Английская Википедия:1988 Hamas charter

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Pp-extended Шаблон:Politics of the Gaza Strip Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:For

The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement, referred to as the Hamas Covenant or Hamas Charter, was issued by Hamas (the Islamic Resistance Movement) on 18 August 1988 and outlines the organization's founding identity, stand, and aims.[1] In 2017, Hamas unveiled a new charter, although without explicitly revoking the old charter.[2][3]

The original Charter identifies Hamas as the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine and described its members to be god-fearing Muslims raising the banner of Jihad (armed struggle) in "the face of the oppressors". The charter defines the struggle to be against the Jews and calls for the eventual creation of an Islamic state in all of former Mandatory Palestine,[4] and the obliteration or dissolution of Israel.[5][6] While the original charter was criticized for antisemitic language,[7][8] which some commentators have characterized as incitement to genocide,[9][10] Hamas's 2017 charter removed the antisemitic language and clarified Hamas's struggle was with Zionists, not Jews.[11][12][13][14]

The relevance of the 1988 charter in Hamas' activities has been questioned. In 2008, the Hamas leader in Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh, stated that Hamas would agree to accept a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders, and to offer a long-term truce with Israel.[15] In 2009 interviews with the BBC, Tony Blair claimed that Hamas does not accept the existence of Israel and continues to pursue its objectives through terror and violence; Sir Jeremy Greenstock however argued that Hamas has not adopted its charter as part of its political program since it won the 2006 Palestinian legislative election.[16] Instead it has moved to a more secular stance.[17] In 2010, Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal stated that the Charter is "a piece of history and no longer relevant, but cannot be changed for internal reasons".[18] Hamas has downplayed the role of its charter since choosing to run candidates for office in elections.[17]

The 2017 charter accepted for the first time the idea of a Palestinian state within the borders that existed before 1967 and rejected recognition of Israel, which it terms the "Zionist entity".[19] It advocates such a state as transitional but also advocates the "liberation of all of Palestine".[20][21] The new document also states that the group does not seek war with the Jewish people but only against Zionism which it holds responsible for "occupation of Palestine".[22] Meshaal also stated that Hamas was ending its association with the Muslim Brotherhood.[20] The relevance of the 2017 charter has been questioned by many including the Office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu which in a statement in 2017 accused Hamas of trying to fool the world and also asked it to stop its terror activities for a true change.[23] Additionally, leaders of Hamas including Mahmoud al-Zahar, co-founder of Hamas, have said Hamas "will not change a single word in its covenant".[24]

Background

In 1987, twenty years after the Six-Day War, the First Intifada (1987–1993) began.[25] In the late 1980s, the Palestine Liberation Organization sought a negotiated solution with Israel in the form of a two-state solution. This was not acceptable to Hamas, the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood,[26] and the charter was written to bridge the ideological gap between the PLO and Muslim Brotherhood.[27] According to Hamas's Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Ahmed Yousef, the Charter "was ratified during the unique circumstances of the Uprising in 1988 as a necessary framework for dealing with a relentless occupation".[28] However, where the Muslim Brotherhood's ideology proposed a more universal Islamic vision, Hamas' charter seeks to narrow its focus on Palestinian nationalism and a strategy of armed struggle, or violent jihad.[27][29]

While the PLO was nationalistic, its ideology was considerably more secular in nature compared to Hamas. Hamas subscribed to a neo-Salafi jihadi theology that sought national liberation by violence as permitted by divine decree.[30][26] While its language was far more religious, its political goals were identical to those of the PLO's charter and called for an armed struggle to retrieve the entire land of Palestine as an Islamic waqf.[27]

The original charter's tone and portrayal of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict as a front in an eternal struggle between Muslims and Jews has been an obstacle for the organization's involvement in diplomatic forums involving Western nations.[2] The updated charter published in 2017 walked back many of these assertions while adding questions regarding the ability of Fatah and its leader Mahmoud Abbas to act as the sole legitimate representative for the Palestinians.[31] In addition, the 2017 charter removed many references to the Muslim Brotherhood as the ties had damaged the group's relationship with Egypt, whom the country considers to be a terrorist organization.[32]

Revised 2017 Charter

Шаблон:Main

Hamas issued a new document in May 2017, named A Document of General Principles and Policies (Arabic وثيقة المبادئ والسياسات العامة لحركة حماس). While this did not officially replace the 1988 charter it is often described as the new or revised Hamas charter.[3] The new document advocated for a Palestinian state in the 1967 borders, describing this as a "national consensus"; however, it also continued to describe Israel as an "illegal entity" and retained the organization's commitment to armed struggle.[19] While the 1988 Hamas Charter was widely criticized for its antisemitism, the 2017 document stated that Hamas' fight was not with Jews as such because of their religion but with the Zionist project that had driven Palestinians from their ancestral lands.[19]

Views on the 2017 document varied. While some welcomed it as a sign of increased political maturity, an attempt to bridge the gap between moderates and hardliners within Hamas, and a potential step on the way to peace, many others, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, dismissed it as a merely cosmetic effort designed to make Hamas sound more palatable while changing nothing about Hamas' underlying aims and methods.[33][34]

In the aftermath of the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, former Ambassador and Wilson Center head Mark Andrew Green described the 2017 revision as having "dressed up [Hamas'] terrorist objectives in more ambiguous, less violent terms" while the 2023 attack showed their objective remained, as in the 1988 charter, "the destruction of the State of Israel and the murder of Jewish people."[35]

Relevance in the 21st century

Ahmed Yousef, an adviser to Ismail Haniyeh (the senior political leader of Hamas), claimed that Hamas has changed its views over time since the charter was issued in 1988.[28] In 2010 Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal stated that the Charter is "a piece of history and no longer relevant, but cannot be changed for internal reasons".[18]

Contrastingly, Mahmoud al-Zahar, co-founder of Hamas, said in 2006 that Hamas "will not change a single word in its covenant". In 2010, he reaffirmed a major commitment of the covenant saying "Our ultimate plan is [to have] Palestine in its entirety. I say this loud and clear so that nobody will accuse me of employing political tactics. We will not recognize the Israeli enemy."[24]

Nathan Thrall, an analyst for the International Crisis Group, on 3 May 2017 (the day after Hamas' issuing their new 2017 Hamas charter) stated that the original charter had been a long source of embarrassment among the reformists in the movement.[36]

Summary of the 1988 charter

  • Article 1 describes Hamas as an Islamic Resistance Movement with an ideological programme of Islam.[1]
  • Article 2 of Hamas' Charter defines Hamas as a "universal movement" and "one of the branches of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine".[1][27][37][38]
  • Article 3 the Movement consists of "Muslims who have given their allegiance to Allah".[1]
  • Article 4 the Movement "welcomes every Muslim who embraces its faith, ideology, follows its programme, keeps its secrets, and wants to belong to its ranks and carry out the duty," [1]
  • Article 5 Demonstrates its Salafist roots and connections to the Muslim brotherhood, declaring Islam as its official religion and the Koran as its constitution.[1]
  • Article 6 Hamas is uniquely Palestinian,[1] and "strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine, for under the wing of Islam followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety where their lives, possessions and rights are concerned". It claims that the world will descend into chaos and war without Islam, quoting Muhammad Iqbal.[1][27]
  • Article 7 describes Hamas as "one of the links in the chain of the struggle against the Zionist invaders" and claims continuity with the followers of the religious and nationalist hero Izz ad-Din al-Qassam from the Great Arab Revolt as well as the Palestinian combatants of the First Arab-Israeli War. It ends with Sahih al-Bukhari's hadith Muslim 2922, suggesting that the Day of Judgment would not come until the Muslims fight and kill the Jews.[1][38]
  • Article 8 The Hamas document reiterates the Muslim Brotherhood's slogan of "Allah is its goal, the Prophet is the model, the Qur'an its constitution, jihad its path, and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes."[1][27]
  • Article 9 adapts Muslim Brotherhood's vision to connect the Palestinian crisis with the Islamic solution and advocates "fighting against the false, defeating it and vanquishing it so that justice could prevail".[1]
  • Article 11 Palestine is sacred (waqf) for all Muslims for all time, and it cannot be relinquished by anyone.[1]
  • Article 12 affirms that "Nationalism, from the point of view of the Islamic Resistance Movement, is part of the religious creed".[1]
  • Article 13 There is no negotiated settlement possible. Jihad is the only answer.[1]
  • Article 14 The liberation of Palestine is the personal duty of every Palestinian.[1]
  • Article 15 "The day that enemies usurp part of Muslim land, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim". It states the history of the Crusades into Muslim lands and says the "Palestinian problem is a religious problem".[1]
  • Article 16 Describes how to go about educating future generations, with an emphasis on religious studies and Islamic history.[1]
  • Article 17 Declares the role of women in Islamic society to be the "maker of men". It condemns Western organizations such as the Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, and intelligence agencies as "saboteurs" for promoting subversive ideas on women.[1]
  • Article 18 Defines the role of women as homemakers and child-rearers, providing education and moral guidance to men.[1]
  • Article 19 Promotes the value of art while promoting Islamic art over "Jahili" art forms.[1]
  • Article 20 Calls for action "by the people as a single body" against "a vicious enemy which acts in a way similar to Nazism, making no differentiation between man and woman, between children and old people".[1]
  • Article 21 Promotes "mutual social responsibility" and urges members "to consider the interests of the masses as their own personal interests".[1]
  • Article 22 Makes sweeping claims about Jewish influence and power.[1][39] It specifically claims that the Jews were responsible for instigating multiple revolutions and wars, including the French Revolution, World War I, and the Russian Revolution. It also claims that Jews control the United Nations, and that they are supported by "the imperialistic forces in the Capitalist West and Communist East".[1]
  • Article 23 Expresses support for all Islamic movements "if they reveal good intentions and dedication to Allah".[1]
  • Article 24 Prohibits "slandering or speaking ill of individuals or groups".[1]
  • Article 25 Discourages Islamic movements from seeking foreign support and expresses support for other Palestinian nationalist movements.[1]
  • Article 26 Allows consultation with other Palestinian movements that are neutral in international affairs.[1]
  • Article 27 Praises the PLO but condemns its secularism.[1]
  • Article 28 Conspiracy charges against Israel and the whole of the Jewish people: "Israel, Judaism and Jews".[1][39] It claims that "Zionist organizations" aim to destroy society through moral corruption and eliminating Islam, and are responsible for drug trafficking and alcoholism.[1]
  • Article 30: Calls on "writers, intellectuals, media people, orators, educaters and teachers, and all the various sectors in the Arab and Islamic world" to pursue jihad.[1]
  • Article 31 Describes Hamas as "a humanistic movement", which "takes care of human rights and is guided by Islamic tolerance when dealing with the followers of other religions". "Under the wing of Islam", it is possible for Islam, Christianity and Judaism "to coexist in peace and quiet with each other" provided that members of other religions do not dispute the sovereignty of Islam in the region.[1]
  • Article 32 Hamas condemns as co-plotters the "imperialistic powers" seeking to corrupt all Arab countries one by one, leaving Palestine as the final bastion of Islam.[39] States that the Zionists' plan is set forth in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and that they intend to expand their control from the Nile to the Euphrates.[1][40]
  • Article 33 calls upon Muslims worldwide to work for liberation of Palestine.[1]
  • Article 34 represents the Temple Mount in Jerusalem as the axis mundi, the sacred point where divine cosmology and temporal history meet.[41] Along with Article 35 it compares Israel with an imperialist-colonialist movement. The articles reflect and draws upon past examples of Crusader and Mongol invasions, both of which initially were successful but were eventually repelled.[42][43]
  • Article 36 outlines the goals of Hamas.[44]

Statements about Israel

The Preamble to the 1988 Charter stated: ″Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam invalidates it, just as it invalidated others before it″.Шаблон:Cn It emphasizes the importance of jihad for the Palestinian question, adding that "initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."[45] The charter also states that Hamas is humanistic, and tolerant of other religions as long as they "stop disputing the sovereignty of Islam in this region".[46] The Charter adds that "renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion [of Islam]".[1]

Analysis

The original, 1988 version of the charter emphasize four main themes:[47]

  1. Destroying Israel and establishing an Islamic theocracy in Palestine is essential;[47]
  2. Unrestrained jihad is necessary to achieve this;[47]
  3. Negotiated resolutions of Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land are unacceptable;[47]
  4. Historical anti-semitic tropes that reinforce the goals.[47]

The Covenant proclaims that Israel will exist until Islam obliterates it, and jihad against Jews is required until Judgement Day. Compromise over the land is forbidden. The documents promote holy war as divinely ordained, reject political solutions, and call for instilling these views in children.[47]

The updated 2017 charter appeared to moderate Hamas's position by stating that Hamas is anti-Zionist, but retains the goal of eliminating Israel.[47] Its claim that it is no longer antisemitic has been refuted numerous times due to the actions of Hamas as well as the statements of its leadership including Fathi Hamad who has publicly called for the killing of Jews.[48][49][50][51]

Ideology

The 1988 Charter makes draws heavily on quotations from the hadith and Qur'an and builds an argument that Jews deserve God's/Allah's enmity and wrath because they received the Scriptures but violated its sacred texts, rejected the signs of Allah, and slew their own prophets.[52] The introduction of the charter identifies Hamas's struggle as a continuation of "Our [long and dangerous] struggle with the Jews…".[53]

Article Seven of the Charter concludes with a quotation from a hadith:

Шаблон:Blockquote

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine, criticized the founding charter of Hamas by labelling it as a "genocidal" document and compared it to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[10] Referring to the charter in an article in The New Yorker magazine, American commentator Philip Gourevitch accused Hamas leadership of having "genocidal" intentions against Jews.[9] According to Bruce Hoffman, the Hamas Charter exhibits "genocidal intentions".[54]

Militant Jihad

The 1988 Charter went further in detailing how Jihad against the Jews was a duty. "The day that enemies usurp part of Moslem land, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Moslem. In face of the Jews' usurpation of Palestine, it is compulsory that the banner of Jihad be raised. To do this requires the diffusion of Islamic consciousness among the masses, both on the regional, Arab and Islamic levels. It is necessary to instill the spirit of Jihad in the heart of the nation so that they would confront the enemies and join the ranks of the fighters."[1]

Antisemitic canards

The 1988 charter contains references to antisemitic canards, such as the assertion that through shrewd manipulation of imperial countries and secret societies, Jews were behind a wide range of events and disasters going as far back in history as the French Revolution.

Шаблон:Blockquote

The charter continues by accusing Jews of engineering World War I as a pretext to abolish the Caliphate, create the League of Nations, and influence the British government into drafting the Balfour Declaration.[1] It echoes Nazi propaganda in claiming that Jews profited during World War II.[55] Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine, has compared these to those that appear in theThe Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[10]

Equivalence of anti-Zionism and antisemitism

Historians such as Jeffrey Herf have argued that unlike the PLO, which has distinguished their national struggle against Zionism from general antisemitism, Hamas, in their 1988 covenant, purposefully fused these two struggles into one against the Jews and Israel.[55][53]

In contrast, the 2017 covenant denies the connection in its only direct mention of Jews everywhere:

Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.
Hamas rejects the persecution of any human being or the undermining of his or her rights on nationalist, religious or sectarian grounds. Hamas is of the view that the Jewish problem, antisemitism and the persecution of the Jews are phenomena fundamentally linked to European history and not to the history of the Arabs and the Muslims or to their heritage.[19][56]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Hamas

  1. 1,00 1,01 1,02 1,03 1,04 1,05 1,06 1,07 1,08 1,09 1,10 1,11 1,12 1,13 1,14 1,15 1,16 1,17 1,18 1,19 1,20 1,21 1,22 1,23 1,24 1,25 1,26 1,27 1,28 1,29 1,30 1,31 1,32 1,33 1,34 1,35 1,36 1,37 Шаблон:Cite web
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  4. "Israeli Official Says Hamas Has Made Abbas Irrelevant" The New York Times, 27 February 2006
  5. Шаблон:Cite web
  6. The Palestinian Hamas By Shaul Mishal, Avraham Sela. Google Books. Retrieved 9 February 2009.
  7. Шаблон:Cite news
  8. Шаблон:Cite web
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite magazine
  10. 10,0 10,1 10,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  11. Шаблон:Cite book
  12. Шаблон:Cite book
  13. Шаблон:Cite book
  14. Шаблон:Cite news
  15. "Haniyeh: Hamas willing to accept Palestinian state with 1967 borders". Haaretz. (09-11-08) Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  16. Шаблон:Cite news
  17. 17,0 17,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. 18,0 18,1 Mazin Qumsiyeh on the History and Practice Of Nonviolent Palestinian Resistance Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May–June 2010, pp. 40-42.
  19. 19,0 19,1 19,2 19,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. 20,0 20,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  21. Шаблон:Cite news
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite news
  24. 24,0 24,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. 26,0 26,1 The PLO Charters of 1964 and 1968 and the Hamas Charter of 1988 By Philipp Holtmann
  27. 27,0 27,1 27,2 27,3 27,4 27,5 The Palestinian Hamas: vision, violence, and coexistence Shaul Mishal, Avraham Sela.
  28. 28,0 28,1 Hamas Charter: Vision, Fact and Fiction Palestine Chronicle (23 January 2011)Retrieved 27 May 2011
  29. Шаблон:Citation "So while al-Qaeda and Hamas have similar ideological roots, Hamas's interpretation of its role in the Islamic community is narrower and focused fundamentally on the Palestinian question. This narrow focus is an important element in Hamas's ideology."
  30. Шаблон:Cite report "The text of the Charter is written in utterly religious and ideological language, starting off with a quotation from the Quran and from the founder of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, Hasan al-Banna." "In article 11 of the Charter we can find Hamas's argument that the right of the Palestinians to their homeland is a divine decree…"
  31. Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Шаблон:Cite news
  33. Hamas accepts Palestinian state with 1967 borders, Al Jazeera, 2 May 2017
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. HAMAS Between Violence and Pragmatism By Marc A. Walther
  38. 38,0 38,1 Шаблон:Cite report
  39. 39,0 39,1 39,2 Reform Judaism Online The 'Protocols' of Hamas Шаблон:Webarchive Steven Leonard Jacobs - Winter 2007
  40. Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs Analysis of the Hamas Charter 8 January 2006
  41. Шаблон:Cite book
  42. Шаблон:Cite book
  43. Шаблон:Cite book
  44. Шаблон:Cite book
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Article 31 of the Hamas Charter (1988) Yale Law School: The Avalon Project
  47. 47,0 47,1 47,2 47,3 47,4 47,5 47,6 Шаблон:Cite web
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite web
  50. Шаблон:Cite journal
  51. Шаблон:Cite news
  52. The Anti-Semitism of Hamas by Meir Litvak in Islamophobia and anti-Semitism pg 87
  53. 53,0 53,1 Шаблон:Cite report "In these documents, the conflict with Israel is entirely explained in religious terms: ‘Our struggle with the Jews is long and dangerous...’ As a result, the authors of the texts have used the terms ‘Zionists’ and ‘Jews’ and their numerous derivatives repeatedly and interchangeably."
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. 55,0 55,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  56. Шаблон:Cite web