Английская Википедия:2016 Republican Party presidential primaries
Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox election Шаблон:US 2016 presidential elections series Presidential primaries and caucuses of the Republican Party took place within all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories between February 1 and June 7, 2016. These elections selected the 2,472 delegates that were sent to the Republican National Convention. Businessman and reality television star Donald Trump won the Republican nomination for president of the United States.
A total of 17 major candidates entered the race. Prior to the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, this was the largest presidential primary field for any political party in American history.[1] From early in the primary season, the race was characterized as a wide and diverse contest with no clear frontrunner. Early polling leaders included former Florida Governor Jeb Bush and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, among others. The race was disrupted by the unexpected entry of Trump in June 2015, who quickly rose to lead polls for the rest of the primary season with the exception of a period in the fall when neurosurgeon Ben Carson experienced a surge in support.
U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas won the Iowa caucuses, while Trump won the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries as well as the Nevada caucuses. On Super Tuesday, Trump and Cruz traded states with Trump receiving the plurality of the day's delegates. From March 16, 2016, to May 3, 2016, only three candidates remained in the race: Trump, Cruz, and Ohio Governor John Kasich. Cruz won four Western contests and won in Wisconsin, keeping open a credible path to denying Trump the nomination on first ballot with 1,237 delegates. However, Trump scored landslide victories in New York and five northeastern states in April, before taking every delegate in the Indiana primary on May 3. Without any further chances of forcing a contested convention, Cruz suspended his campaign[2] and Trump was declared the presumptive Republican nominee by Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus on May 3.[3] Kasich ended his campaign the following day.[4] After winning the Washington primary and gaining support from unbound North Dakota delegates on May 26,[5] Trump passed the threshold of 1,237 delegates required to guarantee his nomination.[6] By the end of the primary voting process, Trump had a commanding lead in the number of pledged delegates, ensuring a very smooth process for being declared the nominee. However, at 44.95%, Trump had the lowest percentage of the popular primary vote for a major party nominee since the 1988 Democratic Party presidential primaries.
On July 19, 2016, Trump and his running mate, Indiana Governor Mike Pence, were officially nominated as the Republican presidential and vice presidential candidates at the Republican National Convention.[7] Trump and Pence went on to defeat the Democratic ticket of Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine in the general election on November 8, 2016, despite the latter ticket consistently leading in polls.[8][9]
Candidates and results
Seventeen major candidates were listed in major independent nationwide polls and filed as candidates with the Federal Election Commission.Шаблон:Citation needed A total of 2,472 delegates attended the 2016 Republican National Convention, and the winning candidate needed a simple majority of 1,237 votes to become the Republican nominee.Шаблон:Citation needed
Delegate breakdown
Fifty-six primary contests were conducted to choose 2,472 delegates. In 50 states and territories the delegates were allocated to candidates by popular vote either statewide or on the congressional district level and then elected according to state rules. In six states and territories, the first-instance popular vote did not allocate any delegates; they were elected later at local conventions and either bound to a candidate or uncommitted.[10] Most delegates were elected as bound delegates, meaning that they were required to vote for a specific candidate on the first ballot at the national convention. Some delegates attended the convention as unbound or uncommitted delegates, meaning that they were free to vote for anyone at the first ballot. These 130 uncommitted delegates included 18 unbound RNC delegatesШаблон:Efn and 112 delegates that have been elected or allocated as uncommitted.Шаблон:Efn Uncommitted delegates were still at liberty to express a preference for a candidate, although that preference was not binding. Among the 901 delegates elected for candidates who later dropped out of the race, 155 were still bound to vote for their candidate on the first ballotШаблон:Efn and 34 were releasedШаблон:Efn according to the local rules of each state party. If no candidate were elected in the first round of voting, a progressively larger number of delegates would have been allowed to vote for the candidate of their choice. The voting rules on subsequent ballots were determined by individual states: most states released their delegates on the second round of voting, and only four states kept them bound on the third round and beyond.[11]
This table shows how many bound delegates each candidate had won before suspending his or her campaign;Шаблон:Efn it does not show how many unbound delegates pledged their support to any candidate during the primaries, nor does it show the expected result of the vote at the national convention. Although a state is considered won by a candidate if a plurality of the state's delegates are bound, RNC Rule 40(b)[12] required a candidate to demonstrate support from a majority of delegates in eight states to be eligible as the nominee. Convention rules are based on delegate votes, not the popular vote. In the context of Republican primaries, the term "states" refers collectively to the fifty states, the District of Columbia and the five inhabited territories (altogether 56 delegations) as specified in RNC Rule 1(b).[13] In the following table, states and territories where the candidates achieved a majority of bound delegates are marked in bold. States and territories where a candidate won a majority of delegates but not a majority of bound delegates are marked in italics.
Nominee
| Candidate | Most recent position | Announced | Campaign Withdrawal date |
Bound delegates Шаблон:Nowrap[14] |
Popular vote[14] |
Contests wonШаблон:Efn | Running mate | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Trump | Файл:Donald Trump official portrait (cropped).jpg | Chairman of The Trump Organization (1971–2017) |
June 16, 2015 | Файл:Trump Transparent.svg (Campaign • Positions) Campaign site Secured nomination: May 26, 2016 [5] |
1,441 (Шаблон:Percentage) (floor 1,725) |
14,015,993 (44.95%) |
41 AL, AR, AS, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, GU, HI, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI, MO, MP, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NV, NJ, NM, NY,OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, VA, VI, VT, WA, WV |
Mike Pence | [15] | |
Withdrew during the primaries
Withdrew before the primaries
Results by delegates (hard total)
Файл:Delegation Vote ,2016 (Republican Party).svg
Results by state popular vote
Файл:U.S. States by Vote Distribution, 2016 (Republican Party).svg
Results by county popular vote
Файл:Republican Party presidential primaries results by county, 2016.svg
Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0
Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0 Шаблон:Legend0
Файл:2016 GOP Primary Counties.svg
Timeline of the race
Background
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, the 2012 GOP presidential nominee, lost the 2012 election to incumbent Democratic president Barack Obama. The Republican National Committee, believing that the long, drawn-out 2012 primary season had politically and personally damaged Romney, drafted plans to condense the 2016 primary season. As part of these plans, the 2016 Republican National Convention was scheduled for the relatively early date of July 18–21, 2016,[69] the earliest date since Republicans nominated Thomas Dewey in June 1948.[70][71]
When John Kasich entered the race on July 21, 2015, the field reached 16 candidates,[72] making it the largest presidential field in the history of the Republican Party (surpassing the 1948 primaries). With Jim Gilmore's announcement to enter the race for a second time on July 30, 2015,[73] the field reached 17 candidates, becoming the largest presidential field in American history (surpassing the 16 candidates in the Democratic Party presidential primaries of 1972 and 1976).[74][75]
In mid-December 2014, Jeb Bush—widely seen as a possible frontrunner for the nomination due to his relatively moderate stances, record as former governor of a crucial swing state, name recognition and access to high-paying donors—was the first candidate to form a political action committee (PAC) and an exploratory committee.[76] Many other candidates followed suit. The first candidate to declare his candidacy was Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who was popular among grassroots conservatives due to his association with the Tea Party movement, and who also received early backing of several prominent Republican donors including Robert Mercer.[77][78]
The 2016 candidates were roughly divided into three camps, with grassroots conservatives represented by Cruz and Carson, the Christian right represented by Huckabee and Santorum, and moderates (or establishment) represented by Bush and Christie. Several—such as Rubio, Walker, and Kasich—were seen as having political backgrounds that may be appealing to both conservatives and moderates. Additionally, not all of these candidates clearly toed the grassroots/establishment divide; for instance, Rubio and Cruz were both elected to the Senate in the early 2010s as members of the Tea Party movement, but by 2015 had been courting the support of prominent party elders, political operatives, and large donors with significant success. In contrast, only three of the candidates, Carson, Trump and Fiorina, were true non-establishment candidates in the sense that they had no formal political experience; though Fiorina is widely considered to have views in line with the establishment wing led by Bush and Christie.[79][80][81] Some called the diversity of candidates representing different wings of the party symptomatic of a struggle for the future direction of the party.[82]
The field was noted for its diversity, and was even called the most diverse presidential field in American history. It included two Latinos (Cruz and Rubio), a woman (Fiorina), an Indian-American (Jindal), and an African-American (Carson). Five were the children of immigrants: Cruz (Cuban father), Jindal (Indian parents), Rubio (Cuban parents), Santorum (Italian father) and Trump (Scottish mother).[83][84][85][86]
Overview
Widely viewed as a very open contest with no clear front-runner, potential candidates fluctuated in the polls for an extended period from late 2012 to the end of 2015. In the year prior to the election season, a total of 17 major candidates campaigned for the nomination, thus making it the single largest presidential primary field in American history at the time.[1] However, by the time the primary season started in early 2016, four candidates had clearly emerged ahead of the rest of the field: Ohio Governor John Kasich, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, Texas Senator Ted Cruz, and New York businessman Donald Trump. Trump maintained wide poll leads throughout 2015 and into 2016, primarily due to his brash and unapologetic style of speaking and campaigning. Trump emphasized a disregard for political correctness, as well as populist and nativist policies; he earned the support of working-class voters and voters without college educations, among other demographics.[87][88][89] However, Trump's brash attitude and polarizing policy stances generated numerous controversies in the media,[90] and many of the other candidates sought to become the "anti-Trump" candidate by condemning his rhetoric and policies. Senators Cruz and Rubio emphasized their youth in comparison to most other candidates and their possible appeal to Hispanic voters.[81][91][92] Additionally, Ohio governor John Kasich, a moderate Republican, remained in the race for an extended period despite being viewed as having little to no chance of winning the nomination.[93]
Despite Trump's lead in most national polls, the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses were won by Cruz due to his support among grassroots conservatives. However, Trump rebounded with strong wins in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada. On Super Tuesday, Trump expanded his lead by winning seven of the eleven states, while the Cruz campaign gained new energy with victories in Alaska, Oklahoma, and the significant stronghold of Cruz's home state Texas. Rubio maintained significant momentum with strong finishes in Iowa (third place), South Carolina (second place), and Nevada (second place), before finally claiming victory in Minnesota on Super Tuesday.
Between Super Tuesday and the beginning of the "winner-take-all" primaries, Cruz stayed nearly even with Trump, winning four states to Trump's five; Rubio won several smaller contests such as Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. In the first round of winner-take-all contests on March 15, Trump greatly expanded his lead by winning five of the six contests. After a significant loss to Trump in his home state of Florida, Rubio suspendedШаблон:Efn his campaign that same day. Meanwhile, Kasich finally gained some momentum by winning his home state of Ohio.
As the primary season entered the spring, the mostly-consolidated field resulted in a closing of the gap between Trump and Cruz, with Trump sweeping the South, the Northeast, and parts of the Midwest while Cruz performed strongly in the West and scored a surprise victory in Maine. Kasich, unable to win any other states besides Ohio, remained far behind in third place. After Cruz's upset win in Wisconsin, speculation began to arise that the convention would be a brokered one in which the establishment would choose Kasich or someone else, since both Trump and Cruz were not viewed favorably by the establishment.[94][95]
As April came to a close and Trump won a resounding victory in his home state of New York, both Cruz and Kasich were mathematically eliminated from winning the nomination without a brokered convention. Both men then formed an alliance to block Trump from winning the nomination, ahead of the "Acela primaries" of five Northeastern states on April 26.[96] Subsequently, Trump swept all five states and greatly increased his delegate lead. In a final push to block Trump's path to the nomination, Cruz announced that one of the former candidates for the nomination, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, would be his running mate if he was the nominee.[97] Nevertheless, after Trump won the Indiana primary on May 3, Cruz suspended his campaign,[2] subsequently leading to Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus announcing Trump as the presumptive nominee.[98] Kasich announced the suspension of his campaign the next day, leaving Trump as the only candidate left in the race. Trump then went on to win all of the remaining primaries, sweeping the remainder of the West, Midwest and the entirety of the West Coast. With his victories in New Jersey and the remaining final states on June 7, not only did Trump officially surpass the necessary number of bound delegates, but he also broke the 2000 record of 12,034,676 popular votes received by the winner of the Republican presidential primaries,[99] with over 14 million votes.[14]
<timeline> ImageSize = width:700 height:auto barincrement:20 PlotArea = top:20 bottom:20 right:20 left:20 AlignBars = early
Define $today = 05/27/2024
Colors =
id:canvas value:gray(0.95) id:lightline value:gray(0.8) id:darkline value:gray(0.3) id:JB value:magenta #Jeb Bush id:BC value:magenta #Ben Carson id:CC value:magenta #Chris Christie id:TC value:magenta #Ted Cruz id:CF value:magenta #Carly Fiorina id:JG value:magenta #Jim Gilmore id:LG value:claret #Lindsey Graham id:MH value:magenta #Mike Huckabee id:BJ value:claret #Bobby Jindal id:JK value:magenta #John Kasich id:GP value:claret #George Pataki id:RP value:magenta #Rand Paul id:RiP value:claret #Rick Perry id:MR value:magenta #Marco Rubio id:RS value:magenta #Rick Santorum id:DT value:rgb(0.937,0.094,0.129) #Donald Trump id:SW value:claret #Scott Walker
- Link to more colors: http://ploticus.sourceforge.net/doc/color.html
DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy Period = from:03/01/2015 till:09/01/2016 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMinor = gridcolor:lightline unit:month increment:1 start:04/01/2015
Backgroundcolors = canvas:canvas
TextData =
pos:(7,30) textcolor:black fontsize:S tabs:(72-left,155-left,230-left,305-left,381-left,459-left,535-left,616-left) text:Mar '15^May '15^Jul '15^Sep '15^Nov '15^Jan '16^Mar '16^May '16^Jul '16
BarData =
barset:Candidates
PlotData=
width:15 fontsize:S textcolor:black anchor:till shift:(10,-4) barset:Candidates from:06/16/2015 till:07/19/2016 color:DT text:"Trump" from:07/21/2015 till:05/04/2016 color:JK text:"Kasich" from:03/23/2015 till:05/03/2016 color:TC text:"Cruz" from:04/13/2015 till:03/15/2016 color:MR text:"Rubio" from:05/04/2015 till:03/04/2016 color:BC text:"Carson" from:06/15/2015 till:02/20/2016 color:JB text:"Bush" from:07/30/2015 till:02/12/2016 color:JG text:"Gilmore" from:06/30/2015 till:02/10/2016 color:CC text:"Christie" from:05/04/2015 till:02/10/2016 color:CF text:"Fiorina" from:04/07/2015 till:02/03/2016 color:RP text:"Paul" from:05/27/2015 till:02/03/2016 color:RS text:"Santorum" from:05/05/2015 till:02/01/2016 color:MH text:"Huckabee" from:05/28/2015 till:12/29/2015 color:GP text:"Pataki" from:06/01/2015 till:12/21/2015 color:LG text:"Graham" from:06/24/2015 till:11/17/2015 color:BJ text:"Jindal" from:07/13/2015 till:09/21/2015 color:SW text:"Walker" from:06/04/2015 till:09/11/2015 color:RiP text:"Perry"
LineData=
layer:front at:02/01/2016 color:green width:1 layer:front at:03/01/2016 color:orange width:1 layer:front at:03/15/2016 color:blue width:1 layer:front at:05/03/2016 color:yellow width:1 layer:front at:06/07/2016 color:red width:1 layer:front at:07/18/2016 color:purple width:1
</timeline>
| Nominee | |
| Suspended campaigns during primaries | |
| Suspended campaigns before primaries |
| Iowa caucuses | |
| Super Tuesday | |
| Super Tuesday II | |
| Indiana primary | |
| Primary elections end | |
| Convention 2016 |
Файл:2016 Republican Party presidential primaries delegate count.svg Файл:2016 Republican Party presidential primaries delegates.svg Файл:2016 Republican Party presidential primaries popular vote.svg
2012–2014: fluctuating polls
After Romney's unsuccessful 2012 campaign, the potential 2016 field was left without a clear future nominee, similar to that of 2008. Different speculations began rising from all sides of the right-leaning political spectrum as to who would make the best possible nominee: One faction of candidates included young freshmen senators, some with alliances to the Tea Party movement, such as Cruz, Paul, and Rubio, who in particular was the focus of attention immediately following 2012. In most national polls from late-2012 to mid-2013, Rubio was leading due to being young, articulate, having a broad appeal among conservatives and moderates and also for his Latino heritage and continued efforts on immigration reform, which many viewed as possible tools to draw Hispanic voters to the GOP.[100][101][102]
However, another narrative for the nomination, similar to that which drove Romney's 2012 campaign, was that the nominee needed to be a governor in a traditionally Democratic or swing state, with a proven record that would stand as proof that such a governor could be president as well. The possible candidates that fit this criteria included Bush, Gilmore, Kasich, Pataki, Walker and Christie, who in particular had been rising in popularity due to his loud and blunt manner of speaking at public events, championed by some as challenging conventional political rhetoric.[103][104] With his record as governor of New Jersey, a heavily Democratic state, factored in, Christie overtook Rubio in the polls from mid-2013 up until early 2014, when the "Bridgegate" scandal was first revealed and started to damage Christie's reputation and poll standing.[105] Although he was later cleared of personal responsibility in the subsequent investigation, Christie never regained frontrunner status.[106]
After Christie's fall, the polls fluctuated from January to November 2014. Candidates who often performed well included Rand Paul, who won CPAC straw polls in 2013, 2014 and 2015,[107][108][109] Wisconsin congressman and 2012 vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan (the eventual House speaker) and former candidates such as former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and then-governor of Texas Rick Perry, further reflecting the uncertainty of the upcoming race for the nomination.[110][111]
April 2014 – January 2015: Jeb Bush leading the polls
In April 2014, Robert Costa and Philip Rucker of The Washington Post reported that the period of networking and relationship-building that they dubbed the "credentials caucus" had begun, with prospective candidates "quietly studying up on issues and cultivating ties to pundits and luminaries from previous administrations".[112]
Though Bush often polled in the low double digits, he was considered a prominent candidate due to his high fundraising ability, record as governor of Florida (a crucial swing state) and apparent electability.[113][114] By November 2014, Bush had finally solidified his lead in the polls.[115][116] Around this time there were talks of the possibility of Romney making a third run for the presidency. During this period from November 2014 until late January 2015, the speculation fueled Romney's rise in many national polls as well, challenging Bush.[117] Although Romney admitted he was entertaining the idea after initially declining, he ultimately reaffirmed his decision not to run on January 30, 2015.[118]
However, by the end of February, another challenger rose to match Bush in the polls: Walker, who often touted his record as governor in a traditionally Democratic state, particularly noting his victory in a recall election in 2012 (the first governor in American history to do so), combined with his reelection in 2014. Walker and Bush balanced out in the polls from late February until about mid-June, at which point Trump entered the race.Шаблон:Citation needed Walker's challenge to Bush also allowed other candidates to briefly resurge in some polls from late April up until mid-June, including former top performers Rubio, Paul and Huckabee, in addition to several newcomers to the top tier of polling, including Cruz and Carson.[110][111]
Mid-2015: Donald Trump and the rise of the outsiders
Shortly after Trump announced his candidacy on June 16, 2015, many pundits noted his uniquely outspoken nature, blunt language and rhetoric, often directly contradicting traditional political candidates. This style was seen as resonating strongly with potential Republican primary voters and Trump began to rise in the polls.[119] After a few weeks of briefly matching Bush, Trump surged into first place in all major national polls by mid-July,[120] which he continued to lead consistently until November. Trump also polled well in the early-voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, often leading or coming in second in those states.Шаблон:Citation needed
With the surge of Trump, a man who had never held political office, the general focus began to shift over to other non-politician candidates, commonly known as "outsiders" and the other two outsiders in the field quickly rose in the polls as well in the wake of the first two debates: Carson, who rose into second place after a well-received performance in the first debate and Fiorina, who rose into the top three after her performance in the second debate.[121][122][123] The rising popularity of non-politician outsiders shocked many political analysts, and fueled a new conversation about how those with no political experience or prior runs for office could appeal more to potential primary voters than career politicians and what it means for the future of the Republican party and American politics in general.[124][125][126][127] Trump used ideas of populism to persuade the average American throughout the election process.[128] In mid-September, the first two major candidates dropped out of the race. Perry suspended his campaign on September 11, 2015, citing his failure to qualify for the primetime debates, his subsequent failure to raise a significant amount of money and his indictment as reasons.[129][130] Ten days later, on September 21, 2015, Walker suspended his campaign mainly due to his own poll numbers dropping after two lackluster debate performances.[131]
End of 2015: the field stabilizes, six candidates gain traction
By the end of September, most polling averages indicated that the field was finally stabilizing in terms of public opinion and six candidates in particular were gaining traction and pulling away from the rest of the field by considerable margins. Polling averages indicated the top six as Trump, Carson, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush and Cruz.[132] Trump and Carson were consistently first and second, respectively; Fiorina was initially in third place before being surpassed by Rubio; while Bush and Cruz remained in fifth and sixth place, respectively.[133][134] The other candidates who had been in the top ten of polling—Christie, Huckabee, Paul and Kasich—all leveled out at roughly 3% or less, while the five remaining candidates outside the top ten—Santorum, Jindal, Pataki, Graham and Gilmore—were consistently polling below 1%. By the third debate in late October, Bush and Fiorina's numbers were also beginning to fade, while Cruz was on the rise and began coming in fourth by most poll averages.[132] The third debate only solidified these numbers: Bush and Fiorina remained in low digits as both were considered lackluster, while Cruz was widely held as the winner and rose even further.[135][136] Throughout this period, both Trump and Carson had pulled well ahead of the rest of the field and with Trump often registering in the low 30s and high 20s and Carson in the low 20s, the two of them combined often made up well over 50% of the electorate in a vast majority of national polls.[132] Later in October and in early November, Carson began to match even with Trump by most polling averages, rising into the mid 20s and often finishing either just behind or just ahead of Trump.[137][138]
By October, with the polls reflecting a field that seemed to be stabilizing, most commentators began to claim that the field had already established who the final four candidates—those who were in the race for the long-term and had the best chance of actually becoming the nominee—would be. The four were listed as being Trump, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz: Trump and Carson for their appeal as outsiders, as well as their opposite personalities—with Trump's blunt nature and tough foreign policy stances, against Carson's soft-spoken nature and personal favorability—Rubio for his appeal to Hispanics and his stance on such issues as immigration reform, combined with strong debate performances and significant donor backing and Cruz for his appeal to Tea Party and Christian conservative voters, which was seen as possibly having a strong impact in the southern states.[140][141] On November 17, 2015, Jindal became the third major Republican candidate to drop out.[142] The November 2015 Paris attacks, which killed 130 people days before Jindal dropped out, were widely seen as having a significant impact on the 2016 presidential race, particularly on the Republican side.[143] The attacks were seen as boosting the campaigns of those with tough stances on immigration like Trump and Cruz, as well as the foreign policy hawks like Rubio.[144][145] Possibly as a result, Carson—who had previously been perceived as uninformed and relatively inarticulate on foreign policy—began to suffer in the polls, with Trump once again solidifying a double-digit lead over everyone else, while Rubio and Cruz began to steadily rise as Carson's numbers declined.[132][146]
By December, Cruz had overtaken Carson by solidifying a base of support among Christian conservatives and averaged national polling of 18%, second only to Trump.[147] The non-interventionist Paul still failed to make traction at this juncture, while Carson fell down to about 10%, roughly even with Rubio.[132] On December 15, 2015, there was another presidential debate, which saw no major changes in the perceptions of the candidates. On December 21, 2015, the same day as the deadline to withdraw from the ballot in his home state of South Carolina, Graham suspended his campaign. Eight days later, on December 29, Pataki, who was struggling to poll above the margin of error, suspended his campaign as well.[148]
January 2016: the road to the early primaries
2016 dawned with the several-month-long truce between Trump and Cruz being broken.[149] Cruz accused Trump of not being a consistent conservative or an ethical businessman, while Trump questioned the Canadian-born Cruz's constitutional eligibility to be president—candidates have to be natural-born U.S. citizens to be eligible to be president—while noting Cruz's past calls for immigration reform.[150][151] This occurred as Trump and Cruz were vying for supremacy at the top of Iowa polls, in addition to both being the top two candidates in all national polls, ahead of the rest of the field by significant margins.[152][153] In the closing weeks before Iowa, Trump and Cruz ran dueling television commercials, each attacking the other's record.[154] Meanwhile, there was conflict between "establishment" candidates Rubio, Christie, Bush and Kasich, largely due to a media-reinforced belief that only a single establishment candidate could remain in the race past the early primaries. The establishment candidates staked their bids on strong showings in New Hampshire and both Christie and Kasich saw upticks in their polling in the weeks before the primary.[155][156] Both the Trump-Cruz conflict and the squabbling between establishment candidates was evident at the Republican debate on January 14. The Republican debate of January 28, devoid of Trump due to priorities and conflicts with moderator Megyn Kelly after the debate in August, was the candidates' last shot at honing their message before the Iowa caucuses. Immigration and foreign policy featured prominently in this debate and many candidates used the opportunity of a "Trump-less debate" to criticize the second-place Cruz, who was also being heavily criticized by prominent Republican leaders in the weeks before Iowa.[157][158]
February 2016: early primaries
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Trump | Cruz | Rubio | Kasich | Carson | Bush | Gilmore | Christie | Fiorina | Paul | Huckabee | Santorum | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Delegates:82
Pledged:82 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:17
Pledged:17 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:16
Pledged:16 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:6
Pledged:6 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:5
Pledged:5 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:4
Pledged:4 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:0
Pledged:0 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:0
Pledged:0 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:1
Pledged:1 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:1
Pledged:1 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:1
Pledged:1 Unpledged:0 |
Delegates:0
Pledged:0 Unpledged:0 |
133
Pledged:133 Unpledged:0 | |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|421,577 (32.7%) |
266,406 (20.7%) |
257,804 (20.0%) |
107,525 (8.4%) |
81,091 (6.3%) |
94,699 (7.3%) |
146 (0.01%) |
24,423 (1.9%) |
15,281 (1.2%) |
10,581 (0.8%) |
3,582 (0.3%) |
1,950 (0.2%) |
1,289,211 | |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Feb 1 | Iowa | 24.3%
Delegates won:7 |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 27.6%
Delegates won:8 |
23.1%
Delegates won:7 |
1.9%
Delegates won:1 |
9.3%
Delegates won:3 |
2.8%
Delegates won:1 |
0.01%
Delegates won:0 |
1.8%
Delegates won:0 |
1.9%
Delegates won:1 |
4.5%
Delegates won:1 |
1.8%
Delegates won:1 |
1%
Delegates won: 0 |
rowspan=4 Шаблон:N/a |
| Feb 9 | New Hampshire
Proportional primary |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 35.2%
Delegates won:11 |
11.6%
Delegates won:3 |
10.5%
Delegates won:2 |
15.7%
Delegates won:4 |
2.3%
Delegates won:0 |
11%
Delegates won:3 |
0.05%
Delegates won:0 |
7.4%
Delegates won:0 |
4.1%
Delegates won:0 |
0.7%
Delegates won:0 |
colspan=2 Шаблон:N/a | ||
| Feb 20 | South Carolina
Winner-take-most primary; 29 delegates for state winner, 3 per winner of each Congressional District |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 32.5%
Delegates won:50 |
22.3%
Delegates won:0 |
22.5%
Delegates won:0 |
7.6%
Delegates won:0 |
7.2%
Delegates won:0 |
7.8%
Delegates won:0 |
colspan=6 Шаблон:N/a | ||||||
| Feb 23 | Nevada
Proportional caucus |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|45.7%
Delegates won:14 |
21.3%
Delegates won:6 |
23.8%
Delegates won:7 |
3.6%
Delegates won:1 |
4.8%
Delegates won:2 |
colspan=7 Шаблон:N/a | |||||||
In the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses, Cruz won a narrow victory over Trump and Rubio.[159] Following poor performances in Iowa, three candidates suspended their campaigns: Huckabee—the winner of the caucuses in 2008—Santorum—the winner of the caucuses in 2012—and Paul, whose father performed very well in the 2008 and 2012 caucuses. This caused the field to narrow to nine.[160][161][162] After coming third in the Iowa caucuses, the media quickly painted Rubio as the candidate most likely to pick up the establishment mantle and ride it to the nomination following a strong performance in New Hampshire, much as McCain and Romney had done in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Rubio used this narrative to pick up a number of endorsements in the days following the Iowa caucuses. However, in the New Hampshire debate of February 6, 2016, Rubio repeated a talking point four times almost verbatim during an exchange with Christie, which led to sharp criticism of his performance in the aftermath and the beginning of the end of Rubio's campaign.[163]
In the New Hampshire primary, Trump scored a decisive victory over the rest of the field, winning the primary with 35% of the vote. Kasich, who had held over 100 town halls in the state, finished second in a surprise to many in the media. Cruz coming in third in the contest was also a shock to many, while Rubio slipped to fifth, behind Trump, Kasich, Cruz and Bush, whose campaign appeared to be revitalized following several months of apparent stagnation. After coming in seventh place in both Iowa and New Hampshire, Fiorina suspended her campaign on February 10, 2016.[164] Later that same day, Christie, whose campaign was staked almost entirely on getting a strong showing in New Hampshire, suspended his campaign after coming in sixth in New Hampshire, failing to reach the minimum 10% vote threshold required to be allocated delegates from the state and qualifying for the next debate on CBS.[165][166] Later that week, Jim Gilmore, who had failed to gain traction, win delegates or be invited to most of the debates, suspended his campaign, narrowing the field to six.[167]
The third contest was in South Carolina. Prior to the primary, Rubio picked up the key endorsement of Governor Nikki Haley, a feat seen as renewing his momentum after a disappointing finish in New Hampshire.[168][169] Exit polling showed that 46% of voters had decided the week before the primary, and that the majority of these votes went to Rubio.[170] When the votes were counted, Trump again won by double digits, garnering 33% of the vote, ahead of Rubio with 22%, who edged out Cruz for second-place by 0.2%. Since Trump carried the vote both statewide and in each congressional district, his result netted him all 50 delegates available in the state.[171] Following disappointing finishes in the first three contests despite outspending his competitors, Bush suspended his campaign on February 20.[172]
Three days following the South Carolina primary, Trump won the Nevada caucuses, winning with 46% of the vote with Rubio in a distant second with 24% and Cruz slightly further behind with 21%.[173]
March 1, 2016: Super Tuesday
Super Tuesday voting, after the early voting in February, decided nearly half of the delegate votes needed to achieve the 1,237 votes to win the nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention—595 delegates at stake, to be exact. Super Tuesday holds the primary voting for 11 states in the primary election process.[174] North Dakota held the last caucus on Super Tuesday, but there was no presidential straw poll and all the delegates elected later at its convention in April were unbound. Wyoming took a straw poll, but it was non-binding and no delegates were allocated on Super Tuesday. Leading up to Super Tuesday, a debate between the remaining five candidates took place in Houston on February 25, 2016. Political rhetoric and charges heated up with Cruz and Rubio teaming up to attack Trump.[175]
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Trump | Cruz | Rubio | Kasich | Carson | Uncom. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|255 | 218 | 96 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 595 |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|2,955,120 (34.4%) |
2,502,557 (29.2%) |
1,881,068 (21.9%) |
546,465 (6.4%) |
493,912 (5.8%) |
– | 8,581,841 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Alabama | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|43.4%
Delegates won:36 |
21%
Delegates won:13 |
18.7%
Delegates won:1 |
4.4%
Delegates won:0 |
10.2%
Delegates won:0 |
– | rowspan=11 Шаблон:N/a |
| Alaska | 33.6%
Delegates won:11 |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|36.4%
Delegates won:12 |
15.2%
Delegates won:5 |
4%
Delegates won:0 |
10.8%
Delegates won:0 |
– | |
| Arkansas | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|32.8%
Delegates won:16 |
31% | 25% | 4% | 6% | – | |
| Georgia | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|39% | 24% | 24% | 6% | 6% | – | |
| Massachusetts | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|49% | 10% | 18% | 18% | 3% | – | |
| Minnesota | 21% | 29% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|36% | 6% | 7% | – | |
| Oklahoma | 28% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|34% | 26% | 4% | 6% | – | |
| Tennessee | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|39% | 25% | 21% | 5% | 8% | – | |
| Texas | 27% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|44% | 18% | 4% | 4% | – | |
| Vermont | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|33% | 10% | 19% | 30% | 4% | – | |
| Virginia | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|35% | 17% | 32% | 10% | 6% | – | |
Trump won the contests in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia, while Cruz netted a strong victory in his home state of Texas and added victories in Oklahoma and Alaska. Rubio won his first contest in the Minnesota Republican Caucus and finished a strong second in Virginia. Kasich won no contests, but he almost won in Vermont and finished second in Massachusetts. Carson did not win or place in any contest, netted only three delegates and though he initially expressed an intent to stay in the race, began showing signs of withdrawing in the days following Super Tuesday; he ultimately suspended his campaign on March 4, 2016.[176][177]
Early March 2016: between Super Tuesdays
After Super Tuesday voting, but before winner-take-all voting was to begin, nine states, two territories and Washington, D.C. held their primaries and caucuses. During this period, 377 delegates were at stake. On March 3, 2016, the day before Carson dropped out of the race, Romney criticized Trump in a heavily publicized speech. Later that day, there was another GOP debate, which again featured Trump, Cruz, Rubio and Kasich. Carson did not participate in the debate, as he announced the suspension of his campaign the next day, narrowing the field to four; he subsequently endorsed Trump on March 10, 2016, the day after Fiorina endorsed Cruz.[178] Meanwhile, as the prospect of a Trump nomination became more imminent, establishment Republicans pressured Romney or House Speaker Paul Ryan to enter the race; Romney had already decided not to enter the race on January 30, 2015, while Ryan announced he would not enter on April 13, 2016.[179][180]
On March 5, Cruz won the Kansas and Maine caucuses by comfortable margins. Trump narrowly won the Kentucky caucus and the Louisiana primary. Rubio and Kasich did not finish first or second on any primaries on "Super Saturday". The following day, the first of the 2016 primaries to be held in a U.S. territory went to Rubio, who won all of Puerto Rico's 23 delegates.[181] On March 8, Trump won in Michigan, Mississippi and Hawaii, while Cruz took the Idaho Republican Primary, and Rubio missed delegate thresholds in Michigan, Mississippi and Idaho, finishing the night with only a single delegate. Despite some favorable polling in Michigan,[182] Kasich did not win any primaries, but he still picked up 17 delegates. Neither Rubio nor Kasich finished first or second in any primaries held that day.
In the Virgin Islands caucuses on March 10, a slate composed wholly of uncommitted delegates was initially elected. However, the entire slate was later disqualified by the territorial party and was replaced by the elected alternates – two uncommitted, two for Rubio and one each for Cruz and Trump.[183] The dispute later went to court.[184] Also on March 10, there was a debate in Florida between the four surviving candidates, which was conducted in a more civil tone than prior debates.[185]
On March 12, the Guam caucuses endorsed eight uncommitted delegates and one unbound Cruz-supporting delegate.[186] Rubio won his final contest in D.C. and 9 delegates went to Cruz in the Wyoming county conventions. Rubio and Trump both earned one delegate and another was elected as uncommitted.Шаблон:Citation needed
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| Trump | Cruz | Rubio | Kasich | Uncom. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|140 | 137 | 48 | 36 | 12Шаблон:Efn | 373 |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|987,571 (37.2%) |
820,746 (30.9%) |
299,397 (11.3%) |
441,127 (16.6%) |
24,662 (0.9%) |
2,653,336 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|5 | 3 | 0+PR+DC | 0 | 0+VI+GU | 8+4 |
| Kansas | 23% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|47% | 17% | 11% | 0.4% | rowspan=13 Шаблон:N/a |
| Kentucky | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|36% | 32% | 16% | 14% | 0.2% | |
| Louisiana | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|41% | 38% | 11% | 6% | – | |
| Maine | 33% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|46% | 8% | 12% | – | |
| Puerto Rico | 13% | 9% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|71% | 1% | – | |
| Hawaii | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|43% | 32% | 13% | 10% | – | |
| Idaho | 28% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|45% | 16% | 7% | – | |
| Michigan | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|37% | 25% | 9% | 24% | 2% | |
| Mississippi | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|47% | 36% | 5% | 9% | – | |
| Virgin Islands* | 6% | 12% | 10% | – | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|65% | |
| Guam† | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|8 | |
| Washington D.C. | 14% | 12% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|37% | 36% | – | |
| Wyoming‡ | 7.2%
Delegates won:1 |
Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|66.3%
Delegates won:23 |
19.5%
Delegates won:1 |
0%
Delegates won:0 |
7.0%
Delegates won:1 | |
* Virgin Islands results do not take account of the later disqualification of delegates. Accounting for the disqualified delegates, the results were as follows: Uncommitted 36%, Cruz 22%, Rubio 18%, Carson 12%, Trump 12%.
† Delegate totals are given in Guam as no tally of the popular vote has been released and one delegate was elected by acclamation.
‡Wyoming held county conventions with no statewide popular vote; percentages represent the vote of county delegates.
March 15, 2016: Super Tuesday II
March 15 featured winner-take-all primaries in the delegate-rich states of Florida—Rubio's home state—and Ohio—Kasich's home state. There were also contests in Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, and the Northern Mariana Islands, totaling 367 delegates. It was widely seen as a very important day in the presidential race because of the large number of winner-take-all delegates at stake. In the days leading up to Florida, the remaining candidates announced prominent endorsements and Trump and Rubio in particular spent millions on television advertisements assailing the other in Florida. The level of protest and violence at Trump rallies meanwhile became an object of criticism by other candidates; one such incident led to the cancellation of a Trump event in Chicago on March 13, 2016.[187] On March 11, 2016, in an effort to stop Trump, Rubio told his supporters in Ohio to vote for Kasich, while Kasich refused to tell his Florida supporters to help Rubio, with a campaign spokesperson later quoted as saying: "We were going to win Ohio anyway even without his help, just as he's going to lose Florida to Trump without ours."[188] The Northern Mariana Islands caucuses were the first contest to close on March 15, with Trump taking 73% of the vote and collecting all nine delegates.[189] In Florida, Trump netted the biggest prize of the night, handily defeating Rubio in Rubio's home state.[190] Trump added to that wins in North Carolina, Illinois and Missouri. Soon after the announcement of his loss in Florida, Rubio suspended his campaign. Kasich got on the board for the first time, winning his home state of Ohio to stave off elimination. Kasich's victory in Ohio meant that the 2016 Republican primaries were the first since 1968 (and the first in which every state held a contest) in which more than three candidates won at least one state (though in 2012 three candidates (Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich) won states and a fourth (Ron Paul) won a territory (Virgin Islands)) while Democratic primaries have historically been more divided; examples are the Democratic primaries in 1968 (five candidates won states), 1972 (seven), 1976 (six), 1988 (five), 1992 (five), and 2004 (four). The election in Missouri was very close, with Trump beating Cruz by fewer than 2,000 votes (0.21%);[191][192] Cruz could have contested the outcome because the difference was less than 0.5%, but chose not to, thereby giving the 12 statewide delegates to Trump and 37 overall out of the 52.[193]
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| Trump | Kasich | Cruz | Rubio | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|228 | 81 | 51 | 6 | 366 |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|3,202,125 (40.6%) |
1,620,506 (20.5%) |
1,912,166 (24.2%) |
957,976 (12.1%) |
7,889,784 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|4+NMP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5+NMP |
| Florida | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|46% | 7% | 17% | 27% | rowspan=6 Шаблон:N/a |
| Illinois | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|39% | 20% | 30% | 9% | |
| Missouri | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|40.8% | 10% | 40.6% | 6% | |
| North Carolina | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|40% | 12% | 36% | 8% | |
| N. Mariana Islands | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|73% | 2% | 24% | 1% | |
| Ohio | 36% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|47% | 13% | 2% | |
Late March – April 2016: a three-candidate race
Seven states and one territory voted between March 22 and April 19, 2016, totaling 315 delegates with New York the largest (winner-take-most, 95), followed by Arizona (winner-take-all, 58).Шаблон:Citation needed
The final debate between the candidates, which had been scheduled to take place on March 21, 2016, in Salt Lake City, was cancelled after Trump and Kasich withdrew from the event. Trump had initially announced that he would be absent as there had been enough debates; Kasich subsequently stated that he would not attend a debate without Trump.[194]
On March 22, with concerns about the border, immigration and national security at the fore, Trump won all 58 delegates in Arizona. However, in Utah, Cruz garnered 69% of the vote, triggering the 50% rule to take all 40 delegates, buoyed by anti-Trump sentiment among many Mormons. All of American Samoa's delegates were uncommitted.[195] After Trump was declared the presumptive nominee, all of the American Samoa delegates committed to him.[196] American Samoa and Utah were the last caucuses of the 2016 Republican primary season.Шаблон:Citation needed
As a Trump nomination became even more likely, the Club for Growth and other backers of the Stop Trump movement began adopting increasingly drastic strategies to derail his nomination, including all-out opposition to him in Wisconsin, seen as one opportunity to deny him the 1,237 delegates needed to clinch the nomination.[197] Trump stated that he foresaw the outbreak of riots if he were denied the nomination at the convention.[198] Despite often being viewed as anathema to the establishment, Cruz began picking up endorsements of establishment figures dismayed by the prospect of a Trump nomination, including that of Romney just before the Utah primary, Bush on March 23, 2016, and Walker on March 29, 2016.[199]
Toward the end of March, the competition between the three remaining candidates grew even fiercer.[200] The increasingly acrimonious back-and-forth between Cruz and Trump took a new turn after the National Enquirer accused Cruz of being involved in five extramarital affairs – claims Cruz denied, accusing Trump of planting the claim, but other sources linked it to Rubio's suspended campaign.[201] On March 29, the same day Walker endorsed Cruz, at a GOP town hall event hosted by CNN, all three remaining Republican candidates distanced themselves from the vow they had taken in September to support their party's eventual nominee. Referring to the pledge, Kasich stated, "all of us shouldn't even have answered that question".[202]
April 3 had a North Dakota convention where Cruz gained support of eight delegates and Trump got one. Cruz later got six extra delegates committed to him. After Cruz dropped out, three delegates switched their support to Trump. The 13 uncommitted delegates backed Trump, giving him the support of 17 delegates and a majority. On April 5, buoyed by support from Walker and the state's talk and national radio hosts, Cruz won the statewide contests by a 48–35% margin and six congressional districts at the Wisconsin primary for 36 delegates. Trump won two congressional districts for six delegates.Шаблон:Citation needed
Following the Wisconsin primary, the three candidates moved on to Trump's home state of New York for its April 19 primary. Trump and Kasich teamed up to assail Cruz for his earlier criticism of Trump's "New York values", while Cruz reiterated his claim that Trump has an inconsistent conservative record and stated that "the only reason Kasich is attacking me now is because Kasich is afraid of going against Trump if I dropped out." Trump also received the support of former New York mayor and 2008 presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani during the lead-up to the New York primary. On April 9, 2016, Cruz won the Colorado delegates after taking a solid majority, the state's four uncommitted delegates declaring support for Cruz, bringing his total delegate count in Colorado to 34. On April 16, 2016, Cruz won all 14 at-large delegates in the Wyoming state convention.[203] He also received the support of RNC Committeewoman Marti Halverson, one of the 3 RNC delegates to the convention.[204]
On April 19, Trump won New York with 59% of the vote, taking 89 of its 95 delegates. Kasich was a distant second with 25% of the vote, taking the other six delegates. Cruz was completely shut-out from receiving any New York delegates, coming in third place with only 15% of the vote, as the threshold for obtaining any delegates was 20%. Following the New York primary, Cruz was mathematically eliminated from reaching the majority of 1,237 delegates to earn the nomination on the first ballot, as he needed 678 more while only 674 were available.[205]
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|Trump | Cruz | Kasich | Uncom. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|154 | 123 | 6 | 5 | 288 |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|1,254,994 (43.9%) |
974,360 (34.1%) |
485,025 (17.0%) |
2,293 |
2,857,840 |
| States won | 3+AS | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|4 | 0 | 0 |
7+AS |
| American Samoa* | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | rowspan=8 Шаблон:N/a |
| Arizona | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|46% | 28% | 11% | – | |
| Utah | 14% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|69% | 17% | – | |
| North Dakota* | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Wisconsin | 35% | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|48% | 14% | 0.2% | |
| Colorado# | 1 | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|29+4Шаблон:Efn | 0 | 3 | |
| WyomingШаблон:Efn# | 0 | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|14 | 0 | 2 | |
| New York | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|59% | 15% | 25% | – | |
* The delegate count is given for American Samoa and North Dakota as no tally of the vote has been released. All delegates from American Samoa are unpledged. All delegates from North Dakota are unbound but some have declared support (committed to) for a candidate (they can still change their minds).
#The delegate count from Colorado and Wyoming is given because there is no tally for popular vote. These delegates, however, can choose to be bound to a candidate or to be left uncommitted. They indicated this when they filed to run for a delegate spot.
April 26, 2016: Acela primary
On April 26, 2016, five Northeastern primaries were contested—Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island—and were collectively termed the "Amtrak" or "Acela primary" in reference to the Acela Express, which runs through the area.[206] All five primaries were won by Trump by overwhelming margins between 29% and 41%; Trump received over 54% of the vote in all five. He claimed all the delegates available in Connecticut, Delaware and Maryland, as well as all 17 pledged delegates in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania also elected 54 unpledged delegates and both the Trump campaign and The Washington Post estimated that Trump would win the support of at least 39 of the Keystone State's 54 unpledged delegates.[207] Only in Rhode Island, where delegates were allocated proportionally, did Kasich (5) or Cruz (2) win any pledged delegates. Trump attained 12 of the 19 there and 111 of the 118 by the end of the night. The night was also notable as Trump cleared 10 million votes, surpassing the vote total attained by McCain[208] and Romney[209] in 2008 and 2012 respectively. The two aforementioned contests were won with the candidate receiving a majority of the popular vote nationwide in both 2008 and 2012. The next day, Trump received the support of 31 unbound delegates from Pennsylvania, while Cruz nabbed four of them, Kasich three, and five remained uncommitted.[210] On April 28, 2016, a Trump rally in Costa Mesa, California, attracted protests that turned violent, with approximately twenty people arrested and a police car vandalized.[211] On April 29, the Trump campaign declared that they had accumulated 1,001 delegates, only 236 from the 1,237 necessary for the nomination.[212]
| Candidate | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| Trump | Kasich | Cruz | Uncom. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 111 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 124 |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 1,356,152 (56.5%) |
506,327 (21.1%) |
475,112 (19.8%) |
3,145 | 2,399,257 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Connecticut | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|58% | 28% | 12% | 1% | rowspan=5 Шаблон:N/a |
| Delaware | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|61% | 20% | 16% | – | |
| Maryland | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|54% | 23% | 19% | – | |
| Pennsylvania | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|57% | 19% | 22% | – | |
| Rhode Island | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|63% | 24% | 10% | 1% | |
May 3, 2016: Indiana primary
Five primaries were contested in May: Indiana, Nebraska, West Virginia, Oregon and Washington, with Indiana awarding the most, with 57 delegates. By late April, Cruz and Kasich had both been eliminated from getting 1,237 delegates, but they still had a chance to accumulate enough delegates to force a contested convention in Cleveland. Realizing this, Cruz and Kasich attempted to focus their efforts in different states, with Cruz challenging Trump head-to-head in Indiana and Kasich challenging Trump in Oregon and New Mexico.[213][214][215] The Indiana primary, whose delegates were awarded winner-take all statewide and by congressional district, was seen as essential to denying Trump the 1,237 delegates needed to secure the nomination.[96] Following the Acela primaries, Cruz attempted to bolster his chances by announcing that, if nominated, he would name Fiorina as his running mate[216] (Fiorina had served as a Cruz campaign surrogate since endorsing him in March after suspending her own presidential campaign in February and Cruz hoped that Fiorina could help his campaign in Indiana and her home state of California).[217] On April 29, 2016, Governor Mike Pence of Indiana announced that he would vote for Cruz in the primary election.[218] Nevertheless, although Trump was outspent by a margin of more than 4–1, he handily won Indiana with 53.3% of the vote, winning a plurality in every Congressional District and taking all 57 delegates.[219] Cruz subsequently dropped out of the race, eliminating any hope of a contested convention in July. As a result, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus tweeted that Trump was the presumptive nominee in the GOP. The next day, Kasich also suspended his campaign, leaving Trump as the only candidate in the race. Many Republican leaders and even former presidential candidates endorsed Trump after the withdrawal of Kasich and Cruz, but other party leaders such as Ryan, Romney and the entire Bush family withheld their support,[220] although Ryan endorsed Trump on June 2, 2016.[221]
| Candidate | Trump | Cruz | Kasich | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|57 | 0 | 0 | 57[222] |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|591,514 (53.3%) |
406,783 (36.6%) |
84,111 (7.6%) |
1,110,543 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Indiana | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|53% | 37% | 8% | rowspan=5 Шаблон:N/a |
May 2016: Trump as presumptive nominee
142 delegates were awarded between the Indiana primary and the final primaries in June; however, with Trump the only candidate remaining, Washington, Oregon, West Virginia and Nebraska became essentially uncontested, although Cruz and Kasich remained on the ballot. Trump won handily in West Virginia, Nebraska and Oregon, although Kasich received one delegate from West Virginia and five in Oregon, while Cruz took five in Oregon as well. The next week, Trump won decisively in Washington State, taking 76% of the vote and 41 of 44 delegates, with the other three uncommitted.Шаблон:Citation needed
| Candidate | Trump | Kasich | Cruz | Uncom. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|127 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 142[222] |
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|987,336 (70.5%) |
157,632 (11.3%) |
185,689 (13.3%) |
– | 1,399,967 |
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Nebraska | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|61% | 11% | 18% | – | rowspan=4 Шаблон:N/a |
| West Virginia | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|77% | 6% | 9% | – | |
| Oregon | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|64% | 16% | 17% | – | |
| Washington | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|75% | 10% | 11% | – | |
After becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Trump said regarding the Republican primaries: "You've been hearing me say it's a rigged system, but now I don't say it anymore because I won. It's true. Now I don't care."[223]
On May 26, 2016, the Associated Press announced that Trump had passed the threshold of 1,237 delegates required to guarantee his nomination,[5] thanks to unbound delegates from North Dakota who declared their support for Trump.Шаблон:Citation needed
June 2016: final primaries
Шаблон:See also The final five primary contests were held on June 7, 2016, in California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico and South Dakota, with California awarding the most with 172 delegates and New Jersey with 51. Though initially pegged by pundits as being an important primary, the suspension of the Cruz and Kasich campaigns following the Indiana primary made the California primary merely a formality at that point, as Trump shattered the all-time record for votes in the Republican primaries set by George W. Bush in 2000 of 12,034,676 votes.[99] After the final primaries, his vote total was 14,015,993 (44.9%), almost 2 million votes higher than the previous record.[14]
| Candidate | Trump | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delegates won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|303 | 303 | ||
| Popular vote | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|2,259,716 (75.2%) |
3,003,652 | ||
| States won | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican| 5 | |||
| California | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|75% | rowspan=5 Шаблон:N/a | ||
| Montana | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|74% | |||
| New Jersey | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|80% | |||
| New Mexico | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|71% | |||
| South Dakota | Шаблон:Party shading/Republican|67% | |||
July 2016: National Convention
Шаблон:Main The 2016 Republican National Convention was held from July 18–21 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland. The delegates selected the Republican presidential and vice presidential nominees and wrote the party platform. A simple majority of 1,237 delegates was needed to win the presidential nomination.[224] Following Trump's decisive win in Indiana and the subsequent suspension of the Cruz and Kasich campaigns, as well as Trump reaching the threshold following his decisive win in Washington state, it became clear that there would not be a contested convention in Cleveland. On the first ballot, Trump won the nomination with 1,725 delegates, 488 more than required.[225]
Campaign finance
This is an overview of the money used in the campaign as it was reported to Federal Election Committee and released on July 21, 2016. Outside groups are independent expenditure-only committees, also called PACs and SuperPACs. Several such groups normally support each candidate but the numbers in the table are a total of all of them, meaning that a group of committees can be shown as technically insolvent even though it is not the case for all of them. The source of all the numbers is OpenSecrets.[226]
| Candidate | Campaign committee (as of June 30) | Outside groups (as of July 21) | Total spent | Suspended campaignШаблон:Efn | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Money raised | Money spent | Cash on hand | Debt | Money raised | Money spent | Cash on hand | |||
| Donald Trump | $88,997,986 | $68,787,021 | $20,210,966 | $0* | $9,744,105 | $7,620,376 | $2,123,729 | $76,407,397[227] | Шаблон:DtsConvention |
| John Kasich | $18,973,502 | $17,564,740 | $1,408,688 | $0 | $15,245,069 | $20,660,401 | $−5,415,332 | $38,225,141 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Ted Cruz | $89,322,157 | $79,919,142 | $9,403,015 | $0 | $67,463,363 | $47,145,301 | $20,318,062 | $127,064,443 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Marco Rubio | $54,739,824 | $51,964,471 | $3,316,872 | $2,067,041 | $61,966,485 | $59,868,636 | $2,097,849 | $111,833,107 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Ben Carson | $62,745,221 | $60,873,041 | $1,872,180 | $266,884 | $16,217,786 | $16,815,756 | $−597,970 | $77,688,797 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Jeb Bush | $33,999,149 | $33,967,964 | $31,185 | $261,703† | $121,196,562 | $104,124,340 | $17,072,222 | $138,092,304 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Jim Gilmore | $383,500 | $383,300 | $200 | $0 | $342,200 | $368,600 | $−125,050 | $751,900 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Chris Christie | $8,294,352 | $8,163,565 | $130,786 | $383,518† | $23,654,517 | $23,146,491 | $508,026 | $31,310,056 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Carly Fiorina | $11,932,371 | $10,683,201 | $1,249,170 | $0 | $14,565,281 | $13,924,385 | $640,896 | $24,607,586 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Rick Santorum | $1,365,073 | $1,361,497 | $3,576 | $556,860† | $714,251 | $1,143,235 | $−428,984 | $2,504,732 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Rand Paul | $12,101,426 | $12,020,383 | $81,044 | $317,365† | $10,856,091 | $8,907,098 | $1,948,994 | $20,927,481 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Mike Huckabee | $4,290,564 | $4,276,260 | $14,304 | $19,204 | $5,874,843 | $6,126,465 | $−251,622 | $10,402,725 | Шаблон:Dts |
| George Pataki | $544,183 | $524,850 | $5,301 | $0 | $1,547,674 | $1,547,674 | $0 | $2,072,524 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Lindsey Graham | $5,423,113 | $5,370,216 | $52,898 | $43,041 | $4,560,305 | $4,391,365 | $168,940 | $9,761,581 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Bobby Jindal | $1,442,464 | $1,442,464 | $0 | $0 | $4,517,207 | $4,517,938 | $−730 | $5,960,401 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Scott Walker | $7,893,839 | $7,877,050 | $16,789 | $898,676† | $24,554,588 | $24,489,961 | $64,627 | $32,367,011 | Шаблон:Dts |
| Rick Perry | $1,427,133 | $1,767,404 | $1,818 | $0 | $15,231,068 | $15,356,117 | $−125,050 | $17,123,521 | Шаблон:Dts |
Notes
- *Trump has so far self-financed his campaign with $36,243,646, most of this as loans.
- †Technically insolvent Шаблон:Citation needed
Process
The Republican National Committee (RNC) imposed strict new rules for states wishing to hold early contests in 2016.[228] Under these rules, no state was permitted to hold a primary or caucus in January; only Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada were entitled to February contests. States with primaries or caucuses in early March were to award their delegates proportionally. Any state that might have violated these rules was to have their delegation to the 2016 convention severely cut: states with more than 30 delegates would have been deprived of all but nine, plus RNC members from that state; states with fewer than 30 would have been reduced to six, plus RNC members.[228] In contrast to the 2012 cycle no states violated these rules.
The Republican Party presidential primaries and caucuses are indirect elections in which voters allocated or elect delegates to the 2016 Republican National Convention. These delegates can be bound or unbound to vote for a particular candidate. The election of the state delegation can happen directly or indirectly as the primary election table below shows.
- Date: The date given in the first column is the date of the popular primary or caucus in a particular state or territory. This event may or may not allocate delegates. Two more dates are also important in the process: the date on which Congressional District delegates are (s)elected, and the date on which state delegates are (s)elected. Some events stretch for more than one day; in these cases the date stated in the table is the final day of the event.
- State delegation: Each delegation is made up of up to three kinds of delegates: party members, delegates from the congressional districts and delegates from the state at-large. They can either be bound, meaning that they are legally bound to vote for a particular candidate in the first ballot at the National Convention, or they can be unbound, meaning that they are free to vote for any candidate at the National Convention. Bound delegates' voting obligations are not necessarily in line with their own personal views, and thus cannot always be used as an indicator as to how a certain delegate will vote should there be more than one ballot at the convention. If a candidate suspends his campaign,Шаблон:Efn the delegates allocated and/or elected to him may become unbound or stay bound depending on state rules
- RNC: Three Republican National Committee members from each state will go to the National Convention as delegates. Most of them will be bound to a candidate according to the result of the primary or caucuses. Only fifteen RNC members will be unbound, their states and territories are marked with a footnote.
- AL: At Large delegates are elected as representatives of the whole state. Each state is allotted ten delegates and each territory six delegates. Each state can on top of this get bonus delegates based on whether it has a Republican governor, it has Republican majorities in one or all chambers of its state legislature, and whether it has Republican majorities in its delegation to the U.S. Congress, among other factors.[229] With the exception of Missouri all these delegates are allocated at the state level.
- CD: Each Congregational District have been assigned three delegates. These are allocated either on the District or State level according to state rules.
- Allocation: Delegates can either be allocated or unallocated at the starting primary or caucuses. They can be allocated to a candidate or as uncommitted. Those delegates that are not allocated at the starting event will later be elected either bound to a candidate or uncommitted also called unbound. The contests that allocate delegates on state and district levels use the following allocating systems:
- Winner-take-all. The candidate receiving the most votes is allocated all the delegates. A few states allocated all their delegates based solely on the statewide vote, but most allocated the AL delegates based on the statewide vote and the CD delegates based on the district vote in each districts. This means a candidate can "win" a state without getting all the delegates in that state's delegation.
- Proportional. All candidates receive delegates in accordance with the popular vote at the primary or caucuses.
- Winner-take-most. This is a hybrid of winner-take-all and proportional. The delegates are allocated proportionally but different rules ensure that only the leading candidates take part in the allocation. If a candidate gets more than a certain threshold of the votes he will be allocated all the delegates, otherwise it is allocated proportionally. High thresholds are in place in winner-take-most primaries or caucuses. Additional rules are also in place in some states.
- Direct election. Instead of voting for a candidate at the primary or caucuses the voters elect the delegates directly. The delegates can state their presidential preference (and be elected on a particular candidate's "ticket") or they can be elected as uncommitted.
- Election: Delegates are elected before, at the same time or after the starting event depending on the allocation method and the state rules.
- Convention. This including Congressional District Conventions, Congressional District Caucuses at State Conventions, Summer Meetings, State and Шаблон:Abbr delegation selection meetings and State Conventions where delegates are elected. Conventions where National Delegates are not (s)elected have not been included in the tablet.
- Direct election. The National Convention delegates are elected directly on the ballot. They will either be bound, as a delegation, to the result of the contest or they will individually state on the ballot what candidate they will be bound to or if they wish to be elected as unbound delegates depending.
- Slate. A slate can be made up in three ways: all candidates submitting a slate before the primary or caucuses, the winning candidate submitting their slate after the primary or caucuses, or the State Committee or Convention making up the slates before the primary or caucuses. The allocated delegates are then selected from these slates.
- Committee. Each state has its own rules and regulations. Ordinarily, the state GOP executive committee or its chairman selects the delegates.
According to Rule 40(b) of the RNC Rules of the Republican Party,[12] enacted prior to the 2012 convention and amended most recently in 2014, nominations at the National Convention may be made only of candidates who demonstrate the support of a majority of delegates of at least eight state delegations. Previously, this had been a lower threshold of a plurality in five states. However, per Rule 42, Rules 26–42 are "Standing Rules for this convention (2012) and the temporary rules for the next convention (2016)". While the current candidates operate under these temporary rules, it is unclear whether they will remain in place for the 2016 convention.Шаблон:Update inline[230][231][232][233] As of March 16, 2016, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has not taken a position on the potential rule change, while others in the party advocate for it.[234][235]
Schedule
| Date | State | State delegation (only voting delegates) | Allocation | Election (Шаблон:Abbr) | Election (Шаблон:Abbr) | Thres- hold | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Шаблон:Abbr | Шаблон:Abbr | Шаблон:Abbr | Total | Шаблон:Abbr | Шаблон:Abbr | Contest | Шаблон:Abbr | Шаблон:Abbr | Date | Type | Date | Type | |||
| Шаблон:Dts | Iowa | 3 | 15 | 12 | 30 | 0 | 30Шаблон:Efn | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | Proportional Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A |
| Шаблон:Dts | New Hampshire | 3 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 3Шаблон:Efn | 18 | Primary (semi-closed) | Proportional | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | 10% |
| Шаблон:Dts | South Carolina | 3 | 26 | 21 | 50 | 0 | 50 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A |
| Шаблон:Dts | Nevada | 3 | 27 | 0 | 30 | 2Шаблон:Efn | 28 | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 3.33%Шаблон:Efn |
| Шаблон:Dts | Alabama | 3 | 26 | 21 | 50 | 0 | 50 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | 20% |
| Alaska | 3 | 25 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 13% | |
| Arkansas | 3 | 25 | 12 | 40 | 9Шаблон:Efn | 31 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | 15% | |
| Colorado | 3Шаблон:Efn | 13 | 21 | 37 | 7 | 30 | Caucus (closed) | (No allocation) | (No allocation) | Шаблон:Dts | Convention Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention Шаблон:Efn | N/A | |
| Georgia | 3 | 31 | 42 | 76 | 0 | 76 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 20% | |
| Massachusetts | 3 | 12 | 27 | 42 | 0 | 42 | Primary (semi-closed) | Proportional | Proportional Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | 5% | |
| Minnesota | 3 | 11 | 24 | 38 | 17Шаблон:Efn | 21 | Caucus (open) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 10% | |
| North Dakota | 3Шаблон:Efn | 25 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 0 | Caucus (closed) | (No allocation) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Oklahoma | 3 | 25 | 15 | 43 | 3 | 40 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15% | |
| Tennessee | 3 | 28 | 27 | 58 | 0 | 58 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec.Шаблон:Efn | 20% | |
| Texas | 3 | 44 | 108 | 155 | 0 | 155 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 20% | |
| Vermont | 3 | 13 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 20% | |
| Virginia | 3 | 13 | 33 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Primary (open) | Proportional | Proportional Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Wyoming | 3Шаблон:Efn | 14 | 12 | 29 | 5Шаблон:Efn | 24 | Caucus (closed) | (No allocation) | (No allocation) | Шаблон:Dts | Convention Шаблон:EfnШаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention Шаблон:Efn | N/A | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Kansas | 3 | 25 | 12 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | 10% |
| Kentucky | 3 | 25 | 18 | 46 | 0 | 46 | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | Proportional Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 5% | |
| Louisiana | 3 | 25 | 18 | 46 | 5 | 41 | Primary (closed) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 20% | |
| Maine | 3 | 14 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Caucus (closed) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 10% | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Puerto Rico | 3 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | 20% |
| Шаблон:Dts | Hawaii | 3 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 19 | Caucus (closed) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A |
| Idaho | 3 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-most | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 20% | |
| Michigan | 3 | 14 | 42 | 59 | 0 | 59 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-most | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15% | |
| Mississippi | 3 | 25 | 12 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Primary (open) | Proportional | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15% | |
| Шаблон:Dts | U.S. Virgin IslandsШаблон:Efn | 3Шаблон:Efn | 6 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | Caucus (closed) | Direct Elec.Шаблон:Efn | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A |
| Шаблон:Dts | District of Columbia | 3 | 16 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | Convention (closed) | Winner-take-most | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15% |
| Guam | 3Шаблон:Efn | 6 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0 | Caucus (closed) | (No allocation) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Florida | 0 | 18 | 81 | 99 | 0 | 99 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-allШаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | N/A |
| Illinois | 3 | 12 | 54 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-all | Direct Elec.Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Missouri | 3 | 25Шаблон:Efn | 24 | 52 | 0 | 52 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-all | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Northern Mariana Is. | 3 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | Caucus (closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elect. | N/A | |
| North Carolina | 3 | 69 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | Primary (semi-closed) | Proportional | Proportional Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Ohio | 3 | 63 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 66 | Primary (semi-closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A | |
| Шаблон:Dts | American Samoa | 3Шаблон:Efn | 6 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0 | Caucus (open) | (No allocation) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A |
| Arizona | 3 | 28 | 27 | 58 | 0 | 58 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-allШаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Utah | 3 | 37 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Caucus (semi-closed) | Winner-take-most | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15%Шаблон:Efn | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Wisconsin | 3 | 15 | 24 | 42 | 0 | 42 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A |
| Шаблон:Dts | New York | 3 | 11 | 81 | 95 | 0 | 95 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | 20%Шаблон:Efn |
| Шаблон:Dts | Connecticut | 3 | 10 | 15 | 28 | 0 | 28 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-most | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | 20% |
| Delaware | 3 | 13 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Maryland | 3 | 11 | 24 | 38 | 0 | 38 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | 14 | 54 | 71 | 54 | 17 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | (No allocation) | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Committee | N/A | |
| Rhode Island | 3 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 19 | Primary (semi-closed) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | 10% | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Indiana | 3 | 27 | 27 | 57 | 0 | 57 | Primary (open) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A |
| Шаблон:Dts | Nebraska | 3 | 24 | 9 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Primary (semi-closed) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-allШаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A |
| West Virginia | 3 | 22 | 9 | 34 | 0 | 34 | Primary (semi-closed) | Direct Elec.Шаблон:Efn | Direct Elec.Шаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | Шаблон:Dts | Direct Elec. | N/A | |
| Шаблон:Dts | Oregon | 3 | 10 | 15 | 28 | 0 | 28 | Primary (closed) | Proportional | Proportional | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 3.57%Шаблон:Efn |
| Шаблон:Dts | Washington | 3 | 11 | 30 | 44 | 0 | 44 | Primary (closed) | Proportional | Winner-take-most | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | 20% |
| Шаблон:Dts | California | 3 | 10 | 159 | 172 | 0 | 172 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | Winner-take-all | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A |
| Montana | 3 | 24 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A | |
| New Jersey | 3 | 48 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Primary (semi-closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Slate | N/A | |
| New Mexico | 3 | 12 | 9 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Primary (closed) | Proportional | ProportionalШаблон:Efn | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | 15% | |
| South Dakota | 3 | 26 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | Primary (closed) | Winner-take-all | N/A | N/A | N/A | Шаблон:Dts | Convention | N/A | |
- Sources: Official Republican Schedule and Nominating Process Шаблон:Webarchive, USA Today and The Green Papers
Close races
States where the margin of victory was under 1%:[236]
- Missouri, Trump by 0.21%
States where the margin of victory was under 5%:
- District of Columbia, Rubio by 1.76%
- Arkansas, Trump by 2.29%
- Vermont, Trump by 2.35%
- Alaska, Cruz by 2.74%
- Virginia, Trump by 2.82%
- Iowa, Cruz by 3.34%
- North Carolina, Trump by 3.47%
- Louisiana, Trump by 3.62%
- Kentucky, Trump by 4.51%
States where the margin of victory was under 10%:
- Oklahoma, Cruz by 6.05%
- Minnesota, Rubio by 7.06%
- Illinois, Trump by 8.57%
- South Carolina, Trump by 9.99%
States where the margin of victory was under 20%:
- Ohio, Kasich by 11.08%
- Hawaii, Trump by 11.11%
- Mississippi, Trump by 11.12%
- Michigan, Trump by 11.62%
- Wisconsin, Cruz by 13.02%
- Maine, Cruz by 13.31%
- Tennessee, Trump by 14.23%
- Georgia, Trump by 14.36%
- Indiana, Trump by 16.62%
- Texas, Cruz by 17.01%
- Idaho, Cruz by 17.33%
- Arizona, Trump by 18.34%
- Florida, Trump by 18.64%
- New Hampshire, Trump by 19.52%
See also
Related
- 2016 Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection
- Nationwide opinion polling for the Republican Party 2016 presidential primaries
- Statewide opinion polling for the 2016 Republican Party presidential primaries
- 2016 Republican Party presidential debates and forums
- Republican Party presidential primaries
National conventions
- 2016 Constitution Party National Convention
- 2016 Democratic National Convention
- 2016 Green National Convention
- 2016 Libertarian National Convention
- 2016 Republican National Convention
Presidential primaries
- 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries
- 2016 Constitution Party presidential primaries
- 2016 Green Party presidential primaries
- 2016 Libertarian Party presidential primaries
Footnotes
References
External links
- RNC 2016 Republican Nominating Process Шаблон:Webarchive
- Green papers for 2016 primaries, caucuses, and conventions
- Visual Action Treemapping|Treemap of 2016 Republican Delegate Count
- Decision Desk Headquarters, including area-mapping for each state and territory
- FoxNews full election coverage Drill down for state progress/results.
Шаблон:United States presidential election, 2016 Шаблон:U.S. presidential primaries Шаблон:State results of the 2016 U.S. presidential election Шаблон:2016 Republican Primaries Шаблон:Donald Trump Шаблон:Trump presidency
- ↑ 1,0 1,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite tweet
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 5,0 5,1 5,2 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ See detailed schedule below
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 14,0 14,1 14,2 14,3 14,4 14,5 14,6 14,7 14,8 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 62,0 62,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Isenstadt, Alex (January 14, 2014) "GOP convention set for July 18–21 in 2016", Politico. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ DelReal, Jose A. (December 16, 2014) "Jeb Bush forms PAC to explore presidential run", The Washington Post. Retrieved December 17, 2014.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 81,0 81,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite magazine
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ See:
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 96,0 96,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 99,0 99,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 110,0 110,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 111,0 111,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 132,0 132,1 132,2 132,3 132,4 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Republican Party of Puerto Rico Presidential Primaries Puerto Rico Republican Party March 6, 2016
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 222,0 222,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег
<ref>; для сносокtgp-rpuне указан текст - ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web (official source tracking active campaigns + adding delegates won on April 26, pending source update)
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 228,0 228,1 Joseph, Cameron. "RNC tightens 2016 primary calendar, rules". The Hill. January 24, 2014. Retrieved June 11, 2015.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- Английская Википедия
- Страницы с неработающими файловыми ссылками
- 2016 United States Republican presidential primaries
- Donald Trump
- Ted Cruz
- Marco Rubio
- John Kasich
- Jeb Bush
- Rand Paul
- Mike Huckabee
- Chris Christie
- Rick Santorum
- Страницы, где используется шаблон "Навигационная таблица/Телепорт"
- Страницы с телепортом
- Википедия
- Статья из Википедии
- Статья из Английской Википедии
- Страницы с ошибками в примечаниях
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_by_election_methods,_2016_(Republican_Party).svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
