Английская Википедия:1927 Chicago mayoral election

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox election Шаблон:ElectionsIL The 1927 Chicago mayoral election was held on April 5, 1927. Democratic incumbent William Emmett Dever was defeated by Republican candidate William Hale Thompson, who had served as mayor from 1915 to 1923. John Dill Robertson (the president West Parks Board, as well as former health commissioner and school board president), who had been previously allied with the ex-mayor, broke with Thompson to run on his own and received more than five percent of the vote. It remains Шаблон:As of the last Chicago mayoral election to be won by a candidate who is not a member of the Democratic Party.

Dever had enforced Prohibition despite being personally opposed to it. This led to increased bootlegging and violence in the city and reduced citizen support. Thompson and Robertson seized the opportunity and entered the race. Thompson promised to end the enforcement of Prohibition and accused the United Kingdom of trying to retake control of the United States, while Robertson promised to quash the crime wave. Thompson bitterly attacked his campaign opponents and it was public knowledge that he was supported and funded by Al Capone. Dever's supporters pushed back against Thompson's rhetoric, asserting that Dever had the sensible policies and the "decency" appropriate for the city. Thompson's victory damaged Chicago's national reputation.

To receive the Democratic nomination, Dever won the party's primary election with 91 percent of the vote, facing only a single weak opponent. Thompson defeated Cook County Board of Review Chairman Edward R. Litsinger in the Republican primary by a 14.61-percent margin of victory.

Background

Democrat William Emmett Dever had been elected mayor of Chicago in 1923 and initially focused on reform.[1] Observing the corruption of city government caused by bootleggers, he resolved to crack down on the illegal liquor trade and strengthen enforcement of Prohibition.[2] He was himself opposed to Prohibition, but felt that disregard for one law could lead to disregard for others.[2] His crackdown on Prohibition was initially effective and led to him being considered a potential dark horse candidate for President of the United States.[3] Nevertheless, the limited supply of alcohol led to bootleggers competing with one another, increasing violence in the city,[3] lowering Chicagoans' approval of Dever's performance.[4] Aware of the effects of Prohibition enforcement on his mayoralty, Dever was reluctant to run for a second term in 1927, a feeling strengthened by poor health and lucrative job offers in the private sector.[5] George E. Brennan, chief of the Democratic party, felt that Dever was the Democrats' strongest candidate against Thompson,[6] and he and businessman Julius Rosenwald convinced Dever to run for reelection.[7]

Republican William Hale Thompson, known as "Big Bill",[8] had been mayor for two terms from 1915 to 1923 and took advantage of the situation to run for a third term, promising to end the enforcement of Prohibition.[9] Having declined a bid for reelection in 1923, he had managed to stay in the public eye by constructing a yawl named the Big Bill with his head as the figurehead and spending $25,000Шаблон:Efn to take it on an expedition to Borneo to find a tree-climbing fish, all ostensibly as a publicity stunt for the Illinois Waterway.[10] He was immensely popular with the city's African-American community,[11] having served as alderman of the 2nd ward, home of Chicago's largest black population,[12] from 1900 to 1902.[13] He also had enemies from his previous tenure, including the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Daily News,[14] and had started to wear out his welcome with former allies such as party boss Frederick Lundin.[15]

West Parks Board President John Dill Robertson, also known as "J.D.", "Doctor Dill", and "Dill Pickle", who had previously been the city's health commissioner from 1915 to 1922,[16] the President of the Chicago Board of Education after that,[17] and an ally of Thompson,[12] ran against Thompson in the Republican primary supported by Lundin.[18] Serving at the time as President of the West Parks Board,Шаблон:Efn[19] he promised to enforce Prohibition while it was still on the books and to smash organized crime in thirty days if elected, comparing gunmen gangs to boils and the bootleg industry to an appendix.[18] Lundin later had Robertson withdraw from the Republican primary in order to campaign for candidate Edward R. Litsinger, and Robertson agreed not to run as an independent in the general election if Litsinger won the primary.[20] Early in the campaign Thompson debated with live rats as stand-ins Robertson and Lundin.[21][22]

Primary elections

Файл:L-R; Harriet Kolanowski, John S. Rusch (chief clerk of the Chicago Board of Elections), Stella Van Dusen, Alice Orlando, and Josephine Cherrin sort ballots in election board office ahead of the February 1927 Chicago primary.jpg
Officials sorting blank ballot papers in the offices of the Chicago Board of Elections ahead of the primaries

Primary elections took place on February 22,[23][24] along with primary elections for City Clerk and City Treasurer and the first round of aldermanic elections.[25] February 22 was incidentally Washington Day.[26]

The primaries were plagued by electoral violence. The New York Times characterized the primaries as plagued by, "shootings, sluggings, theft of ballot boxes, police raids and the arrest of about two hundred gangesters and repeaters at the polls".[27] The Associated Press provided a similar description.[26] Ahead of the election, Cook County Highway Police Chief Michael Hughes came into conflict with General Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department Morgan Collins regarding election security. Hughes had ordered county highway police to supervise polls on the city's West Side. However, Collins then ordered the city police to arrest any county policemen found to be "loitering" around polling places.[28]

Democratic primary

Democratic primary results by ward
Results of the Democratic primary by ward[25]

Dever faced no genuine opposition in his party's primary.[27][29] Attorney Martin Walsh of the 27th ward filed on February 2, claiming to have the backing of "the old municipal ownership leaders" and joining the race "to give Mayor Dever a little exercise."[30] Barratt O'Hara, former lieutenant governor of Illinois, withdrew from the race on February 11, claiming that running against Dever was hopeless and that he expected that Democrats opposed to Dever would vote in the Republican primary for Thompson instead of voting in the Democratic primary.[31]

Ahead of the primary election day, Dever put up a confident face, touting his leadership and his prospects for the general election, remarking, Шаблон:Quote

Dever touted as successes of his mayoral term the construction of a large number of new school buildings, the construction of Wacker Drive, the construction of new bridges, road paving projects, river-straightening projects on the Chicago River, and street lighting installation.[32]

Although he overwhelmingly defeated his token opponent, winning all the wards and securing the citywide vote by more than 10 to 1,[23][25] Dever's vote total in the Democratic primary was less than the margin of victory Thompson had secured in the Republican primary.[9][24] Dever's camp argued that this was not a bad omen but rather that, due to the lack of a competitive race in the Democratic primary, many of Dever's supporters either did not participate in the primaries or voted instead for Thompson in the Republican primary to try and nominate the weaker prospective opponent.[24] Dever anticipated that he would still be able to win reelection with more than 600,000 votes in the general election.[24]

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

Republican primary

Шаблон:See also

G.O.P. primary results by ward
Results of the Republican primary by ward[23][25]
Файл:A Working Mayor For Chicago Edward R. Litsinger.jpg
Newspaper advertisement in support of Litsinger's campaign, advertising Litsinger's pledge to be a "working mayor for Chicago"

Edward R. Litsinger, who was chairman of the Cook County Board of Review and backed by reform-minded U.S. Senator Charles S. Deneen and Edward J. Brundage,[19][33] (the latter of whom had split from his political ally Robert E. Crowe by supporting Litsinger[34]), announced his platform on January 9.[33] He promised to compel the City Council to adopt an ordinance that would end the Chicago Traction Wars and consolidate all transportation lines under public ownership,Шаблон:Efn to construct subways, to form a police investigation into the rampant crime, to look at causes of recent tax increases and investigate potential ways to reverse them, and to clean up streets and alleys.[33] He criticized Thompson as having been corrupt during his previous tenure as mayor.[20] In his campaign, Litsinger pledged "to be a working mayor for all Chicago." Litsinger placed the blame for the city's crime on Robert E. Crowe, the Thompson-aligned Cook County state's attorney.[32]

Robertson initially planned to run in the primary before dropping out in favor of Litsinger per his agreement with Lundin, mounting an independent bid upon Litsinger's primary loss.[19][35] Former policeman Eugene McCaffrey filed for candidacy on February 2 and attracted suspicion as many of the names on his petition sheets appeared to have been written in the same handwriting.[30] He was allowed on the ballot and received more than 1,500 votes.[23]

The Republican primary was marked by intense vitriol between the candidates.[36] Thompson accused Robertson of messy eating, stating that "[With] eggs in his whiskers, soup on his vest, you'd think the doc got his education driving a garbage wagon."[36] Robertson retaliated, accusing Thompson of corruption.[36] Litsinger reiterated such accusations against Thompson and further accused Thompson of conspiring to get 50,000 Democratic votes.[36] Both candidates asserted that they were guaranteed victory and accused the other of conspiring to steal the primary.[36]

In an open letter, Thompson charged that Edward Brundage and Fred Lundin were suburbanites and were guilty of betraying their city roots.[35] He also alleged that Litsinger, who had come from Back of the Yards, had abandoned his roots, writing "You moved to the Gold Coast. Are you thinking of joining the high brows of Lake Forest and becoming a resident of Lake County too?"[35]

Thompson won by a surprisingly large margin;[37] to many, his victory itself was a surprise.[35] He carried 49 of the city's 50 wards.[37] After Thompson's victory, both partisans of Robertson and Democratic leaders claimed that Democratic voters for Thompson had propelled him to the Republican nomination, with the Democrats claiming that they did so in order to give Dever a weaker opponent in the general election.[29] Additionally, The New York Times reported that thousands of Republicans had refused to cast a vote for either candidate in the primary.[27]

Litsinger delivered a concession speech at his campaign headquarters in the Morrison Hotel, saying, Шаблон:Quote

With Thompson's primary victory Robertson launched his independent campaign,[38] having filed a petition the day of the primary with 43,724 signatures to get his People's Ownership Smash Crime Rings party on the ballot.[27]

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

Independent Republican primary

The "Independent Republican" ticket held a primary. The mayoral slot had no candidates, but write-in votes were cast. Thompson won this primary, but chose not to accept their nomination.[39]

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

General election

The general election was held on April 5, along with general elections for City Clerk and City Treasurer[40] and aldermanic runoffs.[41]

Campaign

Шаблон:See also Шаблон:Multiple image

A sketch of Thompson with text exhorting the reader to "Vote for 'Big Bill the Builder'" who it says "cannot be bought, bossed, or bluffed"
Thompson campaign poster, touting him as "Big Bill the Builder" who "cannot be bought, bossed, or bluffed"
Campaign poster with the heading "This is your fight, this fight for Chicago's good name"
Advertisement in support of Dever's campaign, characterizing the election as a fight to preserve the reputation of the city

Thompson accused Dever of treason.[42] Using the slogan "America First",[42][43] he alleged that school superintendent William McAndrew was a British agent sent by King George as part of a grand conspiracy to manipulate the minds of American children and set the groundwork for the United Kingdom to repossess the United States; he accused the "left-handed Irishman" Dever of being part of the plot.[42][44] Thompson based these claims on McAndrew being critical of such artworks as Archibald Willard's The Spirit of '76 and allowing the use in schools of textbooks which Thompson believed were unpatriotic.[42] Thompson declared that his America First slate would elect so many of its candidates that "the king of England will find out for the first time he is damned unpopular",[8] and implied that he might have Dever sent to jail.[8] He described Dever as "very weak, no courage, no manhood, doesn't know how to fight".[8] He promised to reform the police department by ending enforcement of prohibition.[45] He also criticized the League of Nations and the World Court.[46][47] Thompson also supported ending the metering of municipal water.[47]

Democratic chief Brennan said that "All the hoodlums are for Thompson", which Thompson used to convince his supporters that the Democrats were elitist and looked down upon them.[45] Campaigning for German votes, Thompson stated: Шаблон:Blockquote

Dever largely refused to engage in Thompson's style of rhetoric.[48][49] He instead promised to engage in a debate of substantive issues, partaking only in a "decent, friendly discussion without malice or sensationalism".[25] This was not without exception, as Dever did once comment in an interview with the Chicago Daily News that, "Thompson's trouble is mental".[50] Largely, however, Dever responded to Thompson's accusations by declaring them "blarney" which he had no intention of dignifying,[48] and noting that Thompson's comments on international affairs were irrelevant to the duties and powers of the mayoralty.[46] He ran on the slogans "Dever for Decency" and "The best mayor Chicago ever had",[45] the former also used by The Independent Republicans for Dever Committee.[51] He attempted, particularly early in the race, to tout parts of his record such as his construction of Wacker Drive and 51 new schools, as well as a pure milk ordinance he had helped pass.[24] He promised to continue his construction program, including building a long-anticipated State Street subway and widening LaSalle Street.Шаблон:Efn[24] He demurred that "no superman can be found to eliminate crime".[24] Dever's campaign characterized Thompson as, "a political pyromaniac".[50]

Dever allies accused Thompson of receiving $100,000 in campaign contributions from transit and public utilities mogul Samuel Insull during his 1915 mayoral campaign, and insinuated that he was again receiving significant financial support from Insull.[52]

Supporters of both Thompson and Dever resorted to bigotry.[48] Some Republicans used anti-Catholic rhetoric against Dever.[48] Despite Dever also having had a positive relation with black residents of the city,[53] some Democrats attempted to take advantage of Thompson's particularly positive relation with the city's African-American community in order to divide voters racially,[54] claiming that Thompson's election would lead to "Negro supremacy".[48] Palm cards were circulated with an image of Thompson kissing a black boy and with the reverse side reading "Thompson—Me Africa First".[55] Some Democrats hired black people to canvass white neighborhoods for Thompson in an effort to scare white voters.[55] They also attempted to lure black Thompson voters downtown, where they did not often go, with a fake rally outside of Thompson's campaign headquarters.[55] Additionally, the song "Bye Bye Blackbird" was sung at some Dever rallies. Dever supporters also mocked Thompson and his supporters by having a Black man dress up as Paul Revere ride on horseback through the Chicago Loop shouting "The British are coming."[56] Supporters of each candidate accused the other's supporters of plotting to use underhanded tactics to steal the election.[48] In the closing day of the campaign, Dever and Thompson accused each other of attempting to incite a race riot among the city's Black populace.[57]

Robertson continued his platform of quashing crime, promising to "find another Theodore Roosevelt" as police chief and smash organized crime within thirty days.[58] At a rally on March 28, 1927, Robertson announced that, if elected, he would appoint former United States attorney Edwin A. Olson as police chief.[59]

In the closing days of the campaign, analysts perceived Dever to be gaining new momentum.[60]

Шаблон:Multiple image

Endorsements

Thompson was backed by two Hearst-owned newspapers, as well as the African-American Daily Defender and L'Italia, the city's second-best selling Italian newspaper.[51] Four of the city's daily newspapers backed Dever, as did the city's largest Polish, Jewish, and Italian newspapers.[24]

Large advertisement with the heading "Union labor presents a solid front for William Hale Thompson for Mayor"
Cook County Wage-Earner's League newspaper advertisement claiming that "95% of the Trades Unions in Chicago Endorse Thompson"

The Chicago Federation of Labor endorsed Thompson.[47] Margaret Haley, president of the Chicago Federation of Teachers, personally endorsed him as well.[47] The Cook County Wage-Earners' League ran an advertisement for Thompson in the Chicago Tribune, in which it claimed that 95 percent of the trade unions in Chicago endorsed him.[61] However, in actuality, labor support was divided between the two major party candidates. While the Cook County Wage Earners, headed by Chicago Federation of Labor vice-president Oscar F. Nelson, backed Thompson, a notable group of labor officials also backed Dever. Among those backing Dever were Chicago Federation of Labor president John Fitzpatrick and Illinois State Federation of Labor secretary Victory A. Olander.[62] Dever also received the endorsement of the union representing the city's transit employees (workers on its streetcar and elevated lines).[63][64]

After Thompson beat Deneen's favored candidate in the primary Deneen backed Thompson in the general election.[35] Martin Walsh, who had run against Dever in the Democratic primary, served as a stump speaker for Thompson.[65] Thompson was also endorsed by Illinois Attorney General Oscar E. Carlstrom, Illinois Secretary of State Louis Lincoln Emmerson, Illinois Lieutenant Governor Fred E. Sterling, Cook County Sheriff Charles E. Graydon, Cook County Coroner Oscar Wolff and Chicago Postmaster (and 1923 Republican mayoral nominee) Arthur C. Lueder.[66][67][68] Thompson also received a last-minute endorsement from Illinois Governor Len Small.[69]

Thompson received the endorsement of Al Capone after promising lax enforcement of Prohibition.[70] It was public knowledge that Capone was supporting Thompson's campaign effort,[48] collecting campaign contributions from those who sold his beer.[70] Capone donated between $100,000Шаблон:Efn[46] and $500,000Шаблон:Efn[71] to Thompson's campaign. Other crime figures backing Thompson included Jack Zuta,[71] who gave $50,000Шаблон:Efn to his campaign,[72] Timothy D. Murphy, and Vincent Drucci.[71]

Dever was endorsed by prominent reformers campaigning for "Dever and Decency" on his behalf,[46] including Charles Edward Merriam, Harriet Vittum, Harold L. Ickes, and Jane Addams.[51][73] The Ministerial Association of Chicago also endorsed Dever, calling him "the best mayor Chicago ever had ... [and] as loyal as a Catholic as he is [a] citizen".[74] He was backed by businessmen Sewell Avery, Julius Rosenwald, and W. A. Wieboldt,[51] as well as university presidents Max Mason and Walter Dill Scott and attorney Orville James Taylor.[51] He was also backed by socialites Louise deKoven Bowen and Edward Ryerson Jr, as well as builder Potter Palmer and Donald Richberg.[51] Congressman Adolph J. Sabath was a strong backer of Dever's campaign.[53] School superintendent William McAndrew distributed a letter to school principals urging for people to vote Dever.[47]

Файл:Edward Herbert Wright tells fellow African American voters that William Hale Thompson is an enemy to African Americans while campaigning for John Dill Robertson.jpg
Edward Herbert Wright campaigns for John Dill Robertson

In addition to Lundin,[75] Robertson was supported by the incumbentШаблон:Efn 43rd ward alderman Arthur F. Albert,[76] whose opponent Titus Haffa endorsed Thompson.[77] Henry F. Batterman, Lundin's 41st ward committeeman, supported Robertson before crossing over to Thompson.[65] Despite Thompson's popularity with African American voters, there were Edward Herbert Wright-aligned Black Republicans who publicly backed Robertson.[78]

Polling

Chicago Tribune straw polls

The Chicago Tribune conducted straw polls during a portion of the campaign. The first of these polls was published on March 20, 1927.[79] These were not modern scientific polls, and many focused on specific sub-portions of the city's populace, rather than true representative samples.

The Chicago Tribune straw polls indicated that Thompson had very strong support among African Americans.[80][81][82] The cummulative result of all 132,107 straw votes cast over the polls published between March 20 and April 4, 1927, was 51.20 percent for Thompson, 44.22 percent for Dever, and 4.56 percent for Robertson.[83] Despite Thompson regularly leading these polls, on April 4, 1927, the Chicago Tribune wrote that a "Dever plurality" was indicated by an increasing trend towards the mayor in the later days of straw polling.[84]

Шаблон:Graph:Chart

Chicago Tribune straw polls
Date
published
Sample
size
William Emmett Dever
(Democrat)
John Dill Robertson
(Independent)
William Hale Thompson
(Republican)
Lead
April 4, 1927[83] 11,716Шаблон:Efn 46.36% 5.56% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|48.09% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+1.73
April 3, 1927[85] 13,789Шаблон:Efn 46.77% 3.50% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|49.72% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+2.95
April 2, 1927[86] 6,198Шаблон:Efn 44.34% 5.25% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|50.41% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+6.07
April 1, 1927[87] 8,943Шаблон:Efn 44.70% 4.90% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|50.38% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+5.68
March 30, 1927[88] 10,473Шаблон:Efn 44.82% 4.16% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|50.01% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+5.19
March 29, 1927[89] 8,283Шаблон:Efn Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|53.89% 3.03% 43.07% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|+10.82
March 28, 1927[90] 4,741Шаблон:Efn Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|56.85% 4.26% 38.89% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|+17.96
March 27, 1927[81] 5,956Шаблон:Efn 31.20% 3.54% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|65.16% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+33.96
March 26, 1927[91] 12,916Шаблон:Efn 43.31% 4.76% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|52.91% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+9.60
March 25, 1927[92] 5,664Шаблон:Efn 46.58% 6.48% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|48.00% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+1.42
March 24, 1927[93] 6,946 36.19% 4.35% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|59.46% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+23.27
March 23, 1927[82] 8,029Шаблон:Efn 41.64% 3.75% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|54.59% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+12.85
March 22, 1927[94] 9,321Шаблон:Efn Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|53.68% 4.25% 44.22% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|+9.46
March 21, 1927[95] 5,368Шаблон:Efn 35.46% 5.76% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|58.77% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+23.31
March 20, 1927[79] 5,882Шаблон:Efn 44.08% 4.25% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|51.66% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|+7.58

Chicago Business Men's Republican Committee straw polls

Newspaper advertisements for Robertson's campaign run by the Chicago Business Men's Republican Committee included straw polls which each surveyed several locations in the city. The committee, which actively supported Robertson's candidacy, had tabulated the straw polls itself.[96][97][98]

Chicago Business Men's Republican Committee straw polls
Date
published
Sample
size
William Emmett Dever
(Democrat)
John Dill Robertson
(Independent)
William Hale Thompson
(Republican)
April 4, 1927[98] 1,361Шаблон:Efn 40.12% Шаблон:Party shading/Independent|40.34% 19.54%
April 3, 1927[96] 856Шаблон:Efn 21.96% Шаблон:Party shading/Independent|61.21% 16.82%
April 1, 1927[97] 1,660Шаблон:Efn 32.29% Шаблон:Party shading/Independent|45.72% 21.99%

Election day security

Файл:Chicago police discuss how to keep peace during Chicago's municipal general election day 1927 (L-R-Capts. Martin Mullen, William Russell, Daniel Murphy; Chief Collins; Capts. James Allman and Daniel Lynch).jpg
Police Superintendent Morgan A. Collins (fourth from left) and several police captains plan for election day peacekeeping
Файл:Policemen on guard in the office of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, protecting the ballot papers for the 1927 Chicago municipal general election.jpg
Policemen stand guard of blank ballot papers stored in the office of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners ahead of the general election

Due to fears of race riots on election day, ahead of the election, there was talk of the military potentially providing security in the city on election day.[99] Ultimately, the Chicago Police Department sent 5,000 men (including standard policemen, plain clothes officers, and special machine gun squads) to guard the polls.[75] Police Superintendent Morgan A. Collins warned the city's criminal elements, "Any gangsters that are out Tuesday had batter wear bullet-proof vests," warning that the police planned to, "shoot first, talk afterward."[75][67] The Sherman House Hotel, home to both Dever and Thompson's campaign headquarters, was given police security scrutiny on election day.[75][100] Despite Cook County Sheriff Charles E. Graydon requesting that Illinois National Guardsmen be kept at the ready, they were not called to the city. Instead, Adjutant General of Illinois Carlos E. Black promised that guardsmen would be able to be deployed on a two-hour notice.[75] Thompson himself had urged for the National Guard to be sent to secure the polls in Chicago.[101] In all, more than 5,000 police officers in 100 squads guarded the city during the election.[102]

The city avoided rioting on election day. Universal Service described the election as the city's "quietest election in recent years" in terms of electoral violence.[103] In an incident of election crime, gangsters managed to steal the ballot boxes from the 29th precinct of the 45th ward at gunpoint.[104] Shot fatally during election law enforcement activity was mobster Vincent Drucci.[105]

Файл:Wreckage from election-day bombing of forty-second ward building that had been used as a Democratic headquarters (1927 Chicago mayoral election) 1.jpg
Men inspecting the wreckage of a bombed ward Democratic Party headquarters building, an example of electoral violence in what was considered a relatively low-violence general election for its era

The election was marked by an unusually low level of crime: only one ballot box theft and a negligible amount of violence.[106][107] Some claimed that this was due to Capone using his men to guard polling stations and ensure votes for Thompson, but contemporary accounts make no mention of gang activity and police were dispatched to guard polling stations, aided by City Hall employees.[107] Police attributed the quiet at least in part to the death of Drucci,[106] who had allegedly raided the downtown offices of the Dever-supporting 42nd Ward alderman Dorsey Crowe the day before the election and was killed by police upon his arrest later that night.[107] Among some of the incidents of crime that were reported was the kidnapping of two election judges. Two buildings were bombed, including a soft drink establishment owned by State Representative Lawrence C. O'Brien[102] and the 42nd ward Democratic Party headquarters.[108]

Result

Black and white photograph. Thompson stands before a ballot box, inserting his ballot paper into the box. He has a male. To the left of Thompson is a male, and to the right of him is a woman, both also standing
Thompson (center) casts his own ballot
Black and white photo. William Hale Thompson stands before a desk, surrounded by others, while using a telephone of the candlestick telephone-design, with the mouthpiece held to the right-side of his face by his right hand and the earpiece held to his left ear by his left hand
Thompson making a celebratory phone call to his wife after the election returns indicated that he had won the election
Black-and-white photograph showing a wide and busy street in a city center, with the outer lanes of traffic as well as the sidewalks filled by a massive crowd of people standing in celebration. Only the center two lanes of the road are being used by automobiles. In these center-two lanes is bumper-to-bumper automobile traffic, with the traffic consisting solely of dark-colored personal automobiles of an 1920s-era design. The vehicles are traveling bi-directionally in the North American-style norm of having vehicles drive on the righthand side of their respective direction
Crowd of Thompson supporters gather in celebration outside of the Sherman House Hotel after Thompson's victory

The election set the then-record for the most votes cast in a Chicago mayoral election,[62] with just under a million votes being cast.

Thompson won the election with more than 51 percent of votes cast,[40] carrying 28 of the city's 50 wards.[45] Dever's campaign ultimately failed to achieve momentum; Thompson had dominated the discourse early on and left Dever's supporters struggling to react to Thompson's campaign and ultimately failing to fully promote Dever's own message.[48]

Dever saw a significant decline in support from the Democratic party's stronghold, the city's white, working-class, inner-city wards.[48] His support improved in traditionally Republican White Anglo-Saxon Protestant precincts along Chicago's lakeshore.[48] Thompson carried the Black vote by more than 10 to 1,[48] taking the three wards of Chicago's "Black Belt" by more than 59,000 votes.[109] The Associated Press credited the Black vote with supplying Thompson with his victory.[110] According to one study, Thompson received 42.20 percent of the Polish-American vote, Dever 54.07 percent and Robertson 3.73 percent;[111] other sources suggest Thompson may have carried as much as 46 percent of the Polish-American vote.[112] By some accounts, Thompson carried 41 percent of the Czech-American vote and 43 percent of the Lithuanian-American vote, groups that typically firmly supported Democrats.[112] He also won more than 60 percent of the German-American and Swedish-American votes,[113] as well as the Italian-American and Jewish votes.[112] Edward Mazur divided his study of the Jewish vote into two groups, the European/German Jews and the Eastern European Jews.[114] He found that Eastern European Jewish precincts were carried by Thompson 55 to 41 percent, while the German Jewish precincts were carried by Dever 62 to 35 percent.[114]

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate no change Шаблон:Election box candidate no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

Results by ward[40][115]
Ward Dever Dever % Thompson Thompson % Robertson Robertson % Koop Koop %
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 1st 11,076 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|70.38% 3,931 24.98% 731 4.64%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 2nd 1,791 6.76% 24,169 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|91.25% 526 1.99%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 3rd 3,484 11.02% 27,715 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|87.64% 423 1.34%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 4th 6,848 25.00% 20,107 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|73.40% 439 1.60%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 5th 13,148 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|54.47% 10,236 42.40% 756 3.13%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 6th 12,220 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|51.02% 10,843 45.27% 887 3.70%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 7th 15,416 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|52.33% 12,969 44.02% 1,077 3.70%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 8th 13,226 47.19% 13,256 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|47.30% 1,543 5.51%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 9th 6,766 41.70% 7,654 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|47.17% 1,805 11.12%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 10th 4,547 34.07% 7,913 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|59.29% 886 6.64%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 11th 6,882 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 54.55% 5,253 41.64% 480 3.80%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 12th 8,433 44.06% 10,031 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|52.41% 676 3.53%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 13th 6,379 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 65.29% 3,214 32.89% 178 1.82%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 14th 10,163 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 55.90% 7,685 42.27% 332 1.83%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 15th 15,268 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 50.54% 13,437 44.48% 1,506 4.98%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 16th 9,049 47.57% 9,288 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|48.82% 687 3.61%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 17th 8,389 45.51% 8,977 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|48.70% 1,069 5.80%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 18th 11,727 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 49.63% 10,803 45.72% 1,098 4.65%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 19th 15,822 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 49.82% 14,240 44.83% 1,699 5.35%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 20th 4,200 34.12% 7,822 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|63.55% 286 2.32%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 21st 6,239 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 48.53% 6,167 47.97% 451 3.51%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 22nd 7,721 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 57.96% 4,688 35.19% 913 6.85%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 23rd 10,282 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 55.42% 7,338 39.55% 934 5.03%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 24th 8,174 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 58.89% 5,361 38.63% 344 2.48%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 25th 6,740 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 56.58% 4,608 38.68% 564 4.73%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 26th 4,853 40.02% 6,948 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 57.30% 325 2.68%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 27th 7,164 42.47% 8,565 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 50.78% 1,139 6.75%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 28th 6,035 33.44% 10,377 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 57.50% 1,635 9.06%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 29th 12,059 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 49.35% 11,095 45.40% 1,283 5.25%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 30th 16,998 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 53.28% 13,479 42.25% 1,424 4.46%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 31st 3,864 41.98% 5,069 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 55.07% 272 2.95%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 32nd 5,392 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 48.58% 5,204 46.89% 503 4.53%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 33rd 5,603 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 47.69% 5,562 47.34% 585 4.98%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 34th 6,416 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 50.22% 5,812 45.50% 547 4.28%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 35th 4,254 29.11% 9,150 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 62.61% 1,208 8.27% 2 0.01%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 36th 5,027 30.05% 10,293 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 61.54% 1,407 8.41%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 37th 14,647 42.70% 16,366 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 47.71% 3,288 9.59%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 38th 6,431 40.35% 8,529 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 53.51% 978 6.14%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 39th 13,621 43.72% 15,709 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 50.43% 1,822 5.85%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 40th 9,877 33.26% 18,139 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 61.08% 1,681 5.66%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 41st 10,961 36.60% 17,212 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 57.47% 1,778 5.94%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 42nd 6,879 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 50.63% 6,255 46.03% 454 3.34%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 43rd 5,601 37.65% 8,431 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 56.68% 844 5.67%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 44th 6,887 42.54% 8,386 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 51.79% 918 5.67%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 45th 5,897 36.36% 9,378 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 57.83% 942 5.81%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 46th 6,668 38.39% 9,515 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 54.78% 1,188 6.84%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 47th 7,893 34.61% 12,754 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 55.92% 2,161 9.47%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 48th 8,037 42.79% 9,619 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 51.22% 1,125 5.99%
Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 49th 16,797 Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic| 55.14% 12,233 40.16% 1,433 4.70%
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 50th 10,827 40.30% 13,935 Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 51.86% 2,107 7.84%
Total 432,678 43.28% 515,716 51.58% 51,347 5.14% 2 0.00%

Aftermath

The results of the election damaged Chicago's reputation nationally.[46][116] Will Rogers remarked that "They was trying to beat Bill [Thompson] with the Better Element vote. The trouble with Chicago is that there ain't much Better Element."Шаблон:Efn[46][117] The St. Louis Star declared that "Chicago is still a good deal of a Wild West town, where a soapbox showman extracting white rabbits from a gentleman's plug hat still gets a better hearing than a man in a sober suit talking business."[46] The campaign was such that philosopher Will Durant wondered whether democracy was dead.[118]

The election of Thompson attracted not just national, but also strong international attention.[119] The British The Daily News newspaper declared that the election affirmed the validity of, "the description of Chicago as the most lawless city in the world,"[119] and wrote, Шаблон:Blockquote

Many experts concluded that Thompson had won because of his skilled campaigning, providing entertainment while Dever called for virtue.[120] Elmer Davis of Harper's Magazine mused that the mystery was not that Dever lost but that he had received 430,000 votes.[121] George Schottenhamel, writing in 1952 for the Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, argued that Dever "would have been easy opposition for any candidate" running "on a campaign of 'Dever and Decency' despite four years of rampant crime in Chicago".[122] The New York Daily News credited opposition to Dever's enforcement of Prohibition and Thompson's pledge to cease such enforcement as key to Thompson's victory, expressing hope that it would warn leaders of other large city's not to enforce "the tyrannous nonsense that is prohibition." However, the newspaper also decried the result as a "victory of a political haymaker over a sincere man," calling Dever "an earnest and an honest mayor as far as can be discerned," and characterizing Thompson as holding a political record "of administrative rottenness surpassed only by certain Tammany pirates of fifty years ago."[123]

The New York Times regarded Thompson's victory to be "a blow" to the power of Frank Orren Lowden, as it was anticipated to give Thompson and Deneen control over Cook County's delegates to the 1928 Republican National Convention.[124] Thompson had previously unfulfilled ambitions to run on the Republican Party presidential ticket in 1920. In the immediate aftermath of his victory, The New York Times observed that, "these ambitions have been fired anew by his success in the Mayoralty election."[124]

Nobody had expected Robertson to win.[125] The Chicago Tribune noted that he had finished a "poor third" and polled "only" 51,209 votes;[126] The Daily Independent of Murphysboro considered him to have finished at a "hopeless third".[127] Koop's performance of two votes was picked up by the Associated Press[128] and used by an editorial of the Ottawa Citizen as evidence that the threat of socialism was overblown.[129] Communist leader Arne Swabeck called the election "one of the greatest mud-slinging contests ever managed by the 'celebrated' American political parties," and opined that it demonstrated how labor voters should cease "awarding friends and punishing enemies" of capitalist politicians in the major political parties.[62]

Файл:Chicago Tribune Tue Apr 19 1927 page 48 (Thompson inauguration).jpg
Thompson's subsequent mayoral inauguration

In his inaugural address, Thompson reiterated his pledge to oust Superintendent McAndrew.[130] In August 1927, the Chicago Board of Education, now under Thompson's influence after he appointed a number new members, voted to charge McAndrew with insubordination and unpatriotic “conduct incompatible and inconsistent with, and in direct violation" of his duties, suspending him pending an administrative hearing held by the board. The administrative hearing would last months, and the Chicago Board of Education would find McAndrew guilty. The Cook County Superior Court would later void this decision.[131][132]

Thompson would lose to Democrat Anton Cermak in the 1931 Chicago mayoral election[133] as his public approval fell victim to continuing crime and the Great Depression.[134] Historians generally consider Thompson one of the most unethical mayors in American history, in large part due to his alliance with Capone.[135] Dever would serve as the vice president of a bank and died of pancreatic cancer in 1929.[136] Robertson was re-elected by the West Park to serve as its president two days after the mayoral election,[137] and died in 1931 of heart disease.[138] To date, this is the last mayoral election in Chicago won by a Republican candidate.Шаблон:Efn[133]

In the 21st century, Thompson and his 1927 campaign have both been analyzed by some modern writers as precursors to the political career of Donald Trump and Trumpism.[50][139][140]

Gallery

Шаблон:Gallery

Шаблон:Gallery

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Works cited

Шаблон:1927 United States electionsШаблон:Illinois elections

Шаблон:Featured article

  1. Schmidt 1995 pp. 87–89
  2. 2,0 2,1 Schmidt 1995 p. 89
  3. 3,0 3,1 Schmidt 1995 p. 90
  4. Schmidt 1995 p. 97
  5. Schmidt 1995 p. 93
  6. Schmidt 1989 p. 148
  7. Schmidt 1989 p. 150
  8. 8,0 8,1 8,2 8,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  9. 9,0 9,1 Schottenhamel p. 42
  10. Schottenhamel p. 41
  11. Schottenhamel p. 43
  12. 12,0 12,1 Schottenhamel p. 32
  13. Шаблон:Cite web
  14. Schottenhamel p. 33
  15. Schottenhamel pp. 42–43
  16. Шаблон:Cite news
  17. Шаблон:Cite web
  18. 18,0 18,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. 19,0 19,1 19,2 Schmidt 1989 p. 154
  20. 20,0 20,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Bright pp. 257–258
  23. 23,0 23,1 23,2 23,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Election aperture cards primaries не указан текст
  24. 24,0 24,1 24,2 24,3 24,4 24,5 24,6 24,7 Schmidt 1989 p. 156
  25. 25,0 25,1 25,2 25,3 25,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  26. 26,0 26,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  27. 27,0 27,1 27,2 27,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  28. Шаблон:Cite web
  29. 29,0 29,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  30. 30,0 30,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  31. Шаблон:Cite news
  32. 32,0 32,1 Шаблон:Cite news:
  33. 33,0 33,1 33,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  34. Bukowski pp. 182–183
  35. 35,0 35,1 35,2 35,3 35,4 Bukowski p. 183
  36. 36,0 36,1 36,2 36,3 36,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  37. 37,0 37,1 Bright p. 249
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HomeRule1 не указан текст
  40. 40,0 40,1 40,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Election aperture cards не указан текст
  41. Шаблон:Cite news
  42. 42,0 42,1 42,2 42,3 Schmidt 1995 p. 94
  43. Bright p. 242
  44. Bright p. 253
  45. 45,0 45,1 45,2 45,3 Schottenhamel p. 44
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 46,3 46,4 46,5 46,6 Teaford p. 199
  47. 47,0 47,1 47,2 47,3 47,4 Шаблон:Cite book
  48. 48,00 48,01 48,02 48,03 48,04 48,05 48,06 48,07 48,08 48,09 48,10 Schmidt 1995 p. 95
  49. Bright p. 250
  50. 50,0 50,1 50,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  51. 51,0 51,1 51,2 51,3 51,4 51,5 Schmidt 1989 p. 157
  52. Шаблон:Cite web
  53. 53,0 53,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Schottenhamel pp. 43–44
  55. 55,0 55,1 55,2 Bukowski p. 182
  56. Шаблон:Cite journal
  57. Шаблон:Cite web
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. Шаблон:Cite web
  60. Шаблон:Cite web
  61. Шаблон:Cite news
  62. 62,0 62,1 62,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  63. Шаблон:Cite web
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. 65,0 65,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. 67,0 67,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  68. Шаблон:Cite web
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. 70,0 70,1 Eig pp. 94–95
  71. 71,0 71,1 71,2 Schmidt 1989 p. 162
  72. Bukowski p. 187
  73. Eig p. 95
  74. Шаблон:Cite news
  75. 75,0 75,1 75,2 75,3 75,4 Шаблон:Cite web
  76. Шаблон:Cite news
  77. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tribune Haffa не указан текст
  78. Шаблон:Cite web
  79. 79,0 79,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  80. Шаблон:Cite web
  81. 81,0 81,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  82. 82,0 82,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  83. 83,0 83,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Шаблон:Cite web
  86. Шаблон:Cite web
  87. Шаблон:Cite web
  88. Шаблон:Cite web
  89. Шаблон:Cite web
  90. Шаблон:Cite news:
  91. Шаблон:Cite web
  92. Шаблон:Cite web
  93. Шаблон:Cite web
  94. Шаблон:Cite web
  95. Шаблон:Cite web
  96. 96,0 96,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  97. 97,0 97,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  98. 98,0 98,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  99. Шаблон:Cite web
  100. Шаблон:Cite web
  101. Шаблон:Cite web
  102. 102,0 102,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  103. Шаблон:Cite web
  104. Шаблон:Cite web
  105. Шаблон:Cite web
  106. 106,0 106,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  107. 107,0 107,1 107,2 Eig p. 96
  108. Шаблон:Cite web
  109. Schottenhamel pp. 44–45
  110. Шаблон:Cite web
  111. Kantowicz p. 79
  112. 112,0 112,1 112,2 Bukowski p. 186
  113. Bukowski pp. 186–187
  114. 114,0 114,1 Schmidt 1989 p. 166
  115. Schmidt 1989 Table 3 (p. 187)
  116. Schmidt 1989 p. 167
  117. Шаблон:Cite news
  118. Schmidt 1989 p. 161
  119. 119,0 119,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  120. Schmidt 1995 pp. 95–96
  121. Schmidt 1995 p. 96
  122. Schottenhamel p. 49
  123. Шаблон:Cite web
  124. 124,0 124,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  125. Schmidt 1989 pp. 161–162
  126. Шаблон:Cite news
  127. Шаблон:Cite news
  128. Шаблон:Cite news
  129. Шаблон:Cite news
  130. Шаблон:Cite web
  131. Шаблон:Cite web
  132. Шаблон:Cite journal
  133. 133,0 133,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  134. Schottenhamel pp. 45–46
  135. Grossman p. 329
  136. Шаблон:Cite news
  137. Шаблон:Cite news
  138. Шаблон:Cite news
  139. Шаблон:Cite web
  140. Шаблон:Cite web