Английская Википедия:2016 North Carolina gubernatorial election

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Use American English Шаблон:For Шаблон:Infobox election Шаблон:ElectionsNC The 2016 North Carolina gubernatorial election was held on November 8, 2016, concurrently with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as well as elections to the United States Senate and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

Primary elections were held March 15.[1] Both major party candidates won their primaries by overwhelming margins. The Republican nominee, incumbent governor of North Carolina Pat McCrory was running for a second term in office.[2] Roy Cooper, the incumbent Attorney General of the state and the second-longest-serving Attorney General in North Carolina history, was the Democratic nominee. Lon Cecil, a consultant and electrical engineer, was the Libertarian nominee. This race was expected to be among the most competitive in the country in the 2016 gubernatorial election cycle.[3]

On election night, the race was too close to call, with Cooper leading by fewer than 5,000 votes out of more than 4.6 million cast.[4] That lead eventually widened to 10,281 votes. Cooper claimed victory that night, with thousands of provisional ballots still yet to be counted, saying, "We have won this race." However, McCrory refused to concede, claiming that the race was still too close to call and the winner had not yet been determined. He cast doubt on the authenticity of 90,000 late-arriving votes from Durham County, which put Cooper in the lead.[5] McCrory's campaign filed complaints alleging voter fraud in over 50 counties.[6] Both campaigns anticipated a protracted legal battle over the results.[7]

On November 22, 2016, McCrory formally requested a statewide recount;[8] once all ballots are counted, North Carolina election law allows either candidate to request a recount if the margin is fewer than 10,000 votes.[7] On November 30, 2016, the North Carolina State Board of Elections ordered a recount of certain votes in Durham County.[9] The recount was slated to be completed on December 5, 2016. However, when early results made it apparent that the margin would not change, McCrory conceded the race to Cooper on the afternoon of December 5.

This was the first time since North Carolina governors became eligible for immediate reelection in 1976 that a sitting officeholder was defeated in that person's bid for a second term.[10] This was the first North Carolina gubernatorial election since 1896 in which neither candidate received over 50% of the vote. It was also the only gubernatorial seat to flip from Republican to Democratic in 2016. With a margin of 0.22%, this election was additionally the closest race of the 2016 gubernatorial election cycle.

Republican primary

Candidates

Declared

Declined

Polling

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Шаблон:Nowrap
error
Pat
McCrory
Charles
Moss
Robert
Brawley
Undecided
Public Policy Polling March 11–13, 2016 749 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 70% 7% 6% 17%
High Point University March 9–10, 2016 734 ± 2.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 73% 6% 8% 13%
SurveyUSA March 4–7, 2016 688 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 66% 6% 9% 19%
SurveyUSA February 14–16, 2016 437 ± 4.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 67% 17% 16%
Public Policy Polling February 14–16, 2016 597 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 69% 4% 5% 22%
High Point University January 30–February 4, 2016 477 ± 4.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 75% 3% 2% 20%
Public Policy Polling January 18–19, 2016 433 ± 3.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 68% 6% 4% 22%

Шаблон:Hidden begin

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Шаблон:Nowrap
error
Pat
McCrory
Dan
Forest
Undecided
Public Policy Polling August 12–16, 2015 406 ± 4.9% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 60% 20% 20%

Шаблон:Hidden end

Results

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

Democratic primary

Файл:North Carolina Democratic Gubernatorial Primary 2016.svg
Results by county: Шаблон:Collapsible list Шаблон:Collapsible list

Candidates

Declared

Withdrawn

Declined

Polling

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Шаблон:Nowrap
error
Roy
Cooper
Kenneth
Spaulding
Other Undecided
Public Policy Polling March 11–13, 2016 746 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 53% 17% 30%
High Point University March 9–10, 2016 669 ± 2.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 64% 18% 19%
SurveyUSA March 4–7, 2016 687 ± 3.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 51% 19% 30%
SurveyUSA February 14–16, 2016 449 ± 4.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 21% 29%
Public Policy Polling February 14–16, 2016 575 ± 4.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 55% 12% 33%
High Point University January 30–February 4, 2016 478 ± 4.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 11% 40%
Public Policy Polling January 18–19, 2016 461 ± 3.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 55% 10% 35%
Public Policy Polling December 5–7, 2015 555 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 54% 10% 36%
Public Policy Polling October 23–25, 2015 421 ± 4.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 58% 13% 29%

Шаблон:Hidden begin

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Шаблон:Nowrap
error
Roy
Cooper
Anthony
Foxx
Kay
Hagan
Charles
Meeker
Kenneth
Spaulding
Other/
Undecided
Шаблон:Nowrap Шаблон:Nowrap 400 ± 5% 31% 7% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 43% 3% 4% 12%

Шаблон:Hidden end

Results

Шаблон:Election box begin no change Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link no change Шаблон:Election box total no change Шаблон:Election box end

Libertarian primary

Candidates

Declared

Withdrawn

Declined

Write-in candidates

Declared

  • Daniel Orr, navy veteran[29]

General election

Debates

Predictions

Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[30] Шаблон:USRaceRating August 12, 2016
Daily Kos[31] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 8, 2016
Rothenberg Political Report[32] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 3, 2016
Sabato's Crystal Ball[33] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 7, 2016
Real Clear Politics[34] Шаблон:USRaceRating November 1, 2016
Governing[35] Шаблон:USRaceRating October 27, 2016

Polling

Aggregate polls
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Pat
McCrory (R)
Roy
Cooper (D)
Other/Undecided
Шаблон:Efn
Margin
Real Clear Politics October 23 – November 6, 2016 November 6, 2016 46.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|48.4% 5.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic|Cooper +2.2%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Roy
Cooper (D)
Lon
Cecil (L)
Other Undecided
SurveyMonkey November 1–7, 2016 3,126 ± 4.6% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 54% 3%
New York Times Upshot/Siena College November 4–6, 2016 800 ± 3.5% 46% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 47% 7%
Quinnipiac University Шаблон:Webarchive November 3–6, 2016 870 ± 3.3% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 1% 3%
SurveyMonkey October 31–November 6, 2016 2,865 ± 4.6% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 54% 3%
SurveyMonkey October 28–November 3, 2016 2,292 ± 4.6% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 53% 3%
SurveyMonkey October 27–November 2, 2016 1,886 ± 4.6% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 53% 2%
Quinnipiac University Шаблон:Webarchive October 27–November 1, 2016 602 ± 4.0% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 1% 3%
SurveyMonkey October 26–November 1, 2016 1,617 ± 4.6% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 52% 3%
SurveyUSA October 28–31, 2016 659 ± 3.9% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 2% 4%
SurveyMonkey October 25–31, 2016 1,574 ± 4.6% 46% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 52% 2%
CBS News/YouGov October 26–28, 2016 992 ± 4.1% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 46% 1% 9%
Elon University Poll October 23–27, 2016 710 ± 3.7% 44% 44% 1% 3% 8%
NBC/WSJ/Marist October 25–26, 2016 780 LV ± 3.5% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 51% 2% 2%
1,018 RV ± 3.1% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 3% 3%
Quinnipiac University Шаблон:Webarchive October 20–26, 2016 702 ± 3.7% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 3%
New York Times Upshot/Siena College October 20–23, 2016 792 ± 3.5% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 51% 4%
Monmouth University October 20–23, 2016 402 ± 4.9% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 48% 47% 2% 3%
Public Policy Polling October 21–22, 2016 875 ± 3.3% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 46% 3% 8%
The Times-Picayune/Lucid October 17–18, 2016 924 ± 3.0% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 7%
SurveyUSA October 14–18, 2016 651 ± 3.9% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 47% 3% 5%
Civitas Institute (R) October 14–17, 2016 600 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 42% 10%
Washington Post/SurveyMonkey Шаблон:Webarchive October 8–16, 2016 1,191 ± 0.5% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 55% 2%
CNN/ORC October 10–15, 2016 788 LV ± 3.5% 48% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 2%
929 RV ± 3.0% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 2%
NBC/WSJ/Marist October 10–12, 2016 743 LV ± 3.6% 48% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 1% 3%
1,025 RV ± 3.1% 47% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 1% 4%
High Point University October 1–6, 2016 479 ± 4.5% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 3% 5%
SurveyUSA September 29–October 3, 2016 656 ± 3.9% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 2% 6%
Bloomberg/Selzer September 29–October 3, 2016 805 ± 3.5% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 6%
Quinnipiac University Шаблон:Webarchive September 27–October 2, 2016 507 ± 4.4% 46% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 6%
Elon University Poll September 27–30, 2016 660 ± 3.8% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 3% 5%
Public Policy Polling September 27–28, 2016 861 ± 3.3% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 45% 4% 9%
44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 7%
Meredith College September 18–22, 2016 487 ± 4.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 41% 39% 1% 6% 14%
High Point University September 17–22, 2016 404 ± 4.9% 41% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 3% 5%
FOX News September 18–20, 2016 734 LV ± 3.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 43% 3% 1% 7%
800 RV Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 42% 3% 1% 9%
Public Policy Polling September 18–20, 2016 1,024 ± 3.1% 41% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 46% 2% 11%
43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 8%
New York Times Upshot/Siena College September 16–19, 2016 782 ± 3.6% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 50% 7%
Elon University Poll September 12–16, 2016 644 ± 3.9% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 49% 46% 2% 3%
Civitas Institute (R) September 11–12, 2016 600 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 43% 1% 9%
Quinnipiac University Шаблон:Webarchive August 29–September 7, 2016 751 ± 3.6% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 51% 5%
Monmouth University August 20–23, 2016 401 ± 4.9% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 52% 3% 3%
CNN/ORC August 18–23, 2016 803 LV ± 3.5% 46% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center rowspan=2| 52% 2%
912 RV
NBC/WSJ/Marist August 4–10, 2016 921 ± 3.2% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 51% 5%
Public Policy Polling August 5–7, 2016 830 ± 3.4% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 43% 4% 11%
NBC/WSJ/Marist July 5–11, 2016 907 ± 3.3% 45% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 49% 1% 5%
Civitas Institute (R) June 21–23, 2016 600 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 40% 3% 10%
Public Policy Polling June 20–21, 2016 947 ± 3.2% 41% 41% 6% 13%
Civitas Institute (R) May 21–23, 2016 600 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 40% 3% 11%
Public Policy Polling May 20–22, 2016 928 ± 3.2% 41% 41% 5% 13%
RABA Research April 27–28, 2016 688 ± 3.7% 36% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 41% 6% 17%
Civitas Institute (R) April 23–25, 2016 600 ± 4.0% 39% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 5% 8%
Public Policy Polling April 22–24, 2016 960 ± 3.2% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 43% 4% 11%
Elon University Poll April 10–15, 2016 621 ± 3.9% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 6% 5%
SurveyUSA April 8–11, 2016 701 ± 3.8% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 47% 2% 8%
Public Policy Polling March 18–20, 2016 843 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 42% 40% 6% 12%
High Point University March 9–10, 2016 1,576 ± 2.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 45% 8%
Elon University Poll February 15–19, 2016 1,530 ± 2.5% 40% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 42% 3% 15%
Public Policy Polling February 14–16, 2016 1,291 ± 2.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 41% 16%
SurveyUSA February 14–16, 2016 1,250 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 42% 12%
Public Policy Polling January 18–19, 2016 948 ± 3.2% 40% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 43% 17%
Public Policy Polling December 5–7, 2015 1,214 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 42% 14%
Elon University Poll October 29–November 2, 2015 1,040 ± 3.0% 40% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 45% 3% 13%
Public Policy Polling October 23–25, 2015 893 ± 3.3% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 44% 13%
Public Policy Polling September 24–27, 2015 1,268 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 41% 15%
Elon University Poll Шаблон:Webarchive September 17–21, 2015 1,258 ± 3.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 42% 3% 11%
Public Policy Polling August 12–16, 2015 957 ± 3.2% 39% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 42% 18%
Civitas Institute (R) Шаблон:Webarchive August 10–12, 2015 400 ± 4.0% 32% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 34% 33%
Public Policy Polling July 2–6, 2015 529 ± 4.3% 41% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 43% 16%
Civitas Institute (R) June 23–25, 2015 600 ± 4.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 38% 17%
Public Policy Polling May 28–31, 2015 561 ± 4.1% 41% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 44% 15%
Elon University Poll Шаблон:Webarchive April 20–24, 2015 677 ± 3.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 43% 4% 8%
Public Policy Polling April 2–5, 2015 751 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 41% 15%
Public Policy Polling February 24–26, 2015 849 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 41% 16%
Diversified Research February 2–3, 2015 800 ± 3.5% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 42% 14%
Public Policy Polling January 29–31, 2015 845 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 39% 17%
Шаблон:Nowrap January 21–22, 2015 500 ± 4.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 44% 9%
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 39% 15%
Gravis Marketing October 29–30, 2014 1,006 ± 3.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 45% 8%
Gravis Marketing October 16–18, 2014 1,022 ± 3.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 49% 41% 9%
Gravis Marketing September 22–23, 2014 860 ± 3.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 42% 12%
Public Policy Polling September 11–14, 2014 1,266 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 41% 15%
Public Policy Polling August 14–17, 2014 856 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 43% 14%
Gravis Marketing July 22–27, 2014 1,380 ± 3.0% 44% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 46% 10%
Public Policy Polling June 12–15, 2014 1,076 ± 3.0% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 42% 14%
Public Policy Polling May 9–11, 2014 877 ± 3.3% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 42% 15%
Public Policy Polling April 3–6, 2014 740 ± 3.6% 43% 43% 15%
Public Policy Polling February 6–9, 2014 708 ± 3.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 41% 15%
Public Policy Polling September 6–9, 2013 600 ± 4.0% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 48% 11%

Шаблон:Hidden begin

with Pat McCrory
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Kenneth
Spaulding (D)
Other Undecided
Public Policy Polling February 14–16, 2016 1,291 ± 2.7% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 32% 24%
SurveyUSA February 14–16, 2016 1,250 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 48% 38% 15%
Public Policy Polling January 18–19, 2016 948 ± 3.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 34% 22%
Public Policy Polling December 5–7, 2015 1,214 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 32% 21%
Public Policy Polling October 23–25, 2015 893 ± 3.3% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 31% 23%
Public Policy Polling September 24–27, 2015 1,268 ± 2.8% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 34% 21%
Public Policy Polling August 12–16, 2015 957 ± 3.2% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 40% 35% 25%
Public Policy Polling July 2–6, 2015 529 ± 4.3% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 33% 24%
Public Policy Polling May 28–31, 2015 561 ± 4.1% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 43% 32% 25%
Public Policy Polling April 2–5, 2015 751 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 46% 33% 21%
Public Policy Polling February 24–26, 2015 849 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 44% 35% 21%
Public Policy Polling January 29–31, 2015 845 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 36% 17%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Janet
Cowell (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 47% 36% 16%
Public Policy Polling September 6–9, 2013 600 ± 4% 43% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 47% 10%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Anthony
Foxx (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 48% 34% 18%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Kay
Hagan (D)
Undecided
Meeting Street Research January 21–22, 2015 500 ± 4.38% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 50% 42% 8%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Charles
Meeker (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling April 3–6, 2014 740 ± 3.6% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 45% 38% 17%
Public Policy Polling September 6–9, 2013 600 ± 4% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 45% 13%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Pat
McCrory (R)
Josh
Stein (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling September 6–9, 2013 600 ± 4% 42% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 44% 14%
with Phil Berger
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Phil
Berger (R)
Roy
Cooper (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% 35% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 41% 24%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Phil
Berger (R)
Janet
Cowell (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% 37% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 38% 25%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Phil
Berger (R)
Anthony
Foxx (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling December 4–7, 2014 823 ± 3.4% Шаблон:Party shading/Republican align=center| 39% 36% 25%
with Dan Forest
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Dan
Forest (R)
Roy
Cooper (D)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling August 12–16, 2015 957 ± 3.2% 33% Шаблон:Party shading/Democratic align=center| 42% 25%

Шаблон:Hidden end

Preliminary results and legal battle

Шаблон:Election box begin Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box margin of victory Шаблон:Election box turnout Шаблон:Election box gain with party link without swing Шаблон:Election box end

Polls closed at 7:30 pm on election day. On election night, as votes were tallied, Cooper held an early lead, but was overtaken by McCrory around 9:30 pm, and McCrory held the lead for most of the evening. Shortly before midnight, McCrory held a 60,000 vote lead until a block of 90,000 votes from Durham County was added to the total, putting Cooper back in the lead by fewer than 5,000 votes out of 4,500,000 cast.[5] Both candidates addressed supporters around 12:30 am; Cooper declared victory, while McCrory vowed the race was not over and that every vote needed to be counted.[5]

Under North Carolina state law, absentee ballots postmarked on or before election day must be counted, and military and overseas ballots accepted through November 17 must also be counted.[36] Additionally, election administrators "must decide the eligibility of more than 60,000 provisional ballots and the validity of thousands of challenged votes."[36] This process, plus a protracted legal challenge from the McCrory campaign, was likely to leave the election result not formally decided for some time after election day.[36]

McCrory's campaign said that it had "grave concerns over potential irregularities in Durham County."[5] Republican Party of North Carolina Chairman Robin Hayes called Cooper's declaration of victory "rude and grossly premature."[7] On November 10, 2016, both campaigns announced they had retained attorneys in anticipation of a protracted legal battle: Cooper hired lawyers from Washington-based firm Perkins Coie (including Marc Elias[37]), while McCrory hired lawyers from Virginia-based firm Holtzman Vogel Josefiak.[7]

Once all ballots are counted, North Carolina election law allows either candidate to request a recount if the margin is fewer than 10,000 votes.[7]

On November 12, the general counsel of the Durham County Republican Party filed a formal protest with the Durham County Board of Elections alleging "malfeasance" in the tallying of votes in Durham County and calling for a recount.[38] McCrory's campaign said that the 90,000 votes added to the total late on election night appeared to have come from corrupted memory cards. A campaign spokesman said, "What transpired in Durham County is extremely troubling and no citizen can have confidence in the results at this point in time."[38]

On November 14, WRAL reported that there was speculation among political operatives about whether the race could possibly be contested and handed to the North Carolina General Assembly to determine the winner, as was done in 2005, when the General Assembly made June Atkinson the winner of a disputed election for the office of North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction.[39] North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore said getting the General Assembly involved would be "an absolute last resort".[40]

Also on November 14, WRAL reported that the State Bureau of Investigation was investigating whether crimes were committed in the mishandling of 1,000 ballots in the March 2016 primaries in Durham County, the likely epicenter of the battle over the gubernatorial race.[41] The Durham County electoral board chairman said there was no connection between the investigation and the gubernatorial race.[41]

On November 15 Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District Supervisor McCrae Dowless, a Republican and the incumbent for reelection, filed a protest with that county's board of elections over several hundred absentee ballots cast for Cooper and other Democrats, claiming that they were fraudulent; on the basis of similarity of the handwriting with which they were filled out. In his initial filing, Dowless claimed corroboration by a handwriting expert. The complainant had initially expressed concerns about voter fraud related to his own reelection campaign, and before election day.[42][43][44] The McCrory campaign alleged that the ballots were filled out by paid employees of the Bladen County Improvement Association PAC, a political action committee that received funding from the North Carolina Democratic Party.[42] The complaint alleged that one person served as a witness for at least 67 mail-in absentee ballots, and the same person appeared to have filled out the selections on 71 ballots.[45] It said there were at least 250 questionable ballots connected to five people paid by the Bladen County Improvement Association PAC. That organization has responded that the people involved were volunteers with their get-out-the-vote effort, and that the only payments made to them were small stipends for expenses incurred as part of that activity; such as food and gas costs.[46] The McCrory campaign stated, "A massive voting fraud scheme has been uncovered in Bladen County."[46] In response, the Cooper campaign stated: "Governor McCrory has set a new standard for desperation in his attempts to undermine the results of an election he lost."[47]

On November 16, the McCrory campaign announced it had filed election protests alleging fraud in 11 more counties.[6][48] On November 17, the McCrory campaign announced the number of counties in which it had filed protests alleging voter fraud had grown to 50 counties,[47][49] which the Associated Press reported were "without offering detailed proof."[50]

Every county election board in the state has three members: two Republican appointees and one Democrat.[37][51]

Durham County has been seen as the most pivotal county, as it has the most votes at stake.[37] On November 16, the Durham County Board of Elections voted 2-1 to hold an evidentiary hearing on election protest about the ballots in Durham County.[52] At the hearing on November 18, the board unanimously dismissed the protest, with the board's Republican chairman, William Brian Jr., saying that all the evidence shows that the count is correct.[50]

By November 18, Cooper's unofficial advantage over McCrory had grown to about 6,600 votes, out of almost 4.7 million cast.[50][51]

On November 20, the state Board of Elections held an emergency meeting. They declined a McCrory campaign petition for the state board to take jurisdiction over all 50 county election protests, except for the one in Bladen County, which they took over.[53] They decided to convene another meeting on November 22 to issue guidance to county boards on how to handle the protests.[54]

On November 22, the McCrory campaign formally requested a statewide recount.[8]

Also on November 22, the Civitas Institute filed a federal lawsuit seeking an injunction to delay the State Board of Elections' count of ballots of unverified same-day registrants, alleging that there is not enough time to verify the eligibility of voters who registered to vote on election day.[55] Civitas said that neither the McCrory campaign nor the state Republican Party were involved in the lawsuit.[56] Civitas cited a 2012 review conducted by the state Board of Elections that found 2.44% of voters who used same-day registration in 2012 failed the verification process, but the process was not completely finished when the ballots were counted.[56] A court hearing is scheduled for December 8.[57]

On November 26, the Durham County Republican Party's general counsel asked the state Board of Elections to hold an expedited hearing on his appeal of the Durham County Board of Elections' refusal to conduct a recount of that county's votes.[58] The campaign stated they would withdraw their request for a statewide recount if a manual recount of Durham County votes produced the same results as were reported on election day.[59]

On November 30, the State Board of Elections ordered a recount of the Durham County votes.[9] The recount was to be completed by 7 p.m. on December 5. However, by that morning, early results showed no change in the tally. McCrory announced on his campaign's YouTube channel that he was conceding the race to Cooper, saying that it was now clear that "the majority of our citizens had spoken."[10]

Official results

Шаблон:Election box begin Шаблон:Election box winning candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box candidate with party link Шаблон:Election box total Шаблон:Election box gain with party link without swing Шаблон:Election box end

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

Aftermath

Following the election, the General Assembly, controlled by Republicans, passed legislation that would limit the incoming governor's powers.[60] Democrats have referred to the move as a power grab, and Republicans have countered that Democrats have made similar moves when they controlled the legislature.[61]

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:2016 United States elections

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  3. Шаблон:Cite web
  4. Шаблон:Cite web
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 5,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  6. 6,0 6,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  7. 7,0 7,1 7,2 7,3 7,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  8. 8,0 8,1 N.C. governor seeks recount amid voter-fraud complaints, won’t concede
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  10. 10,0 10,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  11. Шаблон:Cite news
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  14. Шаблон:Cite news
  15. Шаблон:Cite news
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite news
  18. 18,0 18,1 18,2 18,3 18,4 18,5 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite news
  20. 20,0 20,1 20,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  22. Шаблон:Cite web
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite web
  28. Шаблон:Cite web
  29. Шаблон:Cite web
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite web
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. 36,0 36,1 36,2 Nigel Duara, North Carolina governor's race still undecided with thousands of votes to be finalized, Los Angeles Times (November 18, 2016).
  37. 37,0 37,1 37,2 Virginia Bridges, Colin Campbell & Craig Jarvis, Appeal planned after Durham County dismisses demand for hand recount, News & Observer (November 17, 2016).
  38. 38,0 38,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. 41,0 41,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  42. 42,0 42,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. Шаблон:Cite web
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. 46,0 46,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  47. 47,0 47,1 Gov. McCrory protests votes in 50 counties, WGHP (November 17, 2016).
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Jim Bradley, Gov. Pat McCrory protesting vote counts in 50 counties Шаблон:Webarchive, WSOC (November 18, 2016).
  50. 50,0 50,1 50,2 Gary D. Robinson, Cooper's ballot count grows over McCrory as challenges continue, Associated Press (November 178, 2016).
  51. 51,0 51,1 Bill Chappell, N.C. Challenger to Gov. McCrory Remains In Lead As Final Ballots Counted, NPR (November 19, 2016).
  52. Durham County board to hold hearing on election protest, News & Observer (November 16, 2016).
  53. Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. Civitas Institute lawsuit wants same-day vote count delayed
  56. 56,0 56,1 Civitas sues to stop final NC vote count, cites concerns about same-day registration
  57. In North Carolina, No End in Sight to Governor’s Race
  58. NC elections board could consider key ballot appeal this week
  59. McCrory will withdraw recount demand if Durham votes recounted
  60. Шаблон:Cite news
  61. Шаблон:Cite news