Английская Википедия:1964 Illinois House of Representatives election

Содержание

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

An election for all 177 seats of the Illinois House of Representatives for the 74th Illinois General Assembly was held on November 3, 1964. The state had been unable to redistrict following the 1960 United States census, with the Democratic governor Otto Kerner Jr. vetoing the Republican-controlled legislature's maps. A backup commission, appointed by the governor, also failed to agree on maps. The state's constitution required that elections be held at-large if a redistricting map could not be enacted, and after court challenges, the Supreme Court of Illinois ruled that one had to take place in 1964. The ballot contained 236 names, with 118 candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties.

Due to straight-ticket voting and the coattails of Lyndon B. Johnson in the concurrent presidential election, every Democratic candidate got more votes than any Republican candidate, flipping the chamber and giving Democrats a super-majority in the state House. Democrats won a total of 118 seats to Republicans' 59 seats.

Background

Constitutional procedure

Prior to the 1960s, Illinois had only redistricted its House of Representatives once since 1901. While the Constitution of Illinois stated that the legislature was required to redistrict the state, it did not provide any method of enforcement. Population shifts in the state had resulted in Chicago having a higher percentage of the state's population, and downstate legislators did not want their region of the state to lose influence. Therefore, starting in the cycle after the 1910 United States census, legislators chose not to redistrict the state, with courts continuing to allow this practice.Шаблон:Rp A constitutional convention, approved by voters in 1918, aimed to deal with the issue,Шаблон:Rp but voters rejected its proposed constitution in 1922.Шаблон:Rp The 1901 legislative map had 51 districts, with 19 located in Cook County.Шаблон:RpШаблон:Efn

As the population of Chicago and Cook County grew, the level of malapportionment continued to increase. In the 1930 United States census, Cook County contained a majority of the state's population, but it continued to contain only 37.3% of the state's legislative districts.Шаблон:Rp Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, residents of the Chicago area, most notably John B. Fergus and John W. Keogh, argued before both state and federal courts in unsuccessful attempts to force redistricting.Шаблон:Rp In the 1930s, there were various efforts supported by governors Louis L. Emmerson and Henry Horner to allow Cook County proportional representation in one legislative chamber, but limit its representation in the other, but these proposals died due to strong bipartisan opposition from downstate politicians.Шаблон:Rp

By 1953, William Stratton, the newly elected governor of Illinois, viewed redistricting as a priority amidst increasing public pressure over malapportionment. Through a number of compromises, he managed to convince the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment to establish new redistricting procedures. The amendment allotted the 58 districts of the Illinois Senate into three areas: 18 to Chicago, 6 to Cook County, and 34 to downstate. The amendment, written to keep the Senate in downstate control, did not provide for periodic reapportionment of the Senate, but it did provide that for the House's 59 districts. Initially, 23 districts would be assigned to Chicago, 7 to suburban Cook County, and 29 to downstate.Шаблон:Rp To ensure regular reapportionment, the constitution contained two separate procedures for if the legislature failed to redistrict. First, redistricting would be done by a ten-member commission, with five members appointed from each political party by the governor. If that commission failed to create districts after four months, an at-large election would be held.Шаблон:Rp

Opposition to the amendment was disorganized, while supporters included many state politicians and newspapers. The new redistricting process was approved by voters in a 1954 referendum with about 80% of the vote.Шаблон:Rp Following the passage of the amendment, new districts were drawn in 1955. At this time, both chambers were Republican-controlled, as was the governorship, leading to a relatively non-controversial redistricting cycle. Each chamber created their own map, and passed the proposed map of the other chamber, with the maps being signed by Stratton. The map used for the House of Representatives map was fairly apportioned, while the Senate's map still retained significant malapportionment. Overall, though, the maps were considered a significant improvement.Шаблон:Rp

1960 redistricting cycle

Following the 1962 elections, Republicans controlled both chambers of the legislature, albeit with a one-seat majority in the House. Governor Otto Kerner Jr. however, was a Democrat, resulting in a divided government. Redistricting for the House was required to take place before the 1964 elections.Шаблон:Rp In data from the 1960 census, the state's population had shifted towards suburbs of Chicago, particularly in Cook County, Lake County, and DuPage County. Using population-based apportionment, two districts would be shifted from Chicago to the suburbs, and two more from southern Illinois to northeastern Illinois.Шаблон:Rp On April 23, Republicans in the legislature introduced a plan to that effect. Democrats responded on the same day with a plan to instead have districts that would cross include parts of both Chicago and its suburbs, allowing the city to have control of 23 districts, arguing that this was fair given Chicago's under-representation in the Senate.Шаблон:Rp

Democrats received no Republican support for their redistricting plan, while Republicans failed to pass their plan over southern Illinois lawmakers in their caucus, who objected to the plan's proposed removal of two districts from their area. As a compromise, Republicans passed a plan that would only remove one district from there, at the expense of a district in Lake County.Шаблон:Rp However, this bill was vetoed by Kerner on July 1, as he deemed it "unfair".Шаблон:Rp Kerner had previously promised to veto any partisan redistricting plan, and his veto message referred to the deliberate under-representation of Republican areas (which occurred as a result of the compromises made to appease downstate lawmakers). Kerner's veto was challenged at the Supreme Court of Illinois, where it was upheld. The failure of the legislature to redistrict caused the responsibility to fall to the backup commission.Шаблон:Rp

Special commission deadlock

Each party's state central committee nominated ten candidates for the redistricting commission, of which Kerner appointed five of each on August 14, 1963.Шаблон:Rp The five Democrats appointed were George Dunne, finance chairman (and future president) of the Cook County Board of Commissioners; Ivan Elliott, former Illinois Attorney General; Alvin Fields, mayor of East St. Louis; Daniel Pierce, a member of the Democratic state central committee; and James Ronan, the chairman of the Democratic state central committee. The five Republicans appointed were Edward Jenison, a former congressman; David Hunter, a former state legislator; Michael J. Connolly, the Republican leader in Chicago's 5th Ward; Eldon Martin, an attorney from Wilmette; and Fred G. Gurley, former president of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. Dunne served as the Democratic spokesman on the commission, while Gurley served as the Republican spokesman. Kerner avoided appointing some of the more prominent politicians who parties nominated for the commission: he did not appoint former governor Stratton, nominated by Republicans, and did not appoint Paul Powell, the Democratic minority leader in the House, or John Touhy, the Democratic minority whip.

The redistricting commission deadlocked over a similar issue to what prevented a bipartisan map from passing the legislature – namely, the number of districts in Chicago. Democrats on the commission argued for maintaining 23 districts in Chicago, and refused to accept a map with less than 22, while Republicans would only accept a map with 21 districts in the city, with two districts being moved to the Cook County suburbs.Шаблон:Rp Starting on November 14, the Republicans on the commission began boycotting the meetings due to Democrats' insistence that Chicago control 23 districts. Republicans only started attending the meetings again on December 12, two days before the final deadline. Negotiations continued up until the deadline, with Democrats eventually proposing a map with only 22 Chicago-based districts, but the commission was ultimately unsuccessful in reaching a compromise.Шаблон:Rp

Court rulings and special legislative session

Before the commission's ultimate failure to create maps, Republican state representative Gale Williams sued to overturn Kerner's veto of the legislative map, arguing that the governor had no authority to veto a redistricting bill. Kerner's actions were defended by the Illinois Attorney General, William G. Clark. This lawsuit was initially dismissed in Sangamon County Circuit Court before being appealed to the state's Supreme Court, which also ruled against Williams.Шаблон:Rp

Two lawsuits were decided by the Supreme Court on January 4, 1964.Шаблон:Rp First, a lawsuit was filed by Republican state representative Fred Branson that challenged the legality of the commission, arguing that since the legislature had not "failed to act" on redistricting, as they had passed a map, a commission could not be established. This lawsuit instead requested that the election be held using the previous redistricting cycle's map. The court rejected this argument, ruling that an at-large election had to take place. Secondly, a lawsuit was filed by Chicago lawyer Gus Giannis arguing that an at-large election also had to take place for the State Senate. In response to this case, Attorney General Clark issued a ruling stating that an at-large election would be required for the Senate as well. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, ruling that the constitution would only mandate an at-large election for the Senate if the chamber had not been redistricted in 1956, as the constitution did not otherwise require the Senate to be redistricted.Шаблон:Rp

Following the court's decisions, Kerner called a special session of the legislature on January 6 to set up procedures for the at-large election. Kerner proposed procedures for the election, and these were passed with slight modification by the legislature. Notably, Illinois's practice of cumulative voting for the House of Representatives was suspended, and instead minority party representation was guaranteed by only allowing each party to nominate 118 candidates for the 177 seats available.Шаблон:Rp The bill was signed by Kerner on January 29 after it passed 161–0 in the House and 46–6 in the Senate.Шаблон:Rp

Файл:1964 Illinois House of Representatives Sample Ballot.jpg

A sample ballot for the election from Lake County.

Election procedure and campaign

The emergency bill passed by the legislature in the special session allowed each party to nominate up to 118 candidates at their party convention. Delegates to each party's convention were elected using the previous districts during the state's April primary.Шаблон:Rp The House recommended that each party nominate 100 candidates, to protect incumbent House members and ensure the minority party would have at least 77 seats.

Candidate selection

Both the Democratic and Republican conventions were held on June 1 in Springfield. The Republican convention, held at a local Elks Club building, was controlled by delegates loyal to Charles H. Percy, the party's candidate for governor. Delegates loyal to Percy refused to renominate nine incumbent legislators from the Chicago area, a part of the so-called "West Side bloc", who were viewed as loyal to the Democratic political machine in Cook County.Шаблон:Rp In the end, 70 Republican incumbents were renominated. The Democratic convention, held at the St. Nicholas Hotel, delegated the responsibility for preparing a slate of candidates to an executive committee. The convention met again on June 20 to approve the candidates; all 68 incumbents who chose to run were renominated with little controversy. Both parties nominated slates of 118 candidates in total.Шаблон:Rp

There were multiple attempts to run a "Third Slate" of candidates. The Better Government Association of Chicago, along with some downstate politicians, presented a "blue ribbon" slate of candidates. However, with both parties putting up what were deemed to be acceptable slates of candidates, and Republicans choosing not to renominate the West Side bloc and nominating some blue ribbon candidates instead, this Third Slate effort disbanded.

Another attempt to put a Third Slate on the ballot was backed by various civil rights groups and labor unions, including the United Auto Workers. Their planned platform focused on election reform and civil rights. The Third Slate intended on nominating 59 candidates, allowing a voter to straight-ticket vote for the slate as well as one of the two major parties. However, this Third Slate failed to make the ballot, with the state's election board ruling on August 21 that they had failed to gather enough signatures.

Popular names were picked to run on each party's ticket. Democrats nominated Adlai Stevenson III, the son of Adlai Stevenson II (a popular former governor), and John A. Kennedy, a businessman with a similar name (but no relation) to president John F. Kennedy, who had been murdered the previous year. Republicans ran Earl D. Eisenhower, the brother of popular former president Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Ballot

The ballot for the State House election was separate from the ballot for other concurrent elections. Voters were allowed to cast up to 177 votes, with a straight-ticket voting option available to vote for all 118 candidates of a party's slate. Voters who voted straight-ticket could also vote for up to 59 candidates from the other party. Both parties recommended utilizing straight-ticket voting. The ballot was 33 inches long and was often referred to as the "bedsheet ballot".

Both parties used the same ordering when listing their candidates on the ballot. Incumbent legislators were placed at the top, ordered by seniority, alternating between candidates from Cook County and downstate. The remaining candidates were then listed, also alternating between Cook County and downstate candidates.Шаблон:Rp

There were four ballots given to voters in 1964: a white ballot, containing most of the typical races (such as for president and governor); a green ballot, voting on the retention elections for various judges; a blue ballot, containing two constitutional amendments to be voted on; and the orange ballot, solely reserved for the House of Representatives election. Before the election, the sheer number of ballots to be voted on led to predictions of a high number of undervotes in the House of Representatives election, but post-election analysis revealed that this did not take place.Шаблон:Rp

Campaigning and endorsements

Both parties encouraged a straight-ticket vote. Republicans explicitly discouraged voting for any Democratic candidates, arguing that voting for Democrats would cause the legislature to become controlled by Richard J. Daley, the mayor of Chicago. Democrats argued that a straight-ticket vote would "ensure representation from every district in Illinois".Шаблон:Rp Individual candidates for the legislature generally avoided campaigning across the state, instead only campaigning around their home region, if at all.Шаблон:Rp

Many newspapers endorsed a partisan slate. The Field Enterprises newspapers,Шаблон:Efn the Chicago Tribune, the Champaign News-Gazette, and the Illinois State Journal endorsed the Republican slate. However, the Illinois State Register, which was, like the Illinois State Journal, under Copley ownership, had a different editorial team and endorsed the Democratic slate. Given the unique electoral system allowing voters to vote for candidates of both parties, some newspapers made bipartisan endorsements of candidates, either in addition to their partisan endorsements, or without making an overall partisan endorsement. The Lindsay-Schaub groupШаблон:Efn of newspapers endorsed 48 Democrats and 48 Republicans after sending a questionnaire to all candidates in the election, suggesting voters to vote straight-ticket and for all of the newspaper's endorsed candidates of the opposing party. Likewise, the Daily Herald, a newspaper serving the suburbs of Chicago, endorsed seven candidates (four Republicans and three Democrats) who they believed had a good understanding of suburban issues.

Results

Reporting

Results were not known immediately after the election; while the results in other statewide races were known on November 4, the statewide tally and canvass for the House elections took multiple weeks. Based on early reported returns in some downstate precincts, Democrats declared victory on November 4, predicting that they had elected their entire slate. However, Republicans did not yet concede, stating that they still believed they had a chance of victory. Cook County's results were fully counted by November 9, though not reported until later. Unofficial results for 100 downstate counties, excluding Cook and DuPage, were reported on November 26, showing a strong performance by Democrats. Unofficial statewide results were reported on December 3, showing that every Democratic candidate had won, with many Republican incumbents losing re-election.

Five Republican candidatesШаблон:Efn obtained an injunction over the results in DuPage County, claiming that there were more votes cast than voters registered in five precincts. The injunction was issued by circuit judge Philip Locke on November 30. After the release of statewide results, it became apparent that the discrepancies would not affect the overall balance of power in the legislature. On December 14, Democratic Attorney General William G. Clark filed a motion to move the case to the Illinois Supreme Court, to force the vote count to be released. The Illinois Supreme Court acted on this on January 6, 1965, releasing the DuPage results only hours before legislators were sworn in. Locke interpreted the Supreme Court's order as allowing him to order recounts in certain precincts, which he did. The recounts found only minor errors with no significant impact on the results.

Analysis

Шаблон:Multiple image Straight-ticket votes elected Democrats to the majority, with every Democrat receiving more votes than any Republican.Шаблон:Rp The strong Democratic performance was attributed to coattails from Democratic president Lyndon B. Johnson's victory over Republican Barry Goldwater in the 1964 United States presidential election in Illinois. However, voters who did not only vote straight-ticket had a significant impact as well: they determined the 59 Republicans who were elected, as well as the order of the winning Democratic candidates.Шаблон:Rp

Contrary to many preelection predictions, voting was not driven by ballot order, with little correlation between where candidates were placed on the ballot and how many votes they received. The top-placing Democrat was Adlai E. Stevenson III, while the top-placing Republican was Earl D. Eisenhower. Both were listed on the bottom half of their respective side of the ballot (Stevenson was the 102nd Democratic candidate listed, and Eisenhower 79th Republican).Шаблон:Rp The results were strongly influenced by endorsements. In downstate Illinois, these were mainly those of the Illinois Agricultural Association and the Illinois AFL-CIO, as well as the Lindsay-Schaub groupШаблон:Efn of downstate newspapers. However, the election was mainly decided in Chicago and its suburbs, where the endorsements of the Chicago American and the Field Enterprises newspapersШаблон:Efn were mostly responsible for the results.Шаблон:Rp

Among the Democrats elected, 68 were incumbents while 50 were new members, and among the Republicans, 31 were incumbents and 28 were new members. 37 incumbent Republicans who ran for reelection lost their seats.Шаблон:Rp Geographically, candidates living in Cook County won a narrow majority of seats. About half of counties had no representatives, and a majority of representatives from both Cook County and from downstate were Democrats.Шаблон:RpШаблон:Efn

Aftermath

The results provided a significant shake-up of the balance of power in the state. While Republicans had maintained control of the Illinois Senate, Democrats now had control of the State House and the governorship. Democrats elected John P. Touhy as the speaker of the House.

Members elected

The 1964 election helped launch the political careers of certain Democrats, including Adlai E. Stevenson III, who later represented Illinois in the U.S. Senate, and Harold Washington, who eventually became mayor of Chicago. The last member elected in 1964 to leave the House was Edolo J. Giorgi, a Democrat from Rockford, who served until his death in 1993.

In 2000, Pat Quinn proposed that some members of the Illinois legislature should be elected at-large, arguing that the 1964 election had produced many good legislators.Шаблон:Rp

Impacts on redistricting

One of the first matters the newly elected legislature had to consider was redistricting. New maps for the State House had to be passed to avoid another at-large election, while new maps for the State Senate had to be passed to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling in Reynolds v. Sims, which required that state legislature districts be roughly equal in population. There was again difficulty in passing maps, with downstate and Chicago legislators not wanting to give up representation in favor of the suburbs, which had grown their relative share of the population. In the end, a five-judge panel decided redistricting for the State Senate, while a legislative committee appointed by the governor was responsible for redistricting the House. The resulting maps were relatively fair to both parties, though caused a significant shift of power from downstate to the Chicago area.Шаблон:Rp

Illinois's constitution was rewritten in 1970. The new constitution modified the procedures for redistricting, adding a tie-breaker to the redistricting commission that would be established if the legislature failed to redistrict.Шаблон:Rp The tie-breaker would only be added if the commission deadlocked, and would be randomly chosen by the Secretary of State, with one candidate nominated by each party.Шаблон:Rp

The legislative process was not successful for redistricting in 1971, 1981, 1991, or 2001, necessitating a commission be formed in each case. In 1971, the commission created a map without the need for a tie-breaker.Шаблон:Rp A tie-breaker was needed in 1981, with a Democrat being chosen by Secretary of State Jim Edgar; the resulting map was biased in favor of the Democratic Party.Шаблон:Rp In 1991, the legislature, controlled by Democrats, passed a map that was vetoed by now-governor Edgar. With the commission again deadlocking, Secretary of State George Ryan chose a Republican for the tie-breaker. However, the Supreme Court, controlled by Democrats, rejected the commission's initial plan, and threatened that an at-large election would be necessary if the commission could not create a valid plan.Шаблон:Rp Ryan described this as a potential constitutional crisis. The commission was eventually able to decide on a map which was successfully enacted; the map survived the court challenges after a Democrat on the court voted with the court's Republicans to uphold the map.Шаблон:Rp In 2001, the commission needed a tie-breaker, with Secretary of State Jesse White selecting a Democrat, and the commission passing its maps on a party-line basis.Шаблон:Rp

The failure of the legislature to redistrict in every cycle between 1965 and 2001, as well as the commission failing in most of those years without a tie-breaker, has received significant criticism. Politicians have been described as choosing to play "redistricting roulette" in attempts to get a favorable map, instead of compromising to draw a fair one.Шаблон:Rp As of 2001, Illinois was the only state to use a randomly selected tie-breaker for its redistricting commission.Шаблон:Rp