single slice of the body.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] It was not widely used until the 1930s, when Dr Bernard George Ziedses des Plantes developed a practical method for implementing the technique.[12]
In October 1963, William H. Oldendorf received a U.S. patent for a "radiant energy apparatus for investigating selected areas of interior objects obscured by dense material".[13] The first clinical CT scan was performed in 1971 using a scanner invented by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield.[14]
Mathematical theory
The mathematical theory behind computed tomographic reconstruction dates back to 1917 with the invention of the Radon transform[1][2] by Austrian mathematician Johann Radon, who showed mathematically that a function could be reconstructed from an infinite set of its projections.[15] In 1937, Polish mathematician Stefan Kaczmarz developed a method to find an approximate solution to a large system of linear algebraic equations.[16][17] This, along with Allan McLeod Cormack's theoretical and experimental work,[18][19] laid the foundation for the algebraic reconstruction technique, which was adapted by Godfrey Hounsfield as the image reconstruction mechanism in his first commercial CT scanner.Шаблон:Citation needed
In 1956, Ronald N. Bracewell used a method similar to the Radon transform to reconstruct a map of solar radiation.[20] In 1959, UCLA neurologist William Oldendorf conceived an idea for "scanning a head through a transmitted beam of X-rays, and being able to reconstruct the radiodensity patterns of a plane through the head" after watching an automated apparatus built to reject frostbitten fruit by detecting dehydrated portions. In 1961, he built a prototype in which an X-ray source and a mechanically coupled detector rotated around the object to be imaged. By reconstructing the image, this instrument could get an X-ray picture of a nail surrounded by a circle of other nails, which made it impossible to X-ray from any single angle.Шаблон:Clarify[21] In his landmark 1961 paper, he described the basic concept later used by Allan McLeod Cormack to develop the mathematics behind computerized tomography.
In October 1963, Oldendorf received a U.S. patent for a "radiant energy apparatus for investigating selected areas of interior objects obscured by dense material," for which he shared the 1975 Lasker Award with Hounsfield.[13] The field of the mathematical methods of computerized tomography continues to be an area of active development.[22][23][24][25] An overview on the history of CT as well as the mathematical methods and their developments has been written by Frank Natterer and Erik Ritman.[26]
In 1968, Nirvana McFadden and Michael Saraswat established guidelines for diagnosis of a common abdominal pathologies, including acute appendicitis, small bowel obstruction, Ogilvie syndrome, acute pancreatitis, intussusception, and apple peel atresia.[27]
Conventional focal plane tomography remained a pillar of radiologic diagnostics until the late 1970s, when the availability of minicomputers and the development of transverse axial scanning led CT to gradually supplant as the preferred modality of obtaining tomographic images. In terms of mathematics, the method is based upon the use of the Radon Transform. But as Cormack remembered later,[28] he had to find the solution himself since it was only in 1972 that he learned of the work of Radon, by chance.
Commercial scanners
CT technology has vastly improved. Improvements in speed, slice count, and image quality have been the major focus primarily for cardiac imaging. Scanners now produce images much faster and with higher resolution enabling doctors to diagnose patients more accurately and perform medical procedures with greater precision.
EMI
The first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield in Hayes, United Kingdom, at EMI Central Research Laboratories using X-rays. Hounsfield conceived his idea in 1967.[14] The first EMI-Scanner was installed in Atkinson Morley Hospital in Wimbledon, England, and the first patient brain-scan was done on 1 October 1971.[29] It was publicly announced in 1972.
The original 1971 prototype took 160 parallel readings through 180 angles, each 1° apart, with each scan taking a little over 5 minutes. The images from these scans took 2.5 hours to be processed by algebraic reconstruction techniques on a large computer. The scanner employed a pencil X-ray beam aimed at a single photomultiplier detector, and operated on the Translate/Rotate principle.[29]
The first production X-ray CT machine (in fact called the "EMI-Scanner") was limited to making tomographic sections of the brain, but acquired the image data in about 4 minutes (scanning two adjacent slices), and the computation time (using a Data General Nova minicomputer) was about 7 minutes per picture. This scanner required the use of a water-filled Perspex tank with a pre-shaped rubber "head-cap" at the front, which enclosed the patient's head. The water-tank was used to reduce the dynamic range of the radiation reaching the detectors (between scanning outside the head compared with scanning through the bone of the skull). The images were relatively low resolution, being composed of a matrix of only 80 × 80 pixels.
In the U.S., the first installation was at the Mayo Clinic. As a tribute to the impact of this system on medical imaging the Mayo Clinic has an EMI scanner on display in the Radiology Department. Allan McLeod Cormack of Tufts University in Massachusetts independently invented a similar process, and both Hounsfield and Cormack shared the 1979 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their contributions to the development of CT.[30]
ACTA
The first computed tomography (CT) system capable of producing images of any part of the human body without the need for a cumbersome "water tank" was the Automatic Computerized Transverse Axial (ACTA) scanner, designed by Dr. Robert S. Ledley, DDS, at Georgetown University. This revolutionary machine was equipped with 30 photomultiplier tubes as detectors and was capable of completing a scan in just nine translate/rotate cycles, significantly faster than the EMI-Scanner. To operate the servo-mechanisms and handle image acquisition and processing, the ACTA scanner used a DEC PDP11/34 minicomputer.
Georgetown University's prototype of the ACTA scanner caught the attention of the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, which acquired the rights to manufacture it. Pfizer subsequently introduced their version of the machine, called the "200FS" (with "FS" denoting Fast Scan). The 200FS generated images in a 256×256 matrix, offering much better image definition compared to the EMI-Scanner's 80×80. It took approximately 20 seconds to acquire a single image slice, making full-body scans feasible, although patients still had to hold their breath during this process – a key distinction from the EMI scanner, which could not perform body scans due to its five-minute acquisition time for a single slice.
The workflow for the ACTA and 200FS machines involved the operator acquiring a series of slices and then processing the images. These images were printed onto films and the raw data were archived onto magnetic tape. This archival step was necessary because the computer lacked the storage capacity for more than one study at a time. In busy hospitals, CT operators found themselves constantly engaged in this labor-intensive process. Maintaining the machine's functionality was also a significant undertaking.
The DEC PDP11/34 computer played a pivotal role in the operation of the ACTA and 200FS scanners. It controlled the gantry, managed the scanning process, and processed raw data into the final images. Remarkably, this computer functioned with a mere 64 KB of memory and a 5 MB hard disk, which held both the operating program and the acquired raw data. The hard disk itself comprised two 12" platters, one of which was internal and fixed, while the other was housed in a removable round cartridge.
Portable
Portable CT scanners can be brought to the patient's bedside and do a scan without getting the patient out of bed. Some portable scanners are limited by their bore size and therefore mainly used for head scans. They do not have image viewing capabilities directly on the scanner. The portable CT scanner does not replace the fixed CT suite. An example of this type of machine is the Siemens Healthineers SOMATOM On.site.
In 2008 Siemens introduced a new generation of scanner that was able to take an image in less than 1 second, fast enough to produce clear images of beating hearts and coronary arteries.
CT may use continuous rotation of the gantry, and can acquire a data set in a few seconds with a spiral technique where the patient is moved in continuously while the machine basically acquires a single spiraling slice, so that all areas of interest are covered quickly. This data can be processed and displayed in any plane. This results in a big reduction in x-ray exposure. Siemens and Toshiba are the leaders in this technology.
Photon counter
In 2021, the FDA approved Siemens' photon-counting scanner. The scanner counts individual x-ray photons that pass through a patient and discriminates their energy, increasing the detail supplied to the reader. The technique also reduces the amount of x-rays needed for a scan.[31]
Largely replaced techniques
CT replaced the more invasive pneumoencephalography for imaging of the brain, as well as most applications of focal plane tomography.
Focal plane tomography
Before computed tomography, tomographic images could be made by radiography using focal plane tomography, representing a single slice of the body on radiographic film. This method was proposed by the Italian radiologist Alessandro Vallebona in the early 1900s. The idea is based on simple principles of projective geometry: moving synchronously and in opposite directions the X-ray tube and the film, which are connected together by a rod whose pivot point is the focus; the image created by the points on the focal plane appears sharper, while the images of the other points annihilate as noise.[32] This is only marginally effective, as blurring occurs in only the "x" plane. This method of acquiring tomographic images using only mechanical techniques advanced through the mid-twentieth century, steadily producing sharper images, and with a greater ability to vary the thickness of the cross-section being examined. This was achieved through the introduction of more complex, multidirectional devices that can move in more than one plane and perform more effective blurring. However, despite the increasing sophistication of focal plane tomography, it remained ineffective at producing images of soft tissues.[32] With the increasing power and availability of computers in the 1960s, research began into practical computational techniques for creating tomographic images, leading to the development of computed tomography (CT). Шаблон:Further
References
- ↑ 1,0 1,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Vallebona A. Una modalità di tecnica per la dissociazione radiografica delle ombre applicata allo studio del cranio Comunicazione al IX Congresso Italiano di Radiologia, Turin, May 1930
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Franco Bistolfi, Alessandro Vallebona 1899-1987. Ricordo di un grande radiologo e del suo contributo allo sviluppo delle scienze radiologiche (PDF), in Fisica in Medicina, n. 2, 2005, pp. 115-123. URL consulted on 9 may 2016 (archived from original url on 4 march 2016) https://web.archive.org/web/20160304211917/http://www.fisicamedica.it/aifm/periodico/2005/2005_2_Fisica_in_Medicina.pdf
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ 13,0 13,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ 14,0 14,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Hornich H., Translated by Parks PC. A Tribute to Johann Radon. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 1986;5(4) 169–9.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Kaczmarz S., "Approximate solution of system of linear equations. Int. J. Control. 1993; 57-9.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Oldendorf WH. Isolated flying spot detection of radiodensity discontinuities – displaying the internal structural pattern of a complex object. Ire Trans Biomed Electron. 1961 Jan;BME-8:68–72.
- ↑ Herman, G. T., Fundamentals of computerized tomography: Image reconstruction from projection, 2nd edition, Springer, 2009
- ↑ F. Natterer, "The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography (Classics in Applied Mathematics)", Society for Industrial Mathematics, Шаблон:ISBN
- ↑ F. Natterer and F. Wübbeling "Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction (Monographs on Mathematical Modeling and Computation)", Society for Industrial (2001), Шаблон:ISBN
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Townsed CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM et al. (2008). Sabiston Textbook of Radiology: The Biological Basis of Modern Radiological Practice, ed 22. Saunders. pp. 104–112.
- ↑ Allen M.Cormack: My Connection with the Radon Transform, in: 75 Years of Radon Transform, S. Gindikin and P. Michor, eds., International Press Incorporated (1994), pp. 32–35, Шаблон:ISBN
- ↑ 29,0 29,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 32,0 32,1 Шаблон:Cite book